2007-26569 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-26569
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PURSUANT TO
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 29-06/07, FOR A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
AT RISK FIRM TO PROVIDE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE RENOVATION AND
CONSTRUCTION OF THE 10TH STREET AUDITORIUM/BEACH PATROL HEADQUARTERS
PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH
THE TOP RANKED FIRM OF MCM CORP., FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, AND
SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH
MCM CORP., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH
THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM OF SOARES DA COSTA CS, LLC, AND SHOULD THE
ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH SOARES DA
COSTA CS, LLC, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE THIRD-RANKED FIRM OF JASCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC., AND UPON
COMPLETION OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, AUTHORIZING THE
ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS TO AMEND THE AGREEMENT WITH A
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE (GMP) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES WITH THE
SELECTED FIRM FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT UPON
CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION.
WHEREAS, RFQ No. 29-06/07 for a Construction Manager at Risk to provide Pre-
Construction Services for the Renovation and Construction of the 10th Street Auditorium/Beach
Patrol Headquarters Project (the "RFQ") was issued on March 29, 2007, with an opening date of
May 11, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the RFQ requested sealed qualifications from firms with the capability and
experience to provide pre-construction services for the renovation and construction of the 10th
Street Auditorium/Beach Patrol Headquarters; and
WHEREAS, a Pre-RFQ submission conference was held on April 13, 2007; and
WHEREAS, Bid Net issued notices to 109 prospective firms, RFP Depot issued notices to
1278 prospective firms, and 101 prospective firms viewed the RFQ documents; which resulted in
the receipt of four (4) responsive and one (1) non-responsive qualification submittals; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager, via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 118-2007, appointed an
Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") consisting of the following individuals:
. Jorge Cano, CIP Assistant Director (Chairperson);
. William Cary, Assistant Director, Planning Department;
. Eric Yuhr, Ocean Rescue;
. Scott Timm, Miami Design Preservation League;
. Jack Johnson, South Beach Resident; and
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, the Committee convened to rank the firms' qualifications;
and
WHEREAS, the Committee members were provided with Performance Evaluation Surveys
received from clients of the proposed project managers and from each of the firms; and
WHEREAS, the Committee also received a reference list of projects, submitted by both the
proposed project managers and from each of the firms; and
WHEREAS, each firm gave a fifteen (15) minute presentation, which was followed by a
thirty (30) minute Question and Answer (Q&A) session with the firm's proposed project manager;
and
WHEREAS, the Committee reviewed and evaluated the qualifications of the four (4) firms
submitting responsive submittals, and ranked MCM Corp., as the top-ranked firm; Soares Da Costa
CS, LLC, as the second-ranked firm; and Jasco Construction Company, Inc. as the third-ranked
firm; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager concurs with the Committee's rankings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the
recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of qualifications pursuant to
Request for Qualification (RFQ) No. 29-06/07, for a Construction Manager at Risk Firm to provide
Pre-Construction Services for the Renovation and Construction of the 10th Street Auditorium/Beach
Patrol Headquarters Project; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top-
ranked Firm of MCM Corp. for Pre-Construction Services, and should the Administration not be
able to negotiate an Agreement with MCM Corp., authorize the Administration to enter into
negotiations with the second-ranked Firm of Soares Oa Costa CS, LLC, and should the
Administration not be able to negotiate an Agreement with Soares Oa Costa CS, LLC, authorize
the Administration to enter into negotiations with the third-ranked Firm of Jasco Construction
Company, Inc.; and upon completion of the Pre-Construction Services, authorizing the
Administration to enter into negotiations to Amend the Agreement with a Guaranteed Maximum
Price (GMP) for the Construction Services with the selected Firm for Pre-Construction Services;
further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Professional Services Agreement upon
conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th
Robert Parcher
D~r
I,
I
June
2007.
ATTEST:
-M~l PClA~
Dermer
~ APPROVED AS TO
. \AGENDA\2007\jun0607\Consent\RFQ_29_06_07 1 OthStreetAuditoriumProject - Resolutif~ & NGUAGE
& FO CUTION
, t 0/ ~1
~
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
Accept The City Manager's Recommendation Pursuant To Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 29-
06/07, For A Construction Manager at Risk Firm To provide Pre-Construction Services for the Renovation
and Construction of the 10th Street AuditoriumlBeach Patrol Headquarters Project; Authorizing The
Administration To Enter Into Negotiations With The Top-Ranked Firm of MCM Corp.; And Should
Negotiations Become Unsuccessful With MCM Corp., Authorizing Negotiations with The Second-Ranked
Firm of Soares Da Costa, And Should Negotiations Become Unsuccessful With Soares Da Costa,
Authorizing Negotiations with The Third-Ranked Firm of Jasco Construction Company; And Further
Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute A Professional Services Agreement Upon Conclusion Of
Successful NeQotiations Bv The Administration.
Ke Intended Outcome Su orted:
To Ensure Well-Desi ned Quali Ca ital Pro'ects.
Issue:
I Shall the City Commission approve the City Manager's recommendation?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
RFQ No. 29-06/07 was issued on March 29, 2007 with an opening date of May 11, 2007. A pre-RFQ
submittal meeting to provide information to firms submitting a response was held on April 13, 2007, and a
subsequent Site Visit was held on April 19, 2007.
BidNet issued bid notices to 109 prospective firms, RFP Depot issued bid notices to 1278 prospective
firms, and 101 prospective firms viewed the RFQ documents, which resulted in the receipt of the following
five (5) proposals:
1. Magnum Construction Management Corp. d/b/a MCM Corp. 4. Zurqui Construction Services, Inc.
2. Jasco Construction Company, Inc. 5. Hewett-Kier Construction, Inc.
3. Soares Da Costa CS, LLC
Hewett-Kier Construction, Inc. was deemed non-responsive prior to the Committee process, as they failed
to submit the required list of projects from the last five (5) years.
The City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 118-2007, appointed an Evaluation Committee ("the
Committee") that convened on May 24,2007.
Each Firm gave a 15-minute presentation, which was followed by a 30-minute Question and Answer (Q&A)
session with the Firm's proposed Project Manager.
At the conclusion of the last Question and Answer (Q&A) session, the Committee evaluated the
qualifications of all four (4) firms, and ranked them as follows:
Top-ranked - MCM Corp.
Second-ranked - Soares Da Costa CS, LLC
Third-ranked - Jasco Construction Company, Inc.
Fourth-ranked - Zurqui Construction Services, Inc.
ACCEPT THE CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1
OBPI Total
Financial Impact Summary:
tD
,.,.
JMG
StreelAuditoriumProject - Summary.doc
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
R7/t
6-~-o7
~
MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Mayor David Dermer and Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager 1 r ~
June 6, 2007 /f
~J
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
CITY MANAGER PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO.
29-06/07, FOR A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK FIRM TO PROVIDE
PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE RENOVATION AND
CONSTRUCTION OF THE 10TH STREET AUDITORIUM/BEACH PATROL
HEADQUARTERS PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO
ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM OF MCM CORP.
FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION
NOT BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES WITH MCM CORP., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO
NEGOTIATE WITH THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM OF SOARES DA COSTA,
AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN
AGREEMENT WITH SOARES DA COSTA, AUTHORIZING THE
ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE THIRD-RANKED FIRM OF
JASCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PRE-
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO
ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS TO AMEND THE AGREEMENT WITH A
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE (GMP) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES WITH THE SELECTED FIRM FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION
OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
ANAL YSIS
On May 16, 2001, the City approved an Agreement with ST A Architectural Group (ST A) to
develop a Master Plan and Project Study for long-term improvements and to complete
design documents for short-term and priority maintenance improvements. The Master Plan
was presented and approved by the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) at the August 13,
2002, meeting. However, even with strong consensus and community support of the Master
Plan, there was insufficient funding available to implement said Plan at the time.
On November of 2004, the Miami-Dade County General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds were
approved by the voters. These bonds included $7,000,000 for this project, increasing the
budget to $7,775,925.
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6, 2007
Page 2 of 8
ST A was then directed to provide an updated cost estimate and a revised proposal including
reprogramming of the facilities; revalidating and updating the Master Plan; and Design, Bid
and Award, and Construction Administration services for the Project. The revised proposal
was submitted to the City in late 2005. On May 10, 2006, the City approved an Agreement
with ST A to proceed with the Project.
The updated Master Plan was presented and approved by the HPB at its December 12,
2006, meeting. The Plan proposes to retain and restore the existing Beach Patrol
Headquarters, as well as the western portion of the existing 10th Street Auditorium; the
primary structures of historical significance. The remaining portion of the Auditorium building
will be demolished to accommodate a new 2-story addition to the retained and preserved
western portion, which will service the needs and requirements of both the Beach Patrol
Headquarters and the Miami Design Preservation League (MDPL). The new Auditorium
addition will be detached from the Beach Patrol Headquarters, allowing for its substantial
restoration, including the West elevation. The design restores the historic North-South
pedestrian connection within Lummus Park that was lost when the two buildings were
attached, as part of the Auditorium construction.
CIP staff has studied the use of Construction Management at Risk (CMR) for the project in
lieu of a standard Design-Bid-Build process. Under the CMR approach, the Owner enters
into an agreement with a Contractor early in the process. The Architectural and CMR firms
would work as a team to provide the City with the most economical and practical
implementation of the project. During the design process, the Contractor provides
Constructability, Value Engineering, and Construction Methods advice so that the final
Construction Documents result in a more accurate price. The end result is a Guaranteed
Maximum Price (GMP) from the Contractor, which is subject to restrictions in change order
requests and minimizes, or eliminates, additional costs to the owner. In this approach, the
CIP staff is involved in monitoring both the Design Professionals and the Contractor
throughout the complete Project process. This tends to minimize additional services
requests from the Design Professionals, since most of the issues which may arise during
construction are addressed previously, during the team design phase reviews.
Additional costs from the Contractor, including time extensions, are also minimized, since
the GMP method prohibits most project cost adjustments. Under this approach, time is of the
essence to the Contractor because there will be no compensation considered for delays.
This delivery method works particularly well with renovation projects, since the CMR can
provide valuable assistance in verifying existinglunforeseen conditions and making
recommendations concerning the availability of construction materials, and the impact it may
have on the design that can be delivered in today's market, within the time constraints
required.
The "Best Value" Procurement process was used to select a firm with the necessary
experience and qualifications, the ability, capacity and proven past successful performance
in providing Construction Management at Risk services.
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6, 2007
Page 3 of 8
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Construction Manager's (CMR) Scope of Services shall include, without limitation, all of
the Preconstruction Services set forth below and, upon approval by the City Commission of
the GMP, and as contemplated in the GMP Amendment or Amendments, and such other
Amendment(s) as necessary, to fix and describe the parties' respective rights and
responsibilities with respect to the Work and the Project, all of the Construction Services
required to complete the Work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, and to
deliver the Project to the City at or below the GMP, when established, and within the
Contract time.
The CMR shall review Project requirements, existing on-site and off-site development,
surveys and preliminary budget, and make recommendations to the City for revisions. The
CMR shall prepare a Preliminary Project Schedule in accordance with the Contract
Documents and in coordination with the City and the Architect/Engineer, identifying all
phases, critical path activities, and critical duties of each of the Project team members. The
CMR shall, at each remaining design phase (Le. 60% Design Development and 100%
Construction Documents), review the Plans and advise the City and the Architect/Engineer
regarding the constructability of the design and of any errors, omissions, or conflicts it
discovers. The CMR shall prepare an outline of proposed bid packages and detailed cost
estimates, and advise the City regarding trends in the construction and labor markets that
may affect the price or schedule of the Project. The CMR shall attend all Project related
meetings. The CMR's Pre-Construction Services shall be provided, and the City shall
compensate CMR for such services, based upon a fixed fee. At the conclusion of the Pre-
Construction Services, the CMR shall, without assuming the duties of the Architect/Engineer,
warrant to the City, that the Plans, Specifications and other Contract Documents are
consistent, practical, feasible and constructible, and that the Project is constructible within
the contract time.
The successful firm will be tasked with the following duties and responsibilities:
Task 1 - Coordination with the Design Professional:
In providing the Construction Manager's services described in this Agreement, the CMR
shall maintain a working relationship with the Architect/Engineer. However, nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed to mean that the CMR assumes any of the responsibilities or
duties of the AlE. The CMR shall be solely responsible for construction means, methods,
techniques, sequence and procedures used in the construction of the Project and for the
safety of its personnel, property, and its operations for performing in accordance with the
CMR's Agreement with the City. The AlE is responsible for the requirements of the Project
as indicated in the Agreement between the City and the AlE. The CMR's services shall be
rendered compatibly and in cooperation with the AlE's services under the City. It is not
intended that the services of the AlE and the CMR be competitive or duplicative, but rather
be complementary.
Task 2 - Design Phase: Review of Design Documents, Scheduling, Estimating & Cost
Control:
The CMR shall meet with the Architect/Engineer and City representatives to review the most
current Exhibit "A" of the Architect/Engineer's Agreement. The CMR shall ensure that the
parties jointly review, modify as necessary, and agree to a single design schedule, to be
called the revised most current Exhibit "A" to the Architect/Engineer's Contract.
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6,2007
Page 4 of 8
The CMR, as a result of the above-noted review of the design documents and
recommendations provided to the City, shall be fully responsible for the coordination of the
drawings with the written specifications.
This includes but is not limited to, the CMR's review of the Construction Documents in
coordination of the Drawings and Specifications themselves, with the existing buildings and
sites to ensure proper coordination and constructability and lack of conflict, and to minimize
unforeseen conditions. The CMR shall, during this phase, be responsible for the proper
identification and location of all utilities, services, and other underground facilities which may
impact the Project. The CMR agrees specifically that no Contract Amendments shall be
requested by the CMR or considered by the City for reasons involving conflicts in the
documents; questions of clarity with regard to the documents; and incompatibility, or conflicts
between the documents and the existing conditions, utilities, code issues and unforeseen
underground conditions.
Task 3 - Bid and Award Phase
The CMR shall prepare a Subcontractor's Pre-Qualification Plan in compliance with the
requirements currently determined by the City. The CMR shall submit to the City the CMR's
list of pre-approved sub-contractors for each element of the Work to be sub-contracted by
the CMR. This list shall be developed by the execution by the CMR of the Sub-contractor's
Pre-Qualification Plan noted above. The City reserves the right to reject any sub-contractor
proposed for any bid to be considered by the CMR. Any claims, objections or disputes
arising out of the Pre-Qualification Plan or list, are the responsibility of the CMR. The CMR
shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the City, its employees, agents, and
representatives in any matter arising out of the Pre-Qualification Plan and/or the sub-
contractor's list, except where the sole cause of the matter is a City directed decision.
Task 4 - Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)
After taking, reviewing and identifying the proposals from the responsive and responsible
sub-contractors, the CMR shall propose to the City, a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP),
which shall be the sum of the proposed sub-contracts and the CMR's General Conditions
(including any fee, profit, overhead and all like amounts) and the agreed upon Contingency
amount. The GMP shall be the full and complete amount for which the CMR agrees to go
forward from the receipt of sub-contract bids to the full completion of the Project.
Prior to acceptance and execution of the GMP, the CMR shall submit a Best Value Quality
Control Plan that identifies risks and potential risks that the CMR does not control, or risk
that is impacted by factors that the CMR does not control, and includes the CMR's plan to
minimize that risk.
A risk would be any existing or potential condition, situation or event that could negatively
impact the project's cost, schedule, quality and the City's expectations.
Upon acceptance and execution of the GMP proposal, by the City, the CMR shall enter into
Sub-Contract Agreements with the sub-contractors selected for the amounts included in the
GMP Proposal for that sub-contract work, and shall function as a General Contractor and
comply with the Contract Documents accordingly with regard to the Project as well as a CMR
with regard to other services required by the Contract Documents.
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6, 2007
Page 5 of 8
Task 5 - Construction Phase
Once the City has accepted the GMP, the City will issue a GMP Amendment which will
include the Contract for Construction. Activities include but are not limited to:
1. The CMR shall coordinate site Construction Management Services including but not
limited to: regular job site meetings, maintaining daily on-site project log and schedule
report, overseeing Quality Assurance, Testing and Inspection Programs, monitoring
Construction Management staff and sub-contractor work performance for deficiencies,
maintaining record copies of all Contract Documents, Change Orders and other
documentation on site, overseeing Construction Management staff and subcontractor
safety programs.
2. The CMR shall staff each assigned project in a satisfactory manner. As a minimum, the
CMR site personnel during the construction phase will include: a Project Manager, a
full-time Project Superintendent and Project Administrative personnel. The CMR shall
provide site personnel that are competent, English-speaking and able to communicate
effectively.
3. The CMR shall update and maintain master project schedules, detailed construction
schedules, submittal schedules, inspection schedules and occupancy schedules.
4. The CMR shall prepare a Schedule of Values associated with the bid package identified
and submit it for approval by the Architect and City's representative(s). All payment
requests must be in accordance with the Schedule of Values approved.
5. The CMR shall process payment requests for approval by the Architect and the City's
representative( s).
6. The CMR shall process any Change Orders due to scope and modifications and shall
submit it for approval by the Architect and the City's representative(s), including a cost
estimate of the proposed change.
7. The CMR shall process Requests for Information (RFl's) and coordinate with the
Architect.
8. The CMR shall provide construction program accounting and reporting to the City as
required.
9. The CMR shall monitor for the presence of existing asbestos containing building
materials and certify to the City that no asbestos containing material has been used.
10. The CMR shall provide Monthly Progress Reports to the City.
11. The CMR shall submit exception-based status reports, associated with the Best Value
Quality Control Plan, addressing conditions, situations, and events that introduce risk to
the project, in terms of cost, schedule, quality, and City's expectations, and including
the CMR's plan to mitigate the risk (s).
12. The CMR shall coordinate with the Architect and City representative(s) the Substantial
and Final inspections, prior to the Architect's approval and issuance ofthe Certificate of
Substantial Completion.
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6, 2007
Page 6 of 8
Task 6 - Post-Construction Phase
The CMR will coordinate Project Close-out, Start-up and transition to operation, per the
Contract for Construction. Activities include but are not limited to:
1. The CMR shall coordinate project Close-Out, Start-up and transition to operation.
2. The CMR will coordinate with the Architect to provide a complete project record
including Project Manual and CADD drawings to show all construction changes,
additions, and deletions compared to the Construction Document (CADD disks will
be provided to the CMR by the Architect).
3. The CMR will coordinate with the City to prepare the Certificate of Final Inspection.
4. The CMR will obtain and review for completeness, have corrected if necessary, and
submit to the City, following the Architect's approval, all Warranties, Operations and
Maintenance Manuals, and other such documents.
5. The CMR is responsible to the City for Warranties and Guaranties.
6. The CMR will complete all punch-list items generated by Contractor during their
inspections.
7. The CMR will coordinate and conduct the Occupancy Evaluation and Warranty
Inspection.
RFQ No. 29-06/07 was issued on March 29, 2007 with an opening date of May 11,2007. A
Pre-RFQ submittal conference to provide information to firms submitting a response was
held on April 13, 2007, and a subsequent Site Visit was held on April 19, 2007.
Bid Net issued bid notices to 109 prospective firms, RFP Depot issued bid notices to 1278
prospective firms, and 101 prospective firms viewed the RFQ documents, which resulted in
the receipt of the following five (5) proposals:
1. MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CORP. D/B/A MCM CORP. ("MCM")
2. JASCO CONSTRUCTIO COMPANY, INC.
3. SOARES DA COSTA CS, LLC
4. ZURQUI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
5. HEWETT-KIER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Hewett-Kier Construction Inc. was deemed non-responsive prior to the Committee process,
as they failed to submit the required list of projects from the last five (5) years.
The City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 118-2007, appointed an Evaluation
Committee ("the Committee") consisting of the Following individuals:
· Jorge Cano, CIP Assistant Director (Chairperson)
· William Cary, Assistant Director, Planning Department
· Eric Yuhr, Ocean Rescue
· Scott Timm, Miami Design Preservation League
· Jack Johnson, South Beach Resident
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6,2007
Page 7 of 8
On May 24,2007, the Committee convened with four (4) of the five committee members;
Eric Yuhr did not attend. The Committee unanimously nominated Jorge Cano as Chair ofthe
Committee.
Jorge Cano, CIP Assistant Director, addressed the Committee and provided a brief
background of the 10th Street Auditorium/Beach Patrol Headquarters and the scope of
services that will be required from the successful firm. The Committee members were also
provided with Performance Evaluation Surveys received from clients of the firms' proposed
Project Manager to be assigned to the Project, and from clients of the four (4) firms being
evaluated. The Committee also received a separate Reference List of Projects completed
from the proposed Project Managers and from each of the four (4) firms.
Each firm gave a 15-minute presentation, which was followed by a 30-minute Question and
Answer (Q&A) session with the firm's proposed Project Manager.
THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE BASED ITS RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE
FOLLOWING FACTORS (As per Florida Statute 287.055 CCNA):
A. The experience, qualifications and portfolio of the Principal (15 points).
B. The experience, qualifications and portfolio of the Project Manager (15 points).
C. The experience and qualifications of the professional personnel assigned to the
Project Team (10 points).
D. Risk Assessment Plan for ensuring quality of work (15 points).
E. Willingness to meet time and budget requirements as demonstrated by past
performance (5 points).
F. Certified Minority Business Enterprise participation (5 points).
Either the Prime Consultant or the sub-Consultant team may qualify for proof of
certification for minority business enterprise participation. Accepted minority
business enterprise certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA),
State of Florida, Miami-Dade County or Miami-Dade County School Board.
G. Location of the Firm (5 points).
H. Recent, current, and projected workloads of the Firm (5 points).
I. The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City (5 points).
J. Past performance based on number and quality of the Performance Evaluation
Surveys (10 points).
K. Demonstrated success in leading active collaborative stakeholder processes to
achieve consensus on program and design in similar size and scope projects based
on budget and size (10 points)
Commission Memorandum - RFQ-29-06/07
June 6, 2007
Page 8 of 8
The final scoring is as follows:
Jorge
Cano
William
Ca
Scott
Timm
Jack
Johnson
Magnum Construction Management Corp.
d/b/a MCM CORP.
JASCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
SOARES DA COSTA CS, LLC
ZURQUI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
AGGREGATE
RANKING
RFQ No. 29-06-07 (#'s 1) (#'s 2) (#'s 3) (#'s 4) TOTALS
Magnum Construction Management Corp.
d/b/a MCM CORP. 2 2 6
JASCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 1 3 11
SOARES DA COSTA CS, LLC
2 1 1 7
ZURQUI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
4 16
The City Manager concurs with the Committee's recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission accept the
recommendation of the City Manager pursuant to Request for Qualification (RFQ) No. 29-
06/07, for a Construction Manager at Risk Firm to provide Pre-Construction Services for the
Renovation and Construction of the 10th Street Auditorium/Beach Patrol Headquarters
Project; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked Firm of
MCM Corp. for Pre-Construction Services, and should the Administration not be able to
negotiate an Agreement with MCM Corp., authorize the Administration to enter into
negotiations with the Second-ranked Firm of Soares Da Costa CS, LLC, and should the
Administration not be able to negotiate an Agreement with Soares Da Costa CS, LLC,
authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Third-ranked Firm of Jasco
Construction Company, Inc.; and upon completion of the Pre-Construction Services,
Authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations to Amend the Agreement with a
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the Construction Services with the selected Firm for
Pre-Construction Services; Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Professional
Services Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration.
T:\AGENDA\2007~un0607\Consent\RFQ-29_06_07 10th StreetAuditoriumProject -Memo.doc