Loading...
2000-24065 RESO RESOLUTION NO. 2000-24065 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ISSUE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 134-99/00 FOR DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STREETS CAPE IMPROVEMENTS OUTLINED IN THE NOVEMBER 2, 1999 GENERAL OBLIGATION (GO) BOND PROJECTS LIST. WHEREAS, on November 2, 1999, the City of Miami Beach voters approved the issuance of an approximately $92 million General Obligation (GO) Bond for Neighborhood, Parks and Beaches, and Fire Safety Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City has identified projects requiring water, wastewater, and stormwater improvements; and WHEREAS, the Administration desires to contract with design professionals for planning and preparation of the constructionlbidding documents needed to undertake the work outlined in the identified GO Bond projects; and WHEREAS, the Administration has drafted a Request for Qualifications for providing the said services and set a tentative date of October 20, 2000, as the deadline for receipt of qualifications; and WHEREAS, the Administration reported its intent to issue the RFQ to the General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee at its August 7, 2000 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby authorize the Administration to issue Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 134-99/00 for design, and construction administration services in conjunction with the streetscape improvements outlined in the November 2,1999 General Obligation (GO) Bond Projects list. PASSED and ADOPTED this 13th day of September, 2000 1f MAYOR ATTEST: ~~ CITY CLERK F:\WORK\SALL\DEI'AZOSJ\GOBonds\GO RiQ Reso-memo.doc APPROVED />S TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION 1tt~ 9r;~O~~ . __~_._JItI.lllIt__.__.__.._~~.. aTYl!ll.n:!.... Group I RFQ Neighborhood Districts Normandy Shores Oceanfront Bayshore star, Palm & Hibiscus Islands ! ~ ----.r alY or "AMI BEAai CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. (;, 1[-00 SUBJECT: Mayor Neisen O. Kasdin and Members of the City Commission Jorge M. Gonzalez \ ._~ City Manager G~ A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ISSUE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 134-99/00 FOR DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS OUTLINED IN THE NOVEMBER 2, 1999 GENERAL OBLIGATION (GO) BOND PROJECT LIST. DATE: September 13,2000 TO: FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS On November 2,1999, the City of Miami Beach voters approved the issuance ofan approximate $92 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond for Neighborhood, Park and Beach and Fire Safety Improvements. To implement the bond projects, the Administration requires the services of design professionals for planning, design and preparation of the constructionlbidding documents needed to undertake the work in accordance with the project list. The Administration has drafted the attached Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to solicit proposals from qualified consultants to proceed with the projects listed below. This RFQ represents the first four of eleven projects requiring professional services. These projects have had extensive initial planning and input from each neighborhood group. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award of each project individually, based on project specific qualifications. Respondents are to submit separate qualifications for each project and shall not be limited to one (I) project. AGENDA ITEM Ci M DATE 9- 13-00 Commission Memorandum September 13, 2000 Page Two PROJECT NO. 1 Star, Palm, and Hibiscus Islands The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: sidewalks, curb and gutter, landscaping and irrigation, paving/resurfacing and markings, signage, parking layout, traffic calming, street lighting and drainage improvements. An evaluation of existing utilities may necessitate upgrading or replacement of water, lead services and sewer infrastructure as part of the proposed improvements. Residents are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which, if approved, will be included in the scope of this project. The total allocation for this project, which includes G.O. Bonds, Water & Sewer Bonds, and proposed Stormwater Bonds, is $3,682,884. Not all of the allocation will require design or construction documents. PROJECT NO.2 Normandy Shores The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: comprehensive landscaping and irrigation, traffic calming, sidewalks, street lighting, street resurfacing, swale enhancement, parking layout, and drainage improvements. Evaluation of existing utilities may also necessitate upgrading the water and sewer systems. Residents are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which, if approved, will be included in the scope ofthis project. The work wil1 also consist of coordination with other consultants with respect to the Normandy Shores Golf Course improvements. The total allocation for this project, which includes G.O. Bonds, Water & Sewer Bonds, and proposed Stormwater Bonds, is $8,822,695. Not all of the total allocation will require design or construction documents. PROJECT NO. 3 Bayshore The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: street resurfacing and new pavement markings, swale restoration and/or curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting upgrades, enhanced landscaping, traffic calming and traffic operational improvements. An evaluation of existing utilities may necessitate upgrading or replacement of water, sewer and drainage infrastructure as part of the proposed improvements. Residents are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which, if approved, wil1 be included in the scope of this project. The work wil1 also consist of coordination with other consultants with respect to the Bayshore Golf Course improvements. The total allocation for this project, which includes G.O. Bonds, Water & Sewer Bonds, and proposed Stormwater Bonds, is $14,533,696. Not all ofthe total allocation wil1 require design or construction documents. Commission Memorandum September 13, 2000 Page Three PROJECT NO. 4 Oceanfront The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: street resurfacing and new pavement markings, swale restoration and/or curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting upgrades, enhanced landscaping, and shoreline enhancements along Indian Creek in coordination with the Indian Creek Greenway Plans, and enhancement of beach front street ends for pedestrian use. An evaluation of existing utilities may necessitate upgrading or replacement of water, sewer and drainage infrastructure as part of the proposed improvements. The total allocation for this project, which includes G.O. Bonds and Water & Sewer Bonds, is $7,026,818. Not all of the total allocation will require design or construction documents. The G.O. Bond program has allocated $57 million dollars for neighborhood roadway improvements. A portion of these funds will be utilized in conjunction with proposed water, wastewater and stormwater Revenue Bond Funds to address critical infrastructure needs. A number of priority projects have emerged based on the analysis done by the Consultants who have worked with the City to develop the Water/Wastewater and Storm-Water programs (Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., CH2M HILL and Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc.) and the concerns expressed by the community in the initial G.O. Planning meetings. In addition, a number of projects have previously been designated for priority action but have not moved forth due to lack of funding. The intent of this RFQ is to initiate the selection of consultant teams to master plan and design the initial combined above and below ground projects. Consultant contracts will be brought to the Commission for approval when funding has been identified for all design aspects of the project. It is anticipated that contracts will be brought for Commission approval in November, 2000. Design and permitting for each of these projects will be nine to twelve months and construction could commence in late 2001. On November 17, 1999, the City Commission referred the $92 Million General Obligation Bond Issue to a joint meeting of the Finance and Citywide Projects Committees. This referral included a six year implementation plan for a variety of neighborhood improvement projects outlined in the General Obligation Bond Project list and identified as needing water/wastewater and stormwater improvements. This is the first group of projects identified as priority based on community input and the required replacement of underground utilities. The G.O. Bond Oversight Committee, on August 7, 2000, recommended Commission approval of this item. &{~ ~^ JMG~GL/RM!JDP (/'f'A Attachment F:\WORK\SALL\DBPAZOSJ\GOBonds\OQ RFQ Rcso-memo.doc \' I j , CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ NO. 134-99/00 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR URBAN DESIGN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR STREETSCAPE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN 4 NEIGHBORHOODS: (1) STAR, PALM & HIBISCUS ISLANDS (2) NORMANDY SHORES (3) BA YSHORE (4) OCEANFRONT A PRE-QUALIFICATION CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 10:00 A.M. ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2000, AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: CITY HALL FOURTH FLOOR LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA RESPONSES ARE DUE ATTHE ADDRESS SHOWN BELOW NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 17 AT 3:00 P.M. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE, THIRD FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 PHONE: (305) 673-7490 FAX: (305) 673-7851 RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE. MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 http:\\ci.miami-beach.fl.U5 . PROCUREMENT OIVISION Telephone (305) 673-7490 Facsimile (305) 673-7851 PUBLIC NOTICE Request for Qualifications (RFQ> NO. 134-99/00 URBAN DESIGN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR STREETSCAPE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN 4 NEIGHBORHOODS: (1) STAR, PALM & HIBISCUS ISLANDS (2) NORMANDY SHORES (3) BA YSHORE (4) OCEANFRONT Scone of Services: To provide for the restoration and enhancement of each neighborhood's streets, consistent with identified needs. Each of the proposed projects will include streetscape work with restoration and enhancement of the neighborhood's street lighting, potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage infrastructure as needed. Sealed qualifications will be received until 3:00 P.M. on October 17. 2000. at the following address:City of Miami Beach, City Hall- Procurement Division, Third Floor, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. Any response received after 3:00 p.m. on October 17, 2000, will be returned to the proposer unopened. The responsibility for submitting qualifications before the stated time and date is solely strictly the responsibility of the proposer. The City is not responsible for delays caused by mail, courier service, including U.S. Mail, or any other occurrence. A Pre-Qualification Conference is scheduled for 10:00 A.M. on Sentember 25. 2000 at the following address: City of Miami Beach, City Hall- Fourth Floor Large Conference Room, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida. The RFQ package is available by calling DemandStar.com at (407) 975-3227 and requesting Document #1343. The City of Miami Beach, may at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in the RFQ or in the responses received as a result of this RFQ, as deemed in the best interest of the City of Miami Beach. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 2 The City of Miami Beach, may at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and aU, or parts of any and aU, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in the RFQ or in the responses received as a result of this RFQ, as deemed in the best interest ofthe City of Miami Beach. You are hereby advised that this RFQ is subject to the "Cone of Silence, " in accordance with Ordinance 99-3164. Requests for additional information or clarifications must be submitted in writing to my attention, and may be forwarded via facsimile to: 305-673-7851. ADDITIONALLY, A COpy OF ALL WRITTEN COMMUNICATION(S) REGARDING THIS RFQ MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK. Firms are hereby advised that this RFQ is further subject to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2000-3234 (The City's Debarment Ordinance). Gus Lopez, CPPO Procurement Director RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pal!e I. OVERVIEW AND QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES II. SCOPE OF SERVICES III. QUALIFICATION STATEMENT FORMAT IV. EVALUATION/SELECTION PROCESS; CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION V. GENERAL PROVISIONS VI. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS VII. ATTACHMENTS VIII. QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS TO BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED TO CITY RFQ No: 134-99100 DATE: 0813012000 4 SECTION I -REOUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS OVERVIEW AND RESPONSE PROCEDURES: A. INTRODUCTIONIBACKGROUND The City of Miami Beach consists of approximately seven (7) square miles of area, with a population approaching 100,000 persons. The City has undergone a major economic revitalization of the activities ofthe private sector in the past two decades. To accommodate the anticipated growth of the City over the next few years, the City plans to undertake an extensive program of capital improvements including the upgrading of the streetscapes, and replacement and/or upgrading of water, sewer, storm drainage and street lighting infrastructure in a number of neighborhoods over the next seven (7) years. These improvements are expected to be funded, in whole or in part, through the General Obligation bond issue, the proposed Water and Wastewater Bond Issue and/or Stormwater Bond Issue, added to the City's on-going capital improvement activities funded through General Funds or other funding sources. This Request for Qualifications is being issued to obtain qualifications of professional firms with the capability and experience to provide professional planning, urban design, landscape architecture and engineering services for design, construction documents, bidding, and construction administration of streetscape and utility improvements in the following neighborhoods: (1) STAR, PALM & HIBISCUS ISLANDS; (2) NORMANDY SHORES; (3) BA YSHORE; and (4) OCEANFRONT It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award of each project individually, based on project-specific qualifications. Respondents are to submit separate qualifications for each project and shall not be limited to one (1) project. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 5 B. RFQ TIMET ABLE The anticipated schedule for this RFQ and contract approval is as follows: RFQ issued September 14,2000 Deadline for receipt of questions October 6, 2000 Pre-Qualification Conference September 25,2000 @ 10:00 a.m. Deadline for receipt of responses October 17,2000 @3:00p.m. Evaluation committee meeting Week of October 30th Commission approval and authorization to negotiate November 15,2000 Contract negotiations November 2000 Projected award date December 6, 2000 Projected contract start date January 1,2001 C. QUALIFICATION STATEMENT SUBMISSION An original and ten (10) copies of complete responses must be received by October 17, 2000 at 3:00 p.m. and will be opened on that day at that time. The original and all copies must be submitted to the Procurement Division in a sealed envelope or container stating on the outside the respondent's name, address, telephone number, RFQ number and title, and due date. The responsibility for submitting a response to this RFQ to the Procurement Division on or before the stated time and date will be solely and strictly that of the proposer. The City will in no way be responsible for delays caused by the U.S. Post Office or caused by any other entity or by any occurrence. Responses received after the RFQ due date and time will not be accepted and will not be considered. D. PRE-QUALIFICATION CONFERENCE A pre-qualification conference is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on September 25, 2000, at the fo1\owing address: City Hall, City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida RFQNo: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 6 E. CONTACT PERSON/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ADDENDA The contact person for this RFQ is the Procurement Director at (305) 673-7490. Proposers are advised that from the date of release of this RFQ until award of the contract, no contact with City personnel related to this RFQ is permitted, except as authorized by the contact person. Any such unauthorized contact may result in the disqualification of the respondent's submittal. Requests for additional information or clarifications must be made in writing to the Procurement Director with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, no later than the date specified in the RFQ timetable. Facsimiles will be accepted at (305) 673-7851. The City will issue replies to inquiries and any other corrections or amendments it deems necessary in written addenda issued prior to the deadline for responding to the RFQ. Respondents should not rely on representations, statements, or explanations other than those made in this RFQ or in any addendum to this RFQ. Respondents are required to acknowledge the number of addenda received as part of their responses. The respondent should verify with the Procurement Division prior to submitting a response that all addenda have been received. F. RESPONSE GUARANTY None required. G. MODlFICA TIONIWITHDRA W ALS OF SUBMITTALS A respondent may submit a modified response to replace aU or any portion of a previously submitted response up until the RFQ due date and time. Modifications received after the RFQ due date and time wiU not be considered. Responses shaU be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the RFQ due date or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of responses without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the RFQ due date and before said expiration date and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. H. RFQ POSTPONEMENT/CANCELLATIONIREJECTION The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 7 I. COST INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of responses to the City, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility of the respondent(s) and not be reimbursed by the City. J. VENDOR APPLICATION Prospective bidders should register with the DemandStar.com (the City's Vendor Database Management Firm); this wi\l facilitate their receipt of future notices of solicitations when they are issued. Potential bidders may contact DemandStar.com at (800) 711-1712 or register on-line at www.Demandstar.com. It is the responsibility of the bidders to inform DemandStar.com concerning any changes, such as new address, telephone number, or commodities. It is the responsibility of the bidders to inform the City concerning any changes, including new address, telephone number, or commodities. K. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ Respondents must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what alternative is being offered. The City, after completing evaluations, may accept or reject the exceptions. In cases in which exceptions are rejected, the City may require the respondent to furnish the services or goods originally described, or negotiate an alternative acceptable to the City. L. SUNSHINE LAW Respondents are hereby notified that all information submitted as part of a response to this RFQ wi\l be available for public inspection after opening of responses, in compliance with Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, known as the "Government in the Sunshine Law". M. NEGOTIATIONS The City may award a contract on the basis of initial offers received, without discussion, or may require respondents to give oral presentations based on their responses. The City reserves the right to enter into negotiations with the selected respondent and if the City and the selected respondent cannot negotiate a mutually acceptable contract, the City may terminate the negotiations and begin negotiations with the next selected respondent. This process may continue until a contract has been executed or all responses have been rejected. No respondent shall have any rights in the subject project or property or against the City arising from such negotiations. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 8 N. PROTEST PROCEDURE Respondents that are not selected may protest any recommendations for contract award by sending a formal protest letter to the Procurement Director, which letter must be received no later than 5 calendar days after award by the City Commission. The Procurement Director will notify the protester of the cost and time necessary for a written reply and all costs accruing to an award challenge shall be assumed by the protester. Any protest received after 5 calendar days from contract award by the City Commission will not be considered, and the basis or bases for said protest shall be deemed to have been waived by the protester. O. RULES; REGULATIONS; LICENSING REQUIREMENTS Respondents are expected to be familiar with and comply with all Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations that may in any way affect the services offered, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines. Ignorance on the part of the respondent will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. P. DEFAULT Failure or refusal of a respondent to execute a contract upon award by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in forfeiture of that portion of any surety required as liquidated damages to the City; where surety is not required, such failure may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the respondent from the City's vendor list. Q. CONFLICT OF INTEREST All respondents must disclose with their response the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all respondents must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest often (10%) percent or more in the respondent or any of its affiliates. R. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSIBILITY Before submitting responses, each respondent shall make all investigations and examinations necessary to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements resulting from failure to make such investigations and examinations will not relieve the successful respondent from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract documents, or will be accepted as a basis for any claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the respondent. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 9 S. RELATION OF CITY It is the intent of the parties hereto that the successful respondent be legaUy considered to be an independent contractor and that neither the respondent nor the respondentOs employees and agents shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents ofthe City. T. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME (PEe) A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list foUowing a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess ofthe threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. U. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS AU respondents are expected to be or become familiar with aU City of Miami Beach Lobbyist laws, as amended from time to time. Respondents shall ensure that aU City of Miami Beach Lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed herein, in addition to disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. V. CONE OF SILENCE Pursuant to Section 2-486 ofthe City Code, firms are hereby advised that the City's Cone of Silence is attached and made part of this RFQ. W. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE Bidders are hereby advised that this RFQ is further subject to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2000-3234 (The City's Debarment Ordinance). Bidders are strongly advised to review the City's Debarment Ordinance. Debarment may constitute grounds for termination ofthe contract as well as disqualification from consideration on any City of Miami Beach RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid. RFQNo: 134.99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 10 X. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS Pursuant to Resolution No.2000-23879 each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with your bid/response or within five days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require your firm or you as a sole proprietor, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City Code. SECTION II -SCOPE OF SERVICES Group I Neighborhood Streetscape Proiects The purpose of the Neighborhood Streetscape Projects is to provide for the restoration and enhancement of the each neighborhood's streets, consistent with identified needs and the community's desires as expressed during the Neighborhood Planning Meetings held from March through June of 2000. Each of the proposed projects will include streetscape work with restoration and enhancement of the neighborhood's street lighting, potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage infrastructure as needed. Aboveground improvements may include restoration and enhancement to the function and aesthetics of streetscapes. This work may include: . Street resurfacing and new pavement markings. . Swale restoration, and/or curb and gutter restoration or upgrades. . Repair, extension, or widening of sidewalks and crossing ramps to provide continuous, ADA-Title III compatible separated pedestrian ways. . Installation of new pedestrian-scale street lighting and/or upgrade of existing lighting to correct deficiencies where needed. . Providing enhanced landscaping and irrigation within the street ROW, consistent with community preferences. . Improving of dead-end streets with lighting, landscaping, fencing, and/or parking, where appropriate. . Providing pedestrian amenities, consistent with community preferences. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 II . Physical and/or operational improvements to local streets for the purposes of increasing pedestrian, non-motorized vehicle, and vehicular safety; and lowering vehicular speeds The aboveground improvements will be coordinated with underground infrastructure improvements, which may include: . Upgrading the drainage collection system . Repair or replacement of water mains and sanitary sewer lines These infrastructure improvements are generally identified in: the City of Miami Beach Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program Master Plan, (March 1997), the City of Miami Beach Water System Master Plan, (November, 1994), and the Citywide Sanitary Sewer Infiltration and Inflow Mitigation Program, and in subsequent amendments to the plans. The work may also include surveying and obtaining permits from the local or state agencies having jurisdiction. Residents of some neighborhoods are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which if approved, may be included in the scope of this project for design and construction administration. The work will also consist of coordination with other consultants with respect to other planned G.O. Bond-related improvements, Within the neighborhoods, certain streets that may be designed to provide traffic calming with the desired effect of lowering the speeds of vehicular traffic. These streetscapes may also include operational enhancements such as traffic control devices, and temporary and permanent traffic control devices, such as: diverters, roundabouts, bulb-outs, mid-block chokes, or marked bicycle facilities. Within the multi-family areas, streets should be designed to provide additional, organized, on-street parking. The first phase of each neighborhood project will include survey and analysis of existing conditions and needs, program planning and cost analysis, The consultant team will be expected to make quality, clear presentations for neighborhood organizations and City Boards, and to forge a consensus plan with City staff and the community, This neighborhood improvement plan may include schematic design for improvements throughout the neighborhood, and a program for implementation including phasing, timetable, and budget. Depending upon the implementation program approved in the first phase, the consultant team will be issued task orders to perform additional work on appropriate portions of the neighborhood improvements. This may include design development, construction drawings and specifications, bidding documents, cost estimates and construction schedules. The consultant may also be requested to review construction bids, to provide construction administration services, and to provide coordination between active construction projects in the same or adjacent areas. An work will be expected to be provided in digital formats in coordination with the City's Public WorkslEngineering Department. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/3012000 12 The selected team will assist the City in regard to public information, which may be required in relation to the assigned construction projects., as well as undertake construction administration, including visiting jobsites regularly to monitor construction progress, provide value engineering throughout the project, review, monitor and approve payment requisitions from the contractor and consultant, provide bimonthly progress reports and status information on the assigned project(s) to City officials, attend and address meetings with City officials, neighborhood groups, and private citizens concerning the project, respond to questions and concerns about the project at City Commission meetings, approve Requests for Change Orders, maintain files of all documentation and correspondence relating to the project in an orderly system which will be submitted to the City upon completion of the project(s). The team will ensure compliance by all contractors with safety and affirmative action policies, review and monitor traffic plans and safeguard existing facilities during construction. The selected team will provide at least bimonthly progress reports and status information on the assigned project(s) to City officials, attend and address meetings with City officials, neighborhood groups, and private citizens concerning the project, respond to questions and concerns about the project at City Commission meetings, maintain files of all documentation and correspondence relating to the project in an orderly system which wi\1 be submitted to the City upon completion of the project. The selected team will ensure compliance by all contractors with safety and affirmative action policies, review and monitor maintenance of traffic (MOT) plans, and safeguard existing facilities during construction. Iflegal issues should arise relating to the project after completion, the selected team will provide records, depositions, and testimony about the project if necessary on a supplementary fee basis. Interested teams must demonstrate streetscape and utility design and construction administration expertise, based on the successful completion of a number of projects of substantial size and complexity for other govermnental and/or private entities. Teams with extensive experience and capability are invited to submit details of their qualifications and experience. PROJECT NO.1 RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 13 STAR. PALM AND HIBISCUS ISLANDS (excJudine: Venetian Islands) Design Project Team Composition: An urban designer/planner should head the design team, which should include a landscape architect and an engineer with extensive experience in streetscape design, traffic calming, drainage and water/sewer utilities. Star, Palm and Hibiscus Islands Project Description: Star, Palm and Hibiscus Islands consist of a single-family residential area. The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: sidewalks, curb and gutter, landscaping and irrigation, paving/resurfacing and markings, signage, parking layout, traffic calming, street lighting and drainage improvements. An evaluation of existing utilities may necessitate upgrading or replacement of water, lead services and sewer infrastructure as part of the proposed improvements. Residents are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which, if approved, will be included in the scope ofthis project. The work may also include surveying and obtaining permits from Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management for storm drainage system. The qualified team may be responsible for planning and design with community input, and production of final bidding/construction documents and drawings, preparation of cost estimates and specifications in coordination with the City's Public WorkslEngineering Department. Water line replacement and upgrades in the amount of $830,577 are funded by the Series 2000 Water & Sewer Bonds. Proposed funding for Stormwater improvements is $2,252,307. The total G.O. Bond allocation for this neighborhood is $600,000. The total allocation for this project is $3,682,884. Not all of the total allocation will require design or construction documents. The City of Miami Beach intends to issue this work on a task order basis for any part of the improvements within each neighborhood, The selected team may be requested to incorporate existing designs and or construction documents into the overall design. A copy ofthe neighborhood projects plan titled "Islands" (conceptually approved by the GO Bond Oversight Committee in July, 2000) is attached in Section VII. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 14 PROJECT NO.2 NORMANDY SHORES Design Project Team Composition: An urban designer/planner should head the design team, which should include a landscape architect and an engineer with extensive experience in streetscape design, traffic calming, drainage and water/sewer utilities. Normandy Shores Project Description: Normandy Shores is a residential island with approximately 300 single family homes and 43 apartment buildings surrounding the Normandy Shores Golf Course and Fairway Park. The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: comprehensive landscaping and irrigation, traffic calming, sidewalks, street lighting, street resurfacing, swale enhancement, parking layout, and drainage improvements. Evaluation of existing utilities may also necessitate upgrading the water and sewer systems. Residents are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which, if approved, will be included in the scope ofthis project. The work will also consist of coordination with other consultants with respect to the Normandy Shores Golf Course improvements. The work may also include surveying and obtaining permits from Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management for storm drainage system. The qualified team may be responsible for planning and design with community input, and production of final bidding/construction documents and drawings, preparation of cost estimates and specifications in coordination with the City's Public Works/Engineering Department. Water line replacement and upgrades in the amount of$I,711,304 are funded by the Series 2000 Water & Sewer Bonds. Proposed funding for Stormwater improvements is $3,711,39\. The total G.O. Bond allocation for this neighborhood is $3,400,000. The total allocation for this project is $8,822,695. Not all of the total allocation will require design or construction documents. The City of Miami Beach intends to issue this work on a task order basis for any part of the improvements within each neighborhood. The selected team may be requested to incorporate existing designs and or construction documents into the overall design. A copy of the neighborhood projects plan titled "Normandy Shores"(conceptually approved by the GO Bond Oversight Committee in July, 2000) is attached in Section VII. RFQ No: \34-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 15 PROJECT NO.3 BA YSHORE Design Project Team Composition: An urban designer/planner should head the design team, which should include a landscape architect and an engineer with extensive experience in streetscape design, traffic calming, drainage and water/sewer utilities. Bayshore Project Description: The Bayshore neighborhood includes all of the area from the south end of the 41 st Street right-of-way to Collins Canal, and from Biscayne Bay east to the Indian Creek waterway. The Bayshore neighborhood includes the Sunset Islands and the Sunset Harbor area. The area is generally comprised of single-family residential streets, with some pockets of multi-family uses. Major institutional uses include Miami Beach High School. The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: street resurfacing and new pavement markings, swale restoration and/or curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting upgrades, enhanced landscaping, traffic calming and traffic operational improvements. An evaluation of existing utilities may necessitate upgrading or replacement of water, sewer and drainage infrastructure as part of the proposed improvements. Residents are considering a special assessment district for underground electric, cable and telephone service, which, if approved, will be included in the scope of this project. The work will also consist of coordination with other consultants with respect to the Bayshore Golf Course improvements. The work may also include surveying and obtaining permits from Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management for storm drainage system. The qualified team may be responsible for planning and design with community input, and production of final bidding/construction documents and drawings, preparation of cost estimates and specifications in coordination with the City's Public Works/Engineering Department. Water line replacement and upgrades in the amount of$3,529,982 are funded by the Series 2000 Water & Sewer Bonds. Proposed funding for Stormwater improvements is $5,928,714. The total G.O. Bond allocation for this neighborhood is $5,075,000. The total allocation for this project is $14,533,696. Not all of the total allocation will require design or construction documents. The City of Miami Beach intends to issue this work on a task order basis for any part of the improvements within each neighborhood. The selected team may be requested to incorporate existing designs and or construction documents into the overall design. A copy ofthe neighborhood projects plan titled "Bayshore"(conceptually approved by the GO Bond Oversight Committee in July, 2000) is attached in Section VII. RFQ No: \34-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 16 PROJECT NO.4 OCEANFRONT Design Project Team Composition: An urban designer/planner should head the design team, which should include a landscape architect and an engineer with extensive experience in streetscape design, traffic calming, drainage and water/sewer utilities. Oceanfront Project Description: The Oceanfront Neighborhood includes all the area from 23'd Street, north to 63 rd Street and from the Atlantic Ocean on the east to the Indian Creek waterway on the west. The area is generally comprised of high-density, multi-family structures, high- density hotels, and commercial uses at street level. The project consists of providing streetscape improvements within an allocated budget, following a priority list submitted by area residents to include: street resurfacing and new pavement markings, swale restoration and/or curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting upgrades, enhanced landscaping, and shoreline enhancements along Indian Creek in coordination with the Indian Creek Greenway plans and enhancement of beachfront street ends for pedestrian use. An evaluation of existing utilities may necessitate upgrading or replacement of water, sewer and drainage infrastructure as part of the proposed improvements. The work may also include surveying and obtaining permits from Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management for storm drainage system. The qualified team may be responsible for planning and design with community input, and production of final bidding/construction documents and drawings, preparation of cost estimates and specifications in coordination with the City's Public Works/Engineering Department. Water line replacement and upgrades in the amount of$I,946,818 are funded by the Series 2000 Water & Sewer Bonds. The total G.O. Bond allocation for this neighborhood is $4,600,000. The total allocation for this project is $7,026,818. Not all of the total allocation will require design or construction documents. The City of Miami Beach intends to issue this work on a task order basis for any part of the improvements within each neighborhood. The selected team may be requested to incorporate existing designs and or construction documents into the overall design. A copy of the neighborhood projects plan titled "Ocean" (conceptually approved by the GO Bond Oversight Committee in July 2000) is attached in Section VII. RFQ No: \34-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 17 SECTION III -QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENT FORMAT Submittals must contain the following documents, each fully completed, and signed as required. Submittals that do not include all required documentation, or are not submitted in the required format, or do not have the appropriate signatures on each document, may be deemed to be non-responsive. Non-responsive submittals will receive no further consideration. A. CONTENTS OF QUALIFICATION STATEMENT 1. Table of Contents The Table of Contents should outline in sequential order the major areas of the submittal, including enclosures. All pages must be consecutively numbered and correspond to the table of contents. 2. Technical Proposal Provide a narrative that addresses the scope of work, the proposed approach to the work, and any other information called for by the RFQ. 3. Price Proposal None is required at this time. Fees are to be negotiated with the top-ranked team(s). 4. Qualifications The minimum qualification requirements for this RFQ are described below. Respondents must provide documentation that demonstrates their ability to satisfy all of the minimum qualification requirements. Submittals, which do not contain such documentation, may be deemed non-responsive. 5. Acknowledgment of Addenda and Respondent Information Forms (Section VIII) 6. Anv other document required by this RFQ. such as a Questionnaire or Response Guarantv. RFQ No: \34-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 18 B. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS / QUALIFICATIONS: Each team interested in responding to this Request for Qualifications must provide the following information. Submittals that do not respond completely to all requirements will be considered non- responsive and eliminated from the process. 1. Team's Experience: Indicate the team's number of years of experience in providing the requested professional services, list all projects undertaken during the past five (5) years, describe the scope of each project in physical terms and by cost, describe the scope of the respondent's responsibilities, and provide the name and contact telephone number of an individual in a position of responsibility who can attest to respondent's activities in relation to the project, provide the name(s) of the person, or persons within your organization who was most actively concerned with managing each project. List and describe all legal claims against the team alleging errors and/or omissions, or any breach of professional ethics, including those settled out of court, during this period. 2. Proiect Manal!er's Experience: Provide a comprehensive summary of the experience and qualifications of the individuals who will be selected to serve as the project managers for the City's project(s). These individuals must have a minimum of ten (10) years' experience in the design and construction of streetscape and utility facilities, and should have served as construction manager on similar projects on a minimum of three previous occasions. 3. Previous Similar Proiects: A list of a minimum of ten similar projects must be submitted. Information should include: * Client name, address, phone number. * Consultant (Architect or Engineer) name, address, phone number. * Description of the scope of the work. * Month and Year the project was started and completed. * Total cost and/or fees paid to your firm. * Total cost ofthe construction, estimated and actual. * Role of the firm and the responsibilities. 4. Oualifications of Proiect Team: List the members of the proposed project team. Provide a list of the personnel to be used on this project and their qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information shall be included for each team member, including any subcontractors, to be assigned to this project. RFQ No: \34-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 19 5. Project Approach: Information should include: *Organizational structure of project team. *Fee structure on prior projects of similar size and complexity. * Approach to project specific to neighborhood. *Narrative description of how project team's experience specifically relates to the neighborhood project. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/3012000 20 SECTION IV -EVALUATION/SELECTION PROCESS; CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION The procedure for response evaluation and selection is as follows: 1. Request for Qualifications issued. 2. Receipt of responses. 3. Opening and listing of all responses received. 4. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each response in accordance with the requirements of this RFQ. Iffurther information is desired, respondents may be requested to make additional written submissions or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. 5. The Evaluation Committee will recommend to the City Manager the response or responses acceptance of which the Evaluation Committee deems to be in the best interest of the City. The Evaluation Committee shall base its recommendations pursuant to Section 287.055, FIorida Statutes, known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). The Committee shall recommend order of preference, no fewer that three firms deemed to be the most highly qualified to perform the required services after considering such factors as: 1. The ability of professional personnel; 2. Past performance; 3. Willingness to meet time and budget requirements; 4. Location; 5. Recent, current, and projected workloads of the firms; and 6. The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City, with the object of effecting and equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms, provided such distribution does not violate the principIe of selection of the most highly qualified firms. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations. 6. After considering the recommendation(s) of the Evaluation Committee, the City Manager shall recommend to the City Commission the response or responses acceptance of which the City Manager deems to be in the best interest of the City. 7. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation(s) in light ofthe recommendation(s) and evaluation of the Evaluation Committee and, if appropriate, approve the City Manager's recommendation(s). The City Commission may reject City Manager's recommendation(s) and select another response or responses. In any case, City Commission shall select the response or responses acceptance of which the City Commission deems to be in the best interest of the City. The City Commission may also reject all proposals. RFQNo: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 21 8. Negotiations between the selected respondent and the City Manager take place to arrive at a contract. If the City Commission has so directed, the City Manager may proceed to negotiate a contract with a respondent other than the top-ranked respondent if the negotiations with the top-ranked respondent fail to produce a mutually acceptable contract within a reasonable period oftime. 9. A proposed contract or contracts are presented to the City Commission for approval, modification and approval, or rejection. 10. If and when a contract or contracts acceptable to the respective parties is approved by the City Commission, the Mayor and City Clerk sign the contract(s) after the selected respondent(s) has (or have) done so. Important Note: By submitting a response, all respondents shall be deemed to understand and agree that no property interest or Iegal right of any kind shall be created at any point during the aforesaid evaluation/seIection process until and unless a contract has been agreed to and signed by both parties. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 22 SECTION V -GENERAL PROVISIONS A. ASSIGNMENT The successful respondent shall not enter into any sub-contract, retain consultants, or assign, transfer, convey, sublet, or otherwise dispose of this contract, or of any or all of its right, title, or interest therein, or its power to execute such contract to any person, firm, or corporation without prior written consent of the City. Any unauthorized assignment shall constitute default by the successful respondent. B. INDEMNIFICATION The successful respondent shall be required to agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Miami Beach and its officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all actions, claims, liabilities, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, for personal, economic or bodily injury, wrongful death, loss of or damage to property, in law or in equity, which may arise or be alleged to have arisen from the negligent acts or omissions or other wrongful conduct of the successful respondent, its employees, or agents in connection with the performance of service pursuant to the resultant Contract; the successful respondent shall pay all such claims and losses and shall pay all such costs and judgments which may issue from any lawsuit arising from such claims and losses, and shall pay all costs expended by the City in the defense of such claims and losses, including appeals. C. TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT If through any cause within the reasonable control of the successful respondent, it shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner, or otherwise violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations material to the Agreement, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate the services then remaining to be performed by giving written notice to the successful respondent of such termination which shall become effective upon receipt by the successful respondent of the written termination notice. In that event, the City shall compensate the successful respondent in accordance with the Agreement for all services performed by the respondent prior to termination, net of any costs incurred by the City as a consequence of the default. Notwithstanding the above, the successful respondent shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the Agreement by the respondent, and the City may reasonably withhold payments to the successful respondent for the purposes of set off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the successful respondent is determined. RFQNo: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 23 D. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF CITY The City may, for its convenience, terminate the services then remaining to be performed at any time without cause by giving written notice to successful respondent of such termination, which shall become effective thirty (30) days following receipt by respondent of such notice. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials shall be properly delivered to the City. If the City as provided in this section, the City shall compensate the successful respondent in accordance with the Agreement for all services terminates the Agreement actually performed by the successful respondent and reasonable direct costs of successful respondent for assembling and delivering to City all documents. No compensation shall be due to the successful respondent for any profits that the successful respondent expected to earn on the balanced of the Agreement. Such payments shall be the total extent of the City's liability to the successful respondent upon a termination as provided for in this section. RFQ No: \34-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 24 RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 SECTION VI -SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 25 SECTION VII -ATTACHMENTS 1.Cone of Silence, Ordinance No. 99-3164 2. Debarment, Ordinance No. 2000-3234 3. (OPTIONAL) RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 26 SECTION VIII - DOCUMENTS TO BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED TO CITY RESPONDENT INFORMATION Submitted by: Entity: Signature: Name (Typed): Address: City/State: Telephone: Fax: It is understood and agreed by respondent that the City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to make awards on all items or any items according to the best interest of the City, and to waive any irregularities in the RFQ or in the responses received as a result of the RFQ. It is also understood and agreed by the respondent that by submitting a response, respondent shall be deemed to understand and agree than no property interest or legal right of any kind shall be created at any point during the aforesaid evaIuationlselection process until and unIess a contract has been agreed to and signed by both parties. (Authorized Signature) (Date) (Printed Name) RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 27 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION NO. 134 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA Directions: Complete Part I or Part II, whichever applies. Part I: Listed below are the dates of issue for each Addendum received in connection with this RFQ: Addendum No.1, Dated Addendum No.2, Dated Addendum No.3, Dated Addendum No.4, Dated Addendum No.5, Dated Part II: No addendum was received in connection with this RFQ. Verified with Procurement staff Narne of staff Date (Respondent -Narne) (Date) (Signature) RFQNo: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 28 DECLARATION TO: Jorge M. Gonzalez City Manager City of Miami Beach, Florida Submitted this day of ,1998. The undersigned, as respondent, declares that the only persons interested in this proposal are named herein; that no other person has any interest in this responses or in the Contract to which this response pertains; that this response is made without connection or arrangement with any other person; and that this response is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The respondent agrees if this response is accepted, to execute an appropriate City of Miarni Beach document for the purpose of establishing a formal contractual relationship between the respondent and the City of Miami Beach, Florida, for the performance of all requirements to which the response pertains. The respondent states that the response is based upon the documents identified by the following number: RFQ No. 134-99/00. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME TITLE (IF CORPORATION) RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 29 Respondent's Name: Principal Office Address: Official Representative: Individual Partnership (Circle One) Corporation If a Corporation. answer this: When Incorporated: In what State: If Foreil!n Corooration: Date of Registration with FIorida Secretary of State: Name of Resident Agent: Address of Resident Agent: President's Name: Vice-President's Name: Treasurer's Name: Members of Board of Directors: RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 QUESTIONNAIRE 30 Ouestionnaire (continued) If a PartnershiD: Date of organization: General or Limited Partnership*: Name and Address of Each Partner: NAME ADDRESS * Designate general partners in a Limited Partnership I. Number of years of relevant experience in operating similar business: 2. Have any similar agreements held by respondent for a project similar to the proposed project ever been canceled? Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, give details on a separate sheet. 3. Has the respondent or any principals of the applicant organization failed to qualify as a responsible bidder, refused to enter into a contract after an award has been made, failed to compIete a contract during the past five (5) years, or been declared to be in default in any contract in the last 5 years? If yes, please expIain: RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 31 Ouestionnaire (continued) 4. Has the respondent or any of its principals ever been declared bankrupt or reorganized under Chapter 11 or put into receivership? If yes, give date, court jurisdiction, action taken, and any other explanation deemed necessary. 5. Person or persons interested in this bid and Qualification Form (have) (have not) been convicted by a Federal, State, County, or Municipal Court of any vioIation of law, other than traffic vioIations. To include stockholders over ten percent (10%). (Strike out inappropriate words) Explain any convictions: 6. Lawsuits (any) pending or completed involving the corporation, partnership or individuals with more than ten percent (10%) interest: A. List all pending lawsuits: B. List all judgments from lawsuits in the Iast five (5) years: C. List any criminal violations and/or convictions of the respondent and/or any of its principals: 7. Conflicts of Interest. The following relationships are the only potential, actual, or perceived conflicts of interest in connection with this response: (If none, so state.) RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/3012000 32 8. Public Disclosure. In order to determine whether the members of the Evaluation Committee for this Request for Proposals have any association or relationships which would constitute a conflict of interest, either actual or perceived, with any proposer and/or individuaIs and entities comprising or representing such proposer, and in an attempt to ensure full and complete disclosure regarding this contract, all Proposers are required to disclose all persons and entities who may be involved with this Proposal. This list shall include public relation firms, lawyers and lobbyists. The Procurement Division shall be notified in writing if any person or entity is added to this list after receipt of responses. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 33 DIVISION 3. LOBBYISTS Sec. 2-481. Definitions. The fo\1owing words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Advisory personnel means the members of those city boards and agencies whose sole or primary responsibility is to recommend legislation or give advice to the city commissioners. Autonomous personnel includes but is not limited to the members of the housing authority, personnel board, pension boards, and such other autonomous or semi-autonomous authorities, boards and agencies as are entrusted with the day-to-day policy setting, operation and management of certain defined functions or areas of responsibility. Commissioners means the mayor and members of the city commission. Departmental personnel means the city manager, all assistant city managers, all department heads, the city attorney, chief deputy city attorney and all assistant city attorneys; however, all departmental personnel when acting in connection with administrative hearings shall not be included for purposes of this division. Lobbyist means all persons employed or retained, whether paid or not, by a principal who seeks to encourage the passage, defeat or modification of any ordinance, resolution, action or decision of any commissioner; any action, decision, recommendation of any city board or committee; or any action, decision or recommendation of any personnel defined in any manner in this section, during the time period of the entire decision-making process on such action, decision or recommendation that foreseeably will be heard or reviewed by the city commission, or a city board or committee. The term specifically includes the principal as we\1 as any agent, attorney, officer or employee of a principal, regardless of whether such lobbying activities fa\1 within the normal scope of employment of such agent, attorney, officer or employee. Quasi-judicial personnel means the members of the planning board, the board ofadjustrnent and such other boards and agencies of the city that perform such quasi-judicial functions. The nuisance abatement board, special master hearings and administrative hearings sha\1 not be included for purposes ofthis division. (Ord. No. 92-2777, 991,2,3-4-92; Ord. No. 92-2785,991,2,6-17-92) Cross reference(s)--Definitions generally, 91-2. Sec. 2-482. Registration. (a) A\1lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities, register with the city clerk. Every person required to register shall register on forms prepared by the clerk, pay a registration fee as specified in appendix A and state under oath: RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 34 (1) His name; (2) His business address; (3) The narne and business address of each person or entity which has employed the registrant to lobby; (4) The commissioner or personnel sought to be lobbied; and (5) The specific issue on which he has been employed to lobby. (b) Any change to any information originally filed, or any additional city commissioner or personnel who are also sought to be lobbied shall require that the lobbyist file an amendment to the registration forms, although no additional fee shall be required for such amendment. The lobbyist has a continuing duty to supply information and arnend the forms filed throughout the period for which the lobbying occurs. (c) If the lobbyist represents a corporation, partnership or trust, the chief officer, partner or beneficiary shall also be identified. Without limiting the foregoing, the lobbyist shall also identify all persons holding, directly or indirectly, a five percent or more ownership interest in such corporation, partnership, or trust. (d) Separate registration shall be required for each principal represented on each specific issue. Such issue shall be described with as much detail as is practical, including but not limited to a specific description where applicable of a pending request for a proposal, invitation to bid, or public hearing number. The city clerk shall reject any registration statement not providing a description of the specific issue on which such lobbyist has been employed to lobby. (e) Each person who withdraws as a lobbyist for a particular client shall file an appropriate notice of withdrawal. (1) In addition to the registration fee required in subsection (a) of this section, registration of all lobbyists shall be required prior to October 1 of every even-numbered year; and the fee for biennial registration shall be as specified in appendix A. (g) In addition to the matters addressed above, every registrant shall be required to state the extent of any business, financial, familial or professional relationship, or other relationship giving rise to an appearance of an impropriety, with any current city commissioner or personnel who is sought to be lobbied as identified on the lobbyist registration form filed. (h) The registration fees required by subsections (a) and (1) of this section shall be deposited by the clerk into a separate account and shall be expended only to cover the costs incurred in administering the provisions of this division. There shall be no fee required for filing a notice of withdrawal, and the city manager shall waive the registration fee upon a finding of financial hardship, based upon a sworn statement of the applicant. Any person who only appears as a representative of a nonprofit corporation or entity (such as a charitable organization, a neighborhood or homeowner association, a local chamber of commerce or a trade association or trade union), without special compensation or reimbursement for the appearance, whether direct, indirect or contingent, to express support of or opposition to any item, shall not be required to register with the clerk as required by this section. Copies of registration forms shall be furnished to each commissioner or other personnel named on the forms. RFQNo: 134.99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 35 (Ord. No. 92-2777, S 3, 3-4-92; Ord. No. 92-2785, S 3, 6-17-92) Sec. 2-483. Exceptions to registration. (a) Any public officer, employee or appointee or any person or entity in contractual privity with the city who only appears in his official capacity shall not be required to register as a lobbyist. (b) Any person who only appears in his individual capacity at a public hearing before the city commission, planning board, board of adjustment, or other board or committee and has no other communication with the personnel defined in section 2-481, for the purpose of self-representation without compensation or reimbursement, whether direct, indirect or contingent, to express support of or opposition to any item, shall not be required to register as a lobbyist, including but not limited to those who are members of homeowner or neighborhood associations. All speakers shall, however, sign up on forms available at the public hearing. Additionally, any person requested to appear before any city personnel, board or commission, or any person compelled to answer for or appealing a code violation, a nuisance abatement board hearing, a special master hearing or an administrative hearing shall not be required to register, nor shall any agent, attorney, officer or employee of such person. (Ord. No. 92-2777, SS 4,5,3-4-92; Qrd. No. 92-2785, SS 4,5,6-17-92) Sec. 2-484. Sign-in logs. In addition to the registration requirements addressed above, all city departments, including the offices of the mayor and city commission, the offices of the city manager, and the offices of the city attorney, shall maintain signed sign-in logs for all noncity employees or personnel for registration when they meet with any personnel as defined in section 2-481. (Ord. No. 92-2785, S 6,6-17-92) Sec. 2-485. List of expenditures. (a) On October I of each year, lobbyists shall submit to the city clerk a signed statement under oath listing all lobbying expenditures in the city for the preceding calendar year. A statement shall be filed even if there have been no expenditures during the reporting period. (b) The city clerk shall publish logs on a quarterly and annual basis reflecting the lobbyist registrations filed. All logs required by this section shall be prepared in a manner substantially similar to the logs prepared for the state legislature pursuant to F.S. S 11.0045. (c) All members of the city commission and all city personnel shall be diligent to ascertain whether persons required to register pursuant to this section have complied with the requirements of this division. Commissioners or city personnel may not knowingly permit themselves to be lobbied by a person who is not registered pursuant to this section to lobby the commissioner or the relevant committee, board or city personnel. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 36 (d) The city attorney shall investigate any persons engaged in lobbying activities who are reported to be in violation of this division. The city attorney shaH report the results of the investigation to the city commission. Any alleged violator shaH also receive the results of any investigation and shall have the opportunity to rebut the findings, if necessary, and submit any written material in defense to the city commission. The city commission may reprimand, censure, suspend or prohibit such person from lobbying before the commission or any committee, board or personnel of the city. (Ord. No. 92-2777, S 6, 3-4-92; Qrd. No. 92-2785, S 7, 6-17-92) RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 37 DIVISION 4. PROCUREMENT Sec. 2-486. Cone of silence. (a) Contracts for the provision of goods and services other than audit contracts. (I) Definition. "Cone of silence" is hereby defined to mean a prohibition on: (a) any communication regarding a particular request for proposal ("RFP"), request for qualifications ("RFQ"), request for letters of interest ("RFLl"), or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and the city's professional staff including, but not limited to, the city manager and his or her staff; and (b) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ, RFLl, or bid between the mayor, city commissioners, or their respective staffs, and any member of the city's professional staff including, but not limited to, the city manager and his or her staff. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the cone of silence shaH not apply to competitive processes for the award of CDBG, HOME, SHIP and Surtax Funds administered by the city office of community development, and communications with the city attorney and his or her staff. (2) Procedure. a. A cone of silence shall be imposed upon each RFP, RFQ, RFLl, and bid after the advertisement of said RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid. At the time of imposition of the cone of silence, the city manager or his or her designee shall provide for public notice of the cone of silence. The city manager shall include in any public solicitation for goods and services a statement disclosing the requirements ofthis division. b. The cone of silence shaH terminate a) at the time the city manager makes his or her written recommendation as to selection of a particular RFP, RFQ, RFLl, or bid to the city commission; provided, however, that if the city commission refers the manager's recommendation back to the city manager or staff for further review, the cone of silence shaH be reimposed until such time as the manager makes a subsequent written recommendation, or b) in the event of contracts for less than $10,000.00, when the city manager executes the contract. (3) Exceptions. The provisions ofthis ordinance shall not apply to oral communications at pre-bid conferences, oral presentations before evaluation committees, contract discussions during any duly noticed public meeting, public presentations made to the city commissioners during any duly noticed public meeting, contract negotiations with city staff following the award of an RFP, RFQ, RFLl, or bid by the city commission, or communications in writing at any time with any city employee, official or member of the city commission, unless specifically prohibited by the applicable RFP, RFQ, RFLl, or bid documents. The bidder or proposer shall file a copy of any written communications with the city clerk. The city clerk shall make copies available to any person upon request. RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/3012000 38 (b) Audit contracts. (1) "Cone of silence" is hereby defined to mean a prohibition on: (a) any communications regarding a particular RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and the mayor, city commissioners or their respective staffs, and any member of the city's professional staff including, but not limited to the city manager and his or her staff, and (b) any oral communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid between the mayor, city commissioners or their respective staffs and any member of the city's professional staff including, but not limited to, the city manager and his or her staff. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the cone of silence shall not apply to communications with the city attorney and his or her staff. (2) Except as provided in subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) hereof, a cone of silence shall be imposed upon each RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid for audit services after the advertisement of said RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid. At the time of the imposition of the cone of silence, the city manager or his or her designee shall provide for the public notice of the cone of silence. The cone of silence shall terminate a) at the time the city manager makes his or her written recommendation as to the selection of a particular RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid to the city commission; provided, however, that if the city commission refers the manager's recommendation back to the city manager or staff for further review, the cone of silence shall be reimposed until such time as the manager makes a subsequent written recommendation, or b) or in the event of contracts for less than $10,000.00, when the city manager executes the contract. (3) Nothing contained herein shall prohibit any bidder or proposer: (i) from making public presentations at duly noticed pre-bid conferences or before duly noticed evaluation committee meetings; (ii) from engaging in contract discussions during any duly noticed public meeting; (iii) from engaging in contract negotiations with city staff following the award of an RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid for audit by the city commission; or (iv) from communicating in writing with any city employee or official for purposes of seeking clarification or additional information from the city or responding to the city's request for clarification or additional information, subject to the provisions of the applicable RFP, RFQ, RFLI, or bid documents. The bidder or proposer shall file a copy of any written communication with the city clerk. The city clerk shall make copies available to the general public upon request. (4) Nothing contained herein shall prohibit any lobbyist, bidder, proposer, or other person or entity from publicly addressing the city commissioners during any duly noticed public meeting regarding action on any audit contract. The city manager shall include in any public solicitation for auditing services a statement disclosing the requirements of this division. (c) Violations/penalties and procedures. An alleged violation of this section by a particular bidder or proposer shall subject said bidder or proposer to the same procedures set forth in section 2-457, shall render any RFP award, RFQ award, RFLI award, or bid award to said bidder or proposer void, and said bidder or proposer shall not be considered for any RFP, RFQ, RFLI or bid for a contract for the provision of goods or services for a period of one year. Any person who violates a provision of this division shall be prohibited from serving RFQ No; 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 39 on a city evaluation committee. In addition to any other penalty provided by law, violation of any provision of this division by a city employee shall subject said employee to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal. Additionally, any person who has personal knowledge of a violation of this division shall report such violation to the state attorney and/or may file a complaint with the county ethics commission. (Qrd. No. 99-3164, S 1, 1-6-99) ORDINANCE NO 2000-3234 RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 40 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE VI, ENTITLED "PROCUREMENT", BY CREATING DIVISION 5, ENTITLED "DEBARMENT", SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-406 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR DEBARMENT OF CONTRACTORS FROM CITY WORK; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; REPEALER; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. Miami Beach City Code, Chapter 2, entitled "Administration", Article VI, entitled "Procurement", is hereby amended by adding the following Division 5, entitled - "Debarment of Contractors from City Work" reading as follows: Division 5. Debarment of contractors from City work. Section 2-397 Purpose of debarment. fa) The City shall solicit offers from. award contracts to, and consent to subcontractors with responsible contractors only: To effectuate this police. the debarment of contractors from City work may be undertaken. (b) The serious nature of debarment requires that this sanction be imposed only when it is in the public interest for the City's protection. and not for purposes of punishment. Debarment shall be imposed in accordance with the procedures contained in this ordinance. Section 2-398 Definitions. (a)Aftiliates. Business concerns. organizations. lobbyists or other individuals are affiliates of each other if. directly or indirectly. (I) either one controls or has the power to control the other. or (ii) a third part controls or has the power to control both. Indicia of control include. but are not limited to. a fiduciary relation which results from the manifestation of consent by one individual to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subiect to his control. and consent by the other so to act; interlocking management or ownership; identity of interests among family members; shared facilities and equipment; common use of employees; or a business entity organized by a debarred entity, individual. or affiliate following RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 41 debarment of a contractor that has the same or similar management. ownership. or principal employees as the contractor that was debarred or suspended. (b) Civil iudgment rneans a iudgrnent or finding of a civil offense by any court of cornpetent iurisdiction. (c) Contractor means any individual or other legal entity that: (l) Directly or indirectly (e.g. through an affiliate\. subrnits offers for is awarded.. or reasonably rnav be expected to submit offers or be awarded a Citv contract, including, but not limited to vendors. suppliers, providers, bidders. proposers. consultants. and/or design professionals. or (21 Conducts business or reasonable rnanbe expected to conduct business. with the Citv as an agent.. representative or subcontractor of another contractor. (d\ Conviction rneans a iudgernent or conviction of a criminal offense be it a felony or rnisderneanor. by any court of cornpetent iurisdiction. whether entered upon a verdict or a plea. and includes a conviction entered upon a plea of nolo contendere rei Debarment rneans action taken by the Debarrnent Comrnittee to exclude a contractor (and. in lirnited instances specified in this ordinance. a bidder or proposer frorn City contracting and City approved subcontracting for a reasonable. specified period as provided in subsection Iil below: a contractor so excluded is debarred. (f) Debarment Committee rneans a grOUP of seven (7) individual rnernbers, each appointed by the Mayor and individual Citv Cornrnissioners. to evaluate and. if warranted. to irnpose debarment, (g) ml9ol'tdel'6!nce Greater weiqht of the evidence means proof bu information that. compared with that opposinq it .leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more probablu true than not. (h) Indictment rneans indictment for a crirninal offense. An information or other filing by cornpetent authority charging a crirninal offense shall be given the same effect as an indictrnent. (I) Leqal proceedinq rneans any civil iudicial proceeding to which the City is a party or any crirninal proceeding. The term includes appeals frorn such proceedings. RFQ No; 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 42 (j) List of debarred contractors rneans a list cornpiled. rnaintained and distributed bv the Citvs Procurernent Office. containing the names of contractors debarred under the procedures of this ordinance. Section 2-399 List Of debarred contractors. (a) The Citl.l's Procurement Office. is the aaencl.l charaed with the implementation of this ordinance shall: (J 1 Compile and maintain a current. consolidated list (Listl of all contractors debarred bl.l City departments. Such List shall be public record and shall be available for public inspection and dissemination; (21 Periodicalll.l revise and distribute the List and issue supplements, ifnecessaT1./. to all departments. to the Office of the Citl.l Manaaer and to the Mal.lor and Citl.l Commissioners: and (3) Included in the List shall be the name and telephone number of the City official responsible for its maintenance and distribution. (b) The List shall indicate: (J I The names and addresses of all contractors debarred. in alphabetical order; (2) The name of the department that recommends initiation of the debannent action; (31 The cause for the debannent action. as is further described herein. or other statutoT1./ or reaulatoT1./ authoritl.l: 141 The effect of the debannent action: (5) The tennination date for each listina; (61 The contractor's certificate of competence or license number. when applicable; (7) The person throuah whom the contractor is aualified. when applicable: 181 The name and telephone number of the point of contact in the department recommendina the debannent action. @ The Citl.l's Procurement Office shall: (J I In accordance with internal retention procedures. maintain records relatina to each debannent; RFQ No: 134-99/00 DA TE: 08/30/2000 43 (2) Establish procedures to provide.for the effective use of the List. includina internal distribution thereof to ensure that departments do not solicit offers from, award contracts to. or consent to subcontracts with contractors on the List: and (3) Respond to inauiries concerninq listed, contractors and coordinate such responses with the department that recommended the action. Section 2-400 Effect of debarment. fa) Debarred contractors are excluded from receivina contracts, and departments shall not solicit offers from. award contracts to, or consent to subcontracts with these contractors. unless the Citu Manaaer determines that an emeraencu exists iustifuina such action. and obtains approval from the Mauor and Citu Commission, which approval shall be aiven bu 5/7ths vote of the Citu Commission at a reaularlu scheduled Citu Commission meetina. Debarred contractors are also excluded from conductina business with the City as aaents, representatives subcontractors or partners of other contractors. (bi Debarred contractors are excluded from actina as individual sureties. Section 2-401 Continuation of current contracts. fa) Commencina on the effective date of this ordinance. all proposed Citu contracts. as well as Reauest for Proposals fRFP). Reauest for Qualifications (RFO). Requests for Letters of Interest fRFLII. or bids issued be the Citll. shall incorporate this ordinance and specifll that debarment mall constitute arounds for termination of the contract as well as disqualification from consideration on anll RFP, RFO. RFLI. or bid. (b) The debarment shall take effect in accordance with the notice provided bu the Citll Manaaer pursuant to subsection 2-405fh) below. except that if a Citu department has contracts or subcontracts in existence at the time the contractor was debarred, the debarment period mall commence upon the conclusion of the contract. subiect to approval of same be 5/7ths vote of the Mallor and Citll Commission at a reaularlll scheduled meeting. @ Citll departments mall not renew or otherwise extend the duration of current contracts. or consent to subcontracts with debarred contractors, unless the Citu Manaaer determines that an emeraencll exists iustifllina the renewal or extension or for an approved extension due to delau or time extension for reasons beuond the contractor's control. and such action is approved bu 5/7ths vote of the Mallor and Citu Commission at a reaularlll scheduled. meetina. (dl No further work shall be awarded to a debarred contractor in connection with a continuina contract. where the work is divided into separate discrete aroups and the RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 44 Cit!!'s refusal or denial of further work under the contract will not result in a breach of such contract. Section 2-402 Restrictions on subcontractina. (a) When a debarred contractor is proposed as a subcontractor for an!! subcontract subiect to Cit!! approval, the department shall not consent to subcontracts with such contractors unless the Cit!! Manager determines that an emeraency exists iustif!!ing such consent. and the Ma!!orand Citli Commission approves such decision. by 5/7ths vote. at a regularly scheduled meetinq. (b) The Cit!! shall not be responsible for an!! increases in proiect costs or other expenses incurred b!! a contractor as a result ofreiection of proposed subcontractors pursuant to subsection 2-402(a) above. provided the subcontractor was debarred prior to bid openinq or openinq of proposals, where the contract was awarded be the City pursuant to an RFP. RFO. RFLI. or bid. Section 2-403 Debarment. (a) The Debarment Committee ma!!. in the public interest. debar a contractor for any of the causes listed in this ordinance. usinq the procedures outlined below. The existence of a cause for debarment. however. does not necessarily require that the contractor be debarred; the seriousness of the contractor's acts or omissions and an!! mitiaatinq factors should be considered in makinq an!! debarment decision. (bi Debarment constitutes debarment of all officers. directors. shareholders owninq or controllina twentli-five (25) percent of the stock. partners. divisions or other organizational elements of the debarred contractor. unless the debarred decision is limited b!! its terms to specific divisions. orqanizational elements or commodities. The Debarment Committee's decision includes an!! existina affiliates of the contractor. if they are fI) specificall!! named and (ii) qiven written notice of the proposed debarment and an opportunit!! to respond. Puturc affiliates ofthc C01'l.tmctor arc subicct to the Deeaffl'Wl'!t Cammittoo's dcoisia1'l.. @ A contractor's debarment shall be effective throuqhout Citli Government. Section 2-404 Causes for debarment (a) The Debarment Committee shall debar a contractor for a conviction or civil iudgment. (1 ) For commission of a fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaininq. attemptinq to obtain. performinq. or makinq a claim upon a public RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 45 contract or subcontract. or a contract or subcontract funded in whole or in part with public funds: (2) For violation of federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers: (3) For commission of embe=lement. theft. forGem. bribem. falsification or destruction of records. makinG false statements. or receivinG stolen propertu: (4) Which makes the Citu the prevailinG partu in a leGal proceedinG. and a court determines that the lawsuit between the contractor and the Citu was frivolous or tiled in bad faith. (b) The Committee mau debar a contractor. (and. limited instances set forth hereinbelow. a bidder or proposer) based upon a /9r-D/9oruier6l.rtoo the greater weiGht of the evidence. for: (l) Violation of the terms of a Citu contract or subcontract. or a contract or subcontract funded in whole or in part bu Citu funds. such as failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one (1) or more contracts as certified bu the City department administerinG the contract; or the failure to perform. or unsatisfactorilu perform in accordance with the terms of one (l) or more contracts. as certified by an independent reqistered architect. engineer. or qeneral contractor. (2) Violation of a Citu ordinance or administrative order which lists debarment as a potentialpenaltu. (3) ll1H/ other cm/so which affects the r-Ds/9orwieilitl;/ €If a Citl;/ oontr-Eletor er Slieoontr6l.eter in /9crf-erminEl Citu werl'<. Section 2-405 Debarment procedures. fa} Requests for the debarment of contractors mau be initiated by a Citu Department or bu a citizen-at larGe and shall be made in writinG to the Office of the Citu Manager. Upon receipt of a request for debarment. the City ManaGer shall transmit the request to the Mauor and City Commission at a reGularlu scheduled meetinG. The Mauor and Citu Commission shall transmit the request to a person or persons who shall be charGed bu the Citu Commission with the dutu of promptly investiQatinq and preparinq a written RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 46 report(s} concerninq the proposed debarment. includinq the cause and qrounds for debarment. as set forth in this ordinance. (b) Upon completion of the aforestated written report. the Gitu Manaqer shall fonuard said report to the Debarment Committee. The Citu's Procurement Office shall act as staff to the Debarment Committee and. with the assistance of the Citu &ol9artmcmt person or persons which prepared the report. present evidence and arGUment to the Debarment Committee @ Notice of proposal to debar. Within ten workinq daus of the Debarment Committe havinG received the reGuest for debarment and written report. the Citu's Procurement Office. on behalf of the Debarment Committee shall issue a notice of proposed debarment advisinG the contractor and any specificallu named affiliates, bu certified mail. return receipt requested. or personal service. containinG the followinG information: (1) That debarment is beinG considered: (2} The reasons and causes for the proposed debarment in terms sufficient to put the contractor and ant/ named affiliates on notice of the conduct or transaction(s} upon which it is based; (3) That a hearinG shall be conducted before the Debarment Committee on a date and time not less than thirtll (30) daus after service of the notice. The notice shall also advise the contractor that it mall be represented by an attomell. mall present documentary evidence and verbal testimonu. and mall cross-examine evidence and testimonll presented aaainst it. (4) The notice shall also describe the effect of the issuance of the notice of proposed debarment. and of the potential effect of an actual debarment. (d) No later than seven (7) workinq dat/s, prior to the scheduled hearinq date, the contractor must furnish the Citt/'s Procurement Office a list of the defenses the contractor intends to present at the hearinq. [fthe contractor fails to submit the list. in writinq. at least seven (7) workinq days prior to the hearing or fails to seek an extension of time within which to do so. the contractor shall have waived the opportunitll to be heard at the hearinq. The Debarment Committee has the riGht to qrant or denll an extension of time, and for qood cause, mall set RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 47 aside the waiver to be heard at the hearina, and its decision may only be reviewed upon an abuse of discretion standard. (el Hearsal./ evidence shall be admissible at the hearina but shall not form the sole basis for initiatina a debarment procedure nor the sole basis of anu determination of debarment, The hearing shall be transcribed. taped or othenuise recorded bu use of a court reporter, at the election Committee and at the expense of the Citu. Copies of the hearina tape or transcript shall be furnished at the expense and reauest of the requestina partu. m Debarment Committee's decision. In actions based upon a conviction or iudament, or in which there is no aenuine dispute over material facts, the Debarment Committee shall make a decision on the basis of all the undisputed. material information in the administrative record. includina anu undisputed, material submissions made bu the contractor. Where actions are based on disputed evidence. the Debarment Committee shall decide what weiaht to attach to evidence of record, iudge the credibility of witnesses, and base its decision on the I9rcl9cmdcl'l;61l'l;CC areater weiaht of the evidence standard. The Debarment Committee shall be the sole trier of fact. The Committee's decision shall be made within ten (101 working daus after conclusion of the hearina, unless the Debarment Committee extends this period for aood cause. (al The Committee's decision shall be in writina and shall include the Committee's factual findinas, the principal causes of debarment as enumerated in this ordinance. identification of the contractor and all named affiliate: affected bu the decision, and the specific term. includina duration, of the debarment imposed. (hi Notice of Debarment Committee's decision. (1) If the Debarment Committee decides to impose debarment. the City ManaGer shall aive the contractor and anu named affiliates involved written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, or hand deliveru. within ten (101 workinG daus of the decision. specifuina the reasons for debarment and includina a copu of the Committee's written decision: statinG the period of RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/3012000 48 debarment, includinG. effective dates: and advisinG that the debarment is effective throuGhout the Citl./ departments. (2) If debarment is not imposed. the Citl./ Manaaer shall notifu the contractor and anl./ named affiliates i1'l.b'oZOIod ,bl./ certified mail. return receipt requested. or personal service, within ten (10) workina dal./s of the decision. (l) All decisions of the Debarment Committee shall be final and shall be effective on the date the notice is sianed bl./ the Citl./ ManaGer. Decisions of the Debarment Committee are subject to review bl./ the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court. A debarred contractor mal./ seek a stal./ of the debarment decision in accordance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Section 2-406 Period of debarment. (al The period of debarment imposed shall be within the sole discretion of the Debarment Committee. Debarment shall be for a period commensurate with the seriousness of the cause(sl. and where applicable. within the quidelines set forth below. but in no event shall exceed five (5) l./ears. (bl The followinG guidelines in the period of debarment shall apply except where mitiaatinG or aaaravatina circumstances iustifl./ deviation: {1 I For commission of an offense as described in subsection 2404(al{1 I: five (51 l./ears (21 For commission of an offense as described in subsection 2404(a}(2): five (51 l./ears. (3) For commission of an offense as described in subsection 2404(a)(3): five (5) years. (41 For commission of an offense as described in subsection 2404(a}(-S41: two (21 to five (51 uears. (51 For commission of an offense as described in subsections 2404(bl(1 lor (21: two (2) to five (5) l./ears. @ The Debarment Committee mau. in its sole discretion. reduce the period of debarment. upon the contractor's written reGuest. for reasons such as: (1) Newlu discovered material evidence: (2) Reversal of the conviction or civil iudament upon which the debarment was RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 49 based: (31 Bona fide chanae in ownership or manaaement: (4)Elimination of other causes for which the debarment was imposed; or (5) Other reasons the Debarment Committee deems appropriate. (d) The d08a7'RWntdebarred contractor's written reauest shall contain the reasons for reauestina a reduction in the debarment period. The Citu's Procurement Office, with the assistance of the affected department shall have thirtu (30) days from receipt of such reauest to submit written response thereto. Tho docision. of tho DolJG.Tmont Cemmittoe r<JC/61.rdiRQ 61. rOC/Uoot made bIRder t,w SUGsoetien. is final and non apl'Jcalable. SECTION2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. SECTION3. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. The sections of this ordinance may be renumbered relettered to accomplish such intention, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article," or other appropriate word. SECTION 4. REPEALER, All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect on the 3rd day ofMarch,200o. PASSED and ADOPTED this 23rd day ofFebruary,2000. II'JA'W-(F:lAITOAGURl- OERAJUIHI-. 0lt0l RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 50 RFQ No: 134-99/00 DATE: 08/30/2000 51 ',,- ~ .,';"'.....5..".'.".....' '1'" .. . . , i:D~~5.5>~' ;,'.... "---'" . VENETIAN, STAR, PALM Ie HIBISCUS Qty of MiamI Beach Proposed Neighborhood Capital Improvements Program 2CXXl - 2007 / . Slreetscdpe ~~. , ~:';.::;,J;,,_1,f:{ ".. '-7_~;~~::""" ~,'; :,,, <. ,_, , \". ~':.i;~~f.~H~r~:?":' _?j".i"i}i{"::{X.;;" "',,--'N... ). ~:_" \. ,,~-' ~.- .-:(..i"":: <>t:> - .;t.-,~ ,,";':":.~}' , ",-.;,\ '-'" ',' -_.-.~"....'..... \'/~:~}o:,-~,;'j:~iI~,r~ '. ';'. tr".'J~'i<rF'~lF'ic cal mlflg" J,;;[~~j,,7<"V:;'?"" : ,. ~ '".: ... .. '. '. ..... . i. ~Q~kl$ .,;".i.1.'~.Y!."..~.I.'.:~:.'."".YE..... STING IN OUR COMMUNITY ~t ""'~"3),.;.;.",.,.;,/j~;~ .... ... 'fim.", ~ ~,_ ,'r'''''-, ;', .. .~>:_ '_,.' >;'::';". i""'- Lighting ':',...4."....., '."". '...~.. .,.,,"...... ,_,. ,.,t~,~ , " ~ ~ .' '.......":&.'.... . ." . .. ,'.' .... .... . '. -,. -" -, ~....:., -.-...,,_. '.- . ,j,'';;'';C'.',o:/ ..:';::;;,~,;-a;\' *- . . <'........ ... '... ...... Curb and gutter Repave Streets Drainage . . ;.,;,~~~~,;~~,..,,, Landscaping Irrigation Venetian Venetian Star, UNy. UNy, Hibiscus. Belle I.. Phose 1 Pna.. 11 Palm Park 2007 2006 2005 2004 Coos!. Cons!. Neighborhood Entrance Signs Traffic Calming Park upgrade 2003 2002 2001 2CXfJ $307.532 design $3.536.618 Coos! $552CXXl Const $146,160 design $48.CXXl design $1,680,~ Cons! $552.CXXl Canst Pedestrian pavement mark- Venetian Causeway Master Plan Phase 1- Venetian Islands . Infrastructure and landscaping Improvements . Pavement . Sidewalk Improvements . Curb and Gutter . Landscape & Irrigation . lighting . Traffic control Improvement . Gateway . Drainage . Water & Sewer Improvements Venetian Causewav Master Plan Phase II - Causeway . Landscape, lighting, gateway Improvements . Pavement . Sidewalk Improvements . Curb and gutter . Landscape & Irrigation . Gateway Treatment ..... .. . ... ..... .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . Belle Isle Park Imorovements . Drainage Improvements . Landscape, Irrigation, signage, pedestrian lar Improvements, lighting and playground nd 2007 Palm Island Park . Tennis court lighting . Tennis court resurfacing 2CXXJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Star. Palm & Hibiscus Islands . Traffic enhancements . Landscaping . Slgnage . lighting . Park Improvements s I.'~ I...~ _ ~,.. D ~ 'U' rJ~~ FUNDING SOURCES . 1999 General Obligation (G.O.! Bond - $6,946,150 - Parks - $675,000 - Streetscapes - $6,271,150 . 1994 Parks Bond - $244,092 . Proposed 2000 WaterlWaste Water Revenue Bond " · Proposed 2000 Stormwater Revenue Bond · local Option Gas Tax . Quality of life Funds . Concurrency Management System Funds . Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) NEXT STEPS G.O. Bond Oversight Committee ................. June 12, 2 (City Commission Chambers) Conversion to Underground ........................ June 19, 2 Utilities Workshop (City Commission Chambers) City approves Water & Waste Water Revenue Bond City approves Stormwater Revenue Bond 'iliimt Community Workshops during Design & Construction Phases ~~ '-~ FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMA116'.J,~ tNTACT: William H. Cory, South Beach Planne ~~~) 673-75 .".~ or John de Pazos (305) 673-700e.."i~,. '~'"f {'iJ;. For further information please visit our WEBSITE http://ci.miami-each.fl.us CoIl 130.5K>73.7010 VOICE fa _ material In ""c..ohlo fonnat "on I_'nle"".,." (.5 day> In advance when ~Iol. '" InFom.atlon on ace"" for P"""'" WIIh """"'1m.. MOR DY SHORES CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 2Cf:X) - 2007 . Streetscope . Street lights ..~,"'f ,:.,.~ ,--, . ,,~.::~) ,.:. " . ~::..~(e~~:'"'~:rf~:~ "...c. ;'~,l' , f.:1:;~ :"{:f:4~"t;~~.~::'.!:.~ :2S~~~~';t: "( ,!-~ ""'5: ~~......... ""....-"".,...~"'-fio:, -.-."..~ ...,~."...,-~ ~ ,~..ii.;;.~; :;~::~:;; __"'C~~ ' '" "..:' .. ~014:' :~ '."., .~:.~ '.-i,~,~~~~--"j' ':>>-:-"tJ.~~ !~-: ,1t";., ,J. i'!!'.1[ -'_ .....;~;! r"~::,,: t}~'" ", -l1'-_.-:-~ ~ ~. - . ".. i. ~ - ~ t J;'~ ' ":. . ,,<i,:~;!~i:~\;:;.:,,::~':~~~1-~:~:'~~ ,-~. . ',- . .:.. .~t? t, __1'""- ~:.~ ~._"_._. ''':,''";~,...,~;."...." ._\, .r Y.... ~r~~~;-':S'-:~...ii'T~~:. '~''"-(~~:;~~~.:,~.,,?~~-v...,.~/ 4 ;.'> ,,-' i. "1.. ~"'l Lighting Landscaping Underground wires Sidewalks Improve tennis courts Entrance enhancements Parking 2003 2002 Street ends 2001 2.OCt) Traffic calming 2007 2006 Swales 2005 Enhance clubhouse Normandv Shores Nel"hborhood Streetscaoe Slnale Famllv Areas: .. . ComprehensIve landscapIng .0 . . Upgraded lIghting . . . SIdewalk repaIr and enhancements .. . Street design for traffic calmIng .. . Swale restoration .. . . Street resurfacing . . Improve street ends at Jones, Hagen and Ray ... Streets .. . CoordInate wIth utilIty companIes If buryIng .. o overhead wires . .Wa~~e~pbcementsoodupgrodes . Drainage Improvements Falrwav Pork . AlumInum fencIng . New recreatIon buIldIng . Basketbaff and tennis courts renovations .lIghtlng . LandscapIng .Playground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . o . . . Normandv Shores Nel"hborhood Streetscaoe MultI FamIly Areas: . Street resurfacIng . SIdewalk additions and repaIrs . Improve swales for parking . Enhanced landscapIng . Street end lIghting, paving, landscaping, parking . Water lIne replacements and upgrades . Drolnage Improvements Golf Course Clubhouse Communlfy Center FUNDING SOURCES . 1999 General Obligation (0.0.) Bond - $4,400,000 - Parks $1,0CIJ,0CIJ - Streetscapes $3,400,0CIJ · 1994 Parks Bond - $3,018,063 · Proposed 20C1J WaterlWaste Water Revenue Bon · Proposed 20C1J Stormwater Revenue Bond · Golf Course Loan Pool · Local Option Gas Tax FOR ADDmONAL INFORMA Joyce Meyers, North Beach Plan (305) 673-75SJ COORDIMATING PROJECTS · Normandy Shores Golf Course and Clubhouse restoration and r NEXT STEPS G.o. Bond Oversight Committee ........ ......... June 12, 2(xx:) 6. (City Commission Chambers) Conversion to Underground ........................ June 19, 2 Utilities Workshop (City Commission Chambers) City approves Water & Waste Water Revenue Bond City approves Stormwater Revenue Bond Community Workshops during Design & Construction Phases For further information please visit our WEBSITE h<<p:l/Ci.miaml- Call '305.l'J73-7010 VOICE Ie __ """""'" In acceMible formal: """ language _ t5 day. In odvonce wIoen "",,",Ie), '" Informatfon on """"" lor """"'" with cbcMIte. ~\ . ' Ii, "".,,;' '1 ", r "1~' . ' t' '1/:' . t'" :~~ ~:>~\ ._,~.J;r;$treets~&1 ":2~~!.;ll' .: :j 'l~~.gr.;, ", r,c" '~&tl" f'~.~.;t. "~jre~t Iig~ts' ;:\;y~~~; _ _ :.~. _ _ , . . . _ '. t';i~~:;. _!:(~.", . ")-:"::,., -~~---'-;,::',;-,,'\~',":':", ..~ <Wafer in~jfaSlr\i_ "i w .:::,:'~<;<i-; -.\~~,:,J~~ri-'~~.f':: ,:I',,:,;fF'~~" , "",. ! "~" ,,,,' c.'. St0r~ dtit'~$ ~, ,.A",,,.,,~,a.;:},,, " " ,J)'~1t1~1'L" . T rafficcdtr("lI"rng:~;"{~~i~~:;t1 . Parks -,~:, ,1~~::':t;~ INVESTING IN OUR ..........'.:,~....."J.~';:".,;..,. ,~ ,,'JO _ ""-';'.-'- COMMUNITY '. .. . ......;'... .;' .;.:.;;..,u""'^~~''''..;,F,<;",;"",..-,,,,~;v'''-i\.~~'''K)i_';ilo;~",.,,,,;,,;-,,,,;;,-,,;,, REQUESTS 'ID'EN11fl'lil5'lf':AEfu.ty.i'1S\)1.,'"O.lJiYlEETIRGS 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2CXYJ $386,CXXJ $830,CXXJ I $200,CXXJ I $3,130,CXXJ $.460,(0) $69,CXXJ . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . Rnv.hare Phase III - Flnmlnao Drive . street rBSlJrfaclng . sidewalk repair . curb and gutter repair . swalelplantlng sfrfp restoratfon . enhanced landscaping wtthln overall streel>cape plan . drainage upgrades . street light upgrac:les . streetscape design for traffic calming . Flamingo water main rehabilltatfon . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ phase V - 40 Street StrAeI>caDe . street rBSlJrfaclng . sidewalk repair . curb and gutter repair . planting strip restoration and enhanced landscaping . street light upgrac:les . streel>cape design and landscaping to provide a buffer to residences to the south . streetscape design for Improved on-street parking Phase I - Rnvshore Nelnhborhood . street resurfacing . sidewalk repair . curb and gutter repair . swalelplantlng strip restoration . enhanced landscapl . dra; . . . . . . . . . . . . Island View Park ~ . . . . . . · · March 2001 Bovshore IV - Lake pat>mast- Area . street resurfacing . sidewalk repair . curb and gutter repair and upgrade . planting strip restoratfon and enhanced landscaping . street light upgrades . entryway features and enhanced street slgnag9 . streetscape c:/esIgn for traffic calming . streel>cape design for Improved on-street parking . Flamingo water main rehabil/fatfon FUNDING SOURCES · 1999 General Obligation (G.O.) Bond - $13,482,865 - Parks - $300,000 - Streetscapes - $5,075,000 - Facilities - $8,107,865 . 1994 Parks Bond - $3,176,880 · Golf Course Loan Pool $8,205,870 · Proposed 2000 WaterlWaste Water Revenue Bond · Proposed 2000 Stormwater Revenue Bond · Local Option Gas Tax · Quality of Life Funds · Concurrency Management System Funds · Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) COORDINATING PROJECTS · Bayshore Golf Course and Clubhouse Restoration and Renovation · Fire Station #2 Renovation · Public Works Yard · Parks Maintenance Center · 25th Street Water Storage Tanks and Water Booster Station Upgrade · 23rd Street Bridge Improvements · Alton Road Enhancements · Collins Waterway Improvements and Restoration · Stash site Improvements NEXT STEPS G.O. Bond Oversight Committee ................. June 12, 2QCX) 600 pm (City Commission Chambersl Conversion to Underground ........................ June 19, 2QCX) 6:30 pm Utilities Workshop (City Commission Chambersl City approves Water & Waste Water Revenue Bond City approves Stormwater Revenue Bond Community Workshops during Design & Construction Phases FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Mark Alvarez, Middle Beach Planner (305) 673-7030 For further information please visit our WEBSITE httpJlcLmiaml-beach.fl.us Cell (~.7010 VOICE to request maIorlalln acces<iblo fonnm; $Ign Imgooge In/srp>",",' is da,.1n advance when ,.,...,1eI. a Infa"'D"on "" accen for '*""" WIth &.d;1itIA . '"" ~.~ ~_~'~-::"""~" ~!"", ~.,. '~- 0ji-',~-_,!!", ~.'~.OC ~.~ -~-~,,,. ,~:._-=.':....-.--...,-'--.... -~ .......--. - - City of Miami 'Beach Proposed Neighborhood Capital Improvements Program D ;rrc:" ". 'l-i ~ f _. 2c:x:::b - 2007 , ~'O'lI'!"iii"~~" .......- .~ ". ;";;:.:',~ <,";" 'II : ..~~.~~.ihr'~E_~ ';r - .,' T .~ \ ,h~;~ ''''Jff.f .' \~~>":!:,,i""~,,~<,~~ :~!i_'F' ~ '~:1 ,. ~'~ ~;;o;~ ' D.,.t"~,~~ "f-""\,:'J!l!''''' ~h - "~ ~1'!I~.a.- " ~;.., 'St~~~1~$Gepe iIiii'.~."""---- "'.' '?,,'fl.;;-,.!:3',;,S , _ " i ."J--i_"" - . i . - i .l' '. ;j!. r "" i!! ... ,,. ~,'_ ~i:":';:- ,.'" . ..... _~_~";;:-<t~'_"-:~, ,;",,, l, t'i:"\;'~<f-"-, :.' ":'<" ,/. . , ., ,.-WiJFe*t" lofrbstFudJlJJ~d. ':;~i:~~:!~_, .. ~f~f ....';~flt ."~ ~.' _~ . ti.l;1'..~'7*,~_~~:},-:'~"'''' ~)., .!"Ao~,_. ~.. f .."".,;~ql,;,,?>;;,','J:'-".~~$'PITllj!~i~'iirn'<;1~e-.;m~.w~.'1>' .-' ',7~~rJ~t!~.:~~~tJ" ':;-"'''''i~'~'''l:,r-",,_.' ;,;i'~~i~~;~~'!;: .' ,"';(;C:;f;~~~,. ~;t;. "~~'" ..'~. " .ft " , if <1" ~ \ .. -1 ii! . . ''J ,; ~ .' ~ '~,. ~ '<0., '" . ; :t::: 't. ....,. ."""'"'-...." ,~~'~l;;?;.~~ 'ff''''''''' Trofcfic Cqlming ""~ . <'~:~~1! ~,,1'tt;"'. " ;~~~ .:/" '.1 Parks ,~;'~~~~~:~~'); .~~;~;:,~:r. !:;., " ,,,' y --'~, ~"~~~"::i;;;\,,..;, "", "'"',+;:ll'i,''' j' .,~~t:,;, r ~ - I :~~js".,.;~t~':"'I"'S" /"6' . "',': ;""'" , '. \' .. ..,..' ., .... ....... . <~I;.,..>,;:!~~E7.~T'tt, Ittt PUR GQ~MUHITY ,.. ":' . ...,:" .-.~ ..':'::-::-' ...- .'..:"'- "'. .:, ': ,. ;'. '. ,'. . - .: ',,: .. '. . . :.-~. - (~ , ., ""i, .- ..,~ 0:" " , ;...;;: -.,'~.~';;-~.'''''_:''''',', " ~ 2007 2006 2005 Slreet- scope 2004 2003 2002 2001 2roJ Indian Creek Greenway: . planning and design for Indian Creek Greenway section from 23rd Street to Allison Park 165th Street) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Oceanfront neighborhood Slreetscape Cross Streets, 25th - 43rd Streets: . street resurfacing . sidewalk repair . curb and gutter repair . enhanced landscaping . street light upgrades . enhanced pedestrian access to the beach . pedestrian amenlffes and restrooms at select locations along beach access . enhanced pedestrian access to the Indian Creek Greenway . coordinate with Indian Creek Greenway plans and designs . coordinate with Infrastructure upgrades under Col~ns Avenue and Indian Creek Drive North Beach RecreatIonal Corridor Indian Beach . Park . . . . . . . . Pancoast · Park . . . . . FUNDING SOURCES . 1999 General Obligation (G.O.) Bond - $4,600,000 - Streetscapes - $4,600,000 . Proposed 2000 WaterlWaste Water Revenue Bond . Proposed 2000 Stormwater Revenue Bond . Local Option Gas Tax . Quality of life Funds . Concurrency Management System Funds . Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) COORDIMATING PROJECTS · Collins Avenue 12' Water Main Extension (41 st - 44th Streets) · Collins Avenue Waste Water Collection System Extension · Indian Creek Greenway . North Beach Recreational Corridor · 23rd Street Bridge Improvements . 63rd Street Bridge and Intersection Enhancements NEXT STEPS G.O. Bond Oversight Committee ................ June 12, 2<XlO 600 pm (City Commission Chambersl Conversion to Underground ....................... June 19, 2000 6:30 pm Utilities Workshop (City Commission Chambersl City approves Water & Waste Water Revenue Bond City approves Stormwater Revenue Bond Community Workshops during Design & Construction Phases FOR ADDITIONAllNFORMATlON PlEASE CONTACT: Mark Alvarez, Middle Beach Planner . (305) 673-7030 For further information please visit our WEBSITE http://ci.miami-beach.fl.u5 CoIl (30.5.1'>73-7010 VOICE 10 reqwoI matenalln <=O<SIb1e formal; SIgn language _ (5 dayo " odYanc. wIoon ,,-hie). or In",,","""" an ="" lor """"'" WIIh ci.d>i",,",-