Loading...
Attachment ARFQ SUMMARY Attachment "A" The Invitation: The City of Miami Beach is extending invitations to qualified developers to submit qualifications and conceptual proposals for the development of the City-owned property know as the "72nd Street Site" (the Site). The City will evaluate submissions based on experience and financial capability and select a developer with whom to enter into negotiations. The Site: The Site is located between Collins and Harding Avenues, fiom 72nd Street to 73rd Street. The approximately 4-acre site is immediately north of the 71st Street Commercial District and south of the Harding Towusite Commercial District, which extends along Collins Avenue between 73rd and 75th Streets. It is situated on the eastern portion of the east/west "open space" park and recreational system between 72nd Street and 73rd Street, which extends from the Atlantic Ocean on the east to the Tatum Waterway on the west. To the immediate east side of the Site is the North Shore open band shell, and to the west, the tennis courts of North Shore Park. The Site is currently used as a public surface parking lot (approximately 306 spaces) serving adjacent uses. Zoning: The Site is currently zoned GU Government Use District; the underlying Future Land Use Map designation is CD-3 Commercial High-Intensity. Main permitted uses for the GU District are government buildings and uses, including but not limited to, parking lots and garages; parks and associated parking; schools; performing arts and cultural facilities; and monuments and memorials. Uses not listed above may be approved by the City Commission through a public hearing. Private or joint government/private uses including air rights, shall be reviewed by the Planning Board prior to approval by the City Commission. The maximum allowable building height is seventy-five (75) feet or seven (7) stories, and 2.75 is the maximum allowable floor area ratio. The City of Miami Beach does not encourage the maximum use of the zoning envelope, and the development must be compatible with the surrounding area. Performance Objectives: While no specific uses are mandated, the City's preference is for a mix of uses, including a design that will respect and promote the spirit of the east/west "open space" park and recreational system of this area and serve to complement the vitality and evolution of the 71 st Street Commercial District, as well as the historic Harding Townsite Commercial District, between 73rd and 75th Streets on Collins Avenue, by creating a clean, safe, and stimulating environment for the people of the City of Miami Beach, its visitors, and the surrounding areas. The architecture and site development should be of the highest quality contemporary design and planning of our time, and should respect, reinforce, and appropriately advance the unique urban character as well as historic qualities of the area, inclusive of the general feeling of "open space", which distinguishes North Beach fi'om South Beach. Desired Development Concepts: The City is seeking a development project that enhances and meets the needs of the businesses, residents, and visitors of the area and that contributes to the vision/goals of promoting North Beach as a quality residential community and a family oriented visitor destination. Uses that could be compatible with these goals include: Commercial Development to meet residential goods and service needs, providing a linkage and/or anchor between the 71st Street Commercial District and the Harding Townsite Commercial District Residential, mixed use project that provides upgraded housing stock and product n Class A Office Space component that is compatible with other activity programmed for the Site and complementary to the two established adjacent business districts · Retail and/or restaurant establishments that promote pedestrian activity Public Plaza or Plazas ("open space") facilitating enhancement of the special "open space" systems unique to the urban character North Beach and the park areas to the east and west of the Site · Family oriented entertainment destination for residents and visitors Enhanced Parking for the uses adjacent to the Site as well as the Ocean Terrace and upper Collins Avenue hotel districts Expanded support facilities for cultural, arts, community theater and performance groups that could perform in the North Beach area · Educational and/or Public Institutions 2 II. THE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY A. BACKGROUND Over the last ten years Miami Beach has evolved l~om being a predominantly tourist destination with a large retirement population, to one which may be characterized as a vibrant urban residential, resort and business community. Access to splendid North Shore beaches and parks, the allure of two historic districts and the increasingly popular Ocean Terrace resort and residential enclave, as well as close proximity to adjacent municipalities Surfside, Bal and Bay Harbours, North Bay Village due west, are all contributing factors to the rediscovery of Miami Beach's North Shore as a place to visit, live, and work. The influx of younger residents and families, coupled with the establishment of new businesses in the area, has established North Beach as a major part of a dynamic international city. North Beach, with its convenient location, tropical climate, and lively pedestrian character, has the ability to attract a wide range of substantial business activity. One of the highlights of the area is the Ocean Terrace beachside hotel and residential district, which recently under, vent a substantial renovation as a part of a major North Beach public improvements project that involved extensive streetscape, landscape and other aesthetic improvements, totaling $21 million and demonstrating the City's commitment to the complete revitalization of its very substantial "uptown" areas. North Beach enjoys an increasingly diverse assortment of international restaurants and sidewalk cafes, as well as a rapidly revitalizing market for large scale as well as small-scale "boutique" hotels, along the beach from 63rd to 87th Streets. Similarly it is becoming home to numerous art shows, festivals, and outdoor performances. These are being held in its significant and substantial "open space" areas, including public parks, such as the North Shore Open Space Park and recreational systems, such as the North Shore (athletics) Park, and the 72nd Street Band Shell. Finally, the remarkable history of North Beach, incorporating the direct involvement of three American presidents, Ulysses S. Grant, in 1875, Warren Harding, in 1922, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in 1941, was but one of the powerful incentives for the City Commission to designate the Harding Townsite/South Altos Del Mar Historic District in 1996 (extend'rog along Collins Avenue and Ocean Terrace, from 73rd Street to 77th Street); another magical incentive was the diverse collection of Art Deco, Streamline Moderne, and Post War Modem style structures, designed by the City's architectural masters between the 1930s and the mid 1960s, which has already brought fame, economic revitalization, and renaissance to South Beach from 1979 through the present. Thus, the diverse and distinctive history, architecture and marine environment of North Beach lend significantly and positively to the future of the area by making it a unique touring, shopping and dining, entertainment, and residential destination with a new and invigorating international flare. The 72nd Street Site was originally a part of the United States Federal Life Saving Reserve established by President Ulysses S. Grant, on July 25, 1875, for the purpose of rescuing shipwreck victims and providing them succor and assistance to return to the mainland. Following the 3 discontinued use of the site for this purpose in the 1920s, a political battle ensued to secure a part of the former Reserve as an urban open space system. In 1941, an Act of Congress ultimately resulted in the 22 acre tract of land, including the Site, being sold to the City of Miami Beach for use as a public park, thus preserving the "open" character of much of the original life saving reserve through to today. Indeed, the recreational park and open band shell facilities, located to the west and east of the Site, are among most intensively used outdoor public facilities in the City. Today, the Site is a landscaped and metered municipal parking lot, serving the adjacent business districts to the north and south, as well as the band shell, park and public recreational facilities to the east and west. B. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN PARAMETERS The development of the Site will substantially define the image of North Beach's easternmost business districts as well as its unique east/west "open space" system for many decades to come and consequently, this development must be considered with the greatest care. It is the single largest and most strategically located tract of open public land available for development in North Beach today. It occupies approximately 4 acres between Collins and Harding Avenues, a block north of the intersection of the City's northernmost primary east/west transportation corridor, the 71st Street Corridor, which becomes the John F. Kennedy Causeway at the City's western limit, as it crosses Biscayne Bay through the City of North Bay Village to Miami and 1-95. This singular location makes the Site conveniently accessible to the splendid Atlantic Ocean beaches of North Beach, its hotel districts, local businesses, cafes and historic districts, as well as oceanside park and recreational areas. The Site's proximity to Miami Beach's "sister" communities of Surfside and Bal Harbour to the north also offer unique opportunities for exceptional development. To the south, the Site is likewise convenient to the upper and mid Collins Avenue hotel districts, as well as all of South Beach, including the rapidly redeveloping Lincoln Road Mall; the Washington Avenue commercial corridor; the Jackie Gleason Theater of the Performing Arts (TOPA); the Miami Beach Convention Center; the renovated and expanded Bass Museum and amerging Collins Park Cultural Arts Campus; the Holocaust Memorial; and Miami Beach City Hall; and of course Miami Beach's important Art Deco Historic District. The 72nd Street Site has remained open public land, available for appropriate development today, for important reasons. Early in the history of Miami Beach, even in the period dating back to 1875, users of the Site had kept this land "open" for public purpose; first as a life saving reserve, then a Coast Guard Station, then a municipal public park, and finally, a landscaped municipal parking lot serving adjacent uses. This well considered and rigorously debated urban land use progression ultimately reflected the City forefathers' caution in preserving the Site for an appropriate and sensible future use; such a use, or mix of uses, would need to best serve the North Beach community in a responsible manner. Wise planning policies and progressive thinking has served this City well and now provides for a unique development opportunity. 4 Although the Site is not included within the boundaries of the Harding Townsite/South Altos Del Mar Historic District or the Altos Del Mar Historic District to its north, the Harding Townsite/South Altos Del Mar Historic District lies immediately adjacent to the Site's northern boundary and is one of the important contextual relationships to be addressed. Arguably, the National Register Art Deco Historic District in South Beach has been and continues to be the single most tangible influence fueling the City's extraordinary resurgence as a design and tourism mecca. The North Beach historic districts, which contain much of the same architecture and character, are anticipated to have a similar positive effect here when properly revitalized. The City Commission, the City Administration, residents, visitors, and design professionals alike will closely monitor any development proposed for the subject Site; particularly analyzing all proposals not only for their functional merit and best appropriate use of the Site, but also for their sensitivity and compatibility to Miami Beach's local historic districts and the City's design legacy. The City Administration, as well as the Historic Preservation and Design Review Boards, have clearly signaled their ongoing interest in preserving the special urban character of the Beach while advancing its cutting edge design continuum well into the future. Due to the scale of the proposed project, and its anticipated impact on the central business districts as well as adjacent local historic districts, it is imperative that the development project must be clearly compatible with the unique pedestrian character, urban scale and building materials, and "open space" relationships of North Beach. C. SITE FUNCTIONS AND ADJACENT URBAN RELATIONSHIPS In defining the successful future development of the Site, the following current Site functions and established urban relationships must be carefully understood and reconciled in any proposal for development: Current Site Functions Primary Municipal Parking for the North Beach Band Shell, North Shore Park, the 71st and 72nd Street Business Districts, and the Harding Townsite (73rd Street to 75th Street) Commercial District as well as "overflow'' lot for Ocean Terrace. Established Adjacent Urban Relationships of Major Significance · · · 71 st Street Commercial District and Harding Townsite (Collins Avenue fi.om 73rd to 75th Street) Commercial District North Beach Band Shell and North Shore Park Altos Del Mar Historic District, and Harding Townsite/South Altos Del Mar Historic District Performing Arts and Visual Arts Supporting Facilities in the Band Shell (to immediate east of the site, and North Shore Open Space (east side of Collins Avenue between 79th and 87th Streets) Ocean Terrace Hotel and Residential District Upper Collins Avenue Hotel District (63rd Street to 87th Street) Atlantic Ocean Beaches · Multi-Modal Transportation Transfer Points (Metro-Dade Buses, and Taxis) at the 5 Crossroads of 71st Street and Collins and Harding Avenues, as well as at locations adjacent to the site along Harding and Collins Avenues, including bike routes and storage. D. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The Site must maintain at least the current level of public parking (approximately 306 spaces) available to the general public, in addition to serving its own needs. Preferably, the proposed Site development will enhance the amount of parking currently available. This is critical, as the future success of North Beach as a quality place in which to live, do business, and visit, will depend upon availability of sufficient conveniently located parking as a high priority. II__. RFQ PROCESS A. PROPOSER REQUIREMENTS As part of this Request for Qualifications, the proposers are expected to demonstrate their professional experience and range of experience in projects of similar scope and complexity, financial capability to successfully undertake and complete the project, and present potential development concepts. The City expects proposers to focus on the full team credentials in developing representative projects, describing the projects, the physical constraints and environment influencing the project concepts, and the actual contribution made by individual team members. Special attention should also be given to demonstrating the team's ability to secure construction and permanent financing for real estate projects. A preliminary development concept that is appropriate to the area, reflective of the team's experience, is required to allow the evaluation committee a succinct introduction to what is envisioned by the Proposer. Proposals shall include: 3. 4. 5. Detailed qualifications (development track record of the entire proposed development team), listing of previous projects of similar magnitude to that being proposed. Description of representative development project by the team, individually and collectively; Demonstration of ability to secure financing for large scale and similar sized projects; Preliminary program; Preliminary design concept (preliminary site plan) and relationship to surrounding areas. Each proposal shall include, at a minimum, the following: A. Qualifications: Identity of developer, including the developer's organizational structure and names and addresses of all principals, including public relation firms, lawyers, and lobbyists. Composition and qualifications of other members of the development team. The development team's professional qualifications and experience in development, financing and management of comparable projects. Please specify the role played by various key 6 members of the team. Developer's experience - Proven team design capability of local or national repntatation Complete and substantial evidence of the developer's financial capability to undertake the proposed project as demonstrated by the ability to finance other large-scale development projects. List of owners and, for private-public projects, public sector participants, with contact names and telephone numbers of completed comparable projects to this magnitude and type for reference. Firm's financial capacity to undertake the project B. Financing Capability: Proposer(s) are required to provide evidence of the ability to obtain financing for a project. Proposals shall include letters of commitment from financial institutions rated AA or better, documenting a proposer's ability to secure the necessary funds to complete a proposed development. Proposals shall include letters of commitment from bonding and insurance firms rated AA or better, demonstrating the project team's ability to obtain the required bonds and insurance. C. Proposer's Development Concept Plan(s): Each Proposal should include a conceptual description of potential development(s) for the site, which may include: · Accessory/ancillary uses to be housed in the facility or on the site. · Mix and character of uses. · Key individual or types of tenants or users. Proposals may include schematic drawings illustrating the proposed development plan. The City will also welcome any concept plans, architectural drawings, or models the pmposer may wish to submit in addition to the development plan description. Evaluation Criteria: Submissions will be evaluated by an Evaluation Committee according to the criteria contained in the RFQ. The following evaluation criteria shall be used by the City of Miami Beach to rank qualified proposals: Experience and track record of the proposer: including the pmposer's proven capability to deliver a high quality design/development project as evidenced by locally or nationally recognized and completed comparable projects, and focusing on the qualifications and experience of members of the development team, quality of similar past development projects, ongoing technical and staff capacities, experience in public-private development projects, and general reputation. Financial capability and level of financial commitment as it would impact the likelihood of project implementation. Developers will be invited to make a presentation to the Evaluation Committee. Upon reviewing all of the proposals and presentations(s), the Evaluation Committee will rank the proposals and will make a recommendation via a written report to the City Manager. The City Manager shall evaluate each proposal submission and will render an independent recommendation to the City Commission along with the Evaluation Committee's report. The City will evaluate the proposals and select a preferred developer. The City will entex into negotiations with the selected developer and, if an agreement cannot be reached with this party, the City will proceed to the second ranked developer (if any), and so on, until an acceptable agreement has been reached. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City reserves the right, at any time during the process, to reject any and all proposals, and to re-advertise for new proposals, or postpone or cancel the RFQ process. B. RFQ TIMETABLE The anticipated schedule for this RFQ is as follows: · RFQ approved issuance by City Commission November 8, 2000 · RFQ advertised December 2000 · Mandatory Pre-proposal Conference December 2000 · Proposals due February 2001 · Presentation and Interviews to Evaluation Committee February 2001 · Notification of Preferred and Alternate ranked Developers March 2001 · City Commission award April 2001 · Negotiation with Preferred Developer and Approval of contract June 2001 The Chesapeake Group, Inc. B~ilding A Foundation For The Future Identified Opportunities from Business Survey "Lineage" owners are 60 years of age or older 25% have not identified someone to take over Investment In Property ," 21% own property; 12% are interested in selling property ¢ 40% would like to make improvements to property or reinvest in business Business Retention · / 41% have problems attracting employees · / Preferences for changes in area (open ended) o Effort to address homeless, alcohol, drugs, etc. Increased security c, Additional development & improvement projects o Improved parking o More effective tourist attraction o New business development Preferences for changes in area (close ended) o More parking (2/3) o Improve residential area o Better maintenance of commercial structures Increased restoration of commercial buildings o Special events IN business areas · / 35% want to expand v' 2% want to contract · / 14% want to change location · / 21% able to make changes (~ current location v' 24% would consider another North Beach location 8516 GREEN LANE, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21244 410*265-17841(FAX)410-521-0480/TCGROUP~EROLS.COM The Chesapeake Group, Inc. Building A Foundation For The Future Space Primary, Secondary, Tertiary & Existing Space Table 77 - Total Existing Space* Retail 347,100 Personal Services 56,600 Professional Services 100,000 Financial Services 30,600 Miscellaneous Services 91,800 Vacant T800 'Developed by The Chesapeake Group, Inc., 2000. Table 78 - Penetration Level Supportable Space and Existing Space for North Beach* Food Eat/Ddnk General Merchandise Fumk'ure Automotive * Service Drugstore 9,400 231,789 206 45,470 20,000 33,021 29,488 6,477 45,000 51,961 46,401 12,200 301349 271104 18,500 16,933 26,645 15,562 86,265 77,036 14,600 44,237 *Developed by The Chesapeake Group, Inc., 2000. 3 Preliminary Planning Conce=ts North Beach Strategic Plan Housing / Residential Neighborhoods Residential use is the most important economic generator in North Beach - present and future Greatest assets: · Waterfront · Existing Iow-scale neighborhoods with architectural character · Proximit7 Vision / Image: "North Beach will be the most desirable urban neighborhood in Miami-Dada Co.' · Range of income · Multi-ethnic · Choices of housing types · Emphasis on families Residential Strategies 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Improve parks Improve streets Marketing strategies · Emphasize unique architectural character · Emphasize the waterways and canals Targeted programs / assistance · Increase homeownership · Rahab loans to increase unit size · Historic preservation incentives · Residential parking Schools Religious institutions Youth programs Essential goods and services Traffic and transportation Accessibility to jobs City of Miami Beach Planning Department (305) 673-7550 October 19, 2000 Page 1 Preliminary Planning Concepts North Beach Strategic Plan Attractions and Tourism Vision: "North Beach is the preferred destination for families vis-fling South Flodda who are seeking beaches, family-oriented activities, cultural arts and good food in a friendly neighborhood environment.. Greatest Assets: · Beaches · Waterways · Quieter, slower pace than South Beach · More affordable than South Beach Strategies Cultural activities · Byron Cadyle Theater convert to arts center · Increased programming in bandshell · Black Box theater · Festivals Family-oriented activities · Improved beaches and parks · North Beach Recreational Corridor / Atlantic Corridor greenway · "Blueway' on Indian Creek and other waterways · Rowing center / sailing and other boating · Nature Centerin NSOSP · Water park · Science or interactive museum 3. MiMo Architecture City of Miami Beach Planning Department (305) 673-7550 October 19, 2000 Page 2 Preliminary Planning Concepts North Beach Strategic Plan Retail/Service Vision: "North Beach has ample goods an~ services to supply residents' needs in convenient locations, and it offers great quality and vadety, reflecting the cultural diversity of the community." Strategies Differentiate function of neighborhood shopping and services from regional-and visitor-oriented businesses Develop marketing, retention and recruitment plans to cluster appropriate businesses in appropriate locations Enhance vehicular accessibility, pedestrian accessibility, parking, and visual environment as necessary to support the identity of each commercial distdct Development Opportunity Sites Byron Cadyle Theater · Cultural Arts - performing, rehearsal, office, and teaching space · Must have adequate parking · Capture spillover activity, especially eating and drinking · Spillover businesses must be located within an enticing and convenient walking distance from the theater West Parking Lots at NSOSP - 79th Street to 87th Street · Parking for park · Quality housing · Mixed use concepts - home office, boutique hotel, schools 72nd Street site · Equity One project · Miami-Dade Community College · Family entertainment uses · Cultural uses · Parking to support surrounding activities · Urban open space Other sites to be identified City of Miami Beach Planning Department (305) 673-7550 October 19, 2000 Page 3 Publix super markets, inc. Tom Adams REAL ESTATE MANAG£R Real Estate Depar~nent May 12, 2000 Doron Valero Equity One Realty & Management, Inc. 777 17th Street - Penthouse Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RE: NWC Collins Ave & 72nd Street North Miami Beach, Dade County, Florida Dear Doron: Congratulations on the approval of your site for a 51 P proto~'pe! Please note, this approval is conditional upon an approved site plan for the shopping center and acceptable lease terms. Prior to the fui1 execution of a Lease Ag-reement, a press release or a sign announcing the shopping center will not be allowed without written permission from Publix. The following is an outline of the procedures for the preparation of plans and specifications for our store building and the common area elements of the shopping center: Construction Contract Documents It is the responsibility of your architect/engineer to prepare construction contract documents for the shopping center. This includes common area elements (such as on- site and off-site utilities, paving, drainage, landscaping, etc.) that relate to the Publix store. P.O. Box 407 Lakeland, FL 33802 - 1936 George Jenkins $1vd. Lakeland, FL 33815 (863) 688-7407 Ext, 5524 Page 2 of 4 May 12, 2000 Supplementary Drawings and Specifications It is also the responsibility of your architect/en~neer to prepare all additional drawings and specifications required to integrate those furnished by Publix into the shopping center construction contract documents. These drawings must be identified as supplementary to the plans and specifications i:urnished by Publix and separate from the shopping center drawings. Publix will furnish its structural criteria and calculations as your engineer requires to facilitate h/s assum/ng responsibility for these supplementary drawings. These supplementary drawings shall include but may not be Iimited to: Drawings for the facade and front canopy extending from the front of the demised premises to the front of the building, covering the canopy walkway, including drawings for modifications required to Publix's structural drawings bv the structural design of the canopy. These will include structural criteria and calculations to facilitate review and approval by Publix. Drawings for any modification requ/red to Publix structural drawings by the structural design of adjacent shops. These will include structural criteria and calculations to facilitate review and approval by Publix. Drawings for any modifications required to Publix drawings to accommodate site conditions other than those indicated on the drawings furnished by Publix, such as elevated foundation walls with resulting ramps/steps from side doors and loading docks/truck wells at the rear of the store. Drawings for pilings and a structural slab as required. Should pilings and/or structural slabs be required, Publix will provide a prototype design. This wilI be for your enghneer's guidance only; he will be expected to assume responsibility for the final design. Drawings for transformer vault, sound control wails, visual screens, and other such appurtenances as may be required by local utilities or authorities having jurisdiction. Page 3 of 4 May 12, 2000 Environmental Audit Also provide a Phase I environmental audit for Publix' review within thirty, (30) days from the date of this letter. Information contained in the audit should be prepared and state for use and reliance upon by Publix and the Landlord. All information relating to said environmental report shall be considered confidential and privileged. Environmental consultant shall not distribute, discuss, disclose, publish or allow to be discovered any confidential information without Publix' prior written consent. Please deliver three copies of this report within 30 days to: James P. Hahn, Esq. General Counsel, Publix Super Markets Hahn, McClurg, Watson, Griffith & Bush, PA Post Office Box 38 Lakeland, FL 33802 Impact Fees Enclosed is an Impact Fee Questionnaire. It is the developer's responsibility to negotiate the lowest possible cost for impact fees. Publix requires that the cost of impact fees be capped. In order to arrive at the amount to be capped, the developer will be required to determine how the county and/or city in which the shopping center will be located determines impact fees. The Developer should obtain ail of the pertinent information required for computing impact fees, calculate the estimated fees, and submit the estimate along with all of the supporting documentation to Woody Rayburn in the Publix Business Analysis and Reporting Department. Publix will require the developer to document his plans for challeng4ng the county or city's assumptions used to calculate the impact fees. This plan must be submitted to Publix before a cap amount will be written into the lease. Please direct any questions regarding impact fees to Woody Rayburn at (941) 616-5743. Geotechnical Studies and Preliminary Drawings Please send three copies of site geotechnical studies and preliminary drawings to John Kitchens, P.E., for review at an early stage of design, thus avoiding any costly redesign at an advanced stage of contract document preparation. Please see the attached Site Development Package for specific Publix design criteria. Page 4 of 4 May 15, 2000 General Contractor The Lease Agreement will require approval of your general contractor by Publix. Please contact our Director of Construction, Bob Newman, to discuss the select/on of a contractor. Final Plans and Specifications Signed-and-sealed documents for bidding and permitting will not be available to you until: (1) The Lease Agreement has been executed by all parties; (2) Tom Feazel, A.I.A. & John Kitchens, P.E. have reviewed and approved Landlord's Final Plans and Specifications. Please advise if you have any questions regarding this procedure. I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. Tom Adams Real Estate Manager SIGNED IN HIS ABSENCE TO AVOID DELAY TA/cm Enclosures: Site Development Packages Impact Fee Questionnaire File James P. Hahn Esq. (w/o attachment) Dave Duncan (w/o attachment) Bob Newman (w/o attachment) Lorerma Skkking (w/o attachment) Woody Raybum (w/o attachment) Mary Dobbins (w/o attachment)