Loading...
Amendment No. 11 - CH2M Hill AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA AND CH2M Hill, DATED MAY 16, 2001, FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE VERIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $10,400.00 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 8 - BAYSHORE AND SUNSET ISLANDS STREETSCAPE RIGHT-OF-WAY NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT. This Amendment No. 11 to the Agreement made and entered this ~ ~ day of r , 2007, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Municipal Corp ation existing under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as CITY), having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, and CH2M HILL, having its offices at 800 Fairway Drive, Suite 350, Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33441(hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT). RECITALS WHEREAS, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 134-99/OO,~the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-24387, on May 16, 2001, approving and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with CH2M Hill, for Professional Services forthe Bayshore and Sunset Islands Streetscape Right-of- Way Neighborhood Project (the Project); and WHEREAS, the Agreement provides forthe detailed planning services forvarious streetscape /landscape /utility improvements within the Bayshore and Sunset Islands neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Agreement was executed for anot-to-exceed amount of $133,174.00; and WHEREAS, the planning effort for the Project has been completed and detail design activities are underway; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 2003, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2003-25432, approving additional design services as Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, for snot-to-exceed amount of $1,913,302.00; and resulting in a revised Page 1 of 6 M8:4008 Amendment No.11 01 11 07 contract fee of $2,046,476.00; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2005, Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement was executed, to re-package Sunset Islands 1 and 2 from Bid Package 8D to Bid Package 8B, for $0.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,046,476.00; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2005, Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement was executed to include the completion of a topographic survey along Pine Tree Drive from West 28~' Street to West 40t Street along the east side of the road, for anot-to-exceed amount of $12,850.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,059,326.00; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2006, Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement was executed to include the evaluation, permitting and preparation of construction cost alternatives for the installation of curbs/valley gutters to Sunset Islands 1 and 2, for anot- to-exceed amount of $2,500.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,061,826.00; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2006, Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement was executed to include the installation of four (4) drainage test wells to provide additional information for the preparation of a Letter of Reasonable Assurance to be submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), as required in the permit application for the Project, for anot-to-exceed amount of $55,863.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,117,689.00; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2006, Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement was executed to include the installation of "P3.2" classified water main replacements required by the City's Public Works Department, for anot-to-exceed amount of $372,230.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,489,919.00; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2006, Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement was executed to include the installation of bike lanes/routes required by the City's Public Works Department, in a not to exceed fee of $58,128.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,548,047.00; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2006, Amendment No. 8 to the Agreement was executed to include the installation of alternative parking in the Lake Pancoast area, for a not-to-exceed amount of $24,900.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,572,947.00; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2006, Amendment No. 9 to the Agreement was executed to include the installation of road edge treatment to Sunset Islands 1 and 2, for a not-to-exceed amount of $3,200.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,576,147.00; and Page 2 of 6 M8:4008 Amendment No.11 01 11 07 WHEREAS, on September 28, 2006, Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement was executed to include the installation of resident requested modifications in the Lake Pancoast area, for anot-to-exceed amount of $8,680.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,584,827.00; and WHEREAS, the following Amendment No. 11, to include the verification of additional underground utilities to avoid conflicts in 37 boring sites in Sunset Island No.1, for a not to exceed fee of $10,400.00; resulting in a revised contract fee of $2,595,227.00. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, agreements, terms, and conditions herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the respect and adequacy are hereby acknowledged, do agree as follows: ABOVE RECITALS The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as a part of this Amendment No. 11. 2. MODIFICATIONS The Agreement is amended as defined in Schedule "A-11 ", attached herein. 3. OTHER PROVISIONS. All other provisions of the Agreement, as amended, are unchanged. 4. RATIFICATION. The City and Consultant ratify the terms of the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 11. Page 3 of 6 M8:4008 Amendment No.11 01 11 07 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 11 to be executed in their names by their duly authorized officials as of the date first set forth above. ATTEST: {~-. I City Clerk ATTEST ~e , )t~~~ Robert Parcher ~~ ~~~ SECRETARY McR.r-~~ de 1 iP ~ far ~o rc~-r~ Print Name Page 4 of 6 M8:4008 Amendment No.11 01 11 07 CITY OF MIAMI BEAC By rg E. Chartrand ire r, CIP Office CONSULTA H2M HILL By ~ ~.~- V~~ ' Pres ent ~1/e~el ~ ~/.~ rd Print Name APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION SCHEDULE "A-11" SCOPE OF SERVICES Schedule "A" entitled, "Scope of Services", is amended as follows: TASK 6.5 -UNDERGROUND UTILITY VERIFICATION, DELETE this paragraph in its entirety and REPLACE it with the following: Task 6.5 -Underground Utility Verification: CONSULTANT shall arrange for and coordinate the efforts of a company to perform test holes using the vacuum extraction method ("potholing") for the purpose of identifying conflicts between the location of existing underground utilities and proposed underground improvements. Actual locations shall be as directed by CONSULTANT. This task shall be utilized as a tool to verify the horizontal location, elevation, size and type of material of the existing underground utilities, as deemed necessary by CONSULTANT, up to the maximum not-to-exceed amount of forty five thousand four hundred dollars ($45,400.00), consisting of thirty five thousand dollars ($35,000) as previously approved, and an additional ten thousand four hundred dollars ($10,400.00) as approved by this Amendment. Unused amounts in this allowance shall be credited back to the CITY at the completion of the project. This level of effort shall include that as required for the Consultant to make revisions to its contract documents to reflect the findings of the verification process and address all conflicts identified with existing and proposed installations. TIME OF COMPLETION A test hole report shall be submitted, and the Consultant shall modify its documents to address conflicts, within 5 weeks of receipt of authorization to proceed. PAYMENT AND COMPENSATION The method for calculating the fees for the aforementioned proposed engineering services (Task 6.5) is established in Exhibit `A' attached, based on estimated labor plus direct costs. The total fee proposed for this Scope of Work shall be on a not- to-exceed basis in the amount of $10,400.00. Invoicing will be monthly and based on hourly rates as defined in the current agreement between CH2M HILL and the City of Miami Beach. Due to the extent of the project and the potential for utility conflicts in the field, an additional 37 boring sites have been proposed to be performed by the Consultant. The Consultant will use data from these additional underground location verifications to assist in the design of the Stormwater, water main and streetscape. A detailed scope. is defined in Schedule "A-11"above. CONSULTANT's request for additional services is attached for reference purposes. Page 5 of 6 M8:4008 Amendment No.11 01 11 07 COMPENSATION • Original Agreement amount $133,174.00. • Amendment No. 1 (Design services for the Bayshore and Sunset Islands Neighborhood) amount $1,913,302.00. • Amendment No. 2 (Re-packaging of Sunset Islands 1 and 2 from Bid Package 8D to Bid Package 8B) amount $0.00 • Amendment No. 3 (Completion of additional topographic survey along Pine Tree Drive) amount $12,850.00. • Amendment No. 4 (Opinion of design, permitting and evaluation of construction cost alternatives for the installation of curbs/valley gutters to Sunset Islands 1 and 2) amount $2,500.00. • Amendment No. 5 (Installation of four (4) drainage test wells) amount $55,863.00. • Amendment No. 6 (Design services for installation of "P3.2" water mains) amount $372,230.00 • Amendment No. 7 (Design services for the installation of bike lanes/routes) amount $58,128.00 • Amendment No. 8 (Design services for the installation of alternative parking in Lake Pancoast area) amount $24,900.00 • Amendment No. 9 (Design services for the installation of road .edge treatment in Sunset Islands 1 and 2) amount $3,200.00 • Amendment No. 10 (Design services for the installation of resident requested modifications in the Lake Pancoast area) amount $8,680.00 • Amendment No. 11 (Design services forthe installation of an additional 37 test holes in Sunset Island 1) amount $10,400.00 • Revised Agreement amount $2,595,227.00 Page 6 of 6 M8:4008 Amendment No.11 01 11 07 DEC-19-2006(TUE) 16:22 5~ p~ ~ UTILITY LpCAT11VG SERVICE S Tb° Cedonio Da Silva I~a~: ssa-~~-s7ao Phone: ~"~': Sean Halsey Pages: 5 (includes cover) !late: 1219-0$ Re: Sayshore Package ~ & ~ c~ ^ Urgwnt ©~ Rovrlow O Please Comn:es# ^ Please Rsply C] Pfl~sa RaeyrCle P. 001 #005 o -J L. `'~ "'t he rrijorr~ralinn cnatarnad m this fae~zr~rite ereca~ ~,r corr~den svtu,~ beprisvlagerl, aid rrintended one~y fortfit rrre ojtbs i~rrlirddaal ur ptity na,,,rrl vho:+r.: I fj~r, t~ r:wdrr of tha ~esaa~ arnt »a# #,6s,ia#ended rrapierl, ar the agarrt ar er~rrpdoyee r~r~rurble jor dekt.~idg tbtr brma~n~rsron to thr• mte~rded raTpient,,Yo><u~ es.~irrssfypro{iib£ledfmm cafiyi~?~, rficrenrinat~~, a~stisliai~'>t~ nri~r carry utferany au~ier, ~ of the inforHta,#on kited as ,th~tfucrimik n~ervra~e.» • CbnltgletSf Upon your approval, execution or out proposal and issuance ~ CHZM-WiN Purchase Order, C3H0 wtll cormnence war its services rxr January 2, 2007_ Please read, sign and return the fotlovv~g prior ttt cornmenCement df services. If you have any questions or raq~re addi~ortal infixmatron, please feel free to corrtact us at 561-737-9800. Regards, Sean www.groundhound.com pH: 561-737800 Fax: 561.73.1742 2930 IWif Commerce Park afire, #1 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 ~OEC-19-2006(TUE) 16:22 ~. oaavMln tl~+ t~~~, MC.YC7~aN i7ccemFicr 19, 2006 Mr. Cedonio lla Silva CH2M Hill ! 1575 Heron Bay Bivd. C"'.oral Springs, FL 3307G A PrufeASionAl Utility Locating Service Re: "Bayshore Package B & C." Mr. Da Silva, P. 002/005 Grc-und Hound Dctectiort Services, inc. (GHD) is pleased to prodrdc the following prppvsal for utility locating services at the above rGrerenced project. As outlined in your a-mail on November 22, 2006, GHll will provide vertic~ei information and verif'tcativn of all indicated utilities at the targeted areas as depicted pn the supplied drawings. GHll will provide the fallowing: Using EM ~t CiPR techniques, GRID will providelverify horizontal locations of targets tv be excavated. Vacuum excavation to expose, verify and record :tll pertinent infvrnnativn with regards to the utility. Provide test hole data sheets dcri,cting our discoveries. DESCRIPTION OT S1rRVICF.S: L~lectromagnetic induction .is a methexi in which a transmitted signal is applied by clircctiy coupling to a desired target. As Lang as the target is mcta8ic, a receiver is used to detect the transmitted signal. Passive ppwc,r detection is aapther technique used tv locate naturally cx;curring magnetic fields present on xoyVCr Cables gcncratittg a SO/GOH7, ~igtial, AddiNcmaliy, passive VLI~ signal can be detected on other metallic utilities that arc typically long in length and aYd well grounded ela:trieully. Snore utility systems contain potions of r,on-metallic rnatorial anti therefore may ba uu-locatable U3111~g WC EM IYI+EIhot{. A GPR unit can assist in identifying nonmetallic utilities and vthc`r structures that are unidentifiable using the traditional )1M techniques. The CsPR method transmits etectmmagnetiC waves, which are pulsed at discrete/time intervals. The trsu~smitted pulse radiates through the earth whereby a portion of the energy is reflected from interfaces of contrctssting electrical properties (e.g. pavement and soil interface, soil slratigraphic changes and buried met<~11ic objects) while the remaining energy continues until reaching additiprtal rcllcctors where the process is repeated. Reflected energy is received by the antennae and recorded for later processing and interpretation. Factors such as soil moisture, clay content and variations in the dielectric constants of materials centre! the effectiveness of the GPR method. Wet conductive soils severely attenuate GPR signals and thus affect the depth of exploration. CPR energy cannot transmit through ferrous objects since moat acts ax a pure reQectar. in order to accurately conduct a radar survey, orthogonal scant mt~.gt be made across thc*. target area. Confined or obstructed areas that restrict the scanning pattern can innpede the data collected and reduce the accuracy of the desired results. 2930 Nw Commerce t'ark ~. SuKe 18oynton t3eactt, FL 33426 PHONE: (SSi)737.9600 FAX: (li6Sj737.17421Nf8: www,groundtroand.com EMAIL Into~raunanaund.com DEC-19-2006(TUE) 16.22 Page Two Mr. Cedonio Tea Silva D~ccrnbar 19, 2006 P. 003/~OS Vacuum excavation is a non-desteuctive technique usCd is sa!'ely expnse utilities using a combitultion of compressed and vacuum air. Once the utility has been exposed, vertical elevation, diameter and material type can be obtained. Conditions such as groundwater, hard, rocky soils, sub-surface obstructions and targets at deep elewatians c:an limit the effectiveness ofvacuum excavation. Targets beyond the limitations of the Vacu~un system maybe "probed" with an air lance. This tecbstique is effective in determining elevation but may be ineffective for determining outside diameter and material type. Duct hanks, large diameter targets and structures often require multiple excavations in order to acquire desired information. Incorporated herein: Locating underground utilities i.~, not an exact Xcience. Therefore, around Hound Detection Services, Inc. ("GHD"} capres~sa, n~ ~antees that using one or any of the available teehnalogtns fnr idcntifyiag utilitic:rJstruc`tures will identify all utllltieslstructures and/or meet the objcc6vc of ouch individual pmject. C:H2M Htil understands that limitatiaus withla the available technology, the complexity of site conditions and cireumatanceu beyond the cantrot of the GHD may Limit the perfortnaacelresults of G1Ill's setvicx:s. The services provided by QH17 shalt be performed in accordance with generally accepted profa~sional ptrac~tices as related to the nature of servIeea performed. [iti0 cannot guarantee that all utilities within any given survey area will be identified as a result of inhc~nt limitations within the technology and existing site conditions. CH2M Hill and any of its subcontcacturs shall hold harmless and Indemnify GIIl7 against any and all losses as a result of inability to locate: or mislucate due to limitations within the available te:chaulugy, the complexity of site conditions and ciriwmstaaees beyond its control, but oat against ncgtigcnce on the part of C'rH0 or its employees. Mend digging is rcxluin:d is all situations when excavating within 24" of Gl1U's mss. Thke proposal eonstitntes the entire agreement bchvccn the parties. The agreement mYy nut be altered, modified nr conditioned in any respect without the prior written consent ~-t ell parties. nvcamenta each as bat not limited to "change orders", "purchase orders", autwcontract Agreements, and statements of terms And ex,nditions of work shall require prior wrltttn aceeptancr by CHD to be binding. Payment to t:Hi} for wank performedl pursuant to this prvposaI shall not be contingent spun GHD's consent to any progosed altccatloa, modillcation or condition ter the agreement. CQNDI'I'Tt)NS -Locating of underground utilities for pre-txcavation/design purposes. • Utility locations arc bcitt$ provided in an attempt to prevent or reduce the likelihaad of damage during excavation and/or provide design information, • Atx:as to be surveyed must be level and free of obstructions. • GHU's inability to complete the pmject due to eondititms outside oi'GHD's e"ot~trol does trot wid this contract. • If tiHD is to produce a map (optional), euatamer is responsible far providing an electronic AutoCAU file for GHD to map its discoveries. If a file is not available, additional cobtx and tune to produce the drawing are likely. • Maps produced by GILD are oat ennsidered to bC "survey grade" drawings. C:iHD will include dimensions from a fixed feature in the field to the hocizantal position of the target being depicted. Drawings are not prepared by a licensed G~ngineer, Sutv~yor or Ur~tilsnutn. llrawings are not prepared to any State survey or drafting standard. + If GIID reviews its discoveries with others responsible for data collection, a copy of the file must be forwarded to this nftice> fpr revicvr. • AFWA standards are used far marking utilities. rIII} is not responsible for moved, altered, and obli#einted marks or maintaining marks. GHI3 will impose an additional fen to relocate/remark facilities. • !f underground facilities are damaged, whether marked by GTil7 or not, it is your responsibility to notify a representative of GIRD within 4R hours of the damage, • GHD is oat a substitute for Chapter 556 of the TL Stara Statute (Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act}. Friar to project eanstruction, excavating eontrtctor is responsible far securing locations of public utilities through Sunshine State C)tta Cal[ of 1'lorida ($t~-432-4770). Any available as-buiita, enginCCrCiI or other rec;orci drawings with regards to Lary utilities within the project limits must be made available W CiHl? for its review prioe to conunencement of field services. The performance of GHD's services is 1urtited to full and unobstructed access to include but oat Limited to: mechanical roams, manholes, hand holes, vaults, meter rc-oms, telecom moms, fixtures (plumbing, clactrical, cemanunication}, dispensers, fenced compounds, tacYks and strue:tures. Full cooperation from the an site personnel is necessary to perform a complete survey. •OEC-19-2006iTUE1 16:22 Page Three Mr. Cedonio Da Silva December 19, 2006 P. 004/005 COST L~STIMATR: Yuc:uu~n F.xcuvativn • Yerform/verify horizontal locations of the requcslcd utilities to be excavated using EM 8e CrPR techniques. • Perform vacuum excavation, record sl! pertinent ucfarmation. • Provide AutoCAD test bole data npurt depicting our discoveries. North B~ty Road R4 Hard {i~$275/Excavation 19 Safi @ $2C,K}/hxcavatian M.O.T. (Not-To-Exceed) $23,100 $ 3,800 $ EiUU 27,Stl0 Sunset Island 1 35 Hard (c~$275/Excavation $ 9,625 2 Soft (a,~ $2001Excuvaticm $ 400 M.O.T. {Not-To-Excccd} 2000 $12,025 Sunset Island 2 53 Hard (a~$275lExcavation $14,575 3 Soft @ ~20U/Excava#ion $ 600 M.O.T. (Not-To-f:xceed) 3 OOU $1$,17; Lake Paneaayt 201 lard ~a $275/Excavation $ S,SUO 5 Saft a, $2U(D/1~"sXCAVation 5 I,UUO M.O.T. (Nat•Ta-Exceed} 1 2U(~ $7,71if1 TutHl Coat $45,400 •DEC-19-2006CTUE) i6. 23 Pa~c Four Mr. Cedonio 1)a. Silva December ]9, 2WG P. 005/005 Mr. Da Silva, thank you for allowing us to present this propogai. Should you halve any questions please contact me at Sbi-73'1-9AOt?, Sincerely, Sean I]a]aey, Area Supcrvisar Ground hound Detection Services, inc. Acccptcd by Title Print Name of Signor Date Re: "F3aySl,ore Package B & C" Page 1 of 3 Mistry, Suresh From: Mizell, Keith [KeithMizell@miamibeachfl.gov] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:01 PM To: Mistry, Suresh Cc: Saltrick, Richard Subject: RE: Bayshore -Draft Amendment No. 11 (soft digs) Administrative approval Great, thanks Suresh. With this I will issue the NTP for Sunset 1. From: Mistry, Suresh [mailto:smistry@hazenandsawyer.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:31 AM To: Mizell, Keith Cc: Saltrick, Richard Subject: FW: Bayshore -Draft Amendment No. 11 (soft digs) Administrative approval Hi Keith: Based on our CIP/PM internal meeting on 1/3/07 attached please find Draft Amendment No. 11 (soft dips) for BP - unset - mmistrative approvaTfor the qty s reviewTapproval. Note that the fee ro osal fror roun oun is or owever, as iscusse remains rom exis in ask 6.5 UUV funds i.e 27,0 minus unse s an minus a e ancoas men men o. __ wasprepared foi X10,400 (i.e $12,025 minus $1,625). If the amendment is acceptable, please get it form approved and forward 4 COple~ OnSU an S~execu~ion. As discussed, summary of funding for the various soft digs for each of the bid packages is as noted below. BP 8B -Sunset #1 - ($10,400) -Administrative approval via Amendment No.11 BP 8B -North Bay Road $27,500) -Commission approval via Amendment No. 12 BP 8B - Sunset #2 - ($18,175) -From existing Task 6.5 reimbursables .NTP for not to exceed amount of $18,175 issued on 1/5/07. BP 8C - Lake Pancoast - ($7,700) -From existing Task 6.5 reimbursables .NTP for not to exceed amount of $7,700 issued on 1/5/07. Thanks, Suresh From: Mistry, Suresh Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:00 PM To: Keith Mizell Cc: Rick Saltrick (richardsaltrick@miamibeachfl.gov) Subject: Bayshore -Draft Amendment No. 11 (soft digs) Administrative approval Hi Keith: Attached please find Draft Amendment No. 11 (soft digs) for BP 8B -Sunset #2 ($21,225) -Administrative approval for the City's review/approval. Note that some of the text is highlighted as we still have not received the fee proposal from Ground Hound. Highlighted text is based upon information received from CH. CH needs to submit fee proposals from Ground Hound for the above soft dig locations for City review/approval. Once we get these we can issue NTP's. After that, if the amendment is acceptable, please get it form approved and forward 4 copies for consultant's execution. 7/30/2007 Page 2 of 3 Thanks, Suresh Note summary of funding for the various soft digs for each of the bid packages is as noted below. BP 8B -North Bay Road $36,575) -Commission approval via Amendment No. 12 BP 8B -Sunset #1 - ($13,875) -From existing Task 6.5 reimbursables ($27,500 remaining) BP 8B -Sunset #2 - ($21,225) -Administrative approval via Amendment No.11 BP 8C -Lake Pancoast - ($9,000) -From existing Task 6.5 reimbursables ($27,500 remaining) From: Mistry, Suresh Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:29 AM To: keithmizell@miamibeachfl.gov Subject: FW: Bayshore BP8B and 8C-soft dig locations maps/fee proposal Importance: High Keith: The number of soft dig locations for BP B and C as noted in the attached soft dig estimate appear to be Okay. MOT quantities calculated using formula, hence do not add up to a whole number when multiplied out to give totals. However, assuming that we accept the totals for completing soft digs at each location, summary of costs and possible funding is as follows: BP 8B -North Bay Road ($36,679.17) -Commission approval via Amendment BP 8B -Sunset #1 - ($13,895.83) -From existing Task 6.5 reimbursables ($27,500 remaining) BP 8B -Sunset #2 - ($21,162.50) -Administrative approval via Amendment BP 8C -Lake Pancoast - ($8,958.33) -From existing Task 6.5 reimbursables ($27,500 remaining) Note the proposed funding is a little bit different from what we discussed at the last design progress meeting, but I believe this will work as noted above. CH needs to submit fee proposals from Ground Hound for the above soft dig locations for City review/approval. Once we get these we can issue NTP's .Let's discuss as CH is looking to receive NTP's ASAP. Thanks, Suresh From: Cedonio.Dasilva@CH2M.com [mailto:Cedonio.Dasilva@CH2M.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:57 PM To: Mistry, Suresh Cc: pilar.doran@ch2m.com Subject: RE: Bayshore BP8B and 8C-soft dig locations maps/fee proposal Suresh, Attached are the revised Island #1 and #2 soft digs location map as well as the revised spreadsheet with the estimate of probable cost........ Please review and approve at your earliest convenience. Best Regards, Cedonio Da Silva Project Manager CH2M Hill 7/30/2007 Page 3 of 3 11575 Heron Bay Blvd. Coral Springs, FL 33076 ® E-Mail = cdasilva Qch2m.com Tel = 954.752.4960 ~' Direct Tel = 954.345.6175 Ext. #238 Fax = 954.752.6730 From: Mistry, Suresh [mailto:smistry@hazenandsawyer.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:35 AM To: Dasilva, Cedonio/CSG Cc: Doran, Pilar/WPB Subject: Bayshore BP86 and 8C-soft dig locations maps/fee proposal Hi Cedo: As discussed, a cursory review of the large maps (22"x34") sent to us with the soft dig proposal of 9.5.06 indicates that they are not the ones that were used for the proposal. Hence, as discussed, please courier to our office 2 sets of the correct large maps that were used for the soft dig proposal. Upon review the City will provide comments/approval accordingly. Thanks, Suresh 7/30/2007