Loading...
Agreement with Keith and Schnars, P.A. aors---cooqi dot - aqo8 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG . DISCIPLINE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, LAND SURVEYING, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 AND 2015-29068 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 29 SCHEDULE B 30 SCHEDULE C 32 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 33 ATTACHMENT B 34 ATTACHMENT C 35 3 . AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 5 day of January , 2016 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Keith and Schnars, P.A., a Florida corporation having its principal office at 10305 NW 41st Street, Suite 112, Doral, FL 33178 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on June 10th, 2015 and July 8th, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015-29041 and 2015-29068, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, 4 which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or 5 excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform.services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change 6 Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five 7 (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. 8 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). the Services as expeditiously 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform t p y as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. 10 extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services p Y 9 (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by 11 the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the 12 Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans 13 and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and 14 insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the 15 sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established bysthis Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for.the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 16 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any 17 resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by.City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work 18 • involving new program elements, when. such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering,. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in pp p Y proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for 20 Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 22 violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility-to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting • any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of • any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Keith and Schnars, P.A. 10305 NW 41st Street, Suite 112 Doral, FL 33178 Attn: Errol Kalayci, Esq. Attn: Tim Hall, P.E. Tele: (954) 776-1616 Fax: (954) 771-7690 Email: ekalayci @ksfla.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY G EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or a pp licant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person,.other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of 26 Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as. may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 27 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its P PY employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by g-°r. respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest �..�∎tvomvr1‘ ITY OF MIA M:I'B �` ,.,t / br # ■ Be% ./ ft/ / CITY LERK 7 Attest ,, KeFt A, - Signature/Secvefary I 1 ORAT'.j .ie /Presid-n MA s 141054-1�� . • _s . `.■ 'A Print Name '� �` •• ' me ����•�•'''••-•"'' '� APPROVED AS TO • lt ��I FORM&LANGUAGE loft &FOR EXECUTION iz a /5 City Attorney KA? Date SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: Keith and Schnars, P.A. 10305 NW 41st Street, Suite 112 Doral, FL 33178 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 29 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer(Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector (CEI) $103.50 Inspector(CEI, Field or $ 94.88 Construction) 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANT:. • No preapproved sub-consultants submitted with proposal. 32 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29068 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., - ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., URS CORPORATION, E-SCIENCES, INC., CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC., THORNTON TOMASETTI, INC., BRINDLEY PIETERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.,_AND BCC ENGINEERING, FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; and WHEREAS, this resolution only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., third highest ranked, Zyscovich, Inc., fourth highest ranked; The Corradino Group, Inc., fifth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1- Environmental Engineering was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; URS Corporation, second highest ranked; E-Sciences, Inc., third highest ranked, CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; GFA International, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., are tied as the sixth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., eighth highest ranked, and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 2 - Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture was as follows: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., top ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 4 - Structural Engineering was as follows: Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., top ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc.,'second highest ranked; Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., third highest ranked; Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., fifth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., sixth highest ranked, and HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the seventh highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code, which states that in the award of contracts the following, shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract; and WHEREAS, after careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, for the discipline of Structural Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of J6/ 2015. ATTEST: /.40f R-fael Granado Cit 1 B i��;4 clip -.: aytr i T:WGENDA120151JuIy1PR000RE r 014'• �r�• 4' siOnal Ar'vitectural and Engineering Services-Reso(Plan,Urban Design,Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).dol INCORP ORATED: I, \ , i• Cry 26 -eikmok . APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE- . &FOR EXECUTION ac...L0p; 11(...(19 City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Via Resolution 2015-29041 passed and adopted June 10, 2015, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the disciplines of Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines: Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. After reviewing the submission, the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received and the City Code, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 5 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account • Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: D •artment Director Assistant City Manager City fi - !er A� EC DM 7,' MT JL • T:IAGEN I O15lJuly\PROCUREME T12N 014- 46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Sumn`a (Plan, Urban Design, Env Eng, t Design,Structural Eng).docx AGDA ITEM C rZ MIAMIBEACH fEI�DDA4E 7-1 IS MIAMI B City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, .miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSIO :/MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of he City Comm(sion FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. • Commission Memorandum Accepting the.Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA(Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3- Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach For Group 1 — Planning and Urban Design Architecture, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services (PLANNING&URBAN LOW DESIGN) Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 95 1 93 1 3 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 82 2 88 2 87 3 7 2 BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 79 5 78 3 88 2 10 3 ZYSCOVICH,INC. 80 4 78 3 85 4 11 4 THE CORRADINO GROUP,INC. 82 2 75 5 81 5 12 5 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 4 For Group 1 — Environmental Engineering, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services• LOW • (ENVIRONMENTAL Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE . ENGINEERING) Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 99 2 94 1 4 1 URS CORPORATION 93 2 100 1 88 4 7 2 E-SCIENCES,INC. 89 4 80 4 89 2 10 3 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 92 3 88 3 87 5 11 4 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 5 79 6 89 2 13 5 GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 82 6 80 4 76 8 18 6 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 82 6 79 6 83 6 18 6 CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. 61 8 57 8 80 7 23 8 For Group 2 — Interior Design and Space Planning, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the rank ing of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014346-YG Professional . Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (INTERIOR DESIGN& . Deborah Rogelio Valena AGGREGATE . SPACE PLANNING) Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 92 1 92 1 88 1 3 1 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS,INC. 78 2 73 2 70 2 _ 6 _ 2 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 5 For Group 4—Structural Engineering, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering LOW Services Oniel Jose A. Sabrina AGGREGATE (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 94 1 94 4 6 1 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 100 1 91 3 96 2 6 1 THORNTON TOMASETTI,INC. 97 3 90 4 97 1 8 3 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 95 4 92 2 93 5 11 4 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 90 5 89 5 95 3 13 5 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 70 6 86 6 77 7 19 6 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 60 7 80 7 78 6 20 7 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5)firms be awarded in each category. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code which states that in the award of contracts the following shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. After careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 6 In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. JLM/MTDM/ EC/AD/YG T:I AGENDA120151July 1PROCUREMENT120 1 4-3 46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Plan,Urban Design, Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).docx RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE f:5 DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February.5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender& Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /,0 day of_1:04e__2015. ATTEST: . ///' r r S 41 « / / Rafael E. ranado, City I c:•`%%%‘"1°4`'14,,Philip Le 'i - l!! •? T:\AGENDA\2015\June\PROCUR: ENT\2014-.-.-'% !°'�mi,;c ofesgiona �hit-. .,=land Engineering Services-Reso.docx * INCORP ORATED: �, ,... \ Nom! 4 -9 • N(r) • APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION c9,L0,6,;\— V City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. On February 26, 2015, March 19, 2015, March 31, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Evaluation Committees appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 054-2015 convened to evaluate Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, The Committees were instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 6 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: epartment Director Assi. Manager City M. ragersM3:.ato AD 1/ ECX DM MT 11) JLM A4 T:IAGEND x015\June1PROCUREMENT\2014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Summa •• x • AGENDA! M 0 MIAMI BEACH 143 C DAYS - 6-10 c S' I BE H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members o he City Co / ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEP NG THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. 144 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering armello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Mc Harry Associates B 1 rY BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA (Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar&Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim • Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the "Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach 145 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • r Public Works, City of Miami Beach Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, y • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. For Group 1, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received for Landscape Architecture, Planning and Urban Design Architecture, and Environmental � Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 1 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering (Group 1) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. LANDSCAPE ARC HITECTURE Fsr .{� �:a 'ArctItec'tueaiani A`' E gineeringiServices .6,215L{LANDS APE ;'. Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE • '.- CTEJRE$-,:;-, • Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking a, TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, .. P.A. 93 1 95 1 83 2 4 1 a ' AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 78 3 90 2 87 1 6 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND : " ASSOCIATES,INC. 81 2 78 3 83 2 T: 7 3 CRAVEN,THOMPSON& ASSOCIATES,INC. I 76 4 61 6 82 4 14 4 MILLER LEGG& ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 5 65 5 77 5 15 5 CHEN MOORE AND "' ASSOCIATES,INC. 70 6 69 4 70 6 'fir 16 6 146 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals (RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 4 For Group 2, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received for General Architecture, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, and Historical Preservation Architecture. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 2 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning (Group 2) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. GENERAL ARCHITECTURE IProfeaskiiiiwo,. �a ik... 4t• 4. ii 661 ' •-_• Deborah Rogelio Valeria -, AGGREGATE „4G $ys�p,1V- '` Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE& !s INTERIOR DESIGN,INC. 95 1 92 3 90 4 4; 8 1 1 GLAVOVIC STUDIO.INC. 88 3 85 8 98 1 12 2 M.C.HARRY&ASSOCIATES, ,1; INC. 94 2 89 7 93 3 r 12 2 STANTEC CONSULTING IA SERVICES.INC. 87 4 95 1 86 7k 12 2 BEA ARCHITECTS.INC. 85 6 90 6 95 2 • 14 5 BERMELLO AJAMIL& •' PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 92 3 88 5 r• 15 6 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS. INC. 80 10 93 2 88 5 ,_•, 17 7 WOLFBERG ALVAREZ AND PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 91 5 80 8 20 8 R.J.HEISENBOTTLE ' ' ARCHITECTS,P.A 87 4 78 9 75 10 23 9 SBLM ARCHITECS,P.C. 84 7 74 11 80 8 {,.' 26 10 RODRIGUEZ ARCHITECTS.INC. 71 11 69 13 75 10 ;. 34 11 CPH,INC. 57 12 75 10 65 13 35 12 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 57 12 70 12 55 14 38 13 CIMA ENGINEERING CORP. 56 14 66 14 70 12 _ 40 14 TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ,;RFQ#i014- YG ,;,'.ki a ProfesS1Elr'l8 z .Archttectcurak�arnd . LC O__ Engineering ServLces;r' Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE (TOWN PLANNING);..- Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking . Mejia Ranking . TOTALS Rank Z)'' SCOVICH,INC. 97 1 84 1 100 1 3 1 I 1 THE CORRADINO GROUP 75 2 76 2 _ 83 2 6 2 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE ... rore ,,,4,-:7; .u;, ��xs', i.04, LOW rt �a ,-9,-, Deborah Rogelio Valeria , AGGREGATE c Ranking Ranking TOTALS Rank ,'=��" '-°"� a; $ Tackett Rankin Madan Ranking Mejia Rankin R.J.HEISENBOTTLE I 3 ARCHITECTS.P.A. 100 1 99 1 90 1 WILLIAM B MEDELLIN t1:; ARCHITEC P.A. 93 3 97 2 90 1 �-,, 6 2 DOUGLAS WOOD t;., ASSOCIATES,INC. 98 2 91 3 75 4 Ei:• 9 3 BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ,ARCHITECTS.P-A. 83 4 84 _ 4 i 80 _ 3 it'-• 11 4 147 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 5 For Group 3, the Committee convened on March 31, 2015 to consider proposals received for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 3 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. CIVIL ENGINEERING f 2O1 46-YG Prafeseran a[;; -•: X .. Artlf®ctuhf ani E'4160erif[d','7' •, ip -Seni 3.. Mow ''r r Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE '(CIVIL ENGINEERING):... a, Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking TOTALS Rank WADE"1"1:2' IM,INC. 95 2 97 1 81 8 11 1 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, '' ' INC. 90 4 90 6 91 2 ;:i; 12 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 10 90 6 96 1 17 3 PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES,INC. 86 8 89 8 89 3 • , 1 19 4 SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOCIATES, � 1 I, INC. 96 1 95 3 62 24 :`1 28 5 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 84 9 82 15 84 5 29 6 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 75 17 93 4 79 9 30 7 R.J.BEHAR&COMPANY,INC. 88 6 83 14 77 10 F i 30 7 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 94 3 87 11 70 18 ; 32 9 • BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, i3 INC. 76 15 96 2 71 17 P-1, 34 10 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 76 15 80 17 86 4 36 11 CPH,INC. 78 13 86 12 74 11 '' 36 11 MILIAN,SWAIN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 87 7 88 9 67 20 36 11 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, • INC. 75 17 88 9 74 11 37 14 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 90 4 74 22 73 13 39 15 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 71 21 81 16 83 6 43 16 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 72 20 91 5 69 19 44 17 LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN, INC. 79 12 70 26 82 7 45 18 HAKS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 80 11 75 21 72 16 48 19 EAC CONSULTING,INC. 77 14 73 23 73 13 50 20 THE CORRADINO GROUP 71 21 78 18 73 13 52 21 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 19 84 13 65 22 54 22 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, - ' INC. 70 23 76 20 64 23 66 23 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 69 24 72 25 . 66 , 21 70 24 ROSS ENGINEERING,INC. 68 25 77 19 _ 60 26 70 24 CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. 67 26 73 _ 23 61 25 74 26 LAND SURVEYING :RFQ#2G14-346 YG Professional ArchIteeturat and i W knginea `Se l�css:1 x p Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE AGGREGATE (LA�,S1 G,.- ,cad �, .. ,. ... , ::.,;:; Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Rankin. QTAL$ Rank SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN& ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 96 1 80 2 4 1 TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING,INC. 91 2 93 2 77 4 8 2 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 87 3 83 7 83 1 11 3 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC. 83 7 87 3 79 3 13 4 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 86 4 84 6 69 5 15 5 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES 85 5 85 5 68 6 16 6 MARLIN ENGINEERING,INC. 84 6 86 4 63 8 18 7 CB&I ENVIRONMENATAL& INFRASTRUCTURE 75 9 82 8 67 7 24 8 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES. INC. 77 8 75 9 60 9 26 9 148 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 6 For Group 4, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received for Structural Engineering and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 4 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Structural Engineering (Group 4) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING RFt.#�2Q14c346 Y4 Professional Arciatecturat and Englneeririg$e 1;', LOW AA CHAN�AL,ELECTR .' Oniel Jose A. Sabrina A GGREGATE D'PAA MBING Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS ! Rank TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. 100 1 88 1 93 1 3 1 Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners,Inc. 86 2 85 3 90 2 7 2 RGD Associates,Inc.DBA RGD err ! Consulting Engineers 73 3 87 2 85 3 8 3 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture. Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture. 149 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 7 R. J. Heisen ott a Architects, William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture. Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying. TLC Engineering For Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami 'Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis. JLM/MT/AD/YG T:I AGENDA12015 1June1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Revised 6.2.2015).docx 150 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 151 AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach 152 WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth 153 highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and • WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & 154 Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2015. ATTEST: Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Philip Levine, Mayor T:I AGENDA 120151June\PROCUREMENT\2014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Reso.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION (4,..3 -e5 City Attorney Date 155 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 156 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 34 MIAW: E.13ACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG • PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES %} ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 24, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office 'til then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 &6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question #71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 /2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications". In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 • 2 Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" - Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a 01/4/• Pro•...... I�DDenis Procurement Director MIAMI BEA H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical", under Group B— Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION. The following clause has been added to Appendix D—Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;" It is up to the Proposer's discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. 1 Q2: Section C1. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete A/E teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term,we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub- consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time. Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its options,, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please provide copies of all sign in sheets scanned and have them sent out as an addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together(one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, n we submit a proposal or will Q p y ca p p you create a separate category for GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GIS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting, we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example: Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. All: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants. Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted.': As indicated above, Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULI, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section C1. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 • { Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014-346-YG as to teaming: whether an architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise. A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized 9 9 9 g P Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10/13 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is 9 9� Y P searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- house, correct? If we cannot do all these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 — Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted" Q20: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A& B? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites. These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings, etc. Q24: At the top of Page 13 of RFQ 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staff's accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staff's accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Q25: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes. Q27: If the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes • what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-original/11 copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving an extension of the current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q29: Will a State issued DBE certification suffice as "verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County." Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q32: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 1 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2nd underlined area a repetitive requirement of the 1st underlined area? Or are you requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 12 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the "Proposing Firm". The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the "Architect and Engineer"in each firm /team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named • herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 10 in this Addendum. 7 Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? A39: Yes. Q40: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime proposer will be responsible to hire the applicable or required sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms (firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select NE Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full NE Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. 8 Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both pre-proposal meetings or will they be posted online? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or"Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400—Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5 relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: "For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, C1 Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 • Q49: We will be submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing — You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back — can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. Q52: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a — it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staff's diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question #24 in this Addendum. Q53: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 — For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w/regards to "term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your "user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The "user name" is the same as the "email address": vusbelgonzalez(a miamibeachfl.gov Q55: Appendix C, C.2 Scope of Work Required — In addition to environmental and geotechnical services, our firm provides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B — Engineering of this RFQ. Q56: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e. building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A& Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include "Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants'Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA, INC. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS& ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO&ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS& NEWMAN INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC MILIAN SWAIN &ASSOCIATES BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG BERMELLO,AJAMIL&PARTNERS O'LEARY RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. BORRELLI & PARTNERS, INC. RED DESIGN GROUP BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BRUCE HOWARD &ASSOCIATES ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP, INC. CALVIN, GIORDANO&ASSOCIATES SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN &ASSOC INC CES CONSULTANTS, INC. SHULMAN &ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA, INC. WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. -Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason, we are requesting a time extension for the Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q62: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section F, when showing project examples, we must list the Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q64: In regard to RFQ 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural & Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 12 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than 5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project { were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. ( 12 Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)? (what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 Submittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the response. Q71: Under Section 0300— Submittal Instructions and Format- TAB 2 - Experience & Qualifications, we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 —should we include Part I - Sections, A-C; and sections F - Example Projects; G - Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II—General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections D-Organizational Chart and E— Resumes of Key Personnel, to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under "specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design / Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? 9 A72: The column titled "Group A —Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled "Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 13 Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A& B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category (minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix `C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal and/or gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3, of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propos- /1i: �� Denis Procurement Director 14 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 1 , 2014 15 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelv (ib onzalez miamibeachfl.gov ext. 6230 1AUL S. MAS?WA ? oS$ * A?JEgtN1 5 lo-0'73o v'mgsiraFaG vossbav, ccr+l feefut.tuDo LAziOS fr -'f Gti.*,'toe e..1n"G-1, tNG . -236-;q *51-ww. lar io*e rrialricdn •Gorr ' J J. FWE5 DettlieLLO M I t• 'Itf-TE4012.6 3. 5 960170Z 705-040 3740 bermelloaJ +tl. toi31cO - ?7`f e\v i co- 1<-e:A re, . • si on. Grte.f5 - c r P 3a5. G-7 .1. MA". w•.c, t k• _ �7 a '7 .'7 3 maa.temm.c-4s`�(�'C.Q tM tWr^+��amtia FL.Gw Giv1 �j - G /P j4vi /44i77AII I( I ( DPrrblliP-/Lr7/vgiemi�rvt�K Fs 9sq- Agfe1 )E / -24 ro z.4 rcleueuzoz4,&rte'behQr. ca,t-1 ®atir igeti4tirXcNiRE. hv� 3b( • ittavoo 601-8464 p C.Api-r-valr&.6 U"L')urd e'r-± VC-.( 71000 34-0d C.(t.pketz4 • CD 11_21 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS • r j .eat eG��.�-mil a@° -06Gc1xi•AfY/ 112ey-/- C�;4-� / JUIA-K C, (e Tb 3ar-436720• c l v o-a @ v`'_ ,('-44 vzz.“-: 2 3 f MEL)SS ` AM`tt=1-(- -Ssoa -9s'37Z"SZZZ. C..i s d 3r,r..,kA 3Dec 5b Jflk v\ bow r� 5 L�'1,�1 6a�3 JOVW_ 0- (Cgu6A Cr . &LA, QAS - • ,61 .36/ 511-7 561 3,11 gig &°41r9i1 i°1415e") A a MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASES" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbeltIonzalezQmiamibeachfl.ilov ext. 6230 c5 04 egwreAL �,�1 G pe5)4 0-s4.81 630s)44/-s-494 J tai//a r g csayroaio.cam,-, e,,,f 7362 . J wso� ��2.6 / _#,..i 62(�s (30_s)-744- 30_s) - ('o)s z 9 00 Joso4c.pk„,cxxietatre (ki.:(04,1 s-caz 1Ty ,L; /-j }-em( x ,'4'4-L 30-c 5 - 3 0 s Norb ci I o ar° /, ,c_o ri 'Ut\N MRS s /IZ A 3c5- 41.01 - h} PN JcfitettickMe7.��1/14.,fi/e •eovYI 32-Col a-�� g.; w kloca NA r i- (sc cE Cc r�to vik amt Q-iC-( 1461 Ve P k.) , eer4 ne5 10 73 -700D Cu"��n h ti 604LeINe Cecc - Ck.C,S«as Bimolialike444 -6; Ok3eLac._@._01).ics‘c id. cave. 3'3 QTh ; /LAZA0 ggh46, zPhievie 9t 6ii4/ 104?6,-) G z -,,,p cy < S A)6.,)10 . 3 trA MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRIG' T) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbel2onzalezamiamibeacht1.Lov ext. 6230 eiv I'a1 6‘.4- 6.4g;4Lerifg 3os-��v-� tai- sl D 3 �v-d3 G ui40�bc�etig,Gorr. (�- eiie NIA wrivQ ,n -dui' R4cec/ S 3Oc-)7áZ/ 3-r VigY6-0 / �� SJi fl/ 4� Li I41 (0(0 1 NM/6 Alms° ' 09c1.1-141 (;o9M-111) -po.loo o 1;A. krm (4,41,51 el i/u Pacc 6 L'tsd Z--cow Co08\al S�S- ' -,r aQfi Dnal tcio' l.3b55 326.w1. tom loan Back4 tt(Xcu 1. C 15`n-\.cu VJLLI,&H . PopeLL-iII tvasie - Z- 3 s% 3o612•G96 • CCask-mk c-)f__o£7 k`-`' '�-/ecrXa"ccY'ra.( 3tD5-6('R-6233 '5c*-(cc t 141,--( .306 2,4 S'43( a°s-- ii• T--\./ u--/r rs►v e¢a At.ENG I N t Nfr-(.o1411 ?es-42;7-16V 7161 r )-i7j V`CI t'-S6 h e.,LCD e:- �erSdti �iti . e1r 44-4e4"1 ;3 R tes i - ✓ 1 .ei�n G1 re' r.EN Ft -�oSo_ MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRPO 1T) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS -wt s Asper lASp Vo-rar 50s sper .svvirtars. (iii3) s Roa_x„,v_ A.9gethwt,15, ),16. 4-2/44Y-4 --)42 rccr, ✓ 1,ark ejs.NA I?C ( 6_4 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 yusbelg,onzalezmiamibeachfl.Qov ext. 6230 Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin& Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain & Associates (305) 441-0123 Stephanie Theard BCC Engineering (305) 670-2350 Kathia Dash R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (305)446-7799 Ileana Gonzalez Robayna& Associates (305) 823-9316 Natalie Lockwood, Andrews & Newman (305)444-6454 Tom Decker Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners 305) 666-5474 Victor Herrera NV5 (954)495-2112 Douglass Man CB&I 561.361.3148 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS Marne Bennetham Jennifer Creed GOE Associates Daniel Goodman DEA Architects Sherry Miller Legg (305) 599-6381 Cathy O'Leary O'Leary Richards Design Associates (305) 596-6628 Stephanie Marlin Engineering (305)477-7575 Antonio Garate ALVAREZ-DIAZ & VILLALON 786.497.1906 Jake Ozyman Haks Engineers, Architects and Land (212) 747-1997 Surveyors, P.C. Michael EAC Consulting (305) 265-5400 Shawn Stanley Consultants 786.762.4115 Mark URS Corporation (305) 262-7466 J PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 13, 2014 16 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbeluonzalezni"miamibeachfl.gov ext. 6230 Ahti'r C.P BEA m . - 30S 63-f MA-f V 20 S �)<t i 24- CS :cc:5E @of:, ) 2.49 -Ea - SCON,ALEZC�".C/,,/�v'Ea_5A Er.it�rNE���r` 7 C� E„, i Z�cCo. c: ,r nL)4 LE2 "3nj,24 -C4-19 1 EMA/ ,5cA �cJS 3 `CAUL= E--744,„/4-4,2,A/6 Cu . 32L/, 767( AZesa A kS ( s) e /ilqk . / f-7! &TS-3 9 f/ a,x-r64z, Cp\Q-rpikiP j cc.ic • (ty - td-k-k kt-ts �o'T7j'�vG� FjZz ek1-4 CO`t S:.tr_4 dZ t . =u;, 2 L4 kMAi fLif om P(bC‘'`"Q Sd? `'`‘ a i-f-j e97(C4.4.1 , Se►Al,EL OSfA16ER.6 c-MN S DOW 305-31'101( V-3q- Lw @(iswe jc6AR.,twelz-,GO rA 305 1-I to-2%0 u :{ (!tio.me_c.corn ,; MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) - i E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzalez Qmiamibeachfl.Qov ext. 6230 C.M.6 Chy 30.5-471-70c.b 13A 110WA frAra e a n/IL - C 1 30�o3/Q /110i wi t v'a cervto wqwi jo v � I Ar ntf-SS&- tGL E119i. ee!r?'Ai 305 73errnvde Z- Let rynvoteZ � %T`c-ek .coiyr SS lj Vanessa. _b)Uvean K Io■gar bL/yG i ►, CMg-FKViewtHA 345 G73 f llZabe-4 \MI/ltkiD14 ewVeafOI 14/140tibetat c/. ,v 1°1° F i Cj71 i fla MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelgonzalezRmiamibeachfl.aov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Innovtec 352-459-1974 lance @innovtec.com James Kahn Keith and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahn @ksfla.com Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting 305-264-2557 Tom Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkski(wadetrim.com Jenny Alonso T.Y. Lin International 305-567-1888 Jenny.alonso@tylin.com Ext. 4034 Staci L. Bolinger Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing 561-494-7006 slbolingerRterracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 William.craven @puretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 jpriem @gleassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters & Associates 407-830-8700 jkemp@bpa-engineers.com bpa-engineers.com Helmut J. Mueller Mueller& Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates @gmail.com MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzun@cphcopr.com cphcopr.com Brenda Kimley-Horn 407-898-1511 Iraldy Martin LIVS Associates 305-443-2933 imartin @livs.net Nadia E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothie Franko OCI Associates (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello Ajamil & Partners (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305) 461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954.524.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 MIAMI BEAC H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 12, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. • Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. mil t1' l%'�wtr -ns °rocurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, _71,7 . Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 7, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.publicpurchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION # 1: The RFQ solicitation file published on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. CLARIFICATION #2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study Addendum#1 10/1/2014 Page 1 of 1 2 I Miami Beach RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposa \ Si c , 'L/ / C ////Pi '=i a en's Procurement Director REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMIBEACH Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS • SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 RFQ 2014-346-YG 2 AA! AA BEACH•. SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three (3) year contract term, with two(2)one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the • City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design/Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services RFQ 2014-346-YG 3 MIAMI BEACH The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19, 2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1, 2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado(a�miamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov RE Q • R 4 MIAMI BEACH 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence."The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&statelD=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RFQ 2014-346-SR 5 MAW BEACH • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to Y 9 postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011-3747, a five (5) point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and RFQ 2014-346-SR 6 MIAMI C twenty(120)calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to Y p 9 Y 9 ry� ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18. TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility: Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or RFQ 2014-346-SR 7 MIAM. BEACH services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and Y Y Y 9 9 q abilities of a proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then RFQ 114-3A 6-SR 8 MIAMI BEACH B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits o r actions o f any kin d o r nature in the name of the C i ty, where applicable, including a pp ellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATIONIWITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. RFQ 2.14-346-SR 9 /M A I BEACH 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2014-346-SR 10 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. TAB 1 Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects, provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban,and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED, ULI,AICP,APA. i> .•.o.-a-. yd„„.s' is+-d!:,z:s %A fir?.::.:fG-.:,J.:!%i��..:.��d/n/CG Xfe"//9i/�iS�,�G/y/i�f91X1�9�/�.4//91//y //.1GG'y.�3'L,Fed/.%d'Xis1311iAY/oJ9�h�i%�/'�i-�H,/jiiil:O.F->;a /.slr.-:ii-inax.Ui,_?.Jri-„o....0,'i.ner...:..vw r'::-FsF. -.:7F cii,-a__Yzs RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, provide copies of the following: a. Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFO 014 6-SR 12 MIAMI BEACH. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFC) 2014-346-SR 13 AMJ BEAC SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee.An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2 (Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions; or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s)(using the same criteria). Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvanta•ed Business Enters rise DBE firms. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 95 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2 Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three 3 ears.See Section 4 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 • 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3) years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2014-346-YG 14 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1. 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A MIA,f\AIrACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 usbel•onzalez• miamibeachfl.•ov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. 'RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is roposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. - . ■. ..• . - - - - • ..• --- - - • - - -• - - e•• ••• _ •.. • --- "• ■ "• - • P.-:.• fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 2 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 4 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ2014-346-YG Appendix_ _ . , A— Page 5 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Res uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 6 APPENDIX B MIA I BEACH NO RFQ N 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 rNote: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. , Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City. Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. • Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix B — Page 1 APPENDIX C MIAMI BOAC Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A— Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five(5)projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI,AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2. SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes; Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering (Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems;TV; Microwave RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages; Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; Parking Decks • Heating; Ventilating; Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets;Airfield Paving; Parking Lots • Interior Design; Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting (Interior, Display, Theater, etc.) • Lighting (Exterior, Streets, Memorials,Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional,Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities(Parks, Marinas, etc.) • Rehabilitation (Buildings, Structures, Facilities, etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies; OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • ,Surve in Mapping, GIS, and other services: Surveying, 0 High Definition Services(HDS) O Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) O Global Navigation Satellite Systems(GNSS) O Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) O Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)and Underground Utility Services O These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design), As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean ,High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation Y 9 • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.) with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83/90) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling & Facilities • Testing & Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply, Treatment and Distribution • Zoning; Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status(particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. �.Y>3 ' ",:•-.y,."�,._.�,..� .:,s,Pi:: ,-..,.-".' �,....+;.h SS '.: �i.'� ':q'::�.`�02:`.,-r.., :'u'_... -.._:� i.'..._:;. .fir.`T�'cYC.�/*�f. $ .>;".f."., .ti .,_.:�., _. _., q,:s:�F._t ,a_.9...: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C APPENDIX D AAAi BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2014.346 VG Appendix C 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix D - Page 1 APPENDIX E MIAMI 1:1. EA '„ H Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 PvAt, i /- 1V \ ! BEAC INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ _ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating "A"as to management and "Class V"as to financial strength or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 GY.;:v'icy//J/'��/- 'Y':f.a.:.:f%.`Yr3'.yn 5dilv.:nh°�,��/%sue/9/�' .. _,:;. _.,.',..:;i,✓. a..,...:;. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix E — Page 1 APPENDIX F MIAMI BEACH Sample Contract RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE )00000000000000000X000 XXXXXXX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this_day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XXXXX)<XXXXXXXXXXXXX)OO(X)(XXXX, a Florida XX)(XXXXXXXX having its principal office at XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 000(XXXX (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Y P PY Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; XXXXXXXXXX X. 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C — Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D— Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E— Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G — Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H — Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition)., Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule "D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive •Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable ' through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of XXXXX)(XX. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Y Y adjustment 9 Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. g) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. g) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. g) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. g) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance.policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, P 9 , omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXX With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXXX)OOOCXXXXX XXXXX)OO<XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX)O(X XXXXX)0XX)OCXXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the 9 P 99 9 date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:1atto1AGUR\AGREEMENT FORMS\A&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX • Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name 1 , I SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION • Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $ 0.00 Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Historic Preservation Board / Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, t hr oug h n o fault of th e Consultant, Construction Administration se rvi ces are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET , SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE r SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT r SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 r - t,. — / -ice J a,'t�n.:•,t+ *rf .� ' �� J l'Ord 't f ) ' .''''f' . *4" - 7 -'14 ilf W';e. 4.1124"‘" " ,Ar-111, )1(alf,-•• :- -49 ` t1 j': :i `►► • 'tt r -#4 -rill•• a .AT �'� ......-7 tai.'• - ..lici. ,•' • . - • 4 ' - : ,• fr. dris --.4 .r r" . _ {Y � • J / _ ' i • e- -t r' y • '� 3'- -•v u � �Nu' ."° t pry:.�'�w - M +� -'' y r.-- .^s t a , - ClTY OF miAmi B AC , , '\.... , , . ,. ,.,.,, _ ..„- ,1,,,, , ),,,,,,. .. " ... .,.. „.-. . ` r• , ( ;;i fr . - 1 ... f - ,.•.._ ..._ ,,.:-._. . fl 1 44 ». j - .. ,1 s '- • y ter 1 x b .. ) . • ? , t . . a. I December 2, 2014 GROUP A - ARCHITECTURE - LANDSCAPE Professional Architectural and Engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG _' KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. -- FLORIDA'S 64 LOCAL FIRM ■ "s ,.. ,' • > St.1. -• ti •,,.. ‘ ' . '''' . a:-4 ,‘.0.214.9-....i 117*. ''''-' s t 1. ' 4. _..„:„.. - ., --E, - 4,.,.,.,.fr,, . s ; __ --).„ A., _. .., .. ... -w N • ,— *r. A* . di-s4:.�\ IR 444%f�+ ', 1 , ate«^ F '''- ti 1 j • Aa.; x 1. s.:‘ 1�' i / ,,� ,,i - f - f, -4 : if kli*" ' Y 1 il} ii, 1' 1 rd./ lifi — 7 _ dt. th- 1 'ilk.. - --." Cover Letter _ _. •.. �S' 41 ..1.41'r-'1 1 i ,,,,,,„ and Table of ..... •skilr Contents . __ .... ' . _L.. , .......... , .......„.. .._ . .. ...............,_ ,..„ , _ , ._, _ . _, . - 4 (��i�r �-c,� y �'� KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. , _'__ FLORIDA'S gig/LOCAL FIRM -�' ", _, _ • i . ry`ti October 28,2014 City of Miami Beach Mr.Alex Denis,Director . .; Department of Procurement MIAMI BEACH 1700 Convention Center Drive t• Miami Beach,FL 33139 ........ m. FroGROUP SS{onal ARCHITECTURE Kral and EnglneAenrg ervkes M , RE: GROUP A -ARCHITECTURE—LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE specbl zed colpyp ps on an os needed.pasis" Professional Architectural and Engineering services in specialized R`0201036Y` categories on an"as-needed-basis" • RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Mr.Denis, Keith and Schnars, P.A. (K&S) is pleased to have this opportunity to respond to the City's solicitation for Group A (Architecture), Landscape Architecture Services.We ask that upon reviewing our comprehensive submittal, you give particular consideration to the important strengths that K&S will bring to the City. We have provided Landscape Architectural Consultant Services under continuing services contracts to various cities including,Fort Lauderdale,Coconut Creek,Miami Proposer: Gardens,Marathon,and North Miami,as well as FDOT Districts 4 and 6 Districtwide Keith anti r c, .ars,.' Miscellaneous Landscape Architectural Services.This experience provides us with Primary Contact: both the knowledge and procedures to fulfill the project requirements and standards Errol iyci, Esq specific to the City of Miami Beach. Vice Presiden ekalayci @kstia.co Our firm has remarkable experience and technical background in production and •_ • management of multiple concurrent projects for a single municipal client. This Qualification Group: experience includes: • Over 30 parks and recreation projects; Area of Species nation: • Over 100 Streetscape/Roadway landscape projects;and 'a a ••- - 1- • General Landscape Architecture Services to over eight(8) municipalities/agencies. K&S is at the forefront of implementing LEED principles and Best Management Practices.We have implemented sustainable practices into all our designs.More importantly,we have incorporated over$15 million worth of sustainable design in our projects in the past eight (8) years.The main focuses of these designs include minimizing environmental impacts,creating "Green Space" and reducing maintenance intervals and using local resources. Our team believes in open and constant communication with the City staff in order to understand maintenance capabilities, preferred equipment and operational requirements.This process helps determine the appropriated use of local resources. K&S uses a proactive and comprehensive approach toward the management of its projects.We concentrate on selecting the organizational structure best suited to meet the requirements and needs of our clients. Our reputation for quality services,timely production and creative,constructible landscape architecture solutions is known by our clients throughout Florida. We look forward to the opportunity to provide the professional services you seek. Respectfully submitted, Errol Kalayci,Esq. Vice President Page 3 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 • (954)776-1616 • Fax(954) 771-7690 a i I`. i :.�.f,. ' 4_ I,. .1 _ + - /,- 1. f A kL -ate ;' d!� 4 1 ,_ !. c ' Y' r! ' j ' 1 7, .I -7 ' / 4 '7.-:,• r + t c • P "' , -4» . Illatt '4 . Ail • 0 LI I komitro,„, TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements - 1 . 1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents - 1 .2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) - 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements TAB 2: Experience and Qualifications - 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm - 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) - 2.3 Financial Capacity TAB 3: Approach and Methodology , ' ' = > _ ; KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. FLORIDA'S 8rk LOCAL FIRM - � r. 1 6500 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 ' ---► Phone: (954) 776-1616 t - ___..�_, Fax: (954) 771-7690 Toll Free: (800) 488-1255 `' www.KSFLA.com /s3F iP 1 ( /1 ! li.i '' ...)- 114 ,.. N. , .:. '. it w /- A 1 't.ii i" ) N , NN. 1 .A . �.Th Response u Certification , -lb_,A,,.., i ...*S° t. . Questionnaire Requirements & o � Affidavit (Appen ix A ._ _ : It,„3,4 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami OeacM1, Florida 33139 Page RFQ 2014-346-YG +lyi ��LOCAL FIRM TAB 1 Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 vusbelgonzalez ai7miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Keith and Schnars No of Years in Business: 42 No of Years in Business Locally: 42 No of Employees: 120 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 6500 North Andrews Avenue CITY: Fort Lauderdale STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33309 TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1 255 FAX NO.: (954) 771-7690 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 10305 NW 41St Street,Suite 112 CITY: Doral STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Errol Kalayci, Esq. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1 255 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: ekalayci @ksfla.corn FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-1406307 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. ,,�l;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 10 FLORIDAS I�r.LOCAL FIRM r rF RFQ 2OI 346-YG /d '�i. TAB1 : Cover Letter & Mini mum Qualifications Requirements , ti 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X : NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES WE NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. - . . ... - - - - -!: . •• -- - --- - -- - " - - -• - . :•• •••• - . • ----• • ■. fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requircmcnt i& Page 1 1 YIC+ KErrH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-Y � y -� = FLORIDAS 5/giLOCAL FIRM TAB I . cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. KEITH and SCHNARS,PA. Page 12 FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2G14-3 5- G TAB 1 : •Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt MA Addendum 1 MA Addendum 6 Addendum 11 MA Addendum 2 MA Addendum 7 Addendum 12 MA Addendum 3 MA Addendum 8 Addendum 13 MA Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 MA Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. Page 13 , ,-,KITH and SCHNARS,P.A. j J J FLORIDAS 64 LOCAL FIRM TAB 1 : Cover letter & Minimurn Qualifications Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 14 FLORIDAS l�LOCAL FIRM �. .;.-. T RFQ 2014-346-Y TAB 1 : Cover Letter • Minimum Qualifications Requirements . . ,,.,.,,‘ PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Resuirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Errol Kalayci, Esq. Vice President Signature of Proposer's Authorized Repre tat e: Date: - 177/ 10/28/2014 r State of FLORIDA ) On this co�day of Orikk- 20�,personally appeared before me _ Li who , County of C I4 roc.octed ) stated that (t)he is the cs T ' of 4Ygitta2zjulks, a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: 10171.01-CA— in - ,1714 Notary Public for the State of Florid) My Commission Expires: . o•'"""sg,"" DONNA M.SOUZA 1741.., = Commission#EE 153810 •-' Expires March 18,2016 irn ., Banded Tfw Troy Fain Insurance 800-385-7019 Page 15 - ,KEITHd SCHNARS,PA.;- RFQ 2OT4-346-YG ', &gip LOCAL , _ fel4;\,,;,•,,,,, .. . . . r- -..- ..• ,, , \\ ,%.,-,,. ..,.,,„..,. _,...r. . :,,,,,,A ., ,.:.,.. : ., )A 211...1. 1 da.:,'' ys.,*,. �i ,•1.',1 :• • • may :.; i J ," •..• 't1 t vt�1t� ` , : '1 F • 'A , � ., f, ' , d .--'1, t,:t .:-. - A,,-,I, . _�,( y �jf :, ' ,1' 1 l 1 ... ` 4,4 " S , • iy I•' ft" ! ensin -�'' I, - Y ;; ,te-. �, k:r' 4: '•_...1 ‘,L'4,"... _,...-••:1 :9��.• '�.i.-' _ • _ , L 0 V .e Minimum .. 4. • ,. . 1 , •: 4 . ill , ,,,.16,104::A7' Qualifications ,,, ,, ,, ,4,440,..,...r.l.„1,,,,,, , ,..4,i, ,,,,.. 40, ,. ,. '16,' 11."' , It Requirements ,. , f.. 1 ,_.. ... c . .,1 .,,„ ., 4 , ._. . . .,,,,40...„ • ._. 000_---. _.„ . . 1 • ... J 1 TAB 1: . Cover letter Minimum Qualifications Requirements . .mmilEastemmy,.7s„ -,:,:_,,--.--. . . . STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 9 1 1] BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 'i'r' LICENSE NUMBER }- LCC000137 T � #{ r The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BUSINESS ';,ti' Named below HAS REGISTERED Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 KEITH AND SCHNARS,PA 6500 N ANDREWS AVE ill • FT LAUDERDALE ' FL 33309-2132 _ VIVA FLORIDA~,. RICK SCOTT ISSUED: 10/07r2013 SEQ# L1310070001555 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION I 0 4 fir.•S BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ti; • 'Y i1 i LICENSE NUMBER •_, '' i101 LA0001479 z J. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT o y' Named below HAS REGISTERED O .. ; Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 I REED,BRUCE K 1000 SW 14TH DR BOCA RATON FL 33486 . ., ir, VIVA FLORIDA SCOTT ISSUED: 10/07/2013 SEQ# L1310070001551 KEN LAWSON RICK SCO GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY tannic t �i ?finib,,, /11$ Open �nibergitp & Continuing (gbu[dtiott 1515 West Commercial Blvd_.Fort Lauderdale,FL 33309 ZIA' itjPir ProvderNumber 8029 (Certificate of cacIjiebentent Prestnteb to Bruce Reed 1000 SW 14 Drive;Boca Raton.FL 33486(954)776-1616- LA00001479 for successful completion of Crime Prevent.Thru Environmental Design 12/8.9,&10/98,0800-1700,24 contact hours,28.5 CEU's,AR.06.588,Instructor,Alan Bock VreOenteb t1jig 10t1'bap of Member, 1998 i G 1;4\11 2� 0 0 m kei tL*1 .•'. Aran.®prn 9mrsit &Continuing Duration 'yam T.)' Ilrogram rlsirtrtor •1961• Page 19 II, i J KEITil and SCHNARS,RA. I� t :a', _1 FLORIDAS gig LOCAL FIRM TAB 1 : Caner Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements ti LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT Cheryl HAS ATTAINED THE DESIGNATION OF LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE BY DEMONSTRATING THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF GREEN BUILDING PRACTICES AND PRINCIPLES NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE USE OF THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED11 GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM1'. D D J ❑❑D C) noc Peter Templetca,GECL restdect D❑ June 13.2013 10785691 June 12 2015 E1 D Date Issued Identification:dumber Valtd Through ■-B C I RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION • . BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE J LICENSE NUMBER .' =FL14., •LA6667177 a The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT • , 4,13- Named below HAS REGISTERED Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30, 2015 CALLENDER, CHERYL C 11310 WOODCHUCK LN BOCA RATON FL 33428 VIVA FIORIOA;- ISSUED: 02/19/2014 SEQ# L1402190000472 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 20 FLORIDA&LocAL FIRM '":*F 2014-346-YG TAB1 Cover Lettèr & Minimu.rn .Q.ualifications Requirements ismillsmisatilmr,„..,;„:„7„,,...:,- , RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 1•. i;: BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ,.;' ' - /':\ LICENSE NUMBER ,`,?<.fie _Ni z LA6667200 -; The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT •4 + Named below HAS REGISTERED 4. "'• Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 ❑ , ■' •; ❑ HANSEN, SHEA ' 4512 SW 37TH AVENUE • ••1' •�• i� _•� FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33312 ••_�1 `t ❑ •' a n k 1 ■ ISSUED: 08/06/2014 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEQ# L1408060000520 _ _ ti firk,iii;;;;-_... MKivJ h11,i/.�� , , /i::P 1��, / � ,•,, r..P;r�. ::: n1,. r.: ,.II I.. ;�,4+ V'i'0�:;:,:��':;. 11{:;•��',i',ti�}; t p..: ,1, a..J r�°4•:.i�'!/.0•.:4�,• ti^:: ,;'' .;:�•.�I -,rr1 I /• :\ I' ,,111 /: /eq. i,If1 //' i:IS'• /., .'il,i /y'`� tiI) I , i,,,l / , aa, i,1,, r Sill�' f r I 1 I„11 I� .,,,• I♦ 1„41 /•� 41,11 I 1 1,11 /'� I� 4411, �. /•'� ,,. h{a ,IS I/%;,�� ,r, Ih..,�� AP, %••� %✓%��� 0,;:,.:3..i.lit i•:•.''•.;•;`��.. .„:„./ o�ie of 1lntcrnattonal (4„,:::,,-_ i" • r I fir%{y: �1Certtf teb arbort5t� :..7> <.1.1„:„..,...5.41"), \:,„,..w.. -..-- �>w +. x•11?') If,-..;,) Ott Shea ._)(lanJen, .,.....,sh, '°' 3abing 5ucce5Sfu1tp contp[eteb tije requirementg egtabti5ljeb bn tije Certification '--*"'.1....�' �\\� = L oarb of tl a International �:: j �ocietp ofrborialtture�, -t:� � OAK v-, tfje abobe nameb i5 ljerebp recogni3eb a5 an J1'9(Certifies Rrbori5t,- ,-- --)?::2,..) e1,•--: j �, 0.- h` -.12 { ,1i �S�b1) ;�;% Certification oars,(CI�air tm�kiera,ri'xecutibe Thirector ,"'ti Vfif,•' oriel of arboriculture p Inv ��1v:o 31 rternationuf �;,;; Y �lnterttational�ociet of arboriculture %;:g:::: FI-64Q9A Apr 7 2012 Jun 30,2015 '°`f,�.'1�) l...,e J�. Certificate Bomber Certifieb ilince expiration Bate ' �;,:;,..off �;w,. n1,• , n ♦ X14,4• ♦ 4144 �♦ ,,,14; �9 -WeN Vr4 11,i W. �rlr.. 11144 •4411. ♦ •rlr, In,r• ♦ n 1,r • /1,r• ♦ ,4111,. ,err ;rrr'-.•a' / '''•• r•` �t`�!/'1151 1I/ iil ,��j i,' �I/I/ '/ii, 1�. ii% I �r :� ill \�.�I /,i1,` 1�� 77i ,�\/// /i11 1��/ Ili ��! f,I 11,II '/1�1• ��/ „,, �1// 5` �\% 1„I �Gyy r��:t;:� �•��:•:e'ti ,1 A ��.:hI �, �4::•. :% j ,j1 1�ti,I •/'• :, �:•� '2' r/ i1 1•.// 144 44:44/ i�1 /�. �f:,A.,S'.; ..;;. •;•• ••1�. '•y1 .,��.. •y, 0 •/4 d, h�.',•,�a. 7, 1,1•��.•:�i 1.�� �, / t �r %I di � / �1 I ♦�i.+I � '• 11:{.;.;.•�.•.si��_ •�` .:1,;• �A�;r. ;•L• ,:'.,:.,:;:.§....::::' .;�.E ..5;•.' ,.'`:}:,'�' '• ..�� •.1'y�.,4.��'.;.:•y.;;+•. .:•'JJ.,4. .::•:•1i.. . .•�.A;,P.,OIL;:�:•..r Vii- U / V \ \ �\ c '� /` Page 21 1, �,KEITH and sCHNARS,P.A. ;'' J,�' FLORIDAS$!1 LOCAL FIRM TART: .. . Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements z _ :___,.-..,.-,:./,.(.....„,.,..,,,,,,,,.-f,,,a,„:„.:,,,,. (y.',:ik:.:77:;:-;s;;;;;;-..,if , ., . ,; o, ‘ 4 ,..,„ ,op,,„, ,;„,,eci, mi;,.,-;;;:‘,ig..0%, : ; :;;;,i;M",,,..;7451:::. ;;; ffi ,;;,WRi„;;;; .::.•,:::',0 C \<-., . .-.1.....,.., A ,,,.w...= 4 ,,,,,,w; 0 _g.,,,,,,,_. :‘ •v.s.v.r. eil •,,,,,,,,,,,„ 14 ,..,,,s,,,,,:• .....w,,,, A-..1.•,,,.,..% -;fiy,,,,,, A -,,,,,,,..,;-_ A •:.:74,,,• A _,,,:yli. :% wiy,,, ',A ,,,lab, A ,,,N4,:..,.....:c..:;,,,,,, 4. I r r • ;:lik:???))) . re.- litterilattOnal .4;)0 tittP of arborttlitture ,,.,,,::.,_, (,,,,,,, ::., ,...:::.:...,, ,,. ,,.,.....„,,,. Certifieb grboricst- ,... .,...,.. Oft-; „...,.........:,..,3 „...i......„ .. , • . . . . ,.. ,,,f,...."..gi:: , .....,....0 „::........, , ,•....„„ : ,. sitii; OM ateya 410.0 .....,..:::::p . . . ........ ,• ........ .„-_,;.,,,.., .,... __. abing ucce55fut1p tontpleteb the requirements e5tabli5beb by tbe Crtification .t.e .......„) :i.:.:..1..11=:: 18oarb of tbe 3nternationaf Ootitp o ef,;(4rboricttfture-, tbe abobe nanteb i5 herebp retogni3eb a5 an 3f ,g Certifieb Rrbort5t- ....., (71;:'4:-":"::-.. ..x............. .0.....:::-• ..44,•,,, ,t.: :-..: Off.tl. Z.117 i--, . , , ...,-,:.:.:i.,...?- /, _ 7/ Certification igoarb,Eft:lir Jun t*bier,,Lxectitibe.Director International ociett]of Arboriculture International " ocietp of Arboriculture .....,, FL-0741A May 12,2001 Jun 30,2016 Certificate flumber Q.r.ertifieb&ince Cxpiration Date ,-..:,:•41,) l/,, 3.......1!"-tmv,,,, vy,„.:47.,..07/ 1.1.F.Tp,•Vy ...y.f.1.1,.., V, •.,„1.1.1.11., 7 -2,41.7,c,07 ,,,,f:,:,,,, oy,, ,,,y:,::- y mits,, v.,,,y,■,:,:,.s 7 •,,,:atafr, v. -ult.' V '•■I 1•• • -`II t,'.• V ,If II'■ V.••'In'.- vl. •',II/1.4.4-::•;:i$,',. ig4 iel . i . S.:■'•''..::4:.% .i.."' ‘:. ;:::5t::;!..41i:!:::1.:.!:.44:*:fil=:.:W... .."Sigf?.:. ?,.4•:$.1.S :gt;..:■."1 .i.S.:if%;•':'$,..1 ...:1::1E ..... P .?:V.;',.1.g.?;.:':'%;'.;::.t.:*.f:** •1 -\.:::3 '' ..911.--.,:"\W\0/ ..■/_.:':-:/.":5 ,Al-:"'Y :-,/5/ ..:':.'"7_, ''.-..g';''' -.4,-.1/\WW/\ :,;7\\W"‘.. -" - :.•17r(7,----.\I'El KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 22 21 FLORIDA'S at LOCAL FIRM -----'---'.. '-.--,,,,i-.kr.',:ii-:.,:-. ', • •__., .:t,',-..'4,4iti,:::;,.: ..:`..' . REQ 2014-346-YG _____ ______e..Clit,.•••. •. •. •, TAB I : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 0 •• f_❑• BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _ j, 4,is • LICENSE NUMBER •: `'� - LA6666970 a T V17-.1 a The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT O •- Ica • Named below HAS REGISTERED •• • Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30, 2015 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER BENJAMIN JR 1525 SW 17TH STREET 1 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33312 VIVA ftORIDA A r RICK SCOTT ISSUED: 10/07/2013 SEQ# L1310070001550 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY - \\- , •� � ' .1. ..� _ ..-? • .- a . t'''. r ,1;1:'; a�i r 4 ri' _ r ., ,xr .. THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION Certifies That On Irf- - . February 10, 2005 . . Chris B. Miller 'I.4 ",lcc Candidate ID 50157 a i,:-_:•:::::--',41 '' ---;:-:▪ ',) Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirements is y f ." And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A :1:`'#▪ = `. ,. . CERTIFIED GOLF IRRIGATION AUDITOR ' : ::::;;:."."t i /z•,' ; h ,),,, ,i ?Z,z i k,:-,A.1 l ty, y• s r Mark Hewitt,CID y;. ,>--;;.',4'_, 1,l ( k \i.)c) 04)) Chair,Certification Board =?;';/y> `�� CGIA is endorsed by•rhe Golf Course Superintendents Association of America 0 r _ y .- :-.1- L_,.1 e ;;;_}..i< F .`' - r°r lyr - e ` <Y+�, ` ,�. . :,,„=,.. ..,-_-;;; t'i t 4°y ,is ,,,y,,,,-„,:,,;:i.,.„,;$,; r } vim,.• Page 23 j, �i j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ.2014. 31 J- FLORIDds LOCAL.FIRM TAB ' Cover Letter & Minimum QualificationsRequirements ----__,.-metainamensaunimmi . , , . . ,. - '. , , , - ., ,,,,, , , , ,- , - , ---:, ,, ,,,,- ,, ,. . '. � � ,' - - - . fir. - 0 .''�.'.� ... ° .- V C, ..,:,,,, .., , THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION Certifies That On i,< 1�I ik1'; November 12, 2004 r Chris B. ■Miller CLIA �� ,,, ,...,, Candidate ID Number: 50157 CAND ID .:-`4'•s'; 3 Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirements . And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A " i CERTIFIED LANDSCAPE ,,. 3, 51 IRRIGATION AUDITOR - a t Q . r„' WI I f o.e ?Zi,L � Mark Hewitt,CID Chair,Certification Board 4, ; ‘(1.' - - A-t■olgiso-4” ---":4-" ---- ------' ''''-'(- --;--- c , • " -! al - ► -* A.43114,"0:-', i `!1 ` �►= ° L ' %? 3 f` 0.'. THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION K3, Certifies That On <<• tie November,13, 2004 �;'‘k) ..: ..'r (ft" , Chris B. Miller f' Candidate ID 004629 } Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirements ', (rt.' And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A -?) IFIED IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR , , .i 27i,z ,,) I't,' Mark Hewitt,CID .. r, `ri: I \ \ Certification Board Chair 1. 4<ai.t." ,A c i 4t,---:.407,E.,,-- -41,:rA,'N.-4.,triLill,iii-lIdilli.:14Miltra'llAa.-rar.,A1Ma- :.,*41' , I,' F ���J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 24 FLORIDAS 5IJ LOCAL FIRM rp g..,`k 4tt G TABI 1 ,, ç9ver L Qualifications Requirements•.� i. :-- _ . - r--.�- ,,may �...v s -,l -,,„.- VW • ,,. , --4..- -.. 4: ,, ( -: r...t./t:.-1- a:\_1Ja.-.,",C.=,,13 11_.17 i 11..14*III t IS 1-",14\t\.1,till 1_l,l_-1,1 7-71J_I' 1 CO/4l 1'1::1?1 1_i1'.1;' 1+'- Cr.IA..?1':1'_\Ja 1;.4 r• F IN� THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION , ' 1, Certifies That On - ` �, , July 26�,2006 l''it 4,., 0, _.,.,,41,.. .::: Chns B. Miller ., (‘,.), 'Candidate Number.004629 a ,,(.. - ,t,t , ._ /h,%- ,.I :',•. r t. ,I,, Successfully Completed Ally The Necessary Requirements i- . t, And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A i �' CER'1 ikeiEED IRRIGATION DESIGNER COMMERCIAL ., , ,_.,,,t .r.„,,5 ,'.1 4.,`., ryrO %` ' . . „ (t I 6A.V---- ; , , Is'', f; TAB 1 : Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements _ .4 . F 1-,. '*._�/ _ .`mil:- ; '1- ry, i � - ..,*i. �. ��a `�N1 1` w .4'i----+ Y ; ?Y r ----1\:•.-- . 4 •/y _ 'i� • ' �4 ,• c-:.:,, ,.„mo' 1?1/4 tr-ti 1 f'1•1' \\�-7--1 \` X14 , - - 7, i) .,. y ./ - A . y t 1 ,. y,,,, ;S*' ,, r•;t..x ,:•-,,q• -a4..i,s ..:� r , C.4 v o �, c v:,` c r •_ %.• ,r�'1 ';, 1 , ^Plw,;.xl>1.2.,1:.=3fF.: .f,F.°e�1=_t.=7,72219.,-fs� "2:7 :7 ,rs =Z= ���51 ��.ff:f 77ZZ.�"`_^ `_l�t+4,!�,. it i' ` S ' ;,:._,,., •`.;,1. ��•I.co:v;. 1 . - ,•r ,` �� . k gild ,f�tti., �� , j _ � FNGLA X 4�L.�� '.: �-• • We KnwWhat G Ni: •\ f:r?'• v m 4 F. a�,, FNGLA CERTIFIED . . ',,,_I`� The Florida Nursery, Growers & Landscape Association { rte'-�r 4 Confers on NI",: ti .'•� • A`::- -4 Chris Miller CCs 0262 '"., '� • � �•;ti Certificate No. �,� e_ ,'' :- -�:: The Title of k _ E. : FNGLA Certified Landscape Contractor (FCLC)`:, r Ia. .,/ -.11�, .� ,.err'y. . \‘1-,k. a; December 31,015 ,, i 1■ j Expiration Date Wes Pam h FNGLA President Ben Bolus FN •• • 4,::;-+:',-,'' ' . 1'y F ' �`' ; ' .;', ^ November 2006 IV• `',c i=e,`'.. It : • Certified Since Harold Jenki FNGLA Certification Chair Merry Mo Certification Dr rl.-'1'/' •. ' � P--'"..- X77 !_�I-l J'T;r'r-r l 1') `r �- era r �f�� �rr.�r�:tr-.r r��.�.���� _ �r ri�rr.�-� -r.r�, / /'`!�, k •F''r^'+� T1^ � r _ ti �_ 'v .-..�-ve r-�+�-5•r�i.; •-s-..-cry u. r 1� 1 �-1 1 •,If, K,t a.s:� •n �.. ',�++r t�:y-•, o ar o e. - ..: ,C'� n a „fi- �a y'.1-,'-'} � 1/. '� vim•. ..r .r _ i i 1 . ^� ,, r " i1 •,, r ti �Yr tt i , f i ` / / \�?� ice' ( rt Y.: 1. i,ee, i \\ k''`',„ �, , ;• 17 c� `► x tom• -- g, rr/ v �s ,,. �{/j• � �j,` �••i /f.'a,�;1� .•. � I rye / � ./ :�.':.,/l:_;ti:•..•,� � r' �:-.,-'�i��.�i t � 1 +.r'"�Y"•v { � ��:� �w..1.�•�+1;�t i'�+-'\ r�, r; ..��.:. /'.. � sf'[.�`�1'�h 7��1�' r Y�� �; eI Z` !t .f \ 3 /+Q5 4w•rS`.!'uriT`,, jw,ont�'4r°I G Eij''r'r:t r;:�•`''.'; • .gt?,,t,u;�; `p, \�� �! 6;:rr1`' -1/ `%ti tti--==1/( �A -iit∎Z a11tb; 1a �'k- —__ill, l r7 = �lir tP t,;,/ �giti? ?&e�FCoru/a Irrigation Society Here recognizes /r 1 r i9 y 6y g �,.,t,,l�� ...hip: •ixl1 i 1 11 1111,'=._.�u,.,. ::�°i �� -----,,.40,:t.:, Cfiris reall' /AO" �0 ..,t1,,,_;, ! On the 201n day ofApri!2005 rig„,b�1 111 �l _ `,h.• ; 'This incftvidua(/ias successfully compheted the Imgation Site Manager Course as instructed 6y the ..,0,0/ ;,;,. ti,g l„ 0/Z: �FCorida Irrigation Society. a\� 411ptH{l> [tilYMI), ik,h, III ILB 1PivviderNum6er.0002995 Iit/1-U`�',- // % !!"$i *!:11 s 1{'i CILB Course Number.00079998 'Weston S ',ht,BFI �q�;;I;,�u..••CILB,approvedInstructor:`Weston°Skip'Wiigkt 'Director of Education,May2,2005 ��'.l �Jl� Continuing Education")nits:8 genera( ' -'4,:s// //irst) , Course(Date:April20a,2005 .i >l�' ' ,.•. r. C i / % 4IQi(�.> /4�I�?�1;D 1 -rte,•..:� it}y. o`'R"` JenniferAmar ,, ..3^\ - 11 Ir7 Exes pion#D0323232 �Iaj`eu . WV. e.sd` aY 11,2007 ( 4�:,.� PR 1 C G T � . 1 r w M u V �{M:M�Ll\Q f e " 'r /n7 ,y r: r'�i\ 41.',/, ` r k1� `z vy ,J `� 0 �z .c `14 �i" , T n. a y 4\.;- / ' A - mo �w� , �7 --.// �'. � ,,'� T -- w �•1 V-"" = �� ` ,, KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 26 - - FLORIDAS 5i�;LOCAL FIRM `{jt RFQ 20114-346-YG . . . .. , • Cover Letter & Minimum Qu..alifcations._Requirements _ -__ t GREEN ADVANTAGED ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION . ; mERCIAL/RESIDE ..''.i t; For successful demonstration of knowledge of environmentally responsible building practices AWARDED TO Chris Whiter ... ........, ,-,,,,,,-,.„-:-,.. _ , 'd' - 1/31/2012 1/31/2012-1/31/2015 (_gib. ;° ':,. Grady(fReat.cm,Green Advantage.Inc. Date Certification Period Certification Number,ether 1012598 ,1,. ,`` ^.4,"nn , m . m. m °+-0, ad r m.,r m rm 'm v�^�7r F''�-'n vt "^A'�,cn , ,i��,��in rtnh . fim�7n 4 4, t�•�- k{ � w i,gi ,�,Tr, tirP�,t 4 v3Q ,doh, -,t,b `T .``LTh,.. a'4�u .00,,,,,,r S 0Si � :.,,Mht^477, y� (. 7 41,- r ,.V to\ .e _l^�J� C 4�l a ti h U v 1 �t 0 ` a 0 _ t w® -? w i . i . w w w —;,;,- Y n E t -„ • -..'77-u7 ww : w x uw7AN” ,, 7uvp w 7wu 77 ww 7.,u nu tw v ._- 77;„,„ ,i,tl u707.' t +r ;r ` � 1 „ 3 The ICPI acknowledges that ` r, F '$y"'d i Chris Miller w�h , t , meets the requirements for the � '~?`r 'A� , ! : E F j�,"", ICPI Concrete Paver Installer Certification - ,„ f. ..r.' .E'_ Certification Valid through 1 213 1120 1.1 rr Ni--:,-i-A, t.,,, F`•- This document conveys that the participant named above has earned a Record of Completion for the Concrete Paver - P t" ,,.....; ,..., Installer Course and has documented the required amount of installation experience and continuing education ` -v,/.. , ., L. / t free,yrr = as required by ICPI for this certification. \,IZ. ,Iir - Cl/tk-AT\da,,Q af.. Zfere,‘",red---- :I”,.-„,a 4?; Chair,ICPI Education Committee ICPI Director of Engineering r I c" !✓ ..I, .., n:r :nrrn_�,"r.n_„.°W'.,.,,;rm,.rr„n m mt •:mWn,n rrn ;rm nnx,w R m n ms,•i r- nwnrrny+m m• m.•;n,,yy:_�,m n y�„m m r ,rm"nrm J 'A V�;.N •++ L.7.7°...".::=7,- ....o. ....... " ° ' a _ mmmmrmm of i l E lr! t st�L14"' G '0}rI Pf~ „ ri ti lA= 6 °6*' 2 < _.l1! - 74.x✓ ' - `� /.. J 4,�.. - .� J ,* `a n M J. .'-,0 ...!! ,w1c s \.1ii , p'. { ,$,b9 -0+ m- i tnn- ps` 54 {imtnratx+` ,J- + n u, J" pni , J D o T ` + `��� n �r` �� J'�(r.-Lsus� "•t". o ,! ..�'- t S�"�. (.Q J� T n c)....., ?�r„`. � ` may°"? L4�' ,p `v l�(� -` �uLCW1 `:o'_.Pt.,,,,,...,_-&;... r,,, ,,,,,...,,,o mod. cngrr �,.. 'rna,lflS ,'.5.�,W..., - "rtlW.�" Page 27 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2 �t4, Q ,t ,` 1`J' FLORIDAS/3( FOCAL FIRM TAB T • TAD 1.. : • Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements -- _, L.' .,.L:1.:•';:it4l:','4-.,:,r.'.. : . C 'FA. 'tiff'+' ' :+'J':A.' : � +: :y;;�::%<�� . r4m m+ .. e .. /+ ,;:�i ..: '49%..,,,, r. .Yik r m ,,,.. rP „..� qN .,., a'++ .'49%..,,., ri .1„ rm,.'14.., r:: . ,. 4m+ 14,:= W': j }�i :..}. nttnattont fof rorituttur e -r / Certtf teb 2trbort t'. :: \(.). \,,,,,- .,,,9 rte:,~- �J~',�\\ , (2h,riLi ' Mtter -: .1', m;; .��' T)abing Sitcce55fttftn contpteteb tIJe requirements estabfistjeb by CO(Certification � i �oarb of the 3�nternationat*ociety of arborintfture-, ',...;;:;':i.i.i tl�e abot a'iamb is ljerebn recogni et)as an if -)0 C rtifieb arbori5t• 0.,;:.;:::::':”. ' 1 torn,„ Ltd' �• #'''''.•1•JI.E.:11t E.' �Eertification Ibloarb.Chair Jitn'Licr,_xecittibe D••irector �.:;,,.� international,oticte of Arboriculture 3lntcrnntiona(sanetp of Arboriculture ;..f. . i (�3,: FL-5218A Sep 25,2004 Dec 31,2016 l.:..- ,14 -••_: Csnititatr_e3vntbrr C:ertitielet um expiration Date _'.``�; 4,fi.:::;:iii.:)...: ..::%' , ,:: w w f vh .,y �r err -++:h +7 �'aa' �\ ;,1 \ri +,r -:•�' : +7 +�%i °! •'." _: �'•` �,!r AJr .t +r S: +r.r �!i ',t`+1.q p,.q +,..r a�i. +.i p.fir +.,ri' J:•.q q:.r :ti s'p\.iii :1 ..•. i� �J•.,� ++t::i +...h +,:.h, �:,r d yq•' �j'�r '1��i ''tt'�,+;t, 'tX,+... 7, - .,/\-,;;•-°'~ __ \ _ _ '• _:--s• - --,/ __ \-73-1,.:;=;:::',,,' b• - ISA QUALIFICATIONS aoDa D b', International 'ocietp of Arboriculture- iii iirn Iree Ri5k zt5�e55ment q uaIificatiou 1 Chris Miller i Having successfully completed the requirements established by the Certification Board of the International Society of Arboriculture;"the above named is hereby recognized as ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified. 51 `f' • it Skip Kincaid.Certification Board Chair Jim Skier,Executive Director International Society of Arboriculture International Society of Arboriculture July 25,2013 July 25,2018 Issue Date Term of Validity End Date t� KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 28 FI�oRIDAs I tI:oCAL FIRM TAB 1. Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements u i vi A &SGfi' U.S. Green Building Council S- HEREBY' CERTIFIES THAT Christopher Miller Jr HAS ACHIF.VEr7 THE DESIGNATION OF tEED ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL T 1' BY DEMONSTRATING THE KNOWLEDGE OF GREEN BUILDING PRACTICE f. REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN(LEER)GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM'. ' r;v -—a_40 . Date Issued _— e ' 'rl October 30,2006 hama S.Richard Fedri 12- Cfrn Presider[CEO and Founding Merman•, � �� � f+y �ka �� _ i�� _'��. J., , � .1t.. _n: F ir _ ��ivr1 �- „�Ct.� t� t s ' V �'� i S'.'~! j Certification No. 2007-0016 iE 'k a Expiration Hate: September 30, 2010 T Skit: _i t s *f� This certifies that 14 ?`�wt.tier\ r:.1)t--.-s,.; Chris 1, [ 1• 1 nS , a Having shown to possess the necessary qualifications S i s y"', ii f r and having complied with the requirements of the +_;:. I I � • Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida,L.A.A. was by an order of this body recognized as competent in dispensing of the duties of a l I ::: Oaf! IZ � J•_ Landscape Inspector (k ., i'_ Given under the seal of the l - Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida,LA.A. y� '- `rr_�; r this 1st day of October,2007 1 �, bm,I6' iii.4,(26x.) ,President I 'i •-� Kimberly Pars ,. .(',. ' 4,4%:0,. E•y. le .x N. T K P -...4e•wivm — _ '� ` •L�r T'1 { _ cv.ri rF �wi(�'" { X *y _� n '�°" �r' .j ;'. i •;f ��'6 Jam' �/��i a /i.3.'v�_. `� r� �^ i r _..;.. 9� "..- ✓� ". fig 5'..7 .n —NL.� .L '' Page 29 KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. RFQ 2014-3461-YG.' ; FLORIDAS$19;LOCAL FIRM I i z �. of yV �� rd s r-,;. yt �,lam, _, Y'A -4,tom' .4 , nit. , Myy ' � ,.,r. ,t '` f L-]'n ..Yom ^° `-•J• : fr , •-, i r `4,-L•C' -nr+ , s� ,\ tom: • �lr J Y .T_ . f s1.0., 61 J -- t;',-(i,,',.'` t-v ti :tiro_—/ 1`r •`,-I•ti7riVf'•N' ,4 • •. � -`/4pr 1 7-` i a� ',,+.'-. -f.� S 1F !• s-.w,. ...,,,. .,,,,t, ,.4:fir.. „.1,.14 r 1-/.'`, •t ,a � i 1 I ,r� � ,,.•. � f1 } �. Ni + rYr ^� e�Y ,ye '''; t q t y 4r r'P f. C %jl M,,l� 1?y .4 i A.Aji a - rir' ! i � ' 1 y� } ( 1 !, . 'gr./;IV:' it 4',"'41,�- if ' i 1 .,' l',,,, * -', ''',,,,L., ..,-,..ze,....t. / ,i---A,i. — i '� / _ R i t �.1 y _ 1• k � ' lip...,.yriti, n. 2 o L '1 • 0,..,,,,.pct r rJr;° ,v ,,1.ti,,t1 t 4...‘,, ,,,,,, -- L, ,Ill,.,;. ,.,.,, , ,,.;.:,&Till, ''N•, . A'-',',1,_•:1'.., it 1 14 ,.• •..s ','-' if-.z,...--1 t',-'1.,,,-. . .-C t . M ! - _ -5\. ,!.:5:'.'.,0.:, r f y 7 Qualificatiotis 14es::4:-.•,., ,,37.:::":,..,,:,r.---- -,,-.V-;.,..-.,--,-.....,-r 1rL--, +,1 SSE ., : fit,. ,, ...'.,. f,r,..„..,,,A-..,-- -,...i.„....-.-,- , I, -.-.z. -=:•,-- -... .--44.. ..4.,,,,i ., of Pro posin g „:„..:,..„,, ,_,.. ..., ...k.'OAT„.,*?"-,:'-'e•"1-4(''IP:- -,c-,,\-‘;• 9:‘' ~ . _ ...,....„.,,,__4 ,j` ,,,.. .• �•err 5,' `i.``l ,._:_,: , . - L :��,,.. •r,. - - v - 3'2-1': \ ' , > i 1 •i, Syr; - - �■• tti. _� _ 424 i •i. ,'. I.__:r., -..... 14 . ,:a _.... . i 1 likl J - I . r. Arigii. ■•••■•■■ ....■ mon■ FIRM OVERVIEW K&S is a firm dedicated to the timely and cost-efficient delivery of services.In fact,in 2007,when FDOT released K&S has comprehensive in-house resources focused its annual summary of design overruns (time and money), on solving the engineering, planning and environmental K&S ranked among the best of the over two hundred firms challenges faced by a diverse client base.Our commitment surveyed. In the six-year period studied, K&S designed to professionalism and strong project management has and surveyed twelve projects with a construction value in allowed us to play a key role in the development of Florida's excess of $120 million. No other firm selected by FDOT residential, commercial, recreational, and transportation in that six-year period completed this volume of work,and infrastructure.We are also very proud to say that over the maintained such low overruns in cost and time. past several years, K&S has managed to maintain its high level of performance,despite our nation's and,in particular, As regulatory requirements have grown,and the need for our region's economic difficulties.K&S has not experienced a true, multidisciplinary approach to project delivery has any significant organizational restructuring, ownership or become essential to our clients, our firm and staff have management changes.We strongly believe this is due to the adapted.Through this adaptation,we have developed staff positive reputation K&S has consistently maintained, the and a project portfolio that can be categorized into several quality of work we produce,our focus on staying current areas of practice: with changes in the industry, and the strong relationships we have built with our clients over the years.Representing • Landscape Architecture; the continuation of historic firms dating to 1929, K&S was • Environmental Sciences and Permitting; officially incorporated in 1972.With 42 years in business, • Comprehensive,Regional and Urban Planning; we are a well-established firm, comprised of over 120 • General Civil Engineering; staff members. Our professionals include environmental • Structural Engineering(Bridges and Waterfront scientists, landscape architects, planners, surveyors, civil Structures); and structural engineers,highway engineers,transportation • Surveying and Mapping; planners, construction inspection specialists, public • Highway Engineering and Design; involvement specialists,graphic designers,and technical and • Transportation Planning; administrative support staff. • Grant Writing; • Construction Engineering and Inspection; 1/4E4* - e f s; ''•• gi y, w4 .'•crl '' 1 1 d1 l ..v,„• ...,..1; >Ap ' .: , P at — . _ 1 l alk , - — w y .acdti'rtiti�iii / Page 33 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. t 1ST 1 FLORIDAS git LOCAL FIRM , L c _A A �// �' . . . \ / -5) ,,,rt-71,', _____C-76 .i.__J "----i _ © ° Eq---,..„, A--1-2,,..._..—gf,Q_ig_Tri., ___, _ , , , „. ,---.. - , ,, _.• . ,...„. ‘• -_, -.., ,,,,,,A. , -, .„_ ,....,,, .. ....... _ _ . .......„ ....., . ,,.Q w: �►~' • ._.. .„ -� , apt,:„ a• 1 ` - l C I l , R\ ' ill - ---;---; , ' l _ t�i ,/ •.- -r; :19\ s-1 l y1, :i .1 ,■ , 'f 1-' Pi : E ? .. �"."��r_ _4 .-.- „,-, ,--,,- ,,.,-,,,.0. ,N:--4-..sr.: .:,. -...ii, , ..y. _ dam'- _ \ ` ., , h� - - - r � ,. - • - it 11. f 4 F� f',..te.11,t•�', ✓• a Y'''. ..''' - • ,�^ 1. r• ''.,r ■ b• E�3c,.ti E3,+,¢. 2`�:'�:T �:ti, _ _ rr x. • Project Development and Environment Studies; t' . . , %i e; - • . , . • Public Involvement and Outreach; - , N. , -- ," j • Site Development Service;and f`.. r� •.. • Visual Communications. ' r_ , ► , ' _„ �- --- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ''�• `t r 'r`.2_, :r`°..' .; SERVICES \,, � '�-. ' K&S' landscape architects have the technical background !_�”=-,� _+thr.„ -._ and experience to provide high-quality services ranging -�, , i.. 7:77 -``� ` `� from initial planning, to construction observation and ' ��.yr� ._• :{,a _ .' 1_ i .--‘ , '-' `�. .j'� a 1'.• / �'. ' ;•��,'t final inspection.We are accustomed to managing multiple b,z;- . „�----...1.,' - , . ;• -a• concurrent projects for a single government client. The %, ' -,� 'I'f,1► projects we have successfully completed recently have : �' `` ' include parks, streetscapes, community enhancements, '' "�''' traffic calming, beautification, roadway improvements, and �?, ;L;, municipal facilities. Our landscape architecture team has _ t ` -' provided services to over eight municipalities/agencies in `.► the past five years,with projects such as City Halls, Public ' ` Works Facilities, municipal complexes, and fire stations. ._ . " Services for these projects have included preliminary , y-`. studies,site planning,irrigation design,site amenities design, y `' j`, planting plans,tree preservation plans,development review - . . approvals and permitting. F - � • .4k-- We have provided landscape architectural services for '= •, more than I 0 parks and recreation projects in the past five _ , ' 4 .�v. years. Successful completion of these projects has required .. ' .: ' " _ a strong start,strict attention to detail,efficient finalization, _ and facility designs that can be properly maintained upon -, < - - completion. Additionally, we have provided services for _---- " over 50 streetscape,traffic calming,and roadway landscape projects in the past five years, for both state and local municipalities.Services consisted of master planning,design development, construction documents, permitting,bidding, public outreach, and inspections. Our diverse designs include hardscape, irrigation, site amenities, planting, and street and pedestrian lighting. '2:11.'1 j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 34 FLORIDAS gig LOCAL FIRM f;;l. ?21,I C. >- 1C .� - •.',-;,.#, ,t 1•ftig: ....-.4,1,,1 „•\\L J-)1� ,�f ,''"i - ! -Z:-.0 1, i lam• --t, �'• r-9 0, r.,•' .t°" ��'-..ice '‘_ ;" '1• .., 1 \M y .. ' , •. ../.�-�'. 1:4,�1 'T r ice. r, �' t. " 'M4a,-,:..•.�'t _ '\•,..;..:: • •• • - ?. '.L I. -.0•. �._ _��! :".. it j - ..: i.i.' ' IP',44-1....:14''lt.{:4..---7\•.:•:,...'..:i'.1'-'? .ci '..i 4 ii".''''' 'A. ' i•-- - r`,..t, t-,,Lk. I,....;,-- 1 . v . :43, .. . —-.,• i . •:I i ca \pia :e'-�� ' -�+.1 f+ , _ I 1 • 1," . ' - clik .."... ,i, . }�,� 1j� 1' 'I — - i . +,.I �y , ,_ • --. i ' �v �"-� =1_ - -'`=•'°m'�Fce„ -. - -� 0 of- ''' --- , Qualifications ______, ________ _____ _,_ . .....:____ ,....._____„.....___,._ __ ............... ______________. . , ,..„.___ fii , ., . • • _ „.,,,,,, .... ,•„•.• „,..k •...,....,_, .. •,•_•_•,.. ,• , , I.....,.. •_._ ,,....• „..... 7-\OA'r.7- - .. , Team „N .., • ,8„... „ . .4 ,.., •,,, • :,.,•,..._ ...,,,,„ , 4 ._. .„..., ,..._ 4.._ ... .... ,,. .,_ , • , ,, ,.. , _ . . ...,,,..„ _ . _, .,, • ....N .., ,.. .... • , ..... .... . ,.. .... . , . .. .. . ,. , __ ,,4 . ......„.. ,,., , , .. .._ .? .. .. _ _ 4, Exoer@ © Iifiifi©u gsg E ..i ORGANIZATIONAL CHART el INI) M [AMBEAC [ [ _. J 'o . PRINCIPAL_ '.114k4 IN-CHARGE r' ,:,, tt Errol Kalayci Vice President ... L "`"44,: Iffy PROJEC—T MANAGER ' Bruce Reed,RLA Director of `',; Landscape Architecture J/ 'i LANDSCAPE NDSCAPE ND APE _ ., tk ARCHITECTURE �- ARCHITECTURE \ ARCHITECTURE , �'` 4-, Chris Millen RLA, i +_ Cheryl Callender,RLA, Shea Hansen,RLA,ISA ISA,LEED AP �� 1'L.'-') LEED Jr �,��' �''= fit' Jr . ND AP.' : a 1L�MCISC-�i4ZPEWA' j7'`"`'1 NDSCAP t ARCHITECTURE , .. % ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE ''''`'• Raul Gavela Al-- Christine McKay Marisol Ortega,ISA I Carilli SUP PORT _ A...., ..._J,.., ....,‘ . • __. -4—N i ....., PLANNING 1 SURVEY&MAPPING CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION CIVIL ENGINEERING ROADWAY J Page 37 KEITH and SCOURS,P.A. 1:1- q VAd4- ,W -1 : FIARIDAS gip LOCAL FIRM - \\L Bruce Reece • RLA mom fiL Mr.Reed has extensive experience in a wide variety of projects where he has provided afull range of landscape architectural services.These services consist of the following land development activities:master planning,programming,plan review,site design and development, landscape and irrigation design, cost analysis, environmental mitigation design/permitting, site approval Tr ! processing/permitting and public/client presentation. As an experienced project manager, _ c ' Mr. Reed has competently prepared and administered construction and bid documents, QA/ QC, contract negotiation, written reports and correspondence, review of project invoices Academic and construction observation. As a divisional staff supervisor, he directs and schedules the Background design teams in completion of landscape architectural design development. Mr. Reed has developed a perceptive understanding of roadway,streetscapes,park and recreational facility B.S.,Landscape design and has consistently established positive rapport with municipal and agency personnel. Architecture,University of He has demonstrated responsible capabilities in team coordination and client/staff/public Florida, 1987 project comprehension and status awareness. He also has significant experience in the areas Professional of commercial/industrial/residential land development analysis and design. In addition, he Registration possesses a wide range of state-of-the-art computer technology capabilities resulting in the presentation and submission of the latest computer-aided calculations, reports and design Registered Landscape production by his design team. Architect,FL#0001479 Professional Relevant Experience Certifications FDOT District 4 General Consulting Services: Provided plan review services for the Crime Prevention Through FDOT District 4. Environmental Design (CPTED) December 1998 Districtwide Landscape Architectural Service, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FL: Project Manager for General Miscellaneous Services including landscape Professional plan preparations, streetscapes, tree impacts, inspections, plan review and CADD Standard Affiliations Recommendations.Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Paul Moss,RLA,Phone:(305)470-5560. American Society of (2001 to Present) Landscape Architects Districtwide Landscape Architectural Services, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FL: Project Manager responsible for consulting services including construction plans, specifications and details for landscape, hardscape, and irrigation plans; site analysis, tree relocations, plan reviews,cost estimates,construction inspection, project coordination and management. Client/Contact FDOT District 6/Craig James (2001 to 2009), Phone: (305) 470-5221; Paul Moss, RLA (2009 to 2013), Kirk Hoosac (2001 to Present), Phone: (305)470-5384. 1-95 Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Manager/ Project Landscape Architect-A 10.5-mile highway beautification project for the 1-95 corridor through Miami-Dade County,including landscaping to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor, reduce maintenance, highlight interchanges and mitigate the effects of the newly installed sound wall. Client/Contacts: FDOT District 6/Craig James (sections 2-7) and Paul Moss, RLA(sections 8&9), Phone: (305)470-5221 (Craig James) and (305) 470-5384 (Paul Moss). (2001 to 20 I I) Biscayne Boulevard, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Architect - 1.4 miles of Biscayne Boulevard in the heart of old downtown Miami roadway improvements including drainage, sidewalk, ADA accessibility, utility and road-widening improvements. Landscape architectural services included the assessment of over 500 trees existing within the project limits, landscape plans, irrigation, and lighting enhancements. Through public involvement events, emphasis was placed on preserving the character and enhancing the pedestrian experience of the Boulevard. Client/Contact FDOT District 6/Jose Barrera, P.E., Phone: (305) 470-5260. (2005 to 201 1) ,, �;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 38 , FLORIDAS tilt LOCAL FIRM � RFQ 2014-344-1fG Bruce Reed, RLA Miami Inter-modal Rental Car Center, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Manager - Planning, irrigation and landscape lighting design for this major Miami International Airport facility. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Paul Moss, RLA, Phone: (305) 470-5384. (2005 to 2011) I-95/SR-9A, Miami-Dade County, FL: responsible a Architect of Record onsible for landscape enhancements along P the I-95/SR-9A in Miami-Dade County. The project included 8 million dollars of landscape enhancement to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor, reduce maintenance, enhance interchanges and mitigate the sound walls. Client/ Contact: FDOT District 6/Paul Moss, RLA, Phone: (305) 470-5560. (2001 to 2010) SR-826/Palmetto Expressway, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Architect of Record responsible for overseeing the proposed landscape enhancements along the corridor. The project included 6 million dollars of landscape enhancements along 8 miles of SR-826 through Miami-Dade County to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor, reduce maintenance, and enhance the interchanges. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Paul Moss, RLA, Phone: (305) 470-5560. (2008 to Present) SR-953/LeJeune Road, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Manager - LeJeune Road is an exciting project serving as a gateway to South Florida's visitors and residence arriving at Miami International Airport. Design budgeted for $6 million included landscape, landscape lighting, hardscape and irrigation design. Post design included working weekly with the contractors, inspectors, owners and maintenance authority. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Paul Moss, RLA, Phone: (305) 470-5384. (2005 to 201 I) Atlantic Boulevard/SR-814, Broward County, FL: Developed streetscape concepts through construction drawings including hardscapes, site amenities, planting and irrigation plans for the City of Pompano Beach for this corridor enhancement project. Client/Contact: City of Pompano Beach/Helen Grey, Phone: (954) 786-4106. (2000 to 2001) Beach Streetscape Las Olas Boulevard Phase, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Project Manager/Landscape Architect of Record - .5 roadway improvements that consisted of roadway realignment, hardscape treatments, ADA upgrades, landscaping, decorative lighting, signage and improved stormwater drainage for a tourist destination known around the world. Services provided: Streetscape, roadway, planting, hardscape, irrigation, landscape, pedestrian and street lighting design, tree relocation plans, bidding assistance, and construction management. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/ Hal Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. (2006 to 2009) SR-7/US-441, Miami-Dade County, FL: I mile; roadway beautification, landscape and irrigation design. Sunset Lakes Municipal Complex,Miramar,FL:Programming,Master Planning,Site Planning,Planting Plan,Irrigation Design, Permitting, Construction Drawings, Specifications for a 26-acre park/municipal complex design build project. Client/Contact: City of Miramar/Henry, Talton, P.E., Phone: (954) 364-2114. (1 1/01 to 10/03) City of Fort Lauderdale General Engineering Services, Broward County, FL: Provided master, site, hardscape, planting, irrigation, and site amenities plans for municipal parks, streetscapes, and infrastructure improvements. Client/ Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Hal Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. (2001 to Present) City of Miami Gardens, Miami-Dade County, FL: Provided master, site, hardscape, planting, and irrigation plans; budgeting reports; public involvement; and permitting and construction observation for gateway signage, parks, and streetscapes. Town of Lantana Municipal Beach Complex, Lantana, FL: Park master planning; programming, survey, design, citizens and park user's survey, public meetings; opinion of implementation cost, concepts, preliminary and final master plan. Client/Contact: Town of Lantana/Mike Greenstein, Phone: (561) 540-5766. (2007) Sunset Lakes Municipal Complex, Miramar, FL: Programming, master and site planning, landscape and irrigation design,construction drawings; permitting, specifications for a 26-acre park/municipal complex design-build project.Client/ Contact: City of Miramar/Henry, Talton, P.E., Phone: (954) 364-2I 14. (2007) Page 39 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 20Y4 346-li''G 'd"= — — FLORID& FIRM Bruce Reed, RLA Deerfield Beach Park Improvement Program, Deerfield Beach, FL: Master planning, site design, landscape and irrigation design; permitting, construction drawings and specifications, bidding and contract administration for renovation of five municipal and neighborhood parks, including pre-engineered buildings specifications for several parks. Client/ Contact: City of Deerfield Beach/Carl Peter, Phone: (954) 480-4200. (I 999) Pine Jog Environmental Education Center Boardwalk/Trail Concept Plans, Palm Beach County, FL: Served as Project Manager. The Project included site analysis, program development, budgets, material evaluations; trail and boardwalk layouts. Also site amenities and signage for this outdoor educational facility. Woodlawn Cemetery Historic Cemetery, Broward County, FL: Services covered preliminary design through construction observation services. Improvements included landscape, hardscape, and irrigation design. Site amenities incorporated were metal picket fence, entrance signage, historical markers, monuments, trash receptacles and benches. Custom construction details, specifications and design concepts were developed to accommodate and preserve the historic elements of the site. Communication with local stakeholders was key to the successful outcome. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Horace McHugh, Phone: (954) 828-6822. (2002) Florence Hardy Park, Fort Lauderdale, FL:Master plan and grant assistance for park renovations including a greenway trail, pedestrian gateway feature, 1/2—mile pedestrian trail, skate amenities,volleyball court, basketball courts,tennis court practice walls/handball courts, pavilions, a gazebo, a tot lot, a playground, renovations to lawn bowling/croquet field area, a native garden, trellis seating areas, a recreation center, decorative pavement, and parking lot additions. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Kathy Conner. (2003 to 2004) Rolling Oaks and Bunche Parks Improvement Program, Miami Gardens, FL: Programming, master planning and grant assistance for two City of Miami Gardens parks entailing more than 40-acres. Improvements include a nature trail, recreation center,maintenance buildings,pavilions, press boxes,a concession/restroom facility,soccer/football fields, tennis courts, a par course, volleyball courts, an aquatic play structure, lighting, signage, parking, and playgrounds. Client/ Contact: City of Miami Gardens/jay Marder, Phone: (305) 622-2225. (11/05) Windmill Park, Coconut Creek, FL: Programming and conceptual designs, proposed improvements to this existing park included entrance features, community garden, basketball courts, pavilions, site furnishings, parking and pathways. Client/Contact: City of Coconut Creek/Shelia Rose, Phone: (954) 973-6756. (7/12 to 1/13) Miramar Town Center, Miramar, FL: Served as the Project Manager, providing landscape architecture services for this urban mixed-use development. The Miramar Town Center was designed as an idyllic traditional downtown with pedestrian oriented streets, beautiful Mediterranean style architecture, "main street" store fronts and waterfront views characteristic of historic towns of Florida. Site amenities included a plaza, fountain, site furniture, decorative pavers, planters, tree grates, and landscape lighting. Client/Contact: CKC Ltd./Centex Rooney for the City of Miramar/Cotter Christian, Phone: (954) 452-9100. (2002 to 2005) Lyons Road Master Plan Streetscape Improvements, Coconut Creek, FL: Scope included master planning through construction documents and bid specifications. Streetscape improvements design for hardscape treatments, site amenities, planting and irrigation. Client/Contact: City of Coconut Creek/Pamela Stanton, Phone: (954) 956-1463. (2004 Master Plan, 2005 Phase 1, 2011 Phase I I) Fort Lauderdale Beach Streetscape Master Plan, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Served as the Project Manager for this $9 million Streetscape Enhancement Project. Complete services from field analysis, concept development, budgeting and public presentations to final documentation. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Hal Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. i J KEITH and SCHNARS,EA. Page 40 FLORIDA& Loan.FIRM t` tw RFQ 2014-346-YG i. <c—:1' _ r i.j Shea Hansen, RLA, «A A, --- -'_ _ 4l A; ` ,If, 7), i Since arriving at Keith and Schnars in 2006,Ms.Hansen has gained a variety of experience in r1'( ;:z ; rs $ t the Landscape Architecture field.Starting as an intern and working up to a Project Manager's 1,, ), � J / position,Shea has worked on many projects large and small from parks to streetscapes and cmaster planning. Shea has strong design instincts and polished graphic skills.As a Certified 4r 7 •' , € Arborist,Shea is also keenly interested in the preservation and improvement of the urban •'\,\\ \ forest in coordination with a Smart Growth design approach to our landscapes. Academic Relevant Experience Background SR-953/LeJeune Road Improvements Project, Miami-Dade County, FL: MLA,Florida A&M Designer -As an Associate,Ms. Hansen participated in landscape and irrigation designs.She University,2007 also facilitated communications between the Miami International Airport staff and Keith and Schnars personnel throughout the project.Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Paul Moss, BFA,Studio Arts,Florida Phone:(305)470-5384. State University,2001 Districtwide Landscape'Design Services, Miami-Dade County, FL: Ms. Hansen Professional served as a contracted in-house project manager for the FDOT District 6 office for 3 years, Certifications providing landscape architectural services including preparation of landscape and irrigation Registered Landscape plan sets, plan reviews, presentations, reports, permit coordination, review meetings, tree Architect,FL#LA6667200, relocations,inspections and miscellaneous consultations. Most notably,on behalf of the DLA, ISA Certified Arborist, Ms. Hansen oversaw the development of the landscape plans, including the inventory and FL#6409A tree relocation for SR-826/836 Interchange Reconstruction Design Build Project; as well, Ms. Hansen oversaw the inventory and tree relocation, landscape design and inspections for SR-826 Palmetto Expressway Reconstruction from Bird Road to Sunset Drive Design Build Project.Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Kirk Hoosac, Phone:(305) 470-5384.(2007 to 201 1) • 1-95 Section 4 Project,Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector-Ms.Hansen was involved in the beautification of a I-mile corridor of 1-95 running through Miami-Dade County. Her contributions to the landscape design of the corridor helped improve the corridor's aesthetic character.The design intent was to reduce the overall amount of care required to maintain the corridor,and mitigate the effects of the installed sound wall. Her work also included post-construction observation site visits and the writing of quarterly landscape deficiency reports. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Craig James, Phone: (305) 470-5221. 1-95 Sections 5 & 8, Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector -An 8.3-mile highway beautification project for the 1-95 corridor through Miami-Dade County,including landscape design to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor, reduce maintenance, highlight interchanges and mitigate the effects of the newly installed sound wall. Her work also included post-construction observation site visits, the writing of quarterly landscape deficiency reports and correspondence with project managers. Client/Contacts: FDOT District 6/Craig James (section 5) and Paul Moss,RLA (sections 8),Phone: (305) 470-5221 (Craig James) and (305)470-5384 (Paul Moss). Biscayne Boulevard, Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector- Ms.Hansen was involved in the landscape and irrigation design for 1.4 miles of streetscape improvements along Biscayne Boulevard in the downtown area of the city of Miami. Alongside her design work,Ms.Hansen's contributions to the project included several onsite analysis visits.Client/ Contact FDOT District 6/Jose Barrera,RE,Phone:(305)470-5260. Page 41 SCHNARS,PA. /, KEITH and S an 1� , RFC/.2E>�1i -34 =1 � frh„ �� FIARIDAS 1 LOCAL FIRM Shea Hansen, RLA,. ISA SR-Al A/Collins Avenue, Miami-Dade County, FL: This I mile RRR roadway project in the heart of south beach includes a landscape beautification component to enhance the pedestrian space and landscape the newly created bulb outs. As Project Designer, Ms. Hansen oversaw the development of the hardscape, landscape and irrigation designs,and facilitated the coordination between the FDOT and the City of Miami Beach. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Heidi Solaun-Dominguez,Phone:(305) 470-5282.(2011 to Present) SR-Al A/North Roosevelt, Monroe County, FL: A 4 miles roadway reconstruction project leading into historic Key West includes a landscape and hardscape design coordinated with the City of Key West. Ms. Hansen assisted with Post Design services,providing construction oversight of the relocation of existing palms.Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Kirk Hoosac,Phone:(305) 470-5384.(2010 to Present) SR-907/Alton Road, Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector -This 1.5 mile section of Alton Road is an active commercial corridor on Miami Beach;heavily traveled by locals and tourists either by foot,bicycle or automobile. In addition to being a complete roadway reconstruction project,FDOT's scope also includes highway beautification with landscape,hardscape,and irrigation plans.Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Danny Iglesias,Phone:(305)470-5289.(20 I 1 to Present) SR-959/Red Road, Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector - These projects include three consecutive milling and resurfacing projects along one of South Florida's State Historic Highways,Red Road.With the installation of new light poles,sidewalks and bike lanes where permitted,significant coordination was performed to address the preservation of the existing canopy trees and provide a context sensitive design. An alternative sidewalk treatment was created to reduce impacts to existing roots structures and to prevent future sidewalk repairs. As well,Ms.Hansen created rendered presentation boards and assisted with several Public Involvement meetings.Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Ana Arvelo, Phone: (305) 470-5210. SR-976/Bird Road, Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector - Ms. Hansen coordinated closely with the Engineer of Record and Lighting Engineer during the design phase of this project in order to assist in implementing a Context Sensitive Design along this State Historic Highway that provided adequate space for newly proposed sidewalks, pedestrian lighting and existing canopy trees. Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Ana Arvelo,Phone: (305) 470-5210. SR-90/SW 8th Street - Miami-Dade County, FL: Designer and Inspector- For this safety and milling and resurfacing project, Ms. Hansen performed a tree inventory for the 80 impacted trees along the corridor.As well as facilitating coordination with the local municipality regarding the impacts and the relocation site/plan. Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Ana Arvelo,Phone: (305) 470-5210. North Miami Downtown Development and Major Corridor Master Plan North Miami, FL: Designer - Six major corridors within the City of North Miami were analyzed based on a Complete Streets Initiatives,gateway treatments, streetscape initiatives, landscape and hardscape treatments.As well, design guidelines and code recommendations were created for the development of mixed-use buildings. Conceptual designs demonstrated recommendations for each roadway.(2013) KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 42 FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM REG 2014-346-YG Chris Miller, RLA, ISA, LEED AP • Mr.Miller is a highly qualified landscape architect with a keen interest in the Green Industry His broad range of experience includes all phases of the design process from site analysis, concept generation and project planning to the computer-aided drafting of landscape, irrigation and amenity designs through final implementation.He is known for his innovative design solutions and immaculate attention to design details, construction specifications, ' plan reviews and construction inspection. Combined with the ability to recognize and _�, . __ : solve the complex requirements of project integration, Mr. Millers expertise includes a Academic thorough understanding of Florida's ecosystems and critical water conservation principles. Background These strengths are complimented by his skill in photography and effective presentations. His many years of experience include planning and design for commercial developments, B.LA.studies,Landscape parks,municipal centers,streetscapes and FDOT roadway beautification projects.Mr.Miller Architecture,University of currently holds 15 Green Industry Certifications. Florida, 1993 to 1997 Relevant Experience Vicenza,Italy Institute of Architecture (European Alton Road, 5th Street to Michigan Avenue, Miami Beach, FL: I-mile street Study program),University reconstruction and drainage project including improvements to sidewalks and the pedestrian of Florida, 1997 experience with landscape, hardscape and irrigation design and coordination of disciplines and unique design details. Professional Registration Biscayne Boulevard, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape and irrigation design and Registered Landscape g p tree preservation for 1.4 miles along Biscayne Boulevard in the downtown Miami. Architect,FL#6666970 Collins Avenue, Miami-Dade County, FL: A RRR roadway project in south beach Professional included a landscape beautification component to enhance the streetscape and landscape Certifications with an irrigation design and customized tree/sidewalk installation details. ISA Certified Arborist ISA Tree Risk Assessor FDOT District 4: Specialty CEI services on landscape projects throughout District 4, LEED Accredited to ensure plan compliance with FDOT specifications and as well as long term landscape Professional installation success. GREEN Advantage Certified Practitioner LeJeune Road, Miami-Dade County, FL: This very high profile 22-acre roadway FNGLA Certified project serves as the gateway to Miami International Airport.The design elements included Horticultural Professional hardscape, landscape, irrigation and lighting, design details and specifications, and included FNGLA Certified construction inspection and project management. Landscape Contractor FIS Certified Irrigation Site Miami Intermodal Center, Miami-Dade County, FL: The MIC is the centerpiece of Manager g a$2.25 billion series of rojects connected to Miami International Airport with an overhead IA Certified Irrigation P � P people mover. It is a consolidated transportation center for visitors using the airport, Contractor commuter trains, rapid transit, buses, and cruise ships in the Port of Miami. Design work IA Certified Irrigation included hardscape, planting, lighting, irrigation, design detail and specifications as well as Designer specialty construction inspection services for this highly visible transportation node. IA Certified Golf Irrigation Auditor Atlantic Boulevard, City of Pompano Beach: Corridor CRA project. Developed IA Certified Landscape streetscape concepts through construction drawings including hardscapes, site amenities, Irrigation Auditor planting and irrigation plans,details and specifications and construction inspection. LIAF Certified Landscape Inspector Al A/Seabreeze Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, !CPI Certified FL:This design for .4-miles of a new pedestrian-friendly roadway and sidewalk corridor along a boulevard parallel to Fort UF/IFAS Florida Master Lauderdale Beach including themed pavement treatments, landscape,and irrigation designs Naturalist through details and construction documents. Native Areas Training Academy Florida Earth Natural Systems Page 43 9 I J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG FEORIDXS&LOCAL FIRM Lk: Ts�_ Chris Miller, RLA, ISA, LEED AP F. Y Professional Beach Streetscape Las Olas Boulevard Phase, Fort Lauderdale, FL:Improvements Affiliations consisted of roadway realignment, hardscape treatments, ADA upgrades, landscaping, American Horticultural decorative lighting, signage, and improved stormwater drainage for a tourist destination Society known around the world. Services provided: Streetscape, roadway, planting, hardscape, irrigation, landscape, pedestrian and street lighting design, tree relocation plans, bidding American Society of assistance,details,specifications,and construction management. Landscape Architects I-95/SR-842/Broward Boulevard Interchange, Broward County, FL: The Florida Irrigation Society interchange serves as one of the gateways to downtown Fort Lauderdale.Provided concepts Florida Native through production plans and construction observation.This beautification project included Plant Society berming,limestone boulders,a native plant palette and irrigation. Florida Nursery Growers 1-75 Visual Resource Assessment Plan, FDOT Central Office: Intensive visual and Landscape Association landscape assessment of 145-miles of the 1-75 corridor, more than 25,000-acres,to create a tool for FDOT and local governments as they plan transportation improvements for the Florida Urban Forestry region to give motorists a favorable impression of Florida.Mr.Miller documented the corridor Council with thousands of geo-referenced photographs,and co-designed an assessment system for corridor visual resources utilizing the landscape character areas of Florida. International Society of Arboriculture Spanish River Park, Boca Raton, FL: Beach Dune Restoration Project for this popular destination, required DEP permitting, invasive plant removal, native beach dune plant International Palm Society restoration,contract specifications,bidding assistance and CEI services. Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida FDOT District 6: Tree risk assessment and analysis along historic Coray Way in Miami to make recommendations for the preservation of the historic trees along this scenic highway, The Irrigation Association in preparation for a roadway rehabilitation project. US Green Building Council 1-95 through Miami-Dade County, FDOT District 6: An I I-mile multi-year landscape project for the 1-95 corridor through Miami-Dade County,to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor,reduce maintenance,enhance interchanges and mitigate the sound wall using 12,000 trees and 186,000 shrubs,80% of which are Florida native species.Services spanned from design through installation inspection and landscape monitoring. Palmetto Expressway Interchanges at 8th, 24th, 36th, 58th, and 74th, FDOT District 6: A series of stand-alone landscape interchange beautification projects along the Palmetto, increasing the urban forest with 4,400 trees and 126,000 shrubs. Following landscape design were required construction meetings and continuous site inspections for plan compliance. 1-95/1-395 and 1-95/1-195 Interchanges FDOT District 6: A 40 acre stand-alone landscape beautification design for these 2 major interchanges, to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor for residents and tourists, build up the green infrastructure and reduce maintenance - required installation monitoring and inspection services KEITH and sCHNARS,P.a. Page 44 liOsi FLowDns_Jr LOCAL FIRM ���, s ` RFQ 2014-346-YG a � -r r 1d Marisol Ortega, ISA Ms.Ortega lends more than 20 years of experience as a designer,project manager,arborist .,` and specialized inspector to the Landscape Architecture Division. Her background spans all aspects of the Green Industry, from pre-construction site survey and analysis, overall project design,construction management,to post development inspection and reporting for 0 r residential,commercial and municipal projects.She has worked with numerous community ,ate ; and city officials as well as developers to provide project landscape design and contract __ - management as well as oversite for the installation and maintenance of city monuments, Academic Background parks,roadways,commercial centers and housing developments.She has also provided post storm hazard assessment,environmental mitigation observation and reporting for wetland Business Management, and coastal environments.Today,she thoroughly evaluates project sites,provides landscape Florida International University and irrigation design,and effectively coordinates with clients,firms,officials and providers Professional throughout the product i on p r oc e ss and project construction. Certifications ISA CertifiedArborist, Relevant Experience FL#741 A AutoCAD-Certification, North Beach, Miami Beach, FL: Provided site analysis and landscape design to enhance Sheridan Technical College the City's traffic calming,roadside parking and beautification for an historic portion of Miami Florida Association of Code Beach. Project included median planting and parking bulb-outs with limited clearance.Species Enforcement Certification, selections were made carefully to allow for longevity of materials in a coastal climate and to Florida Atlantic University comply with set regulations in regards to site visibility. Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Rolling Oaks Park, Miami Gardens, FL: Overall site and landscape design included Certification, nature trails, pavilions, a concession/restroom facility, press boxes, soccer/football fields, University of Florida IFAS lighting,entry signage,playgrounds and parking all designed in a manner to preserve 1000 National Incident Management plus existing specimen size Live Oaks and Slash Pines at this 35-acre park site. Client/ Systems 15-I00,IS-200,IS-700 Contact:City of Miami Gardens/Jay!larder,Phone:(305) 622-2225.(11/05) Certifications, Emergency Management SR-907/Alton Road 5th Street to Michigan Avenue Miami Beach, FL: Provided Institute the landscape design and project management for the complete renovation of this one mile stretch of Alton Road.Thru coordinated efforts with FDOT District 6 and the City of Professional Affiliations Miami Beach, new products like bonded aggregate tree basins and large street trees were American Society of Landscape incorporated into the design. Architecture International Society of SR-836/SR-112 Interchanges/I-95/1-395, and 1-95/1-195, Miami-Dade County, Arborists FL: Provided landscape design for these two major interchanges in Miami. Both projects Landscape Inspectors were designed to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor for residents and tourist, Association of Florida-2006 build up the green infrastructure and reduce maintenance.Very large palms and trees were Board of Directors Chair incorporated into the design to soften the many stacked highways and ramps at these two Florida Association of Code locations. Enforcement Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Environmental Resource Management Awards 2002 ASIA Excellence Award City of Miramar Tree Pruning 2002 FNGA Award City of MiramarTree Pruning 2009 Garden Club of America's Founders Fund Award Habitat Restoration-Pine Jog Nature Trail Page 45 � KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2G14-Mi FLORIDA:S 814 LOCAL FIRM J -1,- �� , Cheryl Callender, RIA, LEED �,�_ Ms. Callender is a trilingual (English, Spanish, and French) professional designer with over i.r 15 years of experience. Her career as a licensed professional Architect in Panama includes 1 / I% designing and managing high profile urban projects. Since receiving her Masters of Landscape \ 1 ..,, - t.. Architecture here in Florida expertise has been applied to numerous streetscapes and roadway 1 designs. In addition to her design duties,Ms.Callender has responsibilities for reviews and - quality analysis and control over projects as well as field inspections. Ms. Callender has considerable experience in all the major software systems used in these types of designs which include Autocad, Microstation, Sketchup, Adobe Photoshop,Adobe Illustrator, and Academic Adobe In-Design. She also is responsible for much of the division's presentation plans and Background graphics. M.LA.,Landscape Architecture,Florida A &M Relevant Experience University,2006 SR-5/US-1/Biscayne Boulevard from NE 15th Street to NE 35th Street, B.S.,Architecture,University Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Design -This project is a I.5-mile section of urban of Panama, 1997 developed boulevard road under total renovation through a section of downtown Miami. Ms.Callender's role included various landscape services such as tree inventory,appraisal,and Professional Registration distribution,landscape design,irrigation design,hardscape design,and lighting design.Client/ Registered Architect, Contact FDOT District 6/Craig James,Phone:(305)470-522.(2009 to 2011) Panama Atlantic Boulevard Streetscape CRA, Pompano Beach, FL: Landscape Design - Registered Landscape This project is a significant streetscape beautification improvement to an existing urban Architect,FL#LA6667177 mixed use street of I-mile length which includes landscape inventories, ADA upgrades, Professional landscaping,irrigation,decorative lighting,signage and improved stormwater drainage for the Certifications main roadway corridor from US-I to Pompano Beach beachfront. Ms.Callender's role also included significant public meetings and graphic presentations as well as coordination with LEED Green Associate other professional teams preparing designs on adjacent projects for the City.Client/Contact City of Pompano Beach/Horacio Danovich,CRA Engineer,Phone:(954) 786-7834. (2010 to 201 I) SW 2nd Avenue Streetscape,CRA, Dania Beach,FL:Landscape Design-This project is a significant streetscape,two-phase,beautification improvement project of approximately 2 miles in an older existing urban neighborhood. The focus of the design was to create traffic calming,a community character and add beautification. Ms.Callender was involved with the presentation graphics for the initial public meetings and the QA/QC process. Client/Contact City of Dania Beach/Jeremy Earle,CRA Director,Phone:(954) 924-6801.(2010 to 201 1) Beach Streetscape, Las Olas Boulevard Phase, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Landscape Design - This 0.50-mile improvements consisted of roadway realignment, hardscape treatments,ADA upgrades,landscaping,decorative lighting,signage and improved stormwater drainage for a tourist destination known around the world.Services provided:Streetscape, roadway,planting,hardscape,irrigation,landscape,pedestrian and street lighting design,tree relocation plans, bidding assistance, and construction management. Client/Contact City of Fort Lauderdale/Hal Barnes,P.E.,Phone:(954) 828-5065.(2006 to 2008) 1-95 Sections 4& 9, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Design - Both sections total 2.5 miles highway beautification project for the 1-95 corridor through Miami-Dade County, including landscaping to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor,reduce maintenance, highlight interchanges and mitigate the effects of sound walls.Ms.Callender was the primary involved in the QA/QC process for both sections. Client/Contact FDOT District 6/Craig James (section 4) and Paul Moss (section 9),Phone:(305) 470-5221(Craig James) and (305) 470-5384 (Paul Moss). (2006 to 201 1) Jr ,"j KEITH and SCHNARS,RA. Page 46 FIARIDAS 61k,LOCAL FIRM , ot4 46-YG 1 Cheryl Callender, RLA•. LEE SR-953/LeJeune Road, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Design-A major infrastructure/roadway beautification project,serving as the primary entrance to Miami International Airport;Tree relocations,landscape,irrigation and lighting plans,and construction observation for the 2 mile project. Ms.Callender's role for this project was primarily in re-design, the QA/QC process,and the extensive field inspections.Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Paul Moss,Phone:(305)470-5384. (2005 to 20 I I) SR-826/Palmetto Expressway from SW 16th Street to SW 2nd Street, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Design -The beautification of approximately I mile of roadway,including the SW 8th Street interchange. Ms.Callender's role included presentations,public meetings,design,quality control,and cost estimating. Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Paul Moss,Phone:(305) 470-5384.(2010 to 201 1) SR-826/Palmetto Expressway from NW 63rd Street to the FEC Railway, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Design-A I.4-mile roadway with interchanges for beautification. Ms.Callender was involved with QA/QC and inspections. Client/Contact:FDOT District 6/Craig James,Phone:(305) 470-5221.(2009 to 201 1) SR-112/1-95/1-195 Interchange from NW 32nd Street to NW 47th Terrace, Miami-Dade County, FL: Landscape Design -This I.75-mile roadway/interchange landscape project is a highway beautification project for a major interchange in Miami-Dade County.The stand-alone landscape project is to improve the aesthetic character of the corridor for residents and tourist,build up the green infrastructure and to reduce maintenance. Ms.Callender's role included design, tree inventory, QA/QC, presentations, and field inspections. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Paul Moss, Phone: (305) 470-5384. (2009 to 201 1) Page 47 - ICErfH and sc RFQ 2014-346-Y ; ;` �L FIRM FLORID&5 ' i/ '_ . , . . : _, ,.,- , Christine McKay M — r, — — — - _ e 1 ,1 , d, Newly hired to Keith and Schnars,Ms.McKay brings to the team more than 7 years experience ,;�f ;.1.f(i - , in the Landscape Architecture field,having worked in both the public and private sectors. She ,, , , f is proficient usingAutoCAD software in the production of landscape,site plan and irrigation ' design drawings. As a Certified Landscape Inspector,Christine is familiar with permitting and , '; r' ', ' inspection processes. Vp :L c- ,A,A - Relevant Experience Academic Districtwide Landscape Design Services,Miami-Dade County, FL: Ms.McKay will Background be serving as a contracted in-house project manager for the FDOT District 6 office,providing Academic Background landscape architectural services including preparation of landscape and irrigation plan sets, BA,Environmental Studies, plan reviews,presentations,reports,permit coordination,review meetings,tree relocations, Warren Wilson College, inspections and miscellaneous consultations. 2000 Professional City of Weston, FL: Assessed the quality and maintenance needs of all street trees in the Affiliations public rights-of way throughout the City.Over 30,000 trees were inventoried using hand-held GPS units,creating a GIS database for this City's maintenance crew to take over.An analysis Landscape Inspectors report of the urban forest was also provided to the City. Association of Florida City of Lauderdale Lakes, FL: Inventoried street trees and swale conditions for all Planning&Zoning Board, roadways in the City, including each residential lot, using hand-held GPS units. Conditions City of North Lauderdale, were noted to help address drainage issues. FL Department of Design, Landscape and Construction Management,Plantation, FL: Reviewed plans/permits, inspected properties,& worked with residents & contractors for co_mpliance with municipality's landscape code. Ms. McKay also helped coordinate the City's horticulture club. City of West Park, FL: Held General Services contract for this new municipality.Helped to secure grants and create bid documents for various community development projects. Provided design services for such projects as streetscapes and park enhancements,as well as monument signs. Library Park,Weston,FL:The Park was designed with many unique features to compliment the neighboring library.Local literary greats are highlighted around a fountain area,and history of the City is documented in a custom hardscape path that meanders throughout the park. In addition to landscape plans,Ms.McKay created site plan details for these distinct landscape design features,including special finishes,gazebos,&water features. Arboretum, Plantation, FL: Involved in the site analysis and design of the first two phases (Palms and Flowering Trees) to turn this linear park into an Arboretum for the City of Plantation. Research and inspection of many area nurseries was required to procure the desired specimen trees and then find appropriate spots for them within the Arboretum.In addition,Ms.McKay created brochure/map identifying the new trees for the public. I-75/Pines Boulevard Interchange, Pembroke Pines,FL: Tree survey and disposition for existing trees impacted by redesign of the interchange.Provided existing and proposed landscape plans. Manatee Isles Drive and South Post Road,Weston, FL:Designed an irrigation system for two long stretches of roadway in Weston. 1,KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 48 FLORIDAS 51k1DC.AL FIRM ` b ,, 2f -346 YG tea. +! _ y - 1 _ Raul Gavela — „ ' - -,-' - ' C s {' 4 ',,7--.' , , `; Mr.Gavela is a biligual Junior Associate who has three years of experience in landscape design. - ' Y` fi He graduated with a Master's Degree from Florida International University.he has worked on ,,_ /; an array of projects showcasing his 2D and 3D graphic skills which have succesfully illustrated ;;' , :' \� proposed design ideas. Mr. Gavela has also worked on several design and relocation plans {' ,, a :� which included site inspections,inventory and analysis field observations. ''$li 1' n .,:;-P R' `. �, ,_, „ Relevant Experience Academic Tucker Design Build: Landscape Designer responsible for operating computer-aided Background drafting (CAD) equipment or conventional drafting station to produce designs, working MLA,Florida International drawings, charts, forms and records. Other responsibilities included analyzing building University,2012 codes, by-laws, space and site requirements, and other technical documents and reports to determine their effect on architectural designs,drawing renderings of site plans and 3D drawing,and designing Schematic sketches.Phone:(561) 901-9222. Ecuador Public Agency of Urban Parks and Public Spaces: Project Manager who analyzed building codes, by-laws, space and site requirements, and other technical documents and reports to determine their effect on architectural designs.Mr.Gavela's other responsibilities included drawing renderings of site plans and 3D drawings,designing Schematic sketches,developing design with the design team,working with landscape contractors.Phone: 0 1 I 593-4 25 99 310. Amazon Landscaping: Freelance Designer who assisted in drawing of renderings of site plans and 3D drawings,designing Schematic sketches,and operating computer-aided drafting (CAD) equipment or conventional drafting station to produce designs,working drawings, charts,forms and records. Page 49 �'.)jam SCHNARS,RA. LOCAL FIRM RFQ�2O 4 3 - �� e TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .._ _ ,,,,1•-•1,.....21.7.1.....K...9.,,M.W.I.M•11.94 PROJECT LIMITS: ''i t � N -t. SR-907/ALTON ROAD r YY, mina= ~""' FROM 5TH STREET ` --". ~4 ' CANOPY TREE TVP CANOPY TREE TYP c TO N MICHIGAN AVENUE,' " 1111111 „�• . 4 4.4. �;:■ • WM � ',0.' 1111111 �`, r r�Y. . .6 'oaf-I Is..ilit ... •� , 1 _. i I 6i ! .ewr,c w�wa7 Al-iwwv.. 4-"'".., - n,ar r.r e • � • .err.'- — .... .,_ -�... ' M.O.WOO Tr=sr-1wwa,... ...ia,....., u *waw. IMAM w. w='f' •a..,r.. w1!•wID, - 1 Ill ^ C-' + -- •.,- ' I ►„, 1 a j .ems • •, w. • '' ..:re4 SECTION VIEW D L ,° - LOOKING NORTH - n N- „ ..". . r -_ 117• I T ' t -i-* .r^ - -,-1 FLOWERING PEDESTRIAN �'� 0 ' BIKE ON PARKING FLOWERING - L 0 MID-SIZE CROSSWALK O SMALL TREE TYP -„ TREE TVP F- A V 4 --:. m: .— f 'Iie a WT'. * i . .-.11"17''.— il ® t: ,!- CANOPY TVP PALM TREE TYP �' # . CITY O F -t”. p e -1111/sr? . , MIAMI BEACH 7 I- _-- , ."-' _ -. .. °- L 3D . Z ;" ':: PLAN VIEW SR-907/Alton Road from 5th Street to N Michigan Avenue Miami Beach, FL This 1.5 mile section of Alton Road is an active commercial corridor in one of Florida's hottest destinations to visit, live, work or play - Miami Beach. The corridor is heavily traveled by locals and tourists either by foot, bicycle or automobile. In addition to being a complete roadway reconstruction project, FDOT's scope also includes highway beautification with landscape,hardscape,and irrigation plans. To soften the urban feeling of this metropolitan corridor,large shade trees are placed adjacent to on-street parking and in curbed bulb-outs;thus providing a shady walk for pedestrians,allowing them to linger along the corridor to enjoy the many shops and cafes that Miami Beach has to offer. Hardscape treatments were designed within the sidewalks to create ADA compliant walkways as well as provide root space for proposed street trees. Working with the City of Miami Beach,irrigation plans were tailored to the City's requests.Ultimately as a tree-lined street that will mature and grow, Alton Road will continue to develop as an asset for the community and its users to enjoy. Client:FDOT District 6 Contact:Paul Moss,District Landscape Architect Address: 1 000 NW 11 I th Avenue,Room 6101,Miami,FL 33172 Phone:(305) 470-5384 Email:Paul.Moss @dot.state.fl.us Start Date:October 2010 Completion Date: Ongoing Design Fees: $115,000 Construction Costs: $1,000,000 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 50 - 1-'; FLORIDAS51$'LOCAL FIRM 'FQ 2014-346-YG TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .......----- 1 . ,, , m;� w•- . Y. . ., , , , . s . ... i s.... _ ^ass - e °'a �c , + 1 • rTft, d. ,,h • • j 7 if r :y N.1 _ --A- ,v041111111kiro pi a4 i•> saatka 0;7 �a --ALA_. 1 -- ik -:•7 ' -''''. ' ,,,e# 4 , S Atlantic Boulevard Streetscape Pompano Beach, FL Keith and Schnars provided professional design services to Pompano Beach CRA for nearly I mile along Atlantic Boulevard from SE 20th Avenue to Ocean Boulevard. This urban streetscape project is part of three CRA improvement projects. This segment created a grand promenade leading east and connecting the two other segments that terminate at the Pompano Beachfront area. Keith and Schnars' Landscape Architecture Division provided landscape and irrigation plans designed with a focused on creating a pleasant and inviting pedestrian atmosphere promoting connectivity with the local businesses and restaurants. The right-of-way improvements along Atlantic Boulevard included the elimination of on street parking and turning lanes to allow for the wider sidewalks and the addition of landscaped planter areas. These improvements allowed for the installation canopy trees, improved stormwater runoff management, and improved the sense of place along the corridor. Medians were also landscaped enhancing the boulevard promenade effect. Additional improvements to this corridor included hardscape enhancements utilizing a unifying decorative pattern, adding irrigation to landscaped planter areas and medians, undergrounding the overhead powerlines, and site amenities. The design process included multiple public involvement meetings to discuss design alternatives and obtain input from the members of the community. In addition, Keith and Schnars coordinated closely with the Landscape Architects designing the other segments, as well as the Pompano Beach CRA, the City of Pompano Beach and the FDOT. Keith and Schnars' Highways Division designed drainage improvements and addressed harmonization details between the concurrent FDOT reconstruction project and Pompano Beach CRA project. Client: Pompano Beach CRA Contact: Horacio Danovich, P.E. Address: 100 W. Atlantic Boulevard, Room 276, Pompano Beach, FL 33060 Phone: (954) 786-7834 Start Date:July 2010 Completion Date: Ongoing Design Fees: $176,000 Estimated Construction Fees: $1,789,000 Page 51 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG ✓- FLORIDAS5it LOCAL FIRM TAB 2 Experience & Qualifications . . , , . _ ,............... ,,.__ . ,,,._,,,.7-'''-e 4 ,„ r , ' a I l I - - - -...;• -0--;': _, ,4064000 _. , I CANOPY TREES ACCENTTREES 11111 I LIGHTED RIGHT-OF-WAY w .„, BOLLARDS SOD o All I I ___, SI i I MULTI-USE PATH !� r S L '> EiSLE : )1 ' IP DRIVEWAY i ' -, kr '- 1,01111 7 * * * 111111MaiAilitlit Oa ' �� REMOVEABLE LANT BED PLANT BED I PLANT BED W TERMINUS BOLLARDS RAMP '„ CONCEPT"B" CONCEPT"C" I y ti.9^ti City of Lake Worth Community Development Block Grant Greenways Project Lake Worth, FL Keith and Schnars' Landscape Architecture Division has provided a preliminary concept for the City of Lake Worth Community Development Block Grant Greenways Project.The Greenway is intended to provide the user with a pleasant experience and accommodate existing driveway connections within the right of way. The multi-use paths are designed for a low volume of pedestrians and bicyclists. The paths typically have gentle curves and line up perpendicular to bisecting streets for crossings. The landscape treatment provides a buffer between the drive aisles and the multi-use paths. Shade and accent trees are used to shade the pathway and drive isles. Low growing shrubs are proposed to accent the multi- use path access points and define the vehicular areas, as well as maintain views throughout the corridor for safety. Seating areas have been provided along greenway blocks that do not have drive isles proposed. The seating areas are orientated towards the existing roadways where more activity and natural surveillance takes place. This design layout inspires an "eyes of the street" approach, discouraging negative activity from happening in the more secluded areas of the pathway. Seat walls are proposed, with similar architectural treatments, as the subdivision gateways—developing a stronger sense of place for the community/neighborhood. Client: City of Lake Worth, Public Services Department Contact: Felipe A. Lofaso, Assistant Director of Public Services Address: 1749 3rd Avenue South, Lake Worth, FL 33460 Phone: (561) 586-1720 Email: flofaso @lakeworth.org Start Date:June 2013 Completion Date:June 2014 Design Fees: $17,400 f'.. . KEITH J RS KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 52 FLORIDAS git,LOCAL FIRM : RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications ......................., PROJECT LIMITS a N �u ' N f y J SR-AIA/COLLINS AVENUE `-�' (19.: � a a Q FROM 5TH STREET TO A ,� g y LINCOLN AVENUE ' _ �k • a cn a ` �� 1W9, I ��jj ��*a�• �J}r 1. µ tn -lob ki,.:,.16.0- .,, li iwar wr� u L � y �0' • i .4 :- ..._. _.••• ..• . _ . .....,t.., , , ,„„,,,,,,,. .. 1 I r 4.y. +' ',":.....r. • R• 3 D J D I"- M Lfl (r) 8 ,Tei I T-: i .411 ; ii ^ # i CITY OF tip :$- a" o w N ...i po L.,,,, (0 2 ".. ii-MIAMI BEACH `-0tr - J-i, 1 ' -..c-,,, ''''5,..e. .b'r i ' "''''' . 4 4 "I' • . 4 z \ I ZM: F. ,.•:,► der ! n •!K r It !/' I I ..2N!,,,„„,•v r,.,,a - I yF SRAtMCOIUNSAVENUE u--•'Ai „ ••� �I 1.r _ l 7�► '.fin r u:� .. s , `��. p . , , . t 4.. .I ' ''"% '. i\ 4114(4::!441,,,I °/ ecto' " ,V. ' 1 f �� .,s. a 1 W t '� + i�l 'ms ' -r'r V' , It- . 1 ! ..�. `% g. J SR-Al A/Collins Avenue from 5th Street to Lincoln Road Miami Beach, FL The SR-A I A/Collins Avenue project is a complete reconstruction of the corridor from 5th Street to Lincoln Road. Keith and Schnars provided landscape architecture services to FDOT and coordinated closely with the City of Miami Beach to ensure that the design of the pedestrian space met the needs of this highly traveled corridor. Within the Historic Preservation District of Miami Beach and adjacent to the world famous Ocean Avenue,Collins Avenue sees a large volume of users. Our streetscape design addresses the needs of these users by balancing coastal appropriate plantings with safe hardscape treatments. In addition to the hardscape and planting plan,K&S designed a water-wise drip irrigation system that will eliminate the overspray and water loss of a traditional spray irrigation system. The use of stately palms accenting the four corners of each cross streets sets the stage for display of the world-renowned style that Miami Beach is known for. Client:FDOT District 6 Contact:Heidi Solaun-Dominguez,P.E.,FDOT Project Manager Address: 1000 NW 1 1 1 t h Avenue,Room 6101,Miami,FL 33172 Phone:(305) 470-5282 Email:heidi.solaun @dot.state.fl.us Start Date:October 2010 Completion Date: Ongoing Design Fees: $45,000 Construction Costs: $250,000 Page 53 i;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. �' FLDRIDAS 1 LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG ` 8�' TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .,,,. 7... ________.7,_,,,,„„.„.,,,.......i , . s / / ,!/ / • 1 ,--,,,, ., • . w y�1 JfN'P N ✓ ; . p I „,_, i t r � ! -i i .,I ' ,11• ;I/L-1 i j ' ,',"i- ' ' 'ii ). . i, _ _..v 1 4 6 /(.” 7.,1 �y 4.*: ' - ..e. ----_..jam- - �,7, - /1 4/ ,lk 2,.. .,-. '.:`e trf.,._r:.:./t"-/f /{—,.. T : ::y ..2 v../P— 4 t y .�ll Windmill Park Concept Coconut Creek, FL Keith and Schnars' involvement in the original plat work for the development of Windmill Park started in 1987 — then called Coco Parc. In 1 990,Keith and Schnars prepared the original design work for the park,providing the City of Coconut Creek with master planning,site design,landscape,irrigation and parking design,construction inspection and administration services,as well as,overall project coordination assistance. The current park includes active and passive recreation areas, bike,jogging and nature trails,picnic areas,playgrounds,ball fields,court games,entrance and park signage,wetland mitigation lakes and multi-purpose buildings. In 2012,Keith and Schnars worked closely with the City to develop a conceptual plan for park improvements that included such elements as an additional basketball court,expanded landscapes,open play areas,shelters,proposed parking,walking paths,station-based exercise circuit,separated large and small dog parks and a restroom facility. Client:City of Coconut Creek Contact:Shelia Rose,Director,Sustainable Development Address: 4860 West Copans Road,Coconut Creek,FL 33063 Phone:(954) 973-6756 Email: SRose @coconutcreek.net Start Date:July 2012 Completion Date:January 2013 Design Fees: $12,500 _1\4 J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 54 FLORIDAS5i,LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG • • \'‘ ' "cf,...1 1 ,„ 4 3•I ,, r.,...,4 ••....,_ - ---.,....!.._ :',•,,,,.' ". ....c.r'''. ;,/ •. , , ' •,`4'•..i. .., ' .Z'k ,.•,,,.... ,, ,,,,,, . , .,,..." .. , ::,,, . - - ,..4 ^ - • At el .t''' s'.- •^,Z,•'......' 4,111, 1' 1 ' - • • "ti ' ....,"a. ",,,,:.''''cit"' '\ ' ' ...)■41(;) ;........,:.:,,,,,. " .4.;',,,C, ch, • . -!: t''' I fin,?.':,,(,:-..,.-1,t,,1411,... ' , 4• •::.:-..•. , „i9t.",•A :. ;* '‘ c 1 le_ ,;;Ilik. 441411-1,4 — . ,... ....e. M.., .41 4. ... .... . - k, • ,..- , •,.. . , l , ------`- ‘ . \ 4; 4W , —1..:' ' 'r ,• :54'2' ;-iff4-! • ' ' --4-4sY1644-7:".t ': I ■ -- ' ,Zt-._ -,„.--' ,--..1:-:,,Nr I ': \ I '; Ji. :- Av .,1•4 , -- . i r-._ , ---1 --, ,-.. _ . , __ - ,-.4--", i't ,„•,,„ ..„, •,_„ r -IA-. \ , \ AA, „F ,.; \ , ." .'''", = 1 , 0 2•.4. ....... ,.„,.......,.„,.. Financial .. . •,..._... . ....„ ..., ,,, wirvAi„,, ,,H.', Capacity ...., .., ,#.14 qir I ,,,,„ ' , ...%'•= ,I TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .. i.................... K&S has requested that Dun & Bradstreet submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact: Yusbel Ganzalez Department of Procurement City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 (305) 673-7000 ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalex @miamibeachfl.gov ate' <a'•�Yb' - :�FIn _ -a� ..�4a � JI �'S� r t1- .- Tip `. t '�.�. f- �� �*. Yc'�, ..�9�R_TS..y�` .? 5 { ; % H y y ci N a ,y,l„.� i-1'd-' -i'- s '-• "1' 'Viz,'-'''','"A'-fit✓•7-- "' 4- . ,.. • �z., ��" .}p � �- i � ,� r _ 4 � � r '#:k, ��`'-sr'r�a,�, � �4'. �'..��' T1 $ 'mil 1,,-Y 1- j'4 `c. 11� ,-, .{' ,Jf• 1 .E LS:CIi.`k"^fC =f' .p M. . , t t i ` r •' ! ",;. Z • /a .s V •,{` ) t'''• • : s■ • t. a -1 + '• 1 i\, v, l ` ♦ ' '`., • \ .'', L I-::. " , - I • ,. ., , s;:\1 tii‘_Awl"" via-Mlikt. , ...., , , .. . ,, - _:‘, ,: .•..... ....,.., . , . _,.... #: ,..,:, ,,_ ... ,,, i ._ ___ .. .,....., : 4. . , , .� ! w ; } .^ = ,,�' ,.�, -,S owl . - L` 1'.M, - • `• _.* �' - �•.. w - , ?,- a- z t Cllr ' ■I, I i �.� ',,` 1�� ..' 1-. �� 1. ■% ?t.. 1 \ n \ 4 j a r • , • .. •.: ;:....a.. .3. :.-. - 3v''► :3� • Page 57 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG j FLORIDAS 81,LOCAL FIRM TAB 3: Approach and Methodology ..................... .,„ ... _. . __ ... _ , _ , - _ • . . ._ M 4: A ,.. , , ...... n„-: , , , . ,. i. - ,,, , . ..iiip .. ,, , , .. 4,r, . 06.,.., 'it1,- , :, ,,,,,,,,, - -, -,,, o ... , ....,,.- „,-4.:.. ...fr.414:14 4. -+4 . i'!- •, / + 4 - __1 -4.; , .11110011 . 4 I- PROJECT APPROACH K&S understands that the success of a landscape installation is dependent upon maintenance.When applicable,involving Whether it's a park,streetscape,greenway,gateway,master maintenance teams early in the design process is an invaluable plan, municipal facility or coastal restoration, K&S has a way to foster proper maintenance and significantly increase time-proven approach to landscape architecture projects; the chances of long-term success.We solicit their input on it is an approach that has been refined over many years of the desired project improvements,and their capabilities.In experience. keeping with sustainable principals,we design for minimal, low maintenance conditions and prepare design-specific To begin, K&S knows that field assessment is critical plans. to project success; therefore, it receives a great deal of emphasis during this stage of the project. This process Sustainable Design is an integral element in the K&S includes site visits to photograph and systematically record approach to landscape architecture. Integrating Green the site, existing conditions, characteristics, opportunities Principles into our projects restores the natural ecological and constraints.The information we collect is reviewed, balance of our region, conserves water and other natural and subsequently utilized in reports and presentations for resources, saves money, reduces maintenance and delivers meetings with the City and the Public,if required. a very long list of other benefits to our clients. The field reviews drive design decisions by locating utilities, Another critical phase in the life of a landscape is the drainage patterns, access, evaluating constructability and construction. A design can reflect all the appropriate existing vegetation. K&S has the ability to provide any provisions and address all of the site conditions;however,if it additional survey work to ensure that all critical site is not constructed correctly,the maintenance of that project information has been gathered and recorded prior to the may never meet the intent of the design.This,in turn,may set commencement of design work. Our field assessments the landscape up for failure.We are experts at supervision, aid the City with professional recommendations,accurate inspection and monitoring projects during construction designs, cost estimates and reports.The analysis work is and warranty. All inspections performed by K&S staff are thoroughly integrated into the design process, and is the documented and photographed for the City's records. foundation for the conceptual design process. K&S professionals are well-acquainted with the permitting K&S has many years of tracking and studying the results and regulatory environment of South Florida governments, of our landscape installations over time, and we have State and Federal agencies, and we know to initiate early documented this with tens of thousands of time lapse coordination with utilities owners and regulating agencies. photographs. This is a huge advantage when producing Our team is also experienced in grant facilitation and conceptual and final designs. Our plans focus on solving has successfully assisted several clients in obtaining grant problems before they arise.All details and specifications are awards, such as the Florida Highway Beautification Grant, project-specific and constantly changing to reflect current and Miami-Dade County Public Works Landscape Funding. materials, Florida horticultural science and construction K&S will team with City staff to prepare, coordinate, and techniques. review grant applications, and assist with plans submitted for review. Page 59 t, i J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. -- -_,1-• FLORIDAS git LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-11G, ` TAB 3: Approach and Methodology MUNICIPAL STAFF SUPPORT been determined, Mr. Reed will assign components of the projects to the appropriate key staff members. Communication with City staff is critical through all the various project milestones,and is significant to a successful QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL completion.The City's designated Project Manager will be K&S' single point of contact;This individual will verify the K&S recognizes the importance of integrating a Quality scope of a potential project and work closely with K&S Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program into all of to provide any existing studies,drawings,surveys and plans the work we undertake. We are aggressively committed needed to start the project. Further, the City's Project to our QA/QC program, which will ensure that the final Manager will also approve consultant's fees, manage the design reflects the highest standards of design and that our review of consultant's work and provide feedback and deliverables conform to the scope,reducing the possibilities guidance as needed. K&S believes that the success of a of errors and omissions. K&S' QA/QC program includes project is relevant to the long-term maintenance capabilities a multi-step review customized for each project, including of the maintaining agency;therefore,we routinely meet with initial reviews prior to developing design concepts, regular maintenance staff during the design phase to determine reviews during the design process,as well as a comprehensive preferred systems and materials. review prior to submitting deliverables. Each of these reviews is cataloged and scanned,then back-checked during STAFF DUTIES the next review. This depth of quality assurance reviews certifies that project decisions are documented,guidelines P 1 g We have compiled a dynamic group of professionals for this are being verified and double-checked, and that K&S can contract,with Bruce Reed,RLA,serving as the primary point assuredly submit and finalize plans with confidence. of contact. Mr.Reed has a proven track record of contract maintenance and will ensure that all tasks,from the request CURRENT WORKLOAD AND AVAILABILITY for proposal to final invoicing, are completed in a timely and effective manner.Additionally, proper communication K&S Landscape ArchitectureTeam has several municipal and and correspondence will be maintained throughout the FDOT contracts currently ongoing. Four of our six large- project, and all related activities will be fully documented. scale landscape projects are in the final stages of design. Mr. Reed's supervision will ensure that our staff has all of The K&S staff has sufficient time to undertake any size the necessary resources to perform quality services to project.The following chart illustrates the Team's current meet the City's objectives.When the scope of projects has and projected workload. 100% % FUTURE WORKLOAD 75% W U ce 0 LV 50% , C .,r 9 J cg O �S, ti 7a ~ 25% • 0% NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV MONTHS (2014/2015) KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 60 FLORIDAS 5/I LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 3: ApproachandMet . . dolog sit di TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES ' ' f. • . �• ' a2'7 ■'' ' ' ;;•r• ~.. ' Y k Our firm utilizes the latest computer programs which '. tit . . .*1 ••' ' '•• include AutoCAD, MicroStation, Adobe Suite, Microsoft • ) = i '� • Y .q 41.4;1/44 Suite, SketchUp and GIS. K&S staff is skilled in creating 4 "- ; • - ,� . •, N three-dimensional design graphics. Graphic renderings '� : ;. 1�'� , i A - tip can be used as a visual tool to help convey the design of ' . -.1111 ` tt.. •\: ,;4 a project and the vision of the City. In addition to the a ` i . Landscape Architecture Department resources, the Team i 0 ,,', , t' ` r can utilize all K&S personnel, equipment and resources ', ' • .I. `ff'Jr available companywide. `,- . a �y �`. =r , J : • SCHEDULE AND BUDGET MANAGEMENT y,'' ,A vik -�w •,.;� ,; '• K&S is highly aware of the importance of reducing public /// ' ' . .� , g Y P gP , spending and identifying cost saving measures when `. �� ' . `;f' • . - .. "'�A ' 'I • ' �' possible. We routinely provide value engineering services tz 4 `4. •, ;. �� p Tr in order to support this cost saving goal while achieving the ,, 115', ` - ~-.' ' `'' `• greatest return on investment. Our large, highly-efficient ~' •- ' 44 r '.i ,4' . ' staff allows us to be flexible, while meeting deadlines _ '�''', '= 44.with quick turnarounds or, in some cases, even schedule , e. , ,, ';,'. . , t•,`• ' - advancements. K&S is committed to meeting all milestones a i 4*... h, y * " S• as identified in project schedules,ensuring that all submittals k, ., • •. •'Y i,- ,,. t , are on time. Our staff will work with the City to tailor the various project scopes, identify key project elements '' a o. and produce conceptual and final cost estimates in order _` I'"i' to confirm that the design fees and project elements meet - . not only the City's desires,but also its budget requirements. • Our management philosophy is to provide effective project . i _ , , coordination throughout a project's duration. Maintaining r / , - . -. proper communication and coordination throughout , 1 Hi a project, as well as documenting project activities, is a • I,,�►, primary goal of the entire K&STeam. Mr.Reed's supervision �l y �►' * , ; •. r � , 1 e will will guarantee that our staff has all the necessary resources r', >l,a[ �� , a,:, to perform quality services that meet the City's objectives ), ,:, . ,! / within the timelines established. ` • `'"'-, - K&S is not a minority or disadvantaged business; however, .'`� ,:=� r- \_ " - we have a diverse ethnic and cultural employee base.FDOT ,1 . • �- . has recognized K&S for its efforts in striving to go above and -.--‘., fir- ;-• beyond in utilizing minority or disadvantaged companies. :�,' ,� 1,, : �T!.••-, t.14 ,�\ .1-_,• 4 41/ �� i '/� F ,rte N� f , -' • ` . .- yam - :.... I Page 61 ;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346r-YG =1_ - FLORIDAS j 'LOCAL FIRM 1 - •`.� _ .. — ,,,,,,,,-.,-,rztrIUMM-77-..-' '-:'•tiliatE; '9 .../. - c zue 'r k a f ; %d ry A z - a .. ,! k. ,az- r x.:4:5 ,s � t f s � It-f.''._a .l s's Z e =.44.4,, d:Y;477:1-,,,..47;:s- G R , j y " '� - E yC - .— 1, t =k a{£ y �� � t Y.__s 4''-'47N-.2..,..:':.■ , t� s .., '-','".-:,:-'11`k*';- a• .4.t'..,. E _.;-.7R 'k.f"° ; k � -.qt __ .-...0- , i . ... .,‘cx,..in:i.., ' . , Y i Y 1 ti.� ,y f.'�?!a qI-i 4 f y ��l��z f °-_ pv° ka' w 4# t '< 5 y T4 t.. ,t {s 4 ,, �,,E 1 . x j J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. J -. :F - FLORIDAS I LOCAL FIRM IN 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 ,'�l'47 Phone: (954) 776-1616 • Fax: (954) 771-7690 • Toff Free: (800) 488-1255 M _ {dL W3. a a a 11 1 ,www.KSFLA.co m -, ,r j ._.'r° i is x b — 1 , .f y L ! w. .• 4:7:-41.-„,t. . . } .. . . a P- r Ev � ..... i,:;.=4,-4.d,-L-_,.,.-... ..m2w.��:.. S (e4qd(Kf) 4.(41‘ L.1°11 • • =en = um mg IR .11 ti, :. z ... VI ..- ---- c- ,;.. ,..- ,- , - ,, a, ... . ..,,,,,. miriew- •l' 1 i 4/, 1 1tI• r 111.11Mii -- •»a ' i 6 40% M. •"h i t. a''.% f aM� ({ ,ierti .. r:: 1 . 1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents F ,� yyy0'u t,; t x ' II 1104 s. �s rte s - r _ ., 1., �i- :,•'I �. . ( L;. �_ 7 5��` _,„ f�., -.-. .� r ..+. 1 - t OII�' - fir'' l�IMA` {.i 1441k41 �• ! I )r. Iri t . 1 , .,- -, -. ....-„,.,. , ,, 444 ..,(70,.,:c ' i'ic r ' -' 1---, - -1,'.--4 ' , ---?i/* v . t' ' 0.' -'41 -a .6_24.... '-7:"..'" - ' --- .,...'"'It s&---,,=' --1"‘--1 4—.1 411 * .Vv*,,,__'*dr. . — _ '4*N, ' - „ -‘,. . ... - -;!.-a . - ak . - _ __-'' ._,, -. a - . - _ ' *4 ,, • -% • '- ' ° - -,-, 4-„\---..,-..,,,, -...,,, . -/ • . • ,mod- ,. � ` im , , ., 0 `dIia-- TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 3; Ii-L-_,*a- , , 4 - 1 . 1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents - 1 .2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) - 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements TAB 2: Experience and Qualifications - 2. 1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm - 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) - 2.3 Financial Capacity TAB 3: Approach and Methodology , - j , ` J KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. •- -,,); F LORI DAS / LOCAL FIRM • 6500 North Andrews Avenue S 1 1 ' i Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 •-r 4-..�, -----A. . i„ Phone: (954) 776-1616 ®�oe�.s�a1s.0 1, ..�somaar.. - - Fax: (954) 771-7690 Toll Free: (800) 488-1255 l. 4,t Agi 7 www.KSFLA.com :TT41pIpI :1 am 114 M' u- --4 1 pi art t. IF- [ - „Hu ►. .rte .- . I H III oil w-..,7---!:g.,7,4,;,-.- . - . h it IL 4. i,. it, „....„... . .,,,, . . .e+.•4+ (t„,, ' ' ) / 1.I II .. . ,.. -?,,. .--„,„ „...., . ...._ ,..-:,-- r 1V - ., 1 .2 1 o Res nse p Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A = KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. (ic)1101) Oat/ 17 ■ FLORIDAs Bit LOCAL FIRM T " October 31, 2014 City of Miami Beach Mr. Alex Denis, Director MIAMI BEACH Department of Procurement 1700 Convention Center Drive Y Miami Beach, FL 33139 GROW I-LNGMIFVN G-IAND SUWfnw HIV�C[S tr�p„y kc Wec/urol anA[^GMemq aw�+c.f in RE: GROUP B - ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES �"�'�°°° «�� nQ 2014316-yG ►ura w•«ua. Professional Architecture and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis" • RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Mr. Denis: On behalf of Keith and Schnars, P.A.(K&S),we would like to thank you for this opportunity to present our professional qualifications to the City of Miami Beach (City) and have assembled the enclosed materials pursuant to your advertisement. We appreciate your consideration of this submittal and are excited at the prospect of working on this assignment. Of particular importance to the City is our extensive experience, expertise and resources in municipal work with a client base including 58 cities throughout Florida, 12 state agencies including FDOT Districts 4 and 6, the City of Miami, Florida Power and Light, 17 Counties including Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County School Board, Broward County School Board, large number d, and a I a ge nu ber of private clients. Based on K&S' understanding of the work to be done, our in-house resources include an experienced Surveying z=and Mapping team with extensive expertise in preparing µ., Topographic Surveys, Boundary Surveys, Specific Purpose ': r ► Surveys, Coastal Surveys, As-Built Surveys, Plat Preparation, ! Horizontal and Vertical Control, Cross Sections, Right-of- Way f Mapping, Digital Terrain Models(D.T.M.),American Land �* Title Association Surveys, Wetland/Mitigation Surveys, Expert Witness Testimony, Construction Surveying, Preparation of Legal Descriptions and Exhibits, Volume Calculations, Hydrographic/Bathymetric Surveys, and other Surveying and Mapping related services. K&S, headquartered in Fort Lauderdale with offices in the City of Doral in Miami-Dade County,Jacksonville and Altamonte Springs, is a multi-disciplinary consulting firm focused on solving the surveying, mapping, G.I.S. planning, engineering, and environmental challenges faced by its diverse client base. The firm is currently home to over 120 professionals including: surveyors, civil and structural engineers, transportation planners, construction inspection specialists, urban designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, graphic designers, computer analysts, as well as a range of technical and administrative support staff. K&S was founded by Surveyors, and for more than 42 years, we have been the State's leading provider of Professional Surveying and Mapping services. Our professional resources include eight (8) field crews, seven (7) licensed Surveyors and Mappers, survey technicians, and state-of-the-art hardware and software. If awarded this contract, operations will be based out of K&S' corporate office located at 6500 North Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The key personnel responsible for the work, and authorized to represent K&S, will be Robert K. Krisak, P.L.S., Project Manager, Eric Wilhjelm, P.S.M., Senior Project Surveyor, Donald Spicer, P.L.S., Project Surveyor, Timothy Gray, P.S.M., Project Surveyor, Benjamin Hoyle, P.S.M., Field Crew Supervisor. All of the personnel listed can be reached at (954) 776-1 616. For this important assignment with the City, we have continued our enthusiastic commitment to diversity by adding a Minority Business Enterprise, F.R.Aleman and Associates, Inc. (FRA),as one of our primary, key subconsultants. FRA was selected for their proven abilities and our long-standing, cooperative working relationship. The firm has been listed by Hispanic Business Magazine(June 1 998-2003) as one of the 500 largest Hispanic-owned companies in the United States and Page 3 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 • (954) 776-1616 • Fax(954) 771-7690 in neighboring Miami-Dade County as the 82nd largest Hispanic Business. FRA is a State-wide Certified Minority Business Enterprise by the Florida Office of Supplier and Diversity. The K&S team also includes I. F. Rooks & Associates, Inc. (IFR), Cooner and Associates,Inc.(CA), and A&B Engineering,Inc.(A&B). IFR will supply the necessary photogrammetric mapping including 2D, 3D Planimetrics, Raster Images and LiDAR Surveys Mr. Ike Rooks, P.S.M., will represent IFR for this project and has extensive knowledge and experience in photogrammetry for transportation, site development, and environmental projects. IFR has the ability to utilize both fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft. CA is also a key element to our Survey team, supplying High Definition Services (HDR) through laser scanning capabilities. A&B will provide additional Survey support to a very strong Surveying and Mapping team. K&S is committed to provide the City with Professional Surveying and Mapping Services to complete a variety of assignments in a timely, cost effective manner. On behalf of the Corporation, and with our President's support, I pledge to commit whatever corporate resources and staffing are required to successfully manage the assigned tasks. In closing, we thank you for your consideration of our firm. If further information is needed, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned, Robert K. Krisak, P.L.S., as our designated contact for this assignment. Respectfully submitted, Mark J. Moshier, P.E. Vice President n , 5 r �.1 e.. .. - m-r • VW*. "" "117. 47- Page 4 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 • (954) 776-1616 • Fax (954) 771-7690 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN " AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 xfo:ma.xe-.c Page �I!ji'1 KEITH «,. a °g�,�x.ARS PA FIa., TAB 1 Cover letter .& Minimum Qualifications Requirements STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Keith and Schnars No of Years in Business: 42 No of Years in Business Locally: 42 No of Employees: 1 20 OTHER NAME(S)PRO P OSER HAS OPERA T ED UNDE R IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 6500 North Andrews Avenue CITY: Fort Lauderdale STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33309 TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1255 FAX NO.: (954) 771-7690 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 10305 NW 41st Street,Suite 112 CITY: Doral STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Mark J.Moshier, P.E. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1255 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: mmoshier @ksfla.corn FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-1406307 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. J4 y y;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 10 FLORIDAS r�'LOCAL FIRM ��e. �.. e - �Ft�2Qld346-Yf TAB 1 Cover Letter &_ Minimum. Qualifications ,Requirements 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is roposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an public sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl.. •6. - • . --- - ---•- 'e- _--- - .. ..... ... .. .• --- - •••: - • ---- Page 11 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. R ' " '' r ii r� ' F LORI DAS8l,!LOCAL FIRM TAB 1 Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementf. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. l2 ��;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page � �' FLORID,u ! LOCAL FIRM 't 8 9 — 4 Y RFQ 2014- -YG • TAB1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements , . 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 MA MA Addendum 2 AAA Addendum 7 Addendum 12 MA Addendum 3 A Addendum 8 Addendum 13 MA Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 MA Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 • If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. • Page 13 ;, KEITH and SCHNARS,CA. • 4 _ - FLORID LOCAL FIRM RFQ ZQ14,346�-16'G - '°- `�� ..'� z �r�l_ n's TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this • solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. • This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. i,2 j;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 14 � � F LORI DA''S5ig'LOCAL FIRM ` . �a * R 2014-346-YG T A B ] : • Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Mark J. Moshier, P.E. Vice President Signature of Proposer's .zed Representative: Date: 4 r 10/31/2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this3L day of X. ,20'4 peRo nally appeared before me ' '!` rd i► 4n0 Count of gohi q ) stated that (s)he is the . St_ t Ie.(' of)'EL* and SchnQs a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Befor-..:: ,,e0IFAtf-14: --;.:.-- • �►%%% MARLENE PINNOCK Not p Public for tr- State e#Florida l 4- 4; :.: MY COMMISSION 8 EE 142118 My Commission xpires: L 3 `C .; .' EXPIRES:February 13,2016 �,ps'.y i Bonded Thm Notary Public Underwrfters Page 15 � �•, t;KEITH and SCHNARS,P A. 204-34Y :* : A,_'_. 91 FLORIDA'S&rt LOCAL FIRM I ---, 1 Ff- '� 1 I_ fir-,•,,.__, c). , -�"' Ilk r 1 H• ./ .. • 1 . 1 x -- r l 3 E p._:.,.._...„. , -.....t.,., . • , .. . , . ..,. Minimum • r r... 1,........................ , _.4.,.,141:",.- •..'4..;,,i,.'. . , Qualifications .. . „ , ,,,,_... _ ,....... .,......_.... . :.•. . t Requirements w .. . _............... .„....,. ,....._ ..../ 1 ' t TAB ] : Cover Letter & ,Minimum Qualifications Requirement.• • s Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services LS4641 �. Division of Consumer Services License No.: _. t Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers 2 Expiration Date. February_k.:OIS 7 1 2005 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee,Florida 32399-6500 • cu;; Professional Surveyor and Mapper License Under the provisions of Chapter 472,Florida Statutes ROBERT KEVIN KRISAK 6344 NN'52ND ST _ ����`�h•-�� POMPANO BEACH,FL 33067-2150 ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is to certify that the professional surveyor and mapper whose name and address are shown abase is licensed as required by Chapter 472.Florida Statutes. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services ��� LS6604 Division of Consumer Services License No.: tt-`g""'z. -- � Board of Professi sno!Surveyor!::and Mappers < . . 2005 'Mappers Expiration Date: February 28,2015 _005 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee,Florida 32399-6500 WE.2014' Professional Surveyor and Mapper License Under the provisions of Chapter 472,Florida Statutes TIMOTHY HAMILTON GRAY 17125N BAY RD#3406 SUNNY ISLES BEACH,FL 33160 ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is to certify that the professional surveyor and rapper whose name and address are shown above is licensed as required by Chapter 472.Florida Statutes. - Page 19 j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. FLORID AS f LOCAL FIRM TAB1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements ---. --.„.„. .,,„-,..„.grommungy - \ Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services „• F °E License No.: LS5872 �� Division of Consumer Services j -'.' '+a! �; Board o f Professional Surveynrc and\•Ia ers February 2015 -�•, pp Expiration Dab:. ,.�nu�u) il; ,,,,41,.1.4,,,A._, it °-apt 2005 Apalachee Pkwa�•Tallahassee,Florida 32399-6500 Professional Surveyor and Mapper License Under the provisions of Chapter 472,Florida Statutes ERIC EDMUND\VILHJELM PO BOX 100602 �� FORT LAUDERDALE,FL 33310-0602 ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is io certify that the professional surveyor and nipper whose name and address are shown above is licensed as required by Chapter 472.Florida Statutes. ?k-4.,§,;-::::.--,,,,,,,.°i�'?,'.°.}C'�.e����."?#%r°,may.;:e�>°.`ii *. i= S ° `:N-'ter•"•.=j•'Xe: _ .°.__ ;i�"'-- :1�.°_�.:t.' :C�s4:, ,: .,e...�.y.Y.' ,J_S. � :.,,,, ,,, ..tf.., , i' ,j.d,' .,,g, .. i .,.�s , ,,y�. 1 f�� �'i� c6_w`" -„ cf i ., -,�•� S .: ra�.s... ° �:.s�V=e.�b o�.�,� c�'e �'.�.'�. :�+�'C•..!•��.1,0_ � :fS;�' �a'_�.-�2�:a>�o_ b- , �.Li;, C'�,. Gc:ty �, ,w:0-,, ,,:,,?-, °+y>�i• ,c..4 -c,,:n c�ei 1 x7 -.? i rq?•9 �' �._-c5�y�°ka y , ,��>..c. �t',4,AlI Hwy ,Y,:�;''-i%�.�'-•�'k.is'• K �• �x �,1� �g^�;i.-�-o`!�_Y"• .a� •C �us} Y�'.��' Y',.1"�•fiS.' �7•G;i �i i� .� ��ri :.X�'�ya:.`y^a 1ri�C �'y: i ,'�-°- � . a. t "c;A� o••-,t L o ;?b,o.� ,'k'g ;�0• ♦- °r- ��o •e'°.'_ N %rte * e: Construction Outreach Training 1 . f;b' Awarded to ° Benjamin Hoyle •,_0.-.44v-s., ..Dial`, �° for completion of Pte' A °, 29 CFR Part 1926 Construction , ;' "Ter, OSHA 30 Hour Certification Course "� } presented by 3' Chartis ro i qo+y, '"°`' ennis antjos-Instructor July 2010 ° Y Certification#RI�tEC-oo47io ,• .;c4;,, ��: .4 .* p. ' ',74,,,:e.` .:�-�? . , `7: x �:•• inLn �? ,,,,:,,e,_;4 7 �u.-4,,,,.^w- •. ;r �i 1� -.a-,�4� % 'Et3 -� ;, '.-<; ;eM,,;: - a`: ,%.-.:1:e,e�.�.�s,.3:4: y `. 4'wN ,v_a e e }=;,-s1.«, 9•o� ._�• �`..a,-.r_r�,ro S. w o a tieo• • r :r tk.W. i;iy' !C.:1W .iG.;y? .Y�+ ".1 {- ,,': ;,t3P: 15..,:t?,: i; TAB 1 : Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements � e4 E�'v„ Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Consumer Services License No.:LB1337 ` .� hoard of Professional Surveyors and M appers Expiration Date February 28.2015 2005 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee,Florida 32399-6300 I YES Professional Surveyor and Mapper Business License Under the provisions of Chapter 472,Florida Statutes KEITH&SCHNARS P A 6500 N ANDREWS AVE FT LAUDERDALE,FL 33309-2132 -- ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is tc cer iiy that tie professional.sr:rseyor and mapper whose name and address are shown shave fs licensed as required by Chapter 472.-rrida Sei ores. ° +E st _ ,..,_��Flurida.Department of Agriculture_and.('nnsamer_Sr•.rviccs Division of Consumer Services License No.:LB66[S -- 7, :y . _ Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers Expiration Date February 28.2015 .3; 2005 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee.Florida 32399-6500 Professional Surveyor and Mapper Business License Under the provisions of Chapter 472.Florida Statutes I F ROOKS.&ASSOCIATES INC 106N\VDRA\EST PLANT CITY,FL 33563 ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is to certify drat the preiessrortal sorcerer and napper'Tease nacre-and address arc ihnw'n abase is licensed a.s required by Chatter 472.Fkrida Statute, • n'e? Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Consumer Services License No.:LB6773 Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers Expiration Date: February 28.2015 20(15 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee,Florida 32399-6500 • Professional Surveyor and Mapper Business License Under the provisions of Chapter 472,Florida Statutes • COONER&ASSOCIATES INC DBA:FOCAL GEOLiAT[CS COONER&ASSOCIATES,INC. 5670 ZIP DRIVE FORT MYERS,FL 33905 ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is to certify that the professional surveyor and supper whose rarer and address arc shaven above is licensed as required by Chapter 472.Florida Statute, Page 21 , th KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. x , ,_ FLORIDAS&It LO ��2014-3464G y,�i s CAL FIRM I- ROAD Imo • • r • • Qualifications of Proposing Firm TA TT. • � © iWi (o1©_____________________ ._ _ .. .. „. . .. 7 . 51----kpr::: ! : _. ,.. . _, .... ..„.4 ,,.. - _ i.... - _, , - .- . , -. ,. 4 4„, , . . s,— . , 4 * . ,, .... , ,.', --,", -- - . .- . .... ..... ..--, ,... ,.. .1,. , . ,.,.. , ._ , ,,,,,i h =.'"ti. ' -. -- - -- - - ' T - .., a I ,� I. _ + c �+ .,. � . - --pfd\ ti 4"• `M_ 4�^ �' - _ P•. . r �S • s. IC KITH i SCEPARS,PA. -- — — °4" .71-- . — 1 1 . ___ _ . #tP;i4; °et_ .' ♦eet-,i J .,.y__ .Fw .., ..,14.1:7'... > -v..'. s .- ` -. T � . 4 , h.i --:1 t 44,:., .. • *'a.. KEITH AND SCHNARS OVERVIEW The firm's professional resources include: Representing the continuation of historic firms providing • Biologists; surveying services since 1929, Keith and Schnars (K&S), • Landscape Architects; incorporated in 1972 and in business for over 42 years, • CADD Specialists; has been recognized, not only for high quality surveying • Public Information Specialists; and mapping, engineering, planning and environmental • Civil Engineers; work, but also for outstanding client service.With over • Public Policy Specialists; 110 professionals within the state of Florida, our team • Construction Inspectors; of surveyors, engineers, planners, and scientists show a • Sanitary Engineers; commitment to client service by providing on-time and • Construction Managers; within budget project completion for both public and • Soils Engineer; private sector clients, including developers, contractors, • CRA Specialist; utility companies,municipalities,and local,state and federal • Structural Engineers; agencies. • Environmental Planners; • Surveyors; K&S was founded by surveyors in Fort Lauderdale,Florida, • Geologists/Hydrogeologists; and has grown over the last four decades to become • Technical Specification Engineers; Florida's innovative leader in providing survey and mapping • GIS Specialists; services and products.In the 1980s,K&S was the first firm • Transportation Planners; in Florida to embrace total station/data collection systems. • Graphic Designers; In 1986,K&S became Florida's largest provider of Geodetic • Traffic Engineers; Survey systems, through Global Positioning System (GPS) • Highway Design Engineers; technology. • Urban and Regional Planners;and • Hydrologists. Today the firm has offices in North, Central, and South Florida and is supported by eleven Divisions offering a full Today, K&S is one of the largest Florida-based consulting range of Engineering,Planning,Surveying and Environmental firms. With over 16 professional engineers,7 professional Services. surveyors,8 Survey Field Crews and over 80 other licensed, administrative,and technical support staff,our offices across Page 25 , �;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. li�4`'-`'�--T 1 :�;, FLORIDAS 81?LOCAL FIRM I TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications _.,,,,,...:w.,5p.„... .„. ,. Florida are currently providing a full range of engineering, A SMALL SAMPLE OF THE TEAM'S planning, and surveying services. Additionally, we are EXPERIENCE INCLUDES: licensed with the State of Florida to perform landscape architecture and geology services. Topographic Survey K&S SURVEY TEAM EXPERIENCE Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood Expansion of Runway; The K&S Team has unprecedented surveying and mapping Homestead Air Reserve Park; Palm Beach County School experience dating back to 1929. Today the Team is a leader Board Project 06D; Sullivan Park - Deerfield Beach; in contemporary surveying and mapping techniques and Ansaldobreda USA Miami Assembly Facility; All Aboard technology. K&STeam's Surveying and Mapping services include: Florida FEC Railroad; Miami Lakes Fire Station #64; Palm Harbour Marina. • As-Built/Record Surveys; GIS • AutoCAD Drafting; • Construction Surveys/Staking Services; • Topographic Surveys; Monroe County Evaluation&Report(EAR),Comprehensive, • Sketch and Legal Descriptions; Plan Update and Land Development Code Re-Write;City • Easement creation; of North Miami GIS - Zoning Map. • Permit Support; • GIS support/GIS mapping; Miscellaneous Surveying and Mapping • Platting; Services Contracts (Municipalities/ • QA/QC review of survey products; Agencies) • Expert Witness Testimony; • Boundary Surveys; City of Fort Lauderdale Water Works 201 I Project;City of • Engineering Design Surveys; Aventura; City of North Lauderdale; City of North Miami. • Differential Leveling; City of Miami Gardens; Broward County School Board, • Roadway Cross-sections & Profiles; - School Board of Palm Beach County;City of Marathon;City • Right-of-Way Surveys; • of Boca Raton;City of Delray Beach;FDOT Districts 4 and 6. • Drainage Surveys; • Control Surveys; ALTA/ACSM Surveys • Volume Calculations; • Tree Surveys; Plantation Fashion Mall; Coconut Creek Casino; Palm • Monumentation of Right of Way Corridors; Harbor Marina, IBM Facility;Cypress Creek Station;Acura • Bridge Data Surveys; of Pembroke Pines; Pasadena Place Apartments; Lancore • Digital Terrain Models (D.T.M.); Nursery;Oakwood Plaza;Galleria Mall;Comfort Inn Miami • Hydrographic/Bathymetric Surveys; Gardens;Design Center of the Americas. • Specific Purpose Surveys; • Wetland/Mitigation Surveys; Construction Layout/As-built Surveys • ACSM/ALTA Surveys; • Site Surveys; • Design Surveys; Conveyance Canal System Hendry County;DoubleTracking • Utility Route Surveys; CSX Railroad in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach • Title Searches; Counties; Century Village in Pembroke Pines; Winston • Records Research and Review; Trails;Woodmont;Timberwalk. • Field Investigation; - 3 ' t • s -., . ,• ,�° L'•• Cost Estimation and Budget Support; `. ' ".3 '1- • Various Technical Support as Required; . �r l _ • Condominium Surveys; ,� •� � •�,4` . • Mean High Water Surveys; r-k " 't p�` � ,a • Submerged/Filled Lands; •13'.,.- rte ,; -_ • Aerial Photography; «;,u.. • Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR); ' / r f—74• Sub Surface Utility Engineering;and � i • High Definition Scanning Services. , ' =I �-J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 26 »> FLORIDA r LOCAL FIRM - - _ TAB 2 ;Experience & Design Surveys taken home two of the twelve Best in Construction Awards given out by the Florida Transportation Builders' 1-95 Martin County RRR Survey for 15.5 miles; Collins Association, a 73-year old non-profit organization that Avenue (D.T.M.) from North 75th Street to Harding many consider the"the voice" of Florida's road and bridge Avenue; Northwest 87th Avenue (D.T.M.); Krome Avenue building industry. from US-I to Southwest 200th Street;State Road A I A from Lake Avenue to State Road 80;Wiles Road Extension;State DYNAMIC GROWTH AND EXPANSION Road 826/Northwest I 22nd Street Interchange and State Road 826/Northwest 1 54th Street Interchange;Andrews The success we have enjoyed over the years has fueled our Avenue Extension; Westgate/Belvedere; Powerline Road; growth and expansion,and today we are one of the largest Lake Poinsett Martin Midway 240 KV Transmission Line. consulting firms in Florida and the State's leading provider of surveying services. Monumentation of Right-of-Way Corridors GREEN PRACTICE AND SUSTAINABLE CSX right-of-way in Broward County; North New River DESIGN Canal;1-75 South of 1-595;Okeechobee Boulevard. Green Practices Right-of-Way Mapping Sustainable Design is an integral element in today's modern Seabreeze Boulevard - Fort Lauderdale; Palm Beach engineering, landscape architecture, architecture and International Airport Connector;State Road 7 from Glades planning fields. Road to Southern Boulevard; Boynton Beach Boulevard; Oakland Park Boulevard from 1-95 to Northeast 2nd Two of our Registered Landscape Architects who are also Avenue; Military Trail from Okeechobee Road to Blue LEED professionals, in addition, on is a Green Advantage Heron Boulevard. Certified Practitioner,a Native Areas Training Academy and Florida Earth Natural Systems participant. We implement PROVEN SCHEDULE AND BUDGET sustainable practices into all our designs.More importantly, ADHERENCE we have incorporated over $15 million dollars worth of sustainable design in our projects in the past 8 years, K&S is committed to the timely and cost efficient delivery minimizing environmental impacts, using native plants, of our services. In fact, in 2007,when the FDOT released creating"Green Space"and reducing maintenance intervals its annual summary of design overruns (time and money), and using local resources. K&S ranked among the best of the over two hundred firms surveyed. In the six-year period studied, K&S designed Sustainable Business Practices and surveyed twelve projects with a construction value in excess of $120 million.Our average cost overrun for the In addition to incorporating green practices and procedures period was only 4%, while our average construction time into our project design and planning,we incorporate them overrun was 1%. No other firm selected by FDOT into the everyday functioning of our firm. For instance, in that six-year period completed this volume of our corporate office is recognized as a Florida-Friendly work, and maintained such low overruns in cost Model Landscape. This puts another dot on the map, and time.This commitment to customer service and high another island-of-green, to make all of Broward County professional standards has also earned us other peer and a NatureScape Sanctuary. Our Installation of a butterfly industry recognition. In 2008,we took home a Best Places garden was but one step in meeting criteria required to be to Work Award at an event co-sponsored by Polk Works recognized by NatureScape Broward. Workforce 2020 and the United Way of Central Florida. In 2007, the Florida Chapter of the American Planning This honor exemplifies a larger commitment to the Association selected one of our planning projects,the South community and an understanding of our natural resources. Miami-Dade Watershed Study and Plan,for the prestigious To promote and preserve native species and ecosystems is FAPA Award of Excellence; McGraw-Hill Companies, more than just common sense for K&S. Integrating Green publisher of Business Week Magazine,selected K&S as one Principles into our projects restores the natural ecological { of the Southeast's Top 50 in Design; and Engineering balance of our region, conserves water and other natural News Record named K&S one of the nation's Top 500 resources, saves money, reduces maintenance and a engineering firms, for the past several decades. K&S has delivers a very long list of other benefits to our clients. Page 27 KEITH and SCHNAR OCAL RFQ 2014r�-yG ,�,' .. � FLORIDA'S Dig LOCAL FIRl�1 TAB '2 Experience & Qualifications • This honor exemplifies a larger commitment to the BUSINESS STRUCTURE/CONTACT community and an understanding of our natural resources. INFORMATION To promote and preserve native species and ecosystems is more than just common sense at K&S, a leader in South Keith and Schnars,P.A. Florida progress for more than 40 years. Integrating Green Structure: S Corporation Principles into our projects restores the natural ecological Address: 6500 North Andrews Avenue balance of our region , conserves water and other natural Fort Lauderdale,FL 33309 resources, saves money, reduces maintenance and a Phone: (954) 776-16 16,(954) 771-7690 (fax) delivers a very long list of other benefits to our clients. Contact: Robert K.Krisak,P.L.S. Email: rkrisak @ksfla.com Website: www.ksfla.com RELEVANT PROJECTS PROJECT NAME LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLIENT/CONTACT Fort Lauderdale City of Fort Design Surveys,Plats,Boundary and Jorge Holguins Lauderdale Fort Lauderdale,FL Topographic Surveys (Imperial Point PM) (954) 828-5675 Hollywood/ Broward County Verification of horizontal and vertical Fort Lauderdale Fort Lauderdale,FL control,sketch and descriptions,misc. Aviation Department International Chris Olson (Parsons) additional services Airport 954 635-3451 Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade Multiple Projects During Survey Miami-Dade County General Land & County,FL Continuing Services Contracts Randy Koper Engineering (305) 755-7860 Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood from Young Circle to Cross-sections and Drainage FDOT District 4 As-built Surveys Paul Doll,P.S.M. Boulevard Intracoastal Waterway, Hollywood,FL (954) 777-4586 City of Miami- Fire Training Miami,FL Boundary and Topographic Survey Capital Improvements Facility Program,Harry James (305) 416-1026 Page 28 KEITH and SCHNARS, .A L__ FLOWDAS QQI LOCAL FIRM - U� - it \tr... �; iL 1 i r a ''.4 11..1 _ v ,� _a• ; �,,' .,`` A Ala J. ' .• • _ ' ., V r' Is' � � r. ,• .• • 4. • ' .'.,.:.. \-‘-.."....:..,:s.:.c,i''''..2-:t. . ■ mac: I Alt Iti°\,. i r ( . F t*• • ...i. .. . . ..... .. . ,.. A' . y 4 y • Y i,� V"• r • i ‘,. 1 N' ,. 2 0 2 ,. ,..,..,. , . ...y . Qualifications ., ..„ . .„ ..„ . „... . .. ., . ... of Proposer . . ,, . . . ,, ... . .,, . .. t . • . .• . ‘, . . . ... e.-0 , ., Li , w' -i,'eipt- ,:,,,',4 \,,,, r F 1,F ' e , i s t.-I ( ..., ..,-.. f • ,- .. f4" ., ,}'°.' . '�qV A b.�{; \ TAB 2e: ' Experience & Qualifications .....__. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART f -- - - 1 _ _ _ - J__ _ . _________________ . , r . ' . _. . --,C ---pd' - PRo AGAR QUALITY CONTROL SURVEYOR , Robert K. Krisak, P.L.S. Eric Wilhelm P.S.M. Mark J. Moshier, P.E. � Wilhjelm, President I Director of Surveying&Mapping Project Surveyor J J J •.1' Pifialt sr " ORS = Timothy Gray, P.S.M. Project Surveyor Donald Spicer, P.L.S. Project Surveyor 4k �i 4! tP• ..R -d .• .yam ;,..h' l SUPERVISION Benjamin Hoyle, P.S.M. j James Vasquez Survey Crew Supervisor Survey Technician .1) Alexe Y Gilev c Office Survey Technician '8 FIE-- i CREWS I I P. - i------.. _. . TRENCH/CONFINED SPACE/ SURVEY SUPPORT" -T UNDERGROUND {A 1AIHOTOGPAPH F.R.ALEMAN . L.F____, A&B ENGINEERING, Inc.* LAND ASSOCIATES, Inc.** F.LcrES, inc. --HDS&SCANNING-Y i COONER&ASSOCIATES, Inc. –.—.- .Y c *SBE ** M/WBE P age 31 � KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A.A RFQ,lat4.346+Y V ' , y +x'i9 . FLORIDA'S 61 LOCAL FIRM• Mark J. Moshier, P.E. Mr. Moshier has more than 37 years of experience in the design, construction engineering and inspection (CEI) and project management of roadway and bridge projects. For 8 years, he worked for the FDOT District 6 serving as the District Construction Engineer directing a multi-million dollar construction program for Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. He also served as a resident engineer responsible for the contract administration of all CEI projects _ in Miami-Dade and Monroe counties. Mr. Moshier is currently involved in the administration ` ' of several major complex highway,bridge,drainage and land development projects, including Academic administration and management for FDOT Distict 6 General Engineering Consultant services Aca Background contract. Mr. Moshier is experienced in partnering principles and concepts. B.S., Civil and Relevant Experience Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, 1977 Vice President for Transportation Services, Keith and Schnars: Responsible for the Professional direction of all highways and structures design, and construction engineering and inspection projects, undertaken by Keith and Schnars. Responsibilities include roadways, bridges, Registration parks,aviation services and other related facilities. (1991 to Present) Registered Professional Engineer, FL#32016 g * FDOT District 6 Construction Engineer, Work Groups 10.1, 10.3, & 10.4, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties,FL:Responsible for the direction and administration of construction work program for Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. Directed multimillion dollar construction program to ensure compliance with Departmental objectives, specifications and policies, FHWA requirements and Departmental goals. Administered all personnel and activities in the District 6 construction office. Contact: Gus Pego, P.E., Phone: (305) 470-5197. (1985 to 1991) *.FDOT District 6 Resident Engineer, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FL: Responsible for contract administration and CEI projects in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. Negotiated contract changes, settled contract claims, developed manpower assignments, prepared and administered construction budget. Contact: Gus Pego, P.E., Phone: (305) 470-5197. (1983 to 1985) * Project Engineer, Sverdrup Corporation, St. Louis, MO: Project engineer for new roadway and bridge construction for the Florida Keys Bridge Replacement Program. Performed condition inspection of Angustora Bridge, Venezuela, South America, Martin Luther King Bridge over Mississippi River, and countywide bridge inspection for the State of Missouri. Construction inspection/supervision of various projects for Granite City Steel. (1979 to 1983) * El Rio Shared Use Pathway, Boca Raton, FL: Keith and Schnars designed a 12'wide shared use pathway which follows the El Rio Canal from Glades Road to Congress Avenue in the City of Boca Raton, Florida. The path was constructed in three segments: Spanish River to Yamato Road, Yamato Road to L-40 Canal andL-40 Canal to Congress Ave. For each of the three segments.Keith and Schnars Roadway design services provided horizontal and vertical design of the paths, signing and markings design, design of stormwater treatment, construction plans preparation,specifications package preparation, and post design services. Client/Contact: City of Boca Raton/Tony Puerta, Phone: (561) 416-3402. * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 32 F LORI Di1'S 51 LOCAL FIRlvt .-- i _ .. , Robert K. Kruk, P.L.S. \: Mr.Krisak has more than 35 years of experience in all phases of land and engineering surveying "°,:r; = - including topographic, boundary, hydrographic, As-Built, construction layout and location : b •- surveys for highways, residential developments commercial projects and expert witness testimony. He has gained this experience through a variety of surveying-related positions, including instrument person, drafter, party chief, and field crew coordination. Mr. Krisak g P P �' �"" is familiar with a wide range of state-of-the-art surveying equipment; And is experienced in project management, field survey supervision, office survey procedures, and staff power Academic scheduling. Background Relevant Experience A.A.S., Forestry, Paul Smith's College, 1977 * Utility Undergrounding Consultant Services, Sunny Isles, FL: Mr. Krisak serves as Project Manager for Survey Services for the Utility Undergrounding Consultant Services Professional contract with Sunny Isles.Survey services included Design Surveys along Collins Avenue;Design Registration Survey of 80+ FPL proposed easement sites; Preparation of Sketch and Descriptions; Design Registered Professional Surveys of portions of I 89th Street, 1 78th Street, Atlantic Boulevard, Northeast 1 70th Street; Surveyor and Mapper, Right of Way verification of I 86th Street, I 85th Street, I 83rd Street, Atlantic Boulevard, and FL#464 I I 78th Street. (2011 to present) * Districtwide Surveying and Mapping Services: Mr. Krisak served as Quality Professional Assurance Program Manager to ensure the high quality of our survey staff and deliverables Affiliations for this Continuing Services Miscellaneous Contract in which we provide the district design Florida Society of surveys, parcel and right-of-way stake outs, digital terrain models (DTM), geodetic control, Professional Surveyors and control surveys, right-of-way mapping, right-of-way (monumentation) surveys, maintenance Mappers mapping and parcel sketches. Client/Contact: FDOT District 4/Bill Arata, P.S.M., Phone: (954) 777-4556. (2008 to Present) Broward County Chapter of F.S.M.S. Fort Lauderdale Miscellaneous Survey Contract, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Mr. Krisak served as Project Manager,supervising Engineering Design Surveys, Boundary Surveys for Key International Who's Who Projects such as Sistrunk Boulevard, NW 19th Street, Miami Road,Sunset Memorial Gardens, of Professionals Septic Area#2,#3,#4,#5,#8 and#I6, Facility Security Sites, Fort Lauderdale Country Club, Shady Banks,Starlight Landing,Fire Station#13,Sunrise Key and Sunrise Intracoastal Subdivision, American Congress on NE 56th Street, South Andrews Avenue of the City's Water Works 2011 Program. Client/ Surveying and Mapping Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Tony Irvine, P.L.S., Phone: (954) 828-5052. (2007 to 2010) Certified CSX Trainer * Wiles Road Extension from Lyons Road to Powerline Road, Broward County, FL: Mr. Krisak supervised field and office survey services for the preparation of final design plans for the extension of Wiles Road from Lyons Road to Powerline Road in Broward County, Florida. Survey Services such as horizontal and vertical control for construction of roadway and bridge and As-Built information were provided for the Design-Build construction of a new roadway from Lyons Road to Florida's Turnpike (West Project) and for the portion of Wiles Road from Florida's Turnpike to Powerline Road (East Project). Surveying services also included roadway alignment surveys, baseline establishments, sketch and descriptions, tree removal permits, topographic survey, monument setting, and right-of-way surveying. Raster images(computer images of aerial photography overlain with roadway design)were utilized to develop a final product. (2012) * Miami-Dade Miscellaneous Master Survey Contract,Miami-Dade County, FL: Mr. Krisak served as Project Manager on various projects for Miami-Dade County, including Homestead Air Reserve Base Park Platting, Miami International Airport (MIA) Projects, Hialeah MetroRail, Intersection Design Survey, Kendall Library Improvements and Fire station 64. Client/Contact: Miami-Dade County/Orlando Capote, P.E., Phone: (786) 469-5248. (2006 to Present) * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients i Page 33 _�;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. � ,� FLORID/AS 54 LOCAL FIRM Eric Wilhjel•m, P.S.M. L 4,- i Mr. Wilhjelm has over 25 years of surveying experience specializing in highway surveying and mapping with 16 of those years with Keith and Schnars.He was employed with the FDOT for 8 • �.� ,a years,primarily working on Right-of-Way Mapping projects.While working for Keith and Schnars, Mr.Wilhjelm has completed both Design and Right-of-Way Survey and Mapping projects. He has experience in every phase of a survey and mapping project from the planning of GPS sessions, compiling DTM s, computing historic baselines and to completion of right-of-way maps. He has "' extensive experience with a variety of engineering and surveying related computer software including MicroStation, Geopak, Caice and Trimble Geometrics Office. Mr. Wilhjelm has Academic served or is serving as a Project Manager for three Districtwide Surveying and one Disrtrictwide Background Right-of-Way Mapping contracts for District 4 and 6. His project management experience B.S., Land Surveying and includes staff supervision, quality control and scheduling. He serves the critical role of Quality Mapping, University of Assurance Program Manager for the Survey Department to ensure the high quality of our survey Florida, 1997 staff and deliverables. Professional Relevant Experience Registrations Registered Professional * Districtwide Miscellaneous Survey and Mapping, FPID: 250686-1-32-16, Surveyor and Mapper, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties FL: Mr. Wilhjelm served as the Project Manager for FL#5872 District 6 Districtwide Miscellaneous Survey and Mapping contract from August 2005 to August 2010. He supervised and oversaw various surveying tasks needed by the Department from Professional simple stakeout assignments, to a 5-mile DTM. Projects were located in both Miami-Dade and Affiliations Monroe Counties. Client/Contact FDOT District 6/Mr.Scott Perkins, P.S.M., Project Manager, Florida Society of Surveyors Phone: (305)470-5194. (8/05 to 8/10) and Mappers * Districtwide Miscellaneous Survey and Mapping, FPID: 229922-4-32-01, Broward, Palm Beach and Martin Counties, FL: Mr. Wilhjelm serves as the Project 1 1 Manager for FDOT District 4 Districtwide Miscellaneous Survey and Mapping contract from May 2006 to present. Projects were located in Broward, Martin and Palm Beach Counties. Client/ Contact FDOT District 4/William Arata, P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (954) 777-4586. (5/06 to Present) FDOT District 4, FPID: 2230012-1-32-05, Broward and Palm Beach, Counties, FL: Project Manager for District 4 Districtwide Right-of-Way Mapping contract from May 2002 to 2010. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Wilhjelm supervised staff and performed quality control on right-of-way maps. Before 2008, he was the surveyor working on individual mapping projects over seeing project from right-of-way maps from setting control to finished maps. Sites were located in Broward and Palm Beach Counties.Client/Contact FDOT District 4/Mr.Louis Cefolia, P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (954) 777-4566. (5/02 to 2010) f FDOT District 4, FPID: 425037-1-32-01, Broward, Martin, and Palm Beach, I Counties,FL:Project Manager for FDOT District 4 Districtwide Surveying and Mapping Services contract from December 2010 to present. This contract calls for various tasks requested by the Department needed for Design Services.This is the third districtwide contract Mr.Wilhjelm has been a Project Manager or Project Surveyor on for District 4.Client/Contact FDOT District 4/ Mr.William Arata,P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (954) 777-4586. (5/02 to 2010) * SR-A1A, FPID: 419858-1-32-01, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Surveyor as a subconsultant on design survey on Collins Avenue from N 75th Street to Harding Avenue in Surfside. Started as cross sections and topography,but upgraded to full DTM.Contact Adriana Manzanares, P.E., FDOT Project Manager, Phone: (305)470-5283. (3/08 to 6/09) Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients I�KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 34 ����' FLORIDAS54.LOCAL FIRM ' .y., Timothy Gra P.S.M. 1 4` Mr. Gray is a Project Surveyor with over 14 years of experience with surveying in South (- �' ' Florida. He is a current resident of Sunny Isles and a graduate of the University of Florida's 7; Geomatics Program. His experience includes a variety of surveying assignments, including: • Right-of-Way mapping, Chain-of-Title research and review, computations, topographic I ; surveys,drainage surveys,ACSM/ALTA surveys,digital terrain models(DTMs),condominium surveys, and calculated parcel stake outs. His experience has included projects for both public and private sector clients. Mr. Gray is proficient in the industry s software including Academic MicroStation XM, Leica Level-pac, GeoPak, Caice, and AutoCAD. He is also proficient in Background the processing of survey data including both Electronic Field Book (EFB) and Tripod Data Systems (TDS) Data collection. B.S., Geomatics, University of Florida, 1999 Relevant Experience Professional * FDOT District 4 Survey, Palm Beach County, FL: Served as Senior Survey Registration Technician for our Miscellaneous Survey Contract providing control, monumentation, and Registered Professional design surveying for projects including: SR-808/13th Avenue Canal, SR-A I A/Spanish River Surveyor and Mapper, Boulevard, Forest Hill Boulevard and SR-A I A/Lake Avenue to SR-80. (2010 to Present) FL#LS6604 * Districtwide Miscellaneous Survey and Mapping, FPID: 229922-4-32-01, Broward, Palm Beach and Martin Counties, FL: Project Surveyor/Senior Survey Technician for District 4 Districtwide Miscellaneous Surveying and Mapping from May 2006 to present. Client/Contact: FDOT District 4/William Arata, P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (954) 777-4586. (5/06 to Present) • Districtwide Miscellaneous Survey and Mapping, FPID: 250686-1-32-16, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties FL: Project Surveyor/Senior Survey Technician for District 6 Districtwide Miscellaneous Surveying and Mapping from August 2005 to present. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Mr. Scott Perkins, P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (305) 470-5194. (8/05 to Present) * SR-882/Forest Hill Boulevard, Sections #93016-1500 & 93016-2500, Palm Beach County, FL: Project Surveyor for Control Survey and Genesis Map from SR-7/ US-44I to SR-809/Military Trial. Contact: Louis Cefolia, P.S.M, Project Manager, Phone: (954) 777-4566. (5/02 to 2/10) *SR-818/Griffin Road, FPID #413832-1, Broward County, FL: Served as the Project Surveyor for the Right-of-Way Maps from SR-7 to Federal Highway/US-I. Client/Contact: FDOT District 4/M. Louis Cetolia, P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (954) 777-4566. (12/06 to 4/08) • FDOT District 6 Survey, Miami-Dade County, FL: Served as Project Surveyor for a Right-of-Way Mapping contract, providing a right-of-way map, Control Survey, and other surveying services for a project along NW 87th Avenue. (8/06 to 6/10) • FDOT District 6, R/W, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, FL: Served as Project Surveyor for our Miscellaneous Right-of-Way Mapping Contract, providing right-of-way maps, control surveys, and surveying services for projects including: SR-870/Commercial ► Boulevard (Broward County), SR-882/Forest Hill Boulevard (Palm Beach County), SR-818/ Griffin Road (Broward County). Mr. Gray worked closely with the FDOT staff to provide right-of-way mapping services for three complex projects along SR-A I A (Broward & Palm Beach Counties)which required more comprehensive research than is customary. (8/05 to 6/10) * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients Page 35 , 1:j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. FLORID/6 81;y!LOCAL FIRM -'. -4.,..-fr:-. .--,14„.4.. ,,, . Y ': . -5 ( , Benjamin Hole, P.S.M. L, ,tip pi / , Mr. Hoyle is a Survey Crew Supervisor with over 12 years of experience throughout the _ �, state of Florida and has been with Keith and Schnars for 7 years. He is a graduate from 4 i <:;.4 . the University of Central Florida Engineering Technology Program. His experience erience includes -,-_ - `--« � ACSM/ALTA surveys, boundary, construction layout, topographic surveys and As-built G= ' -- surveys. Mr. Hoyle has experience in today's newest software including AutoCAD, TDS ,I ''4- T'- collection, Topcon and Trimble GPS. Academic Relevant Experience Background Utility Undergrounding Consultant Services, Sunny Isles, FL: Mr. Hoyle serves B.5., Engineering as Field Crew Supervisor for Survey Services for the Utility Undergrounding Consultant Technology, University of Services contract with Sunny Isles. Survey services included Design Surveys along Collins Central Florida, 2008 Avenue; Design Survey of 80+ FPL proposed easement sites; Preparation of Sketch and Professional Descriptions; Design Surveys of portions of 189th Street, 178th Street, Atlantic Boulevard, Northeast 1 70th Street;right-of-way verification of 1 86th Street, 1 85th Street, I83rd Street, Registration Atlantic Boulevard, and I78th Street. (2011 to present) Registered Professional Surveyor&Mapper, Miami Mover, Miami-Dade County, FL: Supervised field crews in collecting data for FL#LS6769 As-Built of piers, plinths and control for rail system at Miami International Airport. Client/ Professional Contact Miami-Dade County/Tony Hernandez, P.E., Phone: (305) 869-1563. (2010) Certifications Homestead Air Reserve Park, Homestead, FL: Supervised field crews in collecting CSX Safety Facilitator data for 216-acre park for Miami-Dade County. (2009 to 2010) OSHA 30 First Aid 0 Miami Lakes West Fire Rescue Station, Miami-Dade County, FL:Served as Field; Monitoring of. Crew Supervisor for the platting of Miami Lakes West Fire Rescue Station (Station #64). Traffic Safety Survey products included a boundary and topographic survey, preparation of Tentative and Final Plats, elevation certificates, and preparation of eLOMA and LOMR-F application Fall Protection Training documents. Client/Contact: Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Department/Margarita Garces, Phone: (786) 331-4518. (3/09 to Present) G Metrorail Bike Path Improvements, Miami-Dade County, FL: As Field Crew Supervisor, provided topographic surveys and Right-of-Way calculation at multiple client determined intersections. Client/Contact: Miami-Dade Transit/Orlando Capote, Phone: (786) 469-5248. (2011 to 2013) Turkey Point Power Plant, Homestead, FL: Supervised field crews for the layout and As-Built of monitoring wells throughout the power plant for Florida Power and Light. Contact: Stacy Foster, Project Manager, Phone: (561) 691-7065. (2010) fif SR-A1A, FPID #419858-1-32-01, Miami-Dade County, FL: Supervised field crews for design survey on Collins Avenue from North 75th Street to Harding Avenue in Surfside, Florida. Provided cross sections, topography and DTM service. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Adriana Manzanares, P.E., Project Manager, Phone: (305)470-5283. (3/08 to 6/09) 4F SR-25/US-27, FPID #425211-1-52-01, Miami-Dade County, FL: Supervised field crews for a 5-mile DTM of SR-25 and side streets from Homestead Extension of Florida Turnpike to Broward County Line. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Scott Perking, P.S.M., Project Manager, Phone: (305) 470-5194. (2010) -0 Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients F�. i:.KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 36 ___. FLORID,S 84 LOCAL FIRM . .y`_ r . Donald Spicer, P.L.S. 1. '- ' ` a e' Mr. Spicer has more than 37 years of surveying experience as a Professional Land Surveyor r tea.' - in South Florida. His experience includes all phases of land surveying including topographic, r z t. boundary, hydrographic, As-Built, construction layout, location/route surveys for design '''z'—'• .71 '. > purposes, Power Transmission, residential developments, commercial projects and ' American Land Title Association (ALTA) surveys. He is experienced in using AutoCAD for the preparation of Land Surveys, Parcel Sketches, Easements, and Record Drawings. Mr. Spicer also has many years of actual field work experience in the land surveying industry. He is familiar with a wide range of state-of-the-art surveying equipment. He is also experienced Academic in project management, field survey supervision and office survey procedures. Background Registered Professional Relevant Experience Surveyor, FL#4677 * Fire Training Facility at 3900 Thomas Avenue, Miami, FL: Project Surveyor for ' Professional all calculations, horizontal and vertical control, supervison of survey field crews, survey Affiliations drawings and client coordination for boundary and topographic survey. (7/14 to 8/14) Florida Surveying and Mapping Society (FSMS) * Utility Undergrounding - Collins Avenue, Sunny Isles, FL: Project Surveyor ' for all calculations, survey drawings, easement sketch and descriptions, as-built drawings, Florida Surveying and supervision of survey field crews, horizontal and vertical control networks for project. Mapping Society(FSMS) (2011 to present) GPS Users Group South Florida Water Management District Surveying Contract: Field Crew National Society of Supervisor responsible for supervision and coordination of all field crews, verifying Professional Surveyors procedures and accuracy of all field work on several projects in Broward, Palm Beach and (NSPS) Collier Counties such as,Golden Gate Canal(Collier County),Old Pompano Canal(Broward County), Pump Station 13 at Orange Drive and SR-7 (Broward County). (2012 to present) G SR-A1 A, from Sheridan Street to Hollywood Boulevard (Miscellaneous Surveying Contract), Hollywood, FL: Field Crew Supervisor responsible for supervision and coordination of all field crews, verifying procedures and accuracy of all field work on Project. (10/12 to 2/13) • # Christmas Park Boundary and Topographic Survey, Miami, FL: Field Crew Supervisor responsible for supervision and coordination of all field crews,verifying procedures and accuracy of all field work, calculations for boundary determination and reviewing final survey drawings on project. (10/12 to 1 1/12) Oslo Road and 1-95 Interchange Preliminary Design Study (Miscellaneous Survey Contract), Indian River County, FL: Project Surveyor Responsible for all calculations, horizontal and vertical control, right-of-way determination, supervision of all survey field crews for project in Indian River County. Client FDOT District 4. (3/14 to present) Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients Page 37 ;; KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. . FLORIDAS 61:#;LOCAL ARM James Vas u� z • • Mr.Vasquez is a survey professional with over 13 years of experience as a Survey and Mapping :, CADD Technician. His background includes experience in As-Built surveys, design surveys, ,� J ALTA-ACSM Land Title surveys and construction surveying. Mr.Vasquez has created plats 'x� for recording in Broward and Palm Beach Counties. He is also proficient with specialized CADD standards and regulations mandated for the City of Fort Lauderdale. Relevant Experience Academic Background Hard Rock Casino, Hollywood, FL: Survey Technician for various projects on site including preparing a design for parking lots, parking garage and Sprung Building. (2008 to ATI Career Training Center present) Immokalee Casino, Immokalee, FL: Survey Technician for drafting Topographic Surveys, expansion of casino and parking lots. (2008 to present) Coconut Creek Casino, Coconut Creek, FL: Drafting including boundaries, platting, topographic, as-builts and lake cross-sections. Client/Contact: Seminole Tribe of Florida! Deborah Grant, Phone: (954) 585-5652. (2004 to Present) * Homestead Air Reserve Park, Homestead, FL: Drafting for 2I6-acre park in Miami-Dade County including platting, boundary and topographic. (2010 to 201 1) * Snake Creek Road Mitigation Project, Broward and Hendry Counties, FL: Survey Technician for 500- acre mitigation project consisting of Topographic and Design Surveys to mitigate 20-mile roadway embankment reconstruction project for Seminole Reservation in Broward and Hendry Counties for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. (2008) , 4 Septic Area 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Survey Technician preparing a design and utility location survey for a 300-acre municipal residential redevelopment improvement project. (2004 to 2005) Septic Area 8, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Survey Technician preparing a design and utility location survey for a 725-acre municipal residential redevelopment improvement project. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Hal Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. (2004 to 2005) Big Cypress East Conveyance Canal Project, Hendry County, FL: Survey Technician for I 9-mile drainage construction project for Seminole Reservation in Hendry County for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Client: Seminole Tribe of Florida. (2006) * Fort Lauderdale Beach Streetscape, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Drafting for Design Survey Beach Streetscape project for the city of Fort Lauderdale. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Hal Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. (8/05 to 11/05) 4 Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients I,, J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 38 J,,�' FLORIDAS ell LOCAL FIRm 1 I 1 T- > Aiexey Gilev ., , , - ,,,, ii, ,-,, ,----- ---_, -,. , :-,,..-., ,, , ,, __, , [� Mr. Gilev has more than 8 years of land surveying experience as the Certified Survey Technician III Boundary Crew Chief in Florida. His experience includes GIS asset inventories, r '6 strong ACAD background, GPS surveys (Static/ RTK), conventional topographic survey, ALTA, boundary, hydrographic, As-Built, construction layout, R/W survey, Cross-section A survey, Power Tramission lines survey, and Subdivision Layouts. He is familiar with a wide i V.4.-,/. ran e of state-of-the-art surve in g a ui ment. He is also ex erienced in Under round - ` ''' Utility Locations. Academic Background Relevant Experience B.S. Geomatics, University * SR-915, Miami-Dade County, FL: This project was a R/W map from SR-5 to NW of Florida, 2013 110th Terrace. Mr. Gilev was a survey technician on the R/W Modernization Map for A.S., Civil/Surveying SR-9I5 with the primary task of processing field data. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/ Engineering Technology Cristina Kinman Albury, P.S.M., FDOT Project Manager, Phone: (305) 470-5489. (8/13 to A.S., Drafting/Design 7/14) Technology 0 SR-934,Miami-Dade County, FL:This project was a R/W map from W 4th Avenue to A.A., General Study E 4th Avenue. Mr.Gilev was a survey technician on the R/W Modernization Map for SR-934 Valencia College, Orlando, with the primary task of processing field data. In addition, Mr. Gilev was also responsible Florida, 2011 for the drafting of the R/W Map. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Cristina Kinman Albury, A.S., Land Use Technician, P.S.M., FDOT Project Manager, Phone: (305) 470-5489. (10/13 to 7/14) Republic of Belarus * SR-934, Miami-Dade County, FL: This project was a R/W map from SR-5 to NW Land Use Engineering 79th Street. Mr. Gilev was a survey technician on the R/W Modernization Map for NE Byelorussian Agricultural 82nd Street with the primary task of processing field data. In addition, Mr. Gilev was also Academy responsible for drafting the R/W Map. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Cristina Kinman Professional Albury, P.S.M., FDOT Project Manager, Phone: (305) 470-5489. (1/14 to 7/14) Certificates * SR-934,Miami-Dade County,FL:This project a R/W map from the East edge of Isle California Land Surveyor-in-Training of Normandy to Atlantic Ocean. Mr.Gilev was a survey technician on a R/W Modernization Map for 71st Street with the primary task of processing field data. In addition, Mr. Gilev was Certified Survey Technician also responsible for drafting of the R/W Map. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Cristina Ill, Certificate in Geomatics Kinman Albury, P.S.M., FDOT Project Manager, Phone: (305) 470-5489. (1/14 to 7/14) Technical Certificates in Storm Water Asset Inventories, Orlando, FL: Mr. Gilev was the Crew Chief for Architectural Drafting Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation in Central Florida. He performed the Mechanical Drafting complete asset inventories of the storm water structures for the City of Orlando. (3/09 to Land Surveying Drafting 11/12) AutoCAD , Maintenance of Traffic Traffic Signs Inventories, Lake County, FL: Mr. Gilev was the GIS technician for CSX Roadway Worker Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation in Central Florida. He assigned the unique Protection Training ID., collected and post-processed, in ARC View GIS 9.3, over 1,000 traffic signes. (8/07 to Confined Space Entry I 1/07) Advance Utility Locator Professional Traffic Signs Reflectivity Report, Taveres, FL: Mr. Gilev was the GIS technician for Affiliations Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation in Central Florida. He assigned the unique. Florida Society of ID.,collected and post-processed,in ARC View GIS 9.3,over 500 traffic signs. (2/08 to 3/08) Professional Surveyors and Mapping Sun Rail, Orlando, FL: Mr. Gilev worked as part of the land surveying crew on SunRail project. (10/08 to 8/10) * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients Page 39 I,, I:j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. 'J>1 % FLORIDASafkLOCAL FIRM DENNIS STANTON SUE Task Leader Mr. Stanton has specialized in utility coordinating, mapping and protection of .;:i::0,► •. •, subsurface utility systems for over 24 years. He has relevant and recent work ` experience in designating, locating and plant protection projects. He has performed utility investigations with a variety of electronic detection devices, survey equipment and air/vacuum excavators on numerous projects throughout Florida, New York, Virginia and Maryland. He has supervised over 10,000 test '1".., holes and over 1,000,000 utility feet of designating. r PROJECT EXPERIENCE Districtwide Utility Location Services, FDOT 6 (2009 - Present). FRA serves as EXPERTISE the Prime consultant for this contract. Mr. Stanton is the Project Manager, and . provides all the necessary services to designate, locate by excavating, surveying SUE and mapping existing surface and subsurface utilities to support the design of Surveying construction plans on projects selected by the Department. FRA provides exact Utility Coordination horizontal and vertical locations of existing underground utilities by way of electromagnetic, and other geophysical location techniques including vacuum excavation. Mr. Stanton facilitates a quick response to the Department when EXPERIENCE ordering subsurface exploration services. The client benefited by receiving SUE With FRA: 18 Years data which enabled them to identify, address and remedy potential utility conflicts i With Others: Years during the projects design phase. Contact:Mr. Tony Soto(305)470-5232 i a Districtwide Utility Coordination Services, FDOT 6(2006 - 2011;2011-Present). EMPLOYMENT For this contract, Mr. Stanton serves as a Utility Coordinator on an as-needed J oined ERA C'7 :,_99( basis. FRA has completed numerous major roadway projects under this contract and has provided on-site services, as needed. Tasks have included all phases of utility negotiations and relocation (electric, telecommunications/cable, 1996 1993 water/sewer, gas/fuel). FRA has provided Utility Coordination services in Accurate Locating accordance with FDOT's standards, policies and procedures and is familiar with FDOT's utility agreements. FRA has worked with various utilities companies (FPL EDUCATION Distribution, Transmission, Fibernet; Comcast; Bellsouth; Verizon; Miami-Dade B A WASD; Level 3 Communications; Qwest Communications, etc.) on multiple ' projects within Miami-Dade and Monroe County. The client benefited by receiving Liberal Arts SUE data which enabled them to identify, address and remedy potential utility Old Westbury. NY conflicts during the projects design phase. Contact: Mr. Tony Soto (305) 470- _185) 5232 i.Districtwide Utility Location Services & D/W Underground Utility Services CERTIFICATIONS Contract, FDOT 4 (11/2000 - 05/2011). Mr. Stanton, as the Project Manager, Florida Intermediate provided all the necessary services to designate, locate by excavation, survey and Training -ATSS�-1 C2_010) map existing surface and subsurface utilities to support the design of construction plans on projects selected by the Department. He provided exact horizontal and RedVector's vertical locations of existing underground utilities by way of electromagnetic, sonic Understanding and other geophysical location techniques including vacuum excavation. FRA was Subsurface Utility been awarded two consecutive contracts! Contact: Mr. Ken Olson (954) 777- Engineering 20041 4563/Mr. Bob Hughan, PSM(954) 777-4558 Worl<Zone Traffic Control 1-595 Corridor Roadway Improvements, FDOT 4 (04/2009 - 2010). FRA served Intermediate Level as a subconsultant to the ACS Dragados/EarthTech Team for this project. Mr. (2002( Stanton served as the SUE Project Manager for this contract. Under Mr. Stanton's direction, FRA providing SUE services to support the design and construction for Confined Space Entry approximately 15.5 miles of the interstate highway system. FRA provided Training Program (19991 designation of all requested underground utilities by means of electromagnetic and GPR. In addition, we provided utility locations using the vacuum excavation method for approximately 1500 possible utility conflicts. Our in-house surveying OFFICE LOCATION group is providing the necessary survey support so we may deliver a stand alone Miami product certified by a professional Land Surveyor. The schedule of this project was very demanding, FRA was required to complete all required SUE work within the first six months of the design. We completed all work on-time! Contact: Mr. Dong Chen(954) 777-4362 R.ALEMAN x A,sodaies.Inc. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS B SURVEYORS F Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients iv A&B ENGINEERING, INC. Dennis Painter, R.L.S. • Survey Director Firm Affiliation: Mr. Painter has more than 40 years of comprehensive land surveying A&B Engineering, Inc. experience in design, survey, computations, and legal aspects of highways, land development, platting and private survey work, such as boundary surveys, expert witness, topographic surveys, right-of- Education: Associate of Arts(Computers), way mapping,and individual lot surveys. Associate of Science(Surveying)- Palm Beach Community College Representative projects: • STA 3/4 Everglades Construction Project, South Florida Years Experience: Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL - With this Firm: 41 Directed field operations and coordination with other surveying With Other Firms: 1 and engineering consultants. Organizations: • Drainage Districts - Lake Worth Drainage District, South Florida Surveying& Mapping Society Florida Water Management District, Loxahatchee Groves Water Florida Land Surveyor's Council Control District - Design surveys and cross sections for water control structures. Registration: Licensed Professional Land • FPL Power Plant, Martin County — Provided horizontal and Surveyor vertical control, retracement and restoration of land lines, staking and GPS Control Surveying for construction purposes. • FDOT Roads and Highways — Okeechobee Blvd., 1-95 at Atlantic Boulevard, 1-95 at Midway Road and St. Lucie West Boulevard, Districtwide Enhancement Projects - Palm Beach, Broward and Martin counties. • Notable Estates - Boundary surveys for Montsorrel, Mar-A- Lago,DuPont and Roger Dean. • Palm Beach County Roads and Highways - Southern Boulevard/Australian Avenue Interchange; U.S. I Right-of-Way Map (Martin County); U.S. 27 design survey; S.R.�7 baseline retracement. • Colleges& Schools- Palm Beach Community Colleges-North, South,West and Central Campuses, Florida Atlantic University. Provided boundary and/or design surveys for Lake Worth Middle School, Lake Worth Community High School, Greenacres Elementary School,North Grade Elementary School, South Grade Elementary School, U.B. Kinsey Elementary School, and the Bus Parking Compound, the School District of Palm Beach County-various sites. • Bluefield Ranch - Boundary survey and section retracement of 8,000-acre ranch in St. Lucie and Martin Counties. • Farms - DuBois Farms, DuBois Growers, Whitworth Farms, West Boynton Farms, Brynteson's Nursery, Hall's Nursery, Patrick's Nursery,Anthony Groves, Dahlgren's Nursery and Dell Farms. * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients ► Ike Rooks, PSM Project Manager/Principal in Charge 8.3 Photogrammetric Mapping I SBE lk I.F. Rooks Ike is a principal of the firm with more than 26 years of professional experience. He has been a registered FL Professional Surveyor & Mapper (#5416) since 1994. During his career, Ike has managed hundreds of transportation related photogrammetric mapping projects for Counties, Cities, Municipalities, FDOT, and Airport Authorities. Ike is responsible for project management, QA/QC and coordination/communication of project issues and scope to the various IFR team members. Ike ensures all project requirements are met and offers extensive familiarity with FDOT standards, procedures, practices, and guidelines. His experience with the FDOT includes managing aerial photography/photogrammetry projects in each of the 8 Districts. Ike is a member of the Florida Surveying & Mapping Society and the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. EDUCATION SR 5 from SW88th St. to SW 801"St. Valdosta State University(1988) (Miami-Dade County) BA-(Finance/Economics) FDOT District 6 I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Fixed Wing photo missions to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric REGISTRATIONS mapping. Creation of 1" = 40' & black/white digital mosaic in Professional Surveyor&Mapper HMR&TIF Format. Project Length 0.979 Miles #5416 Florida (1994) * SR 826& I-75 Interchange (South Bound Lanes) (Miami-Dade County) MEMBERSHIPS FDOT District 6 Member,American Society of Photogrammetry and I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter Remote Sensing photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping&3D DTM. Project Length 3.9 Miles Member, FSMS * Golden Glades Interchange (Miami-Dade County) FDOT District 6 PROJECT EXPERIENCE I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric Districtwide Aerial Photography/Photogrammetry mapping&3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire FDOT, District 6 black &white film for creation of black/white digital mosaic 1"= This contract includes a range of task work order driven 40'in HMR format. Project Length 4.6 Miles projects throughout the District in which IFR is responsible for providing Aerial Photography/Photogrammetric services. * SR 826 from ■A'of NW 471'', E of NW 67''Ave. (Miami-Dade County) * SR 915 and SR 922 (Miami-Dade County) FDOT District 6 FDOT District 6 I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Fixed Wing photo photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric missions to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping& 3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire mapping. Creation of 1" = 40' & black/white digital mosaic in black/white film for creation of digital mosaics 1" = 40' in HMR HMR&TIF Format. Project Length 2.379 Miles Format. Project Length 2.0617 Miles. * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients Solutions Through Photogrammetry ike kook:, 1C 4,! • 1-95 Managed Lanes(Miami-Dade County) SR 847 from USA Today Way to NW 180i` St FDOT District 6 (Miami-Dade County) I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter FDOT District 6 photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter mapping& 3D DTM. Project Length 7.48 Miles photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping&3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire black/white film for creation of digital mosaics 1"=40'in HMR Krome Avenue from SR 94 to SR 90(Miami-Dade County) &TIF Format. FDOT District 6 I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Fixed-wing photo mission to acquire black & white digital mosaics. Creation of 1-395 from W of 1-95 to Causeway Bridge b/w digital mosaic 1"=40' & 1"=200' HMR Format. Project FDOT District 6 Length 5.8 miles I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping&3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire MDX- PD&E Study of SR924 West Extension from SR826 black/white film for creation of digital mosaics 1"=40'in HMR (Palmetto Expressway to the Homestead Extension of the &TIF Format. Florida Turnpike(HEFT) MDX I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Fixed wing photo SR 826 from S of 122°13 St. to 17`"St. mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping. FDOT District 6 Delivery of black/white digital mosaics 1"=50'in HMR format. I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping&3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire Miami International Airport Runway 8R Extension black/white film for creation of digital mosaics 1" = 40' in HMR Miami-Dade Aviation Dept. &TIF Format. I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Fixed-wing photo mission to acquire black/white photography for the creation of 2D Planimetric File (AutoCAD), 3D DTM TIN File (AutoCAD), SR 948 from NE 74'"Ave to NW 42"Ave. and 1"=20'B/W Digital Mosaic(TIF). FDOT District 6 I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric SR 860 from W of 1-95 to NE of 15"'Avenue ( Dade County) mapping&3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire FDOT District 6 black/white film for creation of digital mosaics 1" = 40' in HMR I.F. Rooks was contracted to perform a Low Altitude Helicopter &TIF Format. photo mission to acquire black/white film for 2D planimetric mapping&3D DTM and a Fixed Wing photo mission to acquire black/white film for creation of digital mosaics 1" = 40' in HMR &TIF Format. / I Solutions Through Phologrammetry COONER & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOCAL GEDMATICS® Curriculum Vitae JEFFREY C. COONER, PLS PRESIDENT- PRINCIPAL SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Florida 1984- American Congress of Surveying & Mapping Professional Land Surveyor, License No. 4052 Florida Surveying & Mapping Society Member& Instructor EDUCATION Surveying & Mapping Advisory Committee, • 1981 University of Florida University of Florida College of Civil Engineering Collier-Lee Chapter-Florida Surveying & Bachelor of Science in Land Surveying Mapping Society (Chapter President in 1993) PROFESSIONAL BOARD In 2001, Governor Jeb Bush appointed Mr. Cooner to the Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Cooner as Chairman of the Rules Committee held workshops and hearings regarding the rewriting of the Minimum Technical Standards (MTS) for Surveying in the State of Florida. The new MTS went into effect in 2006. Mr. Cooner was reappointed to the Board in 2007 by Governor Charlie Crist. Mr. Cooner served as Chair of the Board from January 2008 until his resignation in August 2010. Mr. Cooner is currently an Emeritus Member of the Board. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE Mr. Cooner lead the Surveying and Mapping Section of a large civil engineering firm from 1988 until 1997 when he started his own company. He has been responsible for the activities of multiple professionals and multiple field crews and for the project management, contract management and Quality Assurance/Quality Control [QA/QC]. of many significant surveys for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection [FDEP], South Florida Water Management District [SFWMD], Southwest Florida Water Management District [SWFWMD] and other government agencies as well as private clients. * Ordinary High Water: Mr. Cooner brings unique experience in Ordinary High Water Line boundaries to the respondent team. Mr. Cooner began teaching professional level courses on Navigability and the Ordinary High Water Mark in 1998. Mr. Cooner has established and/or reviewed the Ordinary High Water Line for land acquisition and management purposes on the following water bodies: Lake Cypress, Lake Kissimmee, Lake Rosalie, Lake and Creek Walk-In-The-Water, Lake Pierce, Lake Louisa, Kissimmee River, Reedy Creek, Dead River, Oklawaha River, Middle Chipola River, Tiger Creek, Apalachicola River, Withlacoochee River, Catfish Creek, St. Johns River, Lake Poinsett and Lake Hancock. * Boundary/Special Purpose: Mr. Cooner has provided boundary or special purpose surveys for over 65 sections of land requiring use of Government Retracement Procedures. His boundary and topographic survey experience include many projects on environmentally sensitive lands for SFWMD, SWFWMD and FDEP including topographic surveys of Jack's Branch/Jack's Branch Slough, Flatwoods Recreational Area, Babcock Ranch and Bass Ranch. He was responsible for the survey of 90 water access parcels in Lee County on Gasparilla, Captiva, Pine Island, Estero and Hickory Islands. * Relevant Projects for Public Sector Clients JEFFREY C.COONER, PLS CURRICULUM VITAE PRESIDENT/PRINCIPAL SURVEYOR PAGE 2 Aerial Photogrammetry& LiDAR Evaluation: Mr. Cooner has managed the acquisition and evaluation of aerial ortho-photographs, digital aerial, color infra-red imagery, aerial topographic and LIDAR data throughout most counties in South Florida. It is likely Mr. Cooner ranks in the top few licensed professional in the evaluation of LIDAR data in South Florida. From 1994 to the present, Mr. Cooner was contract manager and project manager for statewide FDEP land acquisition and land management work that involved complex boundary surveys, upland/wetland delineation, title research, subcontracting surveys and professional QA/QC reviews of consultant's surveys for compliance with FDEP acquisition criterion and Minimum Technical Standards. Mr. Cooner has served as principal in charge on the following projects: SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NAVD88 Elevation Survey of Hydrologic Data Collection Sites, Hillsborough, Hernando, Pasco, Pinellas & Polk Counties, FL - The purpose of the project is to recover over 800 hydrologic data collection sites and accurately calibrate their positions both horizontally and vertically. This information will then be used by the SWFWMD in their efforts with lake levels, stream flows, ground water levels; topographic aerial mapping, environmental resource permitting and FEMA flood studies. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Faka-Union Canal Right-of-Way and Boundary, Collier County, FL - The purpose of this survey was to provide a right-of-way and boundary survey on the Faka-Union Canal in Collier County. River of Grass, SFWMD Acquisition from U.S. Sugar Corp. Project, Glades, Hendry & Palm Beach Counties, FL - Cooner & Associates provided the survey and legal description review services of multiple products produced by three survey companies of the 180,000 acre acquisition area. In addition, Cooner& Associates' assisted SFWMD staff with the resolution of multiple title and survey issues, developed an interactive database of thousands of project related documents, and served as liaison between SFWMD and the DEP, State Lands. SFWMD vs. Montoya Ranch, Inc., Okeechobee County, FL - The purpose of this project was to provide expert witness testimony and produce exhibits in support of the SFWMD's eminent domain proceedings. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Indian River/ Mosquito Lagoon - 2007-2011 -Mr. Cooner conducted an Ordinary High Water study on this project on the Indian River and Mosquito Lagoon from Sebastian Inlet to New Smyrna Inlet, approximately 100 miles long. Cinco Bayou: This project included providing a hydrographic survey, mean high water study and quantity study on Cinco Bayou in Okaloosa County, Florida. The project involved compiling and reviewing deeds, maps and historical documents for the 250 acre project area, establishing horizontal and vertical control, performing a MHW study and a hydrographic survey. Florida East Central Regional Rail-Trail, Volusia and Brevard Counties, FL-This project's purpose was to provide professional surveying and mapping review services for the FDEP. LEE COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY Page Field (FMY) Runway No. 5 Topographic & Obstruction Survey-This survey's purpose was to identify, locate and depict improvements along a portion of Runway 5 and a portion of the area outside of the end of Runway 5's approach. The improvements were to be above ground improvements that apparently penetrate or might possibly • penetrate non-precision and precision instrument approach surfaces. COONER&ASSOCIATES.INC. FO CA G E D M A 1 T I C S s. • .r • • r MAI f 2.3 Financial Capacity TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications K&S has requested that Dun & Bradstreet submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact: Yusbel Ganzalez Department of Procurement City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 (305) 673-7000 ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalex @miamibeachfl.gov opP(7-- \ w n 4. ,...i. , i ' '■ :''. i t..,, r i \. \\ -rte. .. i 101/111111b _ . .\. \ 41111011111), 1.8 s 11,.iii$ ,ii 11-N kPi° :`,t fr r ii is ` dix ti _�r Page 49 ii � l KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG �' �� FLORIDAS ! LOCAL FIRM TAB 3: Approach and Methodology —,,,,,,---- ,- - ..J.. APPROACH PROCEDURES availability. Our field and office staff meets with the K&S Team's Project Manager to completely discuss the scope of Our firm has extensive experience in the organization, project to ensure that our survey efforts are on track as management and performance of survey and mapping well as to assign duties and review project specifications. projects. Based on past work experience, K&S is well versed in the preparation of various Survey and Mapping The Project Manager conducts the necessary research Consulting Engineering Services.The K&S team understands appropriate to the project assignment. This research effort the various City projects may include but are not limited may include collecting and or reviewing the following to preparation of Topographic Surveys, Plat preparation, information: Sketch and Descriptions for Easement purposes, Plat review, collect and prepare data for GIS support, Auto- • Company records for any previous connections to CAD drafting, miscellaneous calculations, Design Surveys, the project; Construction Layout, Specific Purpose Surveys, Asbuilt • City,District and other governmental agency files; Surveys, Condominium, Control, Hydrographic, Quantity, • Information either recorded or unrecorded;and Boundary Surveys and other related Survey and Mapping • Additional information that may be obtained from projects.The K&S team can hit the ground running for all of other area professional surveyors. your Survey and Mapping needs.We would like to provide you with an idea of our basic method for completing K&S has a database of information compiled within the City. assignments. The required tasks we address are: This includes past and ongoing company projects. Our survey professionals have extensive experience finding the Project Set-Up and Research:Upon receipt of work order requisite information to start a project off successfully. request from the City, the K&S team will prepare work order estimates including confirmation of scope,proposed Field Surveying Efforts: Our field crew coordinator schedule and man-hour estimates. Work order estimates is responsible for scheduling, monitoring and reviewing all will be prepared on a timely basis in accord with the field activities under the direction of the project surveyor. City request and submitted for review and/or comment. Specifically,the field crew coordinator: Upon receipt of a written notice to proceed or letter of authorization from the City, K&S would attend a kick- • Initiates all field efforts; off meeting between City staff and K&S team members • Schedules field activities; if required by the scope. Our professionals confirm • Reviews safety issues/concerns with field crew the project schedule for all activities. This schedule is personnel; based on the project scope, site conditions, deliverables • Conducts daily reviews of project data; (Title Reports, Planimetrics, etc.) and immediate staffing • Ensures accuracy and completeness;and • Supervises Crews download field data collectors. ,4 ■ : r i#o ,MiW i IL._ ». LYE R ��.ow ■ ,• i tic • •F e, y J w �� ., om i-n . fir/ �, `a z _ °i Page 51 r;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346—Y ',,,,j FLORIDAS 519'LOCAL FIRM s TAB 3: Approach and Methodology 1111 the City goals and requirements. The office survey effort 11 also undergoes a quality control review process. Our � 'ea'i• quality control team will ensure quality control reviews � •-� ,� ,. q Y q Y ' °iftlimin N are conducted. Once the quality control officer is satisfied - wp with the product,the project manager reviews the survey documents to ensure that they meet minimum technical standards and conform to Rule 5J-17 of the Florida Administrative Code. The Project Manager is the final step ,� L. in our quality control process to ensure exceptional results for the City. No survey and mapping project is complete without the delivery of the final product to the City for their review and use and acceptance of the project and final • 1 1.'><p 'err 11!!! � deliverables. _ All of these services will be performed in conformance with the City's specifications which include the following: f9 Researching and using record documents for right-of-ways. �, �•� Locations of all improvements and features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department - , .: Manual.All field data will be collected in digital form Point z" Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.) with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books.The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical `` " Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1 988 (NAVD 1988) and the Horizontal Contro' X Erb ' shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates,East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83/90) Field surveys are carried out using the latest data collection supplemented with digital data files including but not equipment and procedures. This effort includes the limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with utilization of total station and electronic data collectors Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles utilizing data collection program. K&S also has crews fully (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, proficient in utilizing field codes. GIS Data Sets. A quality control review is first performed by the field crew QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY chief,with the field crew coordinator performing another CONTROL review and the project surveyor following with a final review. These quality control reviews are performed prior K&S takes great pride in it's over four decades of providing to the field survey information being forwarded to office professional survey and mapping services. Integral to this staff to alleviate errors and monitor field procedures. long-term success is effective project management and QA/ QC,which includes four key principles: Office Survey Procedures: The field survey data is"moved into the office" for processing in Eagle Point, creating 1. Proper Approach; drawings, and calculations. A Professional Surveyor and 2. Supervision; Mapper,and Project Surveyor,supervises the office effort for 3. Quality Reviews;and conversion of the field information into a completed survey 4. Active Senior Management Oversight. document.The Project Manager coordinates all calculations, CADD assignments, drafting duties, coordinates field to For each project assigned under this contract, a specific office efforts, and reviews projects before final submittal. QA/QC plan will be developed. This plan will be reviewed Depending on the size of the project, both the field and fully with all Team members including subconsultants. office work effort will be performed simultaneously. K&S is committed to maintaining the highest quality The Project Manager reviews and discusses all completed standard for all assignments under this contract. All projects with our team members to ensure that they meet subconsultant work will be reviewed by the K&S QA/ II, r;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 52 F LORI DAS5rt LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2 014-346-YG TAB 3: Approach and Methodology QC Officer for completeness and compliancy with scope SAFETY and standards prior to any submittals. The K&S QA/ QC Program is performed using our best professional Safety issues are a primary concern when personnel and judgment and industry practices. We will uphold these equipment must operate within a public right-of-way. Our practices by having constant communication with the City safety program recognizes this concern,both for our personnel and our subconsultants. We will maintain project logs, and the motoring public. The City is also focused on safety, correspondences,survey and mapping file database. and we have secured ALL the necessary training and experience to allow us to work for the City, in AVAILABILITY AND CAPACITY advance of this submittal.We affirm the FDOT statement that accidents are preventable,and our field supervisors focus their efforts on the identification,isolation,and control of the K&S has over 27 field and office survey personnel based causes of accidents. Our safety credentials are as follows: in Fort Lauderdale.We are your"Big Local" Firm and can start immediately.We will commit our team members to Maintenance of Traffic (Florida Department of successfully perform any and all work authorized under this Transportation Certification): Our crew personnel contract. and field supervisors all acquired the required Maintenance of Traffic Training prior to the January I, 2002 deadline, and All K&S personnel outlined in this proposal are located in we fully support this program. The following personnel are the Fort Lauderdale offices of K&S. Our subconsultant,FRA certified: Benjamin Hoyle, P.S.M., Dorian Grant,Wayne Maragh, is located in Doral, Florida A&B is located in Wellington, Brandon Davis, Tim Gendreau, Roberto Menedez, Sean Baas, Florida while IFR is located in Plant City, FL and CA is Mortis Burke. located in Fort Myers,FL. First Aid (American Red Cross Certification): Our It is the intention of K&S that the majority of the services crew personnel are trained in First Aid and CPR. The defined in the City's RFQ will be performed by K&S. following personnel are certified: Benjamin Hoyle, Dorian Based on the amount of personnel in the K&S Survey Grant, Wayne Maragh, Brandon Davis, Ron Kelley. Department, we can meet the Survey needs of the City. With the subconsultants named on our team, they would Confined Space/Trench Safety (O.S.H.A. supply services required by the City that cannot readily be Certification): Access to confined spaces is extremely performed by K&S.FRA will supply the services necessary dangerous and requires extensive equipment and training. for Underground Utility Designates,Confined Space Entry To ensure the safety of our employees,we utilize our Utility and Ground Penetrating Radar.IFR will supply the necessary Location/Designation subcontractor (FRA) to provide the Aerial Photography services such as LiDAR.CRA will supply trained and certified personnel necessary for access. the services necessary for High Definition scanning work. A&B will supply additional Survey support if needed. 100% x• % FUTURE WORKLOAD 75% VW I I 1 kr. cc D 0 W 500, CC tt 0 H 25ao 00,0 .4. NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV MONTHS (2014/2015) Page 53 .sit..KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG F LORI DAS 8i,LOCAL FIRlvt TAB 3: Approach and Methodology WORKLOAD AND AVAILABILITY Key Team Service Project Member Category Availability In evaluating consultant responses, the City must look at Principal-in- the o experience, availability, capability, responsiveness and Mark L.Moshier,P.E. Charge 5% capacity of the selected firm. In other sections, we have presented our team profile to verify the track record of Robert K.Krisak, Project Manager 20% our firm. This proven ability and client satisfaction should P.L.S. provide the City with a high degree of confidence. Senior Surveyor Eric Wilhjelm,P.S.M. & Mapper/ 20% We are aware of schedule and budgetary constraints and Quality Control are committed to establishing appropriate work plans, Surveyor delivering quality products, on time, within the budget. Our urvey in-house computerized job cost accounting and management James Vasquez STechn c anw 50% information systems provide for timely and effective monitoring of schedules and costs. Regular reports are Timothy Gray,P.S.M. Project Surveyor 25% generated based on actual costs and compared to established Donald Spicer,P.L.S. Project Surveyor 40% man-hour task budgets from the project work plan. Benjamin Hoyle, Field Crew 20/ P.S.M. Supervisor Further, we are committed to provide rapid response to all project concerns, to minimize client difficulties, which (8) Eight Field Collect Field Minimum 3 maximizes client satisfaction with our services. Crews Data Crews Available 100% Only the successful completion of a mapping project will A&B Engineering, Survey Support 15% result in additional projects. It is therefore advantageous Inc. (subconsultant) to K&S to set aggressive, yet realistic schedules. At times, S.U.E./ certain projects may be requested to be expedited, and F.R.Aleman and Confined Space 100% K&S is prepared for that contingency.Multiple survey crews Associates,Inc. (subconsultant) and multiple licensed professionals ensure that work can Aerial begin on the tasks assigned to our team within I working I.F.Rooks & Photography 25% day of receiving the survey request/notice to proceed, and Associates,Inc. (subconsultant) can continue the work until the task is complete. Flexible scheduling allows our team to be available to the City on Cooner& HD Services 25% nights, weekends, and paid holidays, should the schedule Associates,Inc. (subconsultant) require it. K&S SURVEY TEAM EQUIPMENT Our existing and proven team is AVAILABLE and expanding to meet any future needs the City may have. Given our • Seven Data Collectors (TDS and EFB) current and projected workloads, K&S can and will provide • Ten Leica(Three Reflector-less) 2MM DIN;2PPM the personnel and resources required to support the City. • Eleven Automatic Wild Levels • Three Leica Digital Level ' - . ,1-_ g` • Eight Dual-frequency Trimble R8's and 5700 GPS 0---','.":1704`11, ;- R A�'' Receivers, LI, L2, L5, Glonass Capability �* `` , — ti' `{ • Two jon-boats with Outboard Engines ' '' ' ' • Eight Pick U Trucks F-150, GMAC . g P ( ) y . *r �� • Three 4WD Trucks " -` ° ''� ▪ AutoCAD Civil 3D AutoDesk Infra Structure Design - Suite Premium 2014 • Eagle Point Survey Software Miscellaneous Support Equipment • High Definition 3D Laser Scanning System � " • Automated Hydrographic Eco-Sounding Equipment S K ate , '- - - 4 3 • Ground Penetrating Radar ♦o-4 . (glc.,- ,., ,. t• G °;, e• a: , : "3"' a • Sub Surface Utility Location Equipment �' '.� • Aerial Photography Equipment(to provide LiDAR, Fixed Wing and Helicopter Mapping) �;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 54 '� �' FLORIDAS5I:tLOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 3: Approach and Methodology Disadvantage Business Enterprise Although K&S is not a minority or woman owned business, 611V: K&S enthusiastically embraces diversity in all areas of our business practices. One of our most effective CONSULTING ENGINEERS P &LAND SURVEYORS efforts has been in supporting the creation of new minority business enterprises. We were instrumental in the A&B Engineering,Inc. development of the female owned firm of Steinman and 3460 Fairlane Farms Road,Suite 3 Associates, the Hispanic owned firm of CAP Engineering, Wellington,FL 33414 and the African/American owned firm of BND Engineering, Phone: (56 I) 383-7480 Inc. In our recruiting practices, we solicit full and part time Fax:(561) 383-7483 minority high school students and college interns and other employees by using African/American media and BETA. In We have also included IFR for Aerial Photography and our project production practices, we provide a mentoring C&A to provide high Definition Scanning Services.Contact program to our minority firm subconsultants. In addition, information is as follows: we participate with the University of Miami and BETA in advertising programs that encourage minority students to I.F.Rooks&Associates stay in school. Solutions Through Photogrammetry For this important assignment with the City, we have I.F.Rooks &Associates,Inc. continued our enthusiastic commitment to diversity by 106 NW Drane Street adding a Minority Women Business Enterprise as one of Plant City,FL 33563 our primary, key sub-consultants on our team. This firm, Phone:(813) 752-21 13 FRA, was selected for their proven abilities and our long Fax:(813) 752-3102 standing cooperative working relationships. FRA is a fast- growing, successful company. The firm has been listed by COONER & ASSOCIATES Hispanic Business Magazine (June 1998-2003) as one of SURVEYING AND MAPPING the 500 largest Hispanic-owned companies in the United States and in neighboring Miami-Dade County as the 82nd Cooner&Associates,Inc. largest Hispanic Business. FRA is a State-wide Certified 5670 Zip Drive Minority Business Enterprise by the Florida Office of Fort Myers,FL 33905 Supplier and Diversity. Phone:(239) 277-0722 Fax:(239) 277-7179 FRA's outstanding staff will provide our field survey parties with trained and certified personnel for trench safety, K&S has a long standing successful working relationship confined spaces, ground penetrating radar, and subsurface with our team's subconsultants,completing many successful utility locations, on-call. K&S and FRA have a long and projects together successful relationship on similar projects. It is our intention to have FRA provide all the confined space, ground penetrating radar,and utility location work for this contract. As an additional subconsultant, we also have added A&B a certified MBE to be used as survey support.They will provide field and office support. Contact information is as follows: R.ALEMAN and Associates.Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS it SURVEYORS F.R.Aleman and Associates, Inc. 10305 NW 41st Street,Suite 200 Miami,FL 33178 Phone: (305) 591-8777 Fax:(305) 599-8749 Page 55 ;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG » ' FLORI Di■S 501 LOCAL FIRM TAB : Approach and Methodology Oate Minority, Women & Florida Veteran Business Certification F.R. Aleman and Associates, Inc. Is certified under the provisions of 287 and 295.187,Florida Statutes for a period from: 02/04/2014 to 02/04/2016 trIbra& �► c 11/AXI�j'(�r[�F WABAGMBD rrt(1� S��Ji1 t•iViAJ lm-J.A.•hotn. gozntn F't�nda[Cr .ern .ri Via.Socr tart'iemcra 4.44 at tao09. Palm Beach County Office of Small Business Assistance Certifies That A & B ENGINEERING, INC. Vendor#ADAI0003 is a Small Business Enterprise as prescribed by section 2-80.21—2-80.35 of the Palm Beach County Code for a three year period from December 4,2013 to December 3,2016 The following Services and/or Products are covered under this certification: CIVIL ENGINEERING; MAPPING SERVICES(INCLUDING CARTOGRAPHY AND SURVEYING SERVICES,NOT AERIAL) Palm Beach County Board°MCounty Commissioners LtE ulette Burdick.Tay c Mayor Mayor •/ Paulette Bttt Vice May 1 Hal B.Val«Ae Paukue Burdick Allen F.Gray,Man'!er Sht11ry Vina Steven L.Abrams l214.2013 Mart Lou Berger les>B.Samna . County Administrator a`∎ Robert Weamat • • Deputy County Administrator VerdeauC Baku plOAt91' KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 56 »�' FLORIDA'S gib LOCAL FIRM = RFQ 2014-346-YG Mfrs ;i,4q4--"14,41-",.., ;, t: , . - 1 f- .. • 11,10°,0 - a 0'4,4,0 0 . ... 0. ..,- 00, tiv, 0, 0 ,, , •. .. , ....._.:.,,,,..,._.:::_:_::::„..,.........._... ... ,. „,•• , ,, . 1 , _._._________________ r i:=. iiiinesic• . ' zeiliel .. amissio0, - .,-,..in --->+aw --orgratt swat j&i nv' -$r>'SSE y ;7 ,/ , _. -. . .. -j F-t 4,,, ' '-'1'''. } ) fi t ^eo .f . '7%/r., - - -... 7.: — ..-- , ' 1/4--- -...i ■•''' '‘.. ' . . , -7 \. ' 'c, —N\ i CITY OF \ , • ...,4010 i MIAMI BEALCH , simi, , , . , i,..4",, . . .. . . Its,-; rt w • . December 2, 2014 GROUP A - ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN Professional Architectural and Engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG = N P.A.KEITH and SCHARS, FLORIDAS ell LOCAL FIRM ■ • , i { 1 N ... .‘. ■.:'...., .4 .. .. , •, _ � , 5 • i+ 7. • 0 1 1ii7 _ n« I _ ii . t i .ay . 1 , 1 Cover and Table of Contents > 11 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. (eaciaT Ac cacti! mka FLORIDA'S gig,LOCAL FIRM .ue.._,..u._ 3-IJ October 22,2014 City of Miami Beach Mr.Alex Denis,Director YAK Department of Procurement MIAMI BEACH 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,FL 33139 GROUP A-ARCHITECTURE-PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN RE: GROUP A-ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN Psotesslued ca AlN Clu al and EnglneedngseMces In sPeclol¢ed ca kgories on an"as-needed-basis' 10020;1-364-YG - Professional Architecture and Engineering Services in specialized '�`---°`—'"— categories on an"as needed basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Mr.Denis: Keith and Schnars,P.A.(K&S) is a South Florida based business providing professional planning and engineering services �$,- throughout Florida for the past 42 years. K&S has a proven, long-term track record of successful planning projects which have demonstrated our commitment to improving the fabric of life in local communities. Our planners have the advantage of working in a multi-discipline firm providing support in the areas of Landscape Architecture, Surveying, Civil Engineering, i Environmental Planning and Transportation Planning. Our submittal is for Group A - Architecture in the specialty of Planning and Urban Design category. --- i K&S is well known and respected for providing professional planning services to dozens of local and county governments. Our team has provided services that range from conducting Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Findings of Necessity (FON) and the creation of the associated re-development plans to preparing County and Regional Master Plans, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports (EAR), and land development regulations. We have extensive experience in neighborhood plans,corridor studies and have one of the strongest citizen participation programs available. K&S staff includes certified charrette managers with extensive experience in public outreach and facilitation who use proven methods of engaging a wide variety of constituent groups in the planning process. Planning alone cannot create action; therefore, our planners coordinate with our in-house landscape architects, civil engineers,surveyors,and financial professionals to provide a holistic approach to projects from concept to completion. In our submittal package,we have included recent projects demonstrating the vast planning capabilities of our firm,as well as recently completed projects which demonstrate our past success for such diverse communities as: • Monroe County- Comprehensive Plans,EAR,Land Development Regulations; • City of Sebring- Urban Design; • City of Tamarac - Urban Design; • City of Miami Gardens - Community Planning- CRA;and • City of North Miami - Urban Design. Page 3 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 • (954)776-1616 • Fax(954)771-7690 Our most recent accomplishment is the development of the Monroe County EAR,for which we received high praise from the Department of Economic Opportunity.We are currently finalizing updates to their Comprehensive Plan and have begun revisions to the County's Land Development Code. Monroe County,which is designated as an Area of State Critical Concern (ASCC), shares many important issues with Miami Beach, such as:sea level rise and climate change.We developed an Energy and Climate Element within the Comprehensive Plan based upon the results of the EAR,where sea level rise and the impacts of climate change were identified as the number one major planning issue by residents and stakeholders throughout the County The K&S Team believes that active participation of the community is critical to the success of any planning endeavor.Our Public Relations and Outreach Division is a proactive,full-service practice that supports a variety of the firm's projects and provides stand-alone public involvement and outreach services for our public and private sector clients. Our innovative outreach programs have helped communities across the State to comprehend and influence projects that impact their lives. With the aid of superior print and graphic technology,website hosting and solid public participation programs,we incorporate the varied needs of individual stakeholders,community associations,local municipalities,and State and Federal agencies into consensus building processes,a responsibility we take very seriously at K&S. Our local presence ensures that K&S staff members are available at the behest of City officials and staff on short notice.Each of our team's respected professional is known for his or her practical experience,real world solutions,creativity,and commitment to making projects environmentally and economically sustainable;We truly understand the importance of thorough,well- rounded planning.Debbie LOve,AICP, will be the Project Manager for the Planning and Urban design category for which we are seeking qualification. Ms.Love has over 20 years of experience in planning,public outreach,urban design,regulatory development and comprehensive and land use planning.She was the primary author and Project Manager for several EARs throughout Florida,most recently for Monroe County.She has assisted many communities,both large and small,throughout Florida to update their comprehensive plans and land development regulations. We are a firm dedicated to the timely and cost-efficient delivery of services,and understand our clients' desires for the completion of high-quality projects on time,and within budget. Our Fort Lauderdale corporate office will perform the work and providing day-to-day coordination with City staff. We appreciate the opportunity to submit a response to this RFQ.The K&S Team has extensive experience, consists of a diverse group of professionals,and possesses the motivation to provide the City the highest quality planning services. As Principle-in-Charge I will ensure that the K&S Team exceeds your expectations. Should you have any questions,or require any further information,please contact Ms.Love or me at(954) 776-16 16 or via email at ekalayci @ksfla.com and/or dlove @ksfla.com. Respectfully submitted, Errol Kalayci,Esq. Vice President t S illll_, - •l� "911 Page 4 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 • (954)776-1616 • Fax(954)771-7690 1 c ,,,,,,_,.,,.4::,,..,,';'„- --,;., <7 4 _ , nil G.., .: . _ vi i I rie--'-- ' _ i - _ ,, 3 "fie+ k�� �1 .M�1�: .rr. ..:. 1, 11, - I J.. - _- �. �. • , r ' $' . ' ' ,r, t i r , ' ' i i t- .1.,,i , •,,i,J 411I 1 .. I, ' 1_ , 01; i I IFLENI '-46, c p /451.. .4'-: ) -, 1 1-4tr-4,'L-Atr'll : _,...-- ' '4 * 44‘4,' 1 ....,,_.. fir_ _- z- y --, , 0 at • 0 16.1 I lel irio.0 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements - 1 . 1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents - 1 .2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) - 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements TAB 2: Experience and Qualifications - 2. 1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm - 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) - 2.3 Financial Capacity TAB 3: -_ Approach and Methodology , .. __ j / KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. viol --1--- 1 FLORIDAS�(0 LOCAL FIRM 6500 North Andrews Avenue i, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 i, 1- 4 _I Phone: (954) 776-1616 Sit r� ��Y --'__.._ _ - _.. - Fax: (954) 771-7690 f N.•t.''- L "` Toll Free: (800) 488-1255 '' 'r; www.KSFLA.com i / • V i •■1..1:.!: / :■::RI:IN:N: :III MN Lill:IS 0 .......■..■..!■ OM:III • •2.::••::..::�: :MI:MI Or 11111 i :.::!::I::_:. .i ..* ' 44...1 I I k ■ 111166,- • . , . • r ;ri:4; rrfr. :K, .-,,�."..•, 'r.c; .,''4 TA. 4t:it,j, •, .. t...1V Response } Certification ,c ,�,.. ._ .� � \ Questionnaire , . - . , & Requirements, . � _ . . ... Affidavit . . . ...„..„ • „ '. . „,. ..., I 1 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 xfolo�aaa¢ rc Page 'Jf'�. R°oa�yw�r�.M TAB1 Cover Letter & Minimum. Qualifications .Requirements Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez a(�miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Keith and Schnars No of Years in Business: 42 No of Years in Business Locally: 42 No of Employees: 120 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 6500 North Andrews Avenue CITY: Fort Lauderdale STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33309 TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1 255 FAX NO.: (954)771-7690 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 10305 NW 41st Street,Suite 112 CITY: Doral STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Errol Kalayci,Esq. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (954)776-1616 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1 255 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: ekalayci @ksfla.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-1406307 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. lEI KEITH and SCHNARS,Pa. Page 10 ±L FLORID&gip LOCAL FIRM — — — RF Q 2014-3'46-YG • • TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. •. • .• , -. ..• . _ . . -l: - t-. • --- - - .• - • ... _ .. • .._ - using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.Department of Labor's • • ' . Page 11 ti�J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-Y r, 3,�F _ FIARIDAS el LOCAL FIRM TAB 1.: Corer Letter .& Minimum Qualifications Requirements E 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Domestic Partners Spouses Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 12 FLORIDAS&,LOCAL FIRM <: _.�;°'�, RFQ 2014-346-YG•c TAB 1 • • Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt MA Addendum 1 MA Addendum 6 Addendum 11 MA Addendum 2 MA Addendum 7 Addendum 12 MA Addendum 3 MA Addendum 8 Addendum 13 MA Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 MA Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. Page 13 �i KEITH and SCHNARS,RA. FLORID&61p0CAL FIRM ,1 TAB 1 . Cover getter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION . The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 14 gnj O } FLoRIDns irLoCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 1 Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements . .rNi. ■ ,- - PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Ref uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Errol Kalayci, Esq. Vice President Signature of Pr.•• er's Au o' epresentative: Date: j// - 10/22/2014 rx) State_of FLORIDA — ) On this�. day of_ ,2014,personally appeared before me jrisar 1 who County of 520101 ) stated that (s)he is the 6k of Er i+1 an , corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Befo - e: • TillrfarAVA �'•'W'i�4, MA ENE PIM'IOC� �•-�� MY COMMISSION 8 EE 142118 �:ary Public f• the State of Florida .--�g EXPIRES:February 13,2016 My Commiss'.n Expires: j3! 201 I . ''e%pf„n" Banded mn,Notary Pub&underwriters Page 15 E=1 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. REQ��2OT4-3�Rb-I G 4,; ,.,ea �� 1 FcoruD as tiitwcAL FIRM T t1 4 7•, 7 y l�> — <' r 9)' itilli ..''•-l' . • a , `, ' , e w _ 1 j , 'rA v'V'.... ._ . ;.); . . 0 3,„. . � 1 Minimum . ;. • ro-. ... ...,.■ . G , ._, ,_•....„... ..,..._.) .,....,.. ,,,_7_,.. ._ \ . Qualifications mot __,. - ,. -r .,., ....:..,..,..„.........,....., ,.......„,.......,___....... ._.,: „ , ___ __ . .,.......7.,.._._ ,,, .. ..„, . . ....... ...... ._ Requirements ....... _ _, ,GIB_ - _. - . , .,,, ....__,_ \'vim. - '`^ ., . , „...... ,, ... . . .. ___ _ . .. ____ _.___ . .:.,.....___. •,, :. :..... , . . . .., .,. . , ......, r - TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements • This certificate hereby qualifies Debbie Love) AICP as a member with all the benefits of a Certified Planner and a commitment to the AlCP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Certified Planner Number 022684 e"-** Pa& Farmer, FA1CP Graham Billingsley,MCP Executive Director and CEO . President illThe American Planning Associalion's Prciessional Institute American Institute of Certified Planners Mokria Catwi miries 1-ipppen , • =_,-- Page 19 ,.- KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. REG 2014-346-M . ''''' :A24;-41:';'7,;< '' 1.-2__-#3 FLORID&&LOCAL FIRM . . . . . • . , . . ' , . . . . • __ . . TAB 1-: .- . . . . . . , . - . Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements -.---,-,- ,,,-,--7.,':7417,7.-:'r.,4',-..- "• • • ' . . • , . .,,, . . . . , . • . . , . ... , . . . ,, ,, , ' 0 - o . e e , . . .o . . o I ' . I J . .. I . . . . , . . , . e , . o , JAMES S. KAHN HAS QUALIFIED AS A MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PLANNERS JULY 1996 DATE OF MEMBERSHIP . • ''fkl. e.0;•-■ 5'11 . , PRESIDENT ,_____ .,....... .. ..1e=:` EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I I ....=_.-- -... ..,_. .\AE,..KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 20 - , FLORIDXS ii/kLOC.AL FIRM ---77 :-.-7.:,:10,;,',,;',„..:-, ,•RFC/2014-346-YG r �D�I :i 'i I! !'QI• _. IrrIr1 I■ ■■..M I • • _� .� 7 � \, ..I! ' O 1 Al [I, Q ■■am ■,i . Irim svi d 11-111 rill_Lmillo: Ll lletalliallier p, i'1Ptill il' . 'err■i■ �� • t_ •' ■■ �. it . °. _ '■111 3 11—_ pill i.!s 'll 1 13- �\. . . ;��� a �11 1 ii,- ,- ',-(_ ':::-.3!,- -mow.^- .f _ ,�v ...,...,, 7;40,,,vw 1,.- a ,.i.)-,-;,-,-•_, , .;//4 _ ,‘-1 :',..§71,-, .. —roef.i .,. I: :� >� ,: _ �U11'It1r G®'1 `` ','ill! ,S,Lt% as 4 Y 1 1 1 \ . 1. _ v.,; • yt `' 1 ? `t•�s.. *' :hat' n .~ ---` ---ra°+�nr71. -.. - 1 k a> I / O L Qualifications ... of Proposing .. . • Firm ...„ . _.._. __ . ., .. _ „ . . . ... . , . TAB 2 Experience & Qualifications FIRM OVERVIEW • Environmental Sciences and Permitting; • Landscape Architecture; K&S has comprehensive in-house resources focused • Structural Engineering (Bridges and Waterfront on solving the engineering, planning and environmental Structures); challenges faced by a diverse client base. Our commitment • Highway Engineering and Design; to professionalism and strong project management has • Transportation Planning; allowed us to play a key role in the development of Florida's • Grant Writing; residential, commercial, recreational, and transportation • Construction Engineering and Inspection; infrastructure.We are also very proud to say that over the • Project Development and Environment Studies; past several years, K&S has managed to maintain its high • Public Involvement and Outreach; level of performance,despite our nation's and,in particular, • Site Development Service;and our region's economic difficulties.K&S has not experienced • Visual Communications. any significant organizational restructuring, ownership or management changes.We strongly believe this is due to the As a full-service consulting firm,we pride ourselves in our positive reputation K&S has consistently maintained, the ability to engage any type of project at any stage; from quality of work we produce,staying current with changes in concept to construction. We are a committed team of the industry,and the strong relationships we have built with professionals cognizant of client concerns, and dedicated our clients over the years. to achieving project goals while protecting client interests. Representing the continuation of historic firms dating The K&S Planning Team has all the necessary expertise and back to 1929, K&S was officially incorporated in 1972, experience to assist the City on an"as-needed" basis.The and offers a full range of planning, landscape architecture, following is more detailed information about our Planning civil engineering, traffic engineering, survey, structural Services. engineering, highway engineering, and environmental services. We currently have a staff of 120 professionals of PLANNING SERVICES various professional backgrounds. Our strengths lie in our long history throughout Florida,the depth of staff,and our The Planning Division at K&S has provided a wide range of diverse and extensive experience serving public and private planning services to diverse clients,including governmental sector clients.The project profiles included in this proposal entities from local municipalities to regional planning were selected to highlight these strengths, as well as the councils. Our Planning professionals are ready to provide technical expertise required to provide the services for the necessary Planning services to the City's CRA in the GROUP A-ARCHITECTURE- Planning and Urban Design areas of Planning for the DCRA and BCRA,Master Planning to the City of Miami Beach. and Zoning for the CRA,Complete Streets Guidelines,and Design Criterion,as specified in the RFQ.We offer a broad K&S is a firm dedicated to the timely and cost-efficient range of planning services in all of the following areas listed delivery of services. In fact, in 2007, when the FDOT below: released its annual summary of design overruns (time and money), K&S ranked among the best of the over two • Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Plans; hundred firms surveyed.In the six-year period studied,K&S • Findings of Necessity; designed and surveyed twelve projects with a construction • Neighborhood Plans; value in excess of$120 million. No other firm selected by • Downtown Redevelopment Plans; FDOT in that six-year period completed this volume of • City-wide Master Plans; work,and maintained such low overruns in cost and time. • Comprehensive Plans; • Evaluation and Appraisal Reports; As regulatory requirements have grown and the need for • Grant Applications and Grant Administration; a true multidisciplinary approach to project delivery has • Land Development Regulations (LDRs); become essential to our clients, our firm and staff have • Regional Plans; adapted.Through this adaptation,we have developed staff • Strategic Plans for Economic Development and and a project portfolio that can be categorized into several Housing; areas of practice: • Land Use and Site Planning; • Land Use Plan Amendments and Rezonings; • Comprehensive,Regional and Urban Planning; • Geographic Information Systems (GIS); • General Civil Engineering; • Processing of Plans and Permit Approvals; • Surveying and Mapping; • Land Development Feasibility Studies; Page 23 KE and and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 20 14446-VG 4' -0 FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM 1 1 rTA 20 1 p e i @E @ Qucc ifif i u 1 \ • Review and Analysis of Site Plans; the unique threatened/endangered habitat and fauna • Capital Improvement Plans; of the Florida Keys, promote mixed-use development, • Developments of Regional Impact(DRI); provide architectural and site design guidelines, promote • Permit and Approval Processing;and quality redevelopment, ensure eco-friendly development, • Public Presentations. and provide for a broad range of affordable housing to the community's workforce. In addition,we are currently Master Plans, Neighborhood Plans, and updating Monroe County's Land Development Code, Redevelopment Plans to make it consistent with the recent update that K&S completed of their Comprehensive Plan and Evaluation and ? _ ,,73 Appraisal Report(EAR). ,, •vd,t„\k` . Community Redevelopment Plans 1-. i'lliiilliiiirilliti - -- ....ks Ye,f 4 s" jr,--400Pir ' ��!!„ ,��_1111111��_ ►r i� K&S has provided consulting services to Community I.:1�,i' j.-°'i 4 '�/ - N, Redevelopment Agencies across the state, including the „t u,�a1� P g g 1 �, i lj;1 01 cities and counties of Fort Lauderdale,Plantation,Pompano •”` ``� 1 ]i ,.,._ jj Beach, Boca Raton, and Miami-Dade County.These cities fer:^ "'i and counties hired K&S to prepare numerous Findings of 1 / „ •.- 11 o rte! �r - Necessity studies to establish and expand their existing ,; 11111-,,17:11''i r�l . i 1- ill ;�, ! CRAB. We provide assistance to carefully plan for future ...Ali °" growth, taking into consideration the aspirations of the ` ��� .rs �. .'5„ 'x`.711! ,.� „D� —.e . '±: -y°y"'". community that can be directly impacted by redevelopment 11-- ,,-. . .,,, 1,.,;_ ,...` — -� + _ _. efforts. In fact, it is often a community's embrace of such 1 - ---,- _- -7.„�'' ' ��- �- efforts that determines whether or not a project achieves 411 mss , P 1 ----1 a-=' ={ its ultimate goals. Therefore, in addition to planning services at K&S,we place a great deal of emphasis on public The K&S Planning Team has prepared numerous Master involvement,visual communications,and consensus building Plans for both governmental entities and private developers. efforts. We have also prepared master plans for the cities of �, „��� -• Marathon Plantation and downtown Fort Lauderdale.K&S • o,: '6. 4• - ba'° * p • has also completed 10 to 2,000-acre concept development c,�r,,• =- ii-'--t c•S .."r =L . �° * tt, plans which are a result of the due diligence analysis and F ,- 0. _ = research the team prepares as part of the planning process' .r ' s` ,,,� a �!, ~ 8;-j P P P P gP �.� $1:-e � .{?t i` )� ♦�'+ We have also reared numerous neighborhood plans for 9 q�. -6*. " -, - .-�"^, c��.�_'y '1 prepared g P .i. / �l%Z^fit= . s a �A -, .Ater Q- ¢4. ty`r .r .5,y .• local governments and CRAs, including the Washington }' ,r "4,,, " ". ,, s 4 : :„..-T- _-_,.•'"� d�, ,..Heights Neighborhood and Urban Design Plan in the City =;^' -'+ ' `o'� . ''' Y Y"""'�"'��_ ""`'' ' �, �i•� �� 'S '`�oV""': L c'- .A t jr�I'y� P 11�\rl�r,C�,,, of Sebring CRA. The City's CRA sought the assistance of d, • t- .1 I"' _ _�• 4,, K&S to develop this neighborhood Plan for the Washington ',x i. %. ',`s-'�''�� -° ,'-':-;,,._�„''� • ::' ; Heights community,one of the first communities established ,,174.74%'• ' `4a.f� `,, �1`, 1 = ' , `r' in the City that still values its deep cultural and historical 4i• �- � . ` ';;+a ,::-= '-:!,-/-::..ii roots. The Concerned Citizens of Washington Heights .:-,?. , - <°r 1•,,,,r {.: •.,-,;. `*- ° 1-,4z ? 4,- Y• group worked closely with K&S and the CRA, focusing tg s h '�? /7 ti? "' •.:... �I! ' :ro . on revitalizing infrastructure and reinvestment in the . ,„ ��;.;.? f , ` , ,* 4,7r, commercial and residential areas. '., \� . .••/4 ' I''. •$4 •, 0 ,;• land Development Regulations ' .t-:, ,,/�� ,^W;` . P`4%,,47 .114',,„'' ,` °ti. The K&S Planning professionals prepared a new set of �,4, ,' 11,4,..' ` r' ' 2 s '•- ' ,': , r. �,� ��,! � � ale ---_ /(�/• Land Development Regulations for the City of Marathon. •. . t'; %. , .. , :�,._\ /*",? ox `.t,;., ► /17` The new regulations were carefully crafted to meet the •,. . , : ± r ,,ea , �, ‘44,-,-.:_t-.... Jt ,/ Goals,Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, -` �.,_; ,,,,..r . :~ a e : / r • • '°i-f f J 1 '/ , Q Syr r� i .„ tf, r a. !`� // i also prepared by K&S. The regulations were created to '� '�• "�_. '3b,,, '� / i guide development/redevelopment in order to preserve ,,%.,%V.,y,. ± ,,.a*r*- - v F , 1i ., , /. �;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 24 �� Fwx[Dns$itLOCALFIRM - — P a; 4-345-V@ _ • • • '. „ . • '- +` 2.2 Qualifications C.A .r�•_�7�,, - of Proposer Team • \ � 9 1` , , , 1 TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .. : , ._,,,,,,,,,t,..T1 r.V''"`-2' ' ORGANIZATIONAL CHART r cal . MIAMIBEACH .....__________,.. PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE ` _:' Errol Kalayci Vice President J J • °Y PROJECT MANAGE` Debbie Love,AICP i, ,`, Director of Planning Sid i; — .:".. ! t'7 .-- = E_=,� . y r - - - _a PLANNING —` ..? - PLANNING �� 1 PLANNING - • �'Y sl James Kahn,AICP �� Kenneth Wenning Asli Ceylan Oner,Ph.D. g Assistant Director r - Planner 1 of Plannin• F Planner J I - 'SUPPORT -.� 1 r f -' ') ( ..,_IL.,, TRANSPORTATION CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL LANDSCAPE L PLANNING SCIENCES ARCHITECTURE - J — J J ;• •. " �-_ — P a-g e 27- � , I K F S . RFQ 201 4.34'6-V .., : �T, .� �i IARIDAS aitL(XAL FIRM : TAB 2: Experience &Qualifications Planning:Wenning, � Mr. . - ,..-,_,-. .. 1 un and many Kenneth W The K&S Planning Team has a diverse background y g, g years of experience that is complimented with the support - • '.�' ' Wenning has both a planning background of 120 K&S personnel that can provide additional technical _ and a passion for environmental issues assistance such as our in-house Landscape Architects, which influence all planning projects. He Transportation Planners, and Civil Engineers. is experienced in land use studies, codes and ordinances. Mr. Wenning is also The following is the role each member of the K&S Planning ir ,-;.,i n versed in GIS and CADD. Team. 111u' .,� ,,;; ,,,, Debbie Love, AICP, Project • - = Asli Ceylan Oner, Ph.D., Planning: - ' x . Manager: Ms. Love brings over Ms. Oner is an Assistant Professor at 20 years' experience in urban, �- Florida Atlantic University in the School comprehensive and land planning, ' of Urban and Regional Planning. She has a vast experience in urban design, and preparation of land development governmental systems. Ms. Oner will ,M, regulations and comprehensive plans; assist the planning team with design and '' creation of citywide and neighborhood ! P g g ., "/ redevelopment plans for urban and rural public involvement issues. communities throughout Florida; and public engagement and meeting facilitation. She has served as Project Manager for a wide variety of planning activities, including, the .— Comprehensive Plan Update and LDC Re-Write for _ �_T Monroe County (Primary Author). Ms. Love also served 1, :' %- as Project Manager and Primary Author of the City of '' '?, �_ Marathon Land Development Regulations Re-Write and -••A.A.,' +,, _ -,-' - . I! the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code __Ill Update for the City of Indian Rocks Beach. Ms. Love is •` _ • ,, 1r .� ,L P I, _ : a Certified Charrette Manager with extensive community �7` :�-- ;� ., 1" I '4.x;; tk'.. ,,�,y4 rr� 1 Ii.� engagement and meeting facilitation experience, a green 1, . . ' -,;r.,, . ' ; . building member,and is the Director of Planning and Public •;,'"' "•-,:t3= �', �,�L, ,��f, ,. r Involvement and Outreach for K&S. = ' '� �:` ='�,.".1•--''.: A v i 1; 1., II l , - - : James Kahn, AICP, Planning: Mr. ^,,ir ' { ' �: j', - tw - r I� , !-, Kahn understands the governmental ' •`¢e; a114,:3it; '7---1- I 1 ' , _ aspects of planning and translating ideas a,_�4��`'= �''?., '..1, "'.,_ I I 7 ere into projects that can be implemented.He '', '_'-R`�z aY _-; f ;VI' Y ``" has hands-on experience in urban design ,. %; , ! R° 'I� i solutions and working with developers _ • -. ,, . it to implement the visions many codes ...-1 �� provide. Mr. Kahn has a broad range _, =! :- �r � of interdisciplinary experience gained from more than 40 ;,•A years in the fields of planning, transportation, permitting, . '.:: .:'' y'�° ph , Y P g� P P g ,'.- - , ' land development regulations, project management and -_ + '` - ‘,...,-,1`..,- #:. r . `, Rio � � � .,, iI�, construction; he has worked with numerous developers, i t: , i.,I 1 W,' consultants and government agencies. Mr. Kahn's full range 4 • yam: -, •, r 4- �! r►, of planning experience includes master planning, site plan ' '' .,''" design, rezoning and land use plan amendments. He also • ',' . r ' .a',; '' 4� ` has extensive experience in feasibility studies, permitting, T' ' ' �, ° P Y Developments of Regional Impact (DRIs), project :4 f 'I\ 1, '�, ,, �< coordination, and administration of the development l' , review process. He has worked with capital improvement , ; . I r. ta" •plans and the administration of zoning codes, including --I preparation of land development regulations as well as r'— . � _ "" " ' eminent domain cases. r- _ 1 - I, ;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 28 _?j FI:ORIDAS 8I LOCAL FIRM 1(?: 1 6 ly may. N.T- * Debbie Love, AICP i® Ms.Love has over 20 years of experience in urban,comprehensive and land planning,including • z the preparation of neighborhood and redevelopment plans; land development regulations { and comprehensive plans and amendments;community visioning and workshop facilitation; capital improvement programming; affordable housing; environmental impacts; floodplain management and mitigation;and grant writing. Ms. Love's strengths include expertise with the requirements of Florida's Growth Management Act, including development in an Area l - r of Critical State Concern, public involvement and project management. She has served as Project Manager for a wide variety of planning activities, both large and small, throughout Academic Florida,including,the Comprehensive Plan Update and LDR Re-Write for Monroe County, Background the City of Marathon Master Plan and Land Development Regulations Re-Write,EAR-based B.S.Business Administration: Amendments and LDRs for the City of Indian Rocks Beach, and the Washington Heights Applied Management Neighborhood and Urban Design Plan. Specialty,Kaplan School of Business,2002 Relevant Experience Professional Certifications Comprehensive Plan Update, Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), and Certified Member of the LDC Re-Write for Monroe County, FL: Project Manager and Principal Planner- Monroe American Institute of Certified County has contracted with Keith and Schnars to update their Comprehensive Plan Policy Planners,AICP#022684 and Technical Documents to the 2010-2030 planning timeframe; the last update occurred in 1995. The County is located in an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC),encompasses National Charrette-Institute, the Florida Keys and portions of mainland Florida,specifically the Everglades,and is home 2007 to approximately 70,000 residents. Due to the environmental sensitivity of much of the land mass, its designation as a National Marine Sanctuary and the ACSC designation, this Certified Watershed Manager, project includes extensive cooperative efforts with a wide-variety of jurisdictional bodies, 2003 external agencies such as FDOT,ACOE,DEP,US Navy,US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Community Affairs.Client/Contact Monroe County BOCC/Christine Hurley, Florida Green Home Standard Growth Management Division Director, Phone: (305) 289-2517, email: hurley-christine@ Certifying Agent,Florida Green monroecounty-fl.gov (12/09 to Present) Building Coalition,Inc.,2006 Planning Director EAR-based Comprehensive Plan and LDR Amendments, Indian Rocks Beach, Management FL: Project Manager and Primary Author - Keith and Schnars crafted comprehensive plan American Planning amendments based upon the City's recently adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The Association,2003 amendments included those to revitalize their commercial district and corridor;encourage mixed-use and attainable housing development; preserve coastal and natural resources; All Hazards Mitigation reduce green house gas emissions;update the level of service requirements;and assure the Planning Certification, City becomes more walkable and pedestrian friendly.The LDR amendments were drafted to Emergency Management implement the goals,objective and policies of the comprehensive plan,and include provisions Institute,2002 to allow golf cart travel along both State,County and municipally owned streets; preserve and expand the tree canopy;and,address wetland buffering,dock and seawall requirements. Professional Affiliations Client/Contact City of Indian Rocks Beach/Danny Taylor,Interim City Manager,Phone:(727) American Planning Association 595-2517.(11/07 to 1/10) (APA) Florida Chapter,American Land Development Regulations Re-Write, Marathon, FL: Project Manager and Planning Association(FAPA) Primary Author-The City of Marathon desired to create a new set of regulations that were Broward Section,(FAPA) specifically designed to implement the Comprehensive Plan and the concepts illustrated in Treasure Coast Section, the Master Plan. The new LDRs also included mixed-use design guidelines,a revised permit (FAPA) allocation system, marine siting regulations and conservation management plan provisions. Client/Contact:City of Marathon/George Garrett,Planning Director,Phone:(305) 743-0033. Florida FEMATask Force, (10/05 to 2/07) 2000-Current State of Florida Hazard Mitigation Advisory Team Page 29 KEITH and SCHNARS,PA. RF4, . FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM Debbie Love, AICP Downtown Development and Major Corridor Master Plan, North Miami, FL: Project Planner-The City desired to create a redevelopment/development plan that includes the downtown core, NE 1 25th Street, NE 6th Avenue,West Dixie Highway, NW 7th Avenue, NW I I9th Street,and Biscayne Boulevard.Services include data collection and analysis of all existing conditions within project areas,public involvement workshops and a master plan document that will serve as a guide to the future redevelopment efforts within these areas of the City. One of the important tasks of this project was obtaining input from the residents,business owners and stakeholders within the downtown core and along the major corridors. Ms. Love facilitated two Business Community Forums held in two areas of the City. The data collection and analysis were presented to the public and then a"listening and work session"occurred where attendees visited each of the corridor"stations"to discuss the issues with the team and mark-up aerial maps of the corridors with their thoughts,ideas and preferences. The Keith and Schnars team also created Stakeholder Preference Survey's for each corridor that was an integral part of these public input forums. Included in the plan are constraints and opportunities,graphic representations of the corridors, including streetscape design,gateway features,cross-sections, design guidelines, land development code amendment recommendations and implementation strategies. Client/Contact:City of North Miami/Tanya Wilson-Sejour, City Planner,Phone:(305) 895-9826.(I I/I I to 4/13) Valencia Lakes Development of Regional Impact, Arcadia, FL: Principal Planner-The Village ofValencia Lakes is proposed to be developed as the second urban area in Desoto County. Valencia Lakes will be a self-sustaining New Town designed using New Urbanist principles and will cover 3,840 acres on State Road 70 in eastern DeSoto County. At build-out, in approximately twenty years, the Valencia Lakes DRI will include 12,000 homes, 60,000 square feet of office space, 554,000 square feet of commercial retail space,and a special employment center on fifteen acres to serve a projected population of 25,000.The conceptual plan for the Village prepared by the Valencia Lakes development team provides for the restoration of existing wetlands and wildlife habitat,as well as the creation of an integrated storm water/ recreational lake management system. Issues being addressed in cooperation with various government agencies include adequacy of the transportation network,provision of water,wastewater and educational facilities.Client/Contact: Ramar Group Companies/Robert Morris,Phone:(94 I) 923-6353.(12/05 to 6/07) Washington Heights Neighborhood and Urban Design Plan, Sebring CRA, Sebring, FL: Project Manager and Principal Planner -Washington Heights is one of the first communities established in the City and one of the first African-American communities in Highlands County. Ms. Love served as Project Manager and Principal Planner for the development of a neighborhood development/redevelopment plan intended to preserve and celebrate the rich, cultural heritage of the community and encourage economic growth.Additionally,she managed the charrette and visioning exercise that identified the future desired type and style of development and redevelopment in the neighborhood;and served as the Plan's primary author.Client/Contact:City of Sebring CRA/Robin Hinote,Phone:(863) 471-5104.(5/08 to 4/09) Citywide Redevelopment Master Plan, Marathon, FL: Project Manager -This newly incorporated city of 10,000 in the Florida Keys sought to discover the redevelopment level and approach desired by the residents and stakeholders. The Master Plan included a planning approach that acknowledged the unique characteristics of the various areas of the city and sought to provide development/redevelopment strategies and concepts that not only preserved those unique aspects of place,but encouraged appropriate levels and type of development. Additionally,the plan included market and economic analysis to assist in guiding and attracting sustainable residential and commercial development. Ms.Love served as Project Manager and authored major portions of the plan, including an analysis of each area's existing conditions and implementation strategies. Client/Contact: City of Marathon/George Garrett, Planning Director, Phone: (305) 743-0033. (1/03 to 2/07) Major Arterial Corridor Study, Tamarac, FL: A major arterial roadway study that includes University Drive, SR-7, Commercial Boulevard and McNab Road. The study focuses on developing a vision that defines the physical,functional, aesthetic and cultural character of each corridor. Ms.Love assisted with the public outreach on this project for a city-wide community workshop, creating meeting announcements and providing workshop facilitation to obtain important public input for each corridor.Client/Contact:City of Tamarac/Jennifer Bramley,Community Development Director,Phone:(954) 597-3530,email:jenniferb @tamarac.org,(2/12 to 12/12) KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 30 FLORIDAS eft,.FIRM .0 4 f�• - RFQ 2014-345-YG • Debbie Love, AICP South Miami-Dade Watershed Study and Plan, Miami-Dade County, FL: The South Miami-Dade Watershed Study and Plan is a long-range planning and water resources study for south Miami-Dade County.The population of this environmentally-sensitive area between Biscayne National Park and Everglades National Park is expected to double to 1.5 million people by 2050.The Study and Plan was undertaken to proactively address the impacts that such population growth would have on the Watershed.The project is arguably one of the most scientifically-based and complex planning efforts ever undertaken in Florida.The Study evaluates potential policy choices on how growth might occur and looks at the consequences of each of those choices.The Study resulted in over 4,000 pages of scientific analysis and evaluation which was technically reviewed through an independent peer review board.The Plan,which is based on the Study results,provides the County with a planning roadmap to the year 2050 and consists of a temporal and spatial framework for Smart Growth and resource protection to the year 2050.The Plan includes a set of 67 implementation strategies that provide the policy direction to make the Plan effective.The Plan provides direction to the County and the communities in the Watershed on how to facilitate and promote a healthy and sustainable Watershed.An integral part of the Study and Plan was an extensive public involvement program that included over 89 public meetings and events.The project won the 2007 Award of Excellence from the Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association.Ms.Love served on the planning team in the development of specific implementation strategies for the Plan.Client/Contact:South Florida Regional Planning Council/ Jim Murley,Phone:(954) 985-4416.(6/03 to 11/07) South Miami Heights Finding of Necessity (FON), Miami-Dade County, FL: Finding of Necessity analysis to determine if 1,714-acres of unincorporated Miami-Dade County was eligible in accordance with Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes to establish findings for slum and blight. Keith and Schnars utilized all available data from GIS, Miami-Dade Property Appraiser and County data on land use and zoning,code violations and crime statistics. Existing data was verified and detailed field investigations were made of the entire area. In the analysis of the South Miami Heights area it was concluded that the area did not exhibit enough evidence and site deterioration to warrant the creation of a Community Redevelopment Area.Client/Contact Miami-Dade County/Michael Iturrey,Phone:(305) 375-4608.(12/05 to 2/07) NW 7th Avenue Corridor CRA Extension Finding of Necessity (FON), Miami-Dade County, FL: The FON was to determine if I60-acres could be added to the existing CRA boundary in accordance to Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes. The study analyzed demographic and economic conditions,population densities,income levels,taxable value of real property,occupancy,code violations and crime to determine of slum and blight criteria could be satisfied.The Keith and Schnars team presented the findings to the Office of Business Strategic Management and the Tax increment financing (TIF) Committee and conducted several public meetings to explain the project and findings.Client/Contact:Miami-Dade County/Jorge Fernandez,Phone:(305) 375-1543.(7/10 to 4/1 I) NW 79th Street Corridor Finding of Necessity (FON), Miami-Dade County, FL: Finding of Necessity for I,245-acres in unincorporated Miami-Dade County. The NW 79th Street Corridor was challenging in that it had diverse land uses and contained a multi-cultural demographic. During the public review process, Miami-Dade County amended the boundaries to incorporated a greater area which the analysis indicated was appropriate. The Keith and Schnars team conducted numerous public meetings and presentations in the area which included the County Housing and Community Development Committee.The findings were presented to the Miami-Dade County Commission which approved the FON. Client/Contact:Miami-Dade County/Jorge Fernandez,Phone:(305) 375-1543.(6/06 to 4/09) SW 157th Avenue Widening, Miami-Dade County, FL: Ms. Love is assisting with the public outreach for this Miami-Dade County road widening project. Services include preparation of a CommunityAwareness Plan(CAP),community meeting preparation, meeting announcements/flyers, coordination and meeting facilitation. Client/Contact: Miami-Dade County/Raul Quintela,P.E.,Project Manager,Phone:(305) 375-3971.(I/13 to Present) Mobility Plan and Fee,Maitland, FL: Project Manager for the development of a Mobility Plan that will be incorporated into the CIP and a Mobility Fee that will replace Transportation concurrency(TCEA),proportionate share and Impact Fees. Client/Contact:City of Maitland/Richard Wells,Phone:(407) 539-6200.(2013 to Present) Page 31 i';KEIm and SCENARS,RA. RFQ 2014-346-Yf FLORI ns&LOCAL FIRM • Debbie Love, AICP • Crosstown Parkway, Project Development and Environment (PD&E): Studies, Port St. Lucie, FL: Keith and Schnars was retained by the City of Port St.Lucie to undertake not one,but two,simultaneous interchange proposals for new interchanges along 1-95 at Crosstown Parkway and Becker Road. Since the area also included proximate upstream and downstream interchanges, as well as an existing interchange (Gatlin Boulevard), the FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) required that a System-wide analysis be performed of all five interchanges.The justification of a new interchange on the interstate highway system is among the most difficult and time consuming technical applications that traffic engineers can undertake.The process requires complex technical traffic analyses and forecasting, environmental studies consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including completing the Socio-Cultural Impact Report,as well as meeting multiple policy goals set by the FHWA and the FDOT.Ms. Love provided Peer Review and Quality Control oversight for the required analysis of the socio-cultural impact effects of the project on individual groups or neighborhoods near the project and the effect of the project on the community as a whole.Client/Contact:City of Port St.Lucie/Patricia Roebling,P.E.,Phone:(772) 871-5174.(2004 to 2006) Mobility Fee, Osceola County, FL: Project Manager for the development of a Mobility Fee that will replace transportation concurrency,proportionate share and Impact Fees,and assist the Planning Office Staff of Osceola County with updates to the Comprehensive Plan to establish the basis for a Mobility Fee.Client/Contact:Osceola County/Mary Moskowitz,Phone:(407) 742-0200.(2014 to Present) (Present) KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 32 FLORID&&LOCAL FIRM RFC 2014-34 -YG H)�f ; ry James Kahn, AICP mast Mr. Kahn has a broad range of interdisciplinary experience gained from his work with developers,consultants and governmental agencies for more than 40 years in the fields of planning,transportation,permitting,land development regulations,project management and 1 • construction. Mr.Kahn's full range of planning experience includes master planning,site plan design,rezoning and land use plan amendments. He also has extensive experience in feasibility '' studies, permitting, Developments of Regional Impact (DRIs), project coordination and administration of the development review process. He has worked with capital improvement plans and the administration of zoning codes,including preparation of the land development Academic regulations as well as eminent domain cases. Background M.S.,Management and Relevant Experience Public Service,Nova University, I978 Comprehensive Plan Update, Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), and LDC Re-Write for Monroe County, FL: Senior Planners and QA/QC Officer for this Bachelor ofTechnology in four-phased project includes an update of the County's Comprehensive Plan Policy and Urban Systems,Florida Technical Documents to the 2010-2030 planning timeframe;the last update occurred in 1 995; International University, preparation of the EAR;and an update to the LDC to make it more user friendly,incorporate 1 976 modern planning strategies,and implement the Goals,Objectives and Policies of the updated Comprehensive Plan.Client/Contact:Monroe County BOCC/Christine Hurley,Phone:(305) B.A.,Geography,University 289-2517.(12/09 to Present) of South Florida, 1973 Master Plan and Land Development Regulations, Marathon. FL: Deputy Project A.A.,Pre-Architecture, Manager,who assisted in the development of the Master Plan and participated in numerous Miami-Dade College, 1971 public hearings and charrettes. Mr. Kahn was also involved in the development of land development regulations necessary for the City to implement the Master Plan.Client/Contact: Professional City of Marathon/George Garrett,Planning Director,Phone:(305) 743-0033.(6/02 to 2/07) Certifications Certified Member of the Washington Heights Neighborhood and Urban Design Plan, Sebring, FL: American Institute of Washington Heights is one of the first communities established in the City and one of the first Certified Planners, African-American communities in Highlands County.The project included a one-day charrette AICP#005537 and visioning exercise that identified the future desired type and style of development and redevelopment in the neighborhood.Mr.Kahn was the lead Planner and his duties included: National Incident public outreach,design charrette assistance;guidance in preparation of the design plans;and Management Certificates: QA/QC for the project. Client/Contact: City of Sebring CRA/Robin Hinote, Phone: (863) ICS 100,ICS 200,ICS 300, 471-5104.(5/08 to 4/09) ICS 400,IS 700,IS 800 Citywide Master Plan,Hollywood,FL:Project Manager for the preparation of a city-wide Professional Master Plan for the City of Hollywood. The Plan addressed physical and socio-economic Affiliations issues as they pertain to individual neighborhoods, commercial and business districts and American Planning the City as a whole.Market conditions,demographic,employment,public facility and other Association (APA) evaluation criteria were analyzed.The Plan,in large part,has been implemented through the City's Capital Improvements Program and has been highly implemented to make Hollywood Florida Chapter,American what it is today. Client/Contact City of Hollywood/Jaye Epstein, Phone: (954) 921-3471. Planning Association (FAPA) (10/99 to 10/01) Treasure Coast Section, Downtown Fort Lauderdale Master Plan and Design Guidelines,Fort Lauderdale, (FAPA) FL: Mr.Kahn served as coordinator for document preparation of a Design Guideline Manual that was the culmination of dozens of Charrette meetings and public hearings for the future development of downtown Fort Lauderdale. Efforts included assisting numerous design professionals on graphics and illustrations which were essential to the success of the document. Client/Contact City of Fort Lauderdale/Greg Brewton, Phone: (954) 828-5261. (10/02 to 11/03) Page 33 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. REQ 2Q14 346::.x . FLORID&&LOCAL FIRM • James Kahn,. AICP • • MainStreet Design Manual,Coconut Creek, FL: Project Planner and planning team member responsible for advising in the areas of Land Use, Zoning, Platting, and Infrastructure. This main street project created a pedestrian-oriented, sustainable,green community in one of the last large tracts (400 acres) of undeveloped infill parcels in northern Broward County.The design standards are a result of a master planning process that involved numerous community meetings and stakeholder input and is oriented towards green technology and LEED principles in a traditional design concept.The design manual was also subsequently approved by the City as a Regional Activity Center (RAC). The project received an Award of Excellence from the Florida APA in 2005. Client/Contact:City of Coconut Creek/Shelia Rose, Phone: (954) 973-6770. (3/04 to I 1/04) Central Plantation Master Plan, Plantation, FL: Mr. Kahn served as a team member responsible for design coordination and document preparation. Duties also included assistance in numerous Charrettes and analysis of design issues.This project is a conceptual master plan for an 860-acre suburban area located in Central Plantation's, central business district. The objective of the study was to work with the public, key stakeholders and city officials to define a vision for the area to foster economic sustainability,improve mobility,encourage transit,mixed-use and infill development, create a pedestrian friendly environment and provide a"sense of place" for the entire community.The project included a Transit Greenway Study to determine the feasibility of implementing a transit greenway system in the district.The study applied transit greenway components throughout the master plan area for a multimodal corridor that included pedestrian improvements,bikeways,transit,landscaping and public involvement.Client/Contact:City of Plantation/Larry Leeds,Phone: (954) 797-2622 (4/02 to 5/03) Citywide Master Plan, Hollywood, FL: Project Manager for the preparation of a city-wide Master Plan for the City of Hollywood.The Plan addressed physical and socio-economic issues as they pertain to individual neighborhoods,commercial and business districts and the City as a whole. Market conditions, demographic, employment, public facility and other evaluation criteria were analyzed.The Plan,in large part,has been implemented through the City's Capital Improvements Program and has been highly implemented to make Hollywood what it is today. Client/Contact: City of Hollywood/Jaye Epstein,Phone:(954) 921-3471.(1 0/99 to 10/01) City of Aventura, FL: When the City of Aventura was formed in Miami-Dade County, Keith and Schnars acted as City Planners while the city formulated its initial structure. Mr. Kahn was responsible for reviews of planning activities which included site plan and plat reviews, land use and zoning evaluations,and he coordinated a complete GIS mapping of the city,including the City's Zoning Map and Future Land Use Map.Client/Contact:City of Aventura/Joanne Carr,Community Development Director,Phone:(305) 466-8940,email:jcarr @cityofaventura.com. East Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Plan, Atlantic Boulevard Overlay District and LAC Plan Amendment, Pompano Beach, FL: Lead Project Planner for the preparation of a Community Redevelopment Plan for the 160-acre East Pompano Beach Redevelopment Area.This included a two-day design charrette, which was attended by over 200 interested persons. The redevelopment plan focused on urban revitalization strategies that allowed the City to fully utilize the existing man-made resources while preserving and enhancing the exiting natural resources. The redevelopment plan embraced new urbanism principles with a sustainable mix of uses, capital improvements, land acquisition strategies, funding strategies and urban design concepts that were supported by a detailed market analysis. Included in this project was the preparation and submittal of a comprehensive plan amendment for the designation as a Local Activity Center (LAC) for the area;and the Atlantic Boulevard Overlay District which created design standards, development regulations and included public involvement for the redevelopment of the corridor.Client/Contact:City of Pompano Beach/Mark Lauzier,Assistant City Manager,Phone:(954) 786-4601.(6/01 to 3/02) South Miami Heights Finding of Necessity(FON),Miami- Dade County, FL: Mr.Kahn was project manager for a Finding of Necessity analysis to determine if 1,714 acres of unincorporated Miami-Dade County was eligible in accordance with Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes to establish findings for slum and blight. Keith and Schnars utilized all available data from GIS, Miami-Dade Property Appraiser and County data on land use and zoning,code violations and crime statistics. Existing data was verified and detailed field investigations were made of the entire area. In the analysis of the South Miami Heights area it was concluded that the area did not exhibit enough evidence and site deterioration to warrant the creation of a Community Redevelopment Area. \;� KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 34 JS�� FLORIDAS I.LOCAL FIRM RF4 2OI4-346-YG • Jaynes Kahn, AICP . r NW 7th Avenue Corridor CRA Extension FON,Miami-Dade County,FL:Mr.Kahn acted as Project Manager for the NW 7th Avenue Corridor CRA Extension Finding of Necessity for Miami-Dade County.The study was to determine if 160 acres could be added to the existing CRA boundary in accordance to Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes. The study analyzed demographic and economic conditions,population densities,income levels,taxable value of real property,occupancy,code violations and crime to determine of slum and blight criteria could be satisfied.The Keith and Schnars team presented the findings to the Office of Business Strategic Management and the Tax increment financing (TIF) Committee and conducted several public meetings to explain the project and findings. NW 79th Street Corridor FON, Miami-Dade County, FL: As Project Manager Mr.Kahn was responsible for overall report preparation and team coordination to analyze the Finding of Necessity for I,245 acres in unincorporated Miami-Dade County. The NW 79th Street Corridor was challenging in that it had diverse land uses and contained a multi-cultural diversity. During the public review process,Miami-Dade County amended the boundaries to incorporate a greater area which the analysis indicated was appropriate. The Keith and Schnars team conducted numerous public meetings and presentations in the area which included the County Housing and Community Development Committee. The findings were presented to the Miami-Dade County Commission which approved the FON. Peninsula Corporate Center DRI, Boca Raton, FL: Project Manager for a mixed-use Development of Regional Impact (DRI) located in the City of Boca Raton. Mr. Kahn's duties included responsibility for design team coordination and production of the DRI documents for approvals. Mr.Kahn also acted as Project Manager on all the individual projects within the DRI which included:Hilton Hotels,360,000 square feet of office and a residential village. The DRI also included extensive transportation improvements which included a park and ride facility,I-95 interchange,5 miles of HOV lanes,and extensive widening of major arterials surrounding the project.Client/Contact:CarrAmerica,Inc./Earle Yancey,Phone:(770) 618-2430.(5/87 to Present) EAR-based Comprehensive Plan and LDR Amendments, Indian Rocks Beach, FL: Project Manager- Keith and Schnars crafted comprehensive plan amendments based upon the City's recently adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The amendments included those to revitalize their commercial district and corridor;encourage mixed-use and attainable housing development;preserve coastal and natural resources;reduce greenhouse gas emissions;update the level of service requirements;and assure the City becomes more walkable and pedestrian friendly.The LDR amendments were drafted to implement the goals,objective and policies of the comprehensive plan,and include provisions to allow golf cart travel along both State,County and municipally owned streets;preserve and expand the tree canopy;and,address wetland buffering,dock and seawall requirements.Client/Contact:City of Indian Rocks Beach/Danny Taylor,Interim City Manager, Phone:(727) 595-25 17.(11/07 to I/1 0) Eminent Domain Services: Mr. Kahn has worked on eminent domain cases in South Florida for both governmental agencies and private clients. Mr.Kahn's expertise is in the areas of planning,design,permitting,use analysis,providing cure options and coordinating with appraisers and other team professionals. Mr. Kahn experience also includes assisting legal counsel and providing expert witness. Page 35 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346 G ,, , t FIARIDAS&Local FIRM • Kenneth Wenning Mr.Wenning has a broad range of interdisciplinary experience gained from his work with developers,consultants and governmental agencies in the fields of planning,environmental, landscaping, permitting, development approval, project management, and site/master plan t;' design. Mr.Wenning's full range of experience includes,rezoning,land use plan amendments, environmental site assessments(ESA's),endangered&threatened species surveys/relocations, � monitoring, and mitigation. He also has extensive experience in project coordination, ���► administration of development review process, computer aided design (CAD),geographic information systems (GIS),due diligence,and marine surveying/mapping/photography. Academic Background Relevant Experience B.A.,Urban and Regional Planning& Development, Monroe County Comprehensive Plan updates,Monroe County, FL: Mr.Wenning Ball State University,2005 assisted with the statutorily required amendments to the comprehensive plan and land development codes. Numerous text amendments were needed in both documents to Minor,Geography,Ball facilitate future growth within unincorporated areas within the Florida Keys. Mr.Wenning also State University,2005 drafted conservation regulations and low impact development standards for the landscaping section. Client/Contact: Monroe County/Mayte Santamaria,Phone: (305) 289-2500. Minor,Natural Resources, Ball State University,2005 Comprehensive Plan cartography, Monroe County, FL: Mr.Wenning prepared and assembled numerous maps that were statutorily required for inclusion within the Professional comprehensive plan: land use,soils,flood zone,terrestrial habitat,coastal high hazard,road Certifications system,roadway functional classification,number of through lanes,roadway level of service, PADI Scuba and potable water facilities. Client/Contact Monroe County/Mayte Santamaria,Phone:(305) 289-2500. Action Plan, North Miami, FL: Mr.Wenning prepared implementation strategies and funding mechanisms to achieve goals outlined in the city's Master Plan.The goal of the Action Plan was to revitalize the downtown and its' major transportation corridors by providing the following: Streetscaping,landscaping,façade enhancements,multi-modal transportation options,civic complex,pedestrian connectivity,student housing,capital improvement projects, university incubators,and public outreach/advisory committee. Client/Contact:City of North Miami/Tanya Wilson-Sejour,Phone:(305) 895-9286. C-51 ICW Access Study,Various Municipalities, FL: Mr Wenning prepared a map to indicate parcels which could benefit from the construction of a boat lift at the C-5 I control structure (5-155) located between West Palm Beach,and Lake Worth. Nearly 1,500 parcels could potentially gain boat access to the Atlantic Ocean,and municipalities would likely gain additional property taxes from the construction of personal boat docks. Client/Contact James Anaston-Karas,Phone:(772) 341-0524. KEITH and SCHNARS,RA. Page 36 FLORIDAs 5IkLOCAL FIRM fil . pi i rte, - .,- ,tl. Ash Ceylan Oner; Ph D. - `6 a Ms.Oner is an Assistant Professor at Florida Atlantic University in the School of Urban and • I Regional Planning.She has a vast experience in urban design,and governmental systems. Ms. t - , • , : Oner will assist the planning team with design and public involvement issues. . Relevant Experience . , Assistant Professor and Bachelor of Urban and Regional Planning, - - — --<,..- Undergraduate Program Coordinator, School of Urban and Regional Planning (SURP), Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL: (2008 to Present) Academic Background SURP Undergraduate Program Coordinator, Boca Raton, FL: Ms. Oner advises Ph.D.Environmental around 170 students each semester in terms of their class scheduling and career paths.She Design &Planning,Virginia is the first point of contact for students that would like to participate in the program. Ms. Polytechnic Institute & Oner responsibilities include organizing information sessions for undergraduate students at State University,2008 the beginning of every academic semester.She also prepares annual assessment plans for the Bachelor of Urban and Regional Planning Program (BURP) and writes assessment results at Masters ofArchitecture, the end of every academic year. Ball State University,2003 Adjunct Faculty, College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Tech, M.B.A.Finance,Ball State Blacksburg, VA: (2007 to 2008) University,2003 Research Assistant, Metropolitan Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,VA: (2006 M.S.,City Space & to 2007) Society,London School Teaching Assistant, College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Tech, of Economics & Political Blacksburg, VA: (2006 to 2007) Science,2000 Research Assistant, College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Tech, B.S.,Architecture,Middle Blacksburg, VA: (2003 to 2006) East Technical University, Assistant Webmaster:data handling in Globalization and World Cities Research 1999 Group: (2003 to 2006) Awards & Research Assistant,Miller College of Business, Ball State University,Muncie, IN: Recognition (2001 to 2003) 2011-2012 FAU College for Design & Social Inquiry Graduate Assistant, London Center, Ball State University in London, United Distinguished Teacher Kingdom: (2001 to 2003) Award Project Collaborator and Subsequent Planner, Wellington 2060 Living 2011-2012 FAU College Laboratory, Wellington, FL: for Design & Social Inquiry • Principal Investigator,Wellington Community Satisfaction Survey.Fall 2013 effort:25% Excellence and Innovation • Principal Investigator,Wellington Neighborhood Action Plans,Summer 2013 effort 6% In Advising Award • Principal Investigator,Wellington Business Inventory Analysis,Spring 2012 effort 5%, Fall 2012 effort:25% • Co-Principal Investigator,Wellington Equestrian Survey,Summer 2012 effort:25%, Spring 2012 effort 5% • Co-Principal Investigator,Wellington Economic Inventory Analysis,Fall 2011 effort 25% Project Planner,City of Hollywood 2012 Redistricting Project,City of Hollywood, FL: • Principal Investigator,Spring 2012 effort 5% Transit Supportive Infrastructure and Land Use Study Midtown Plantation and Southwest Sunrise, Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization, Broward County, FL: • Collaborator,Spring 2010 effort:5% Page 37 KEITH and sCHNARS P.A. RFQ 20j1T443 4 J-1 J FLORIDAS Loc..FIRM TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .....I.........w. .1. The following chart indicates 5 recent planning projects that the team members have worked on for public sector clients. Project sheets are also attached for the projects. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Debbie Love, AICP James Kahn, AICP Kenneth Wenning Monroe County Comprehensive Plans, Evaluation and X X X Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations North Miami X X X Urban Design Washington Heights X X Urban Design Tamarac X Urban Design Oslo Road PD&E X X X Planning Studies Miami Gardens X X X Community Planning - CRA C-51 Canal X X Waterways Connectivity • ;t 104 IPt; ,Asp `s� #Str' one r_ -2,--._,i,-- a - f i. ,$,,,,Y : 4 P"a �P . , MF` s i• '3. r a w.%ON) ., s t :. i _ .1 i I„,,,IT , ___ isomp Ir.......„..m._ 4„:3 1,,,,,,z if r „ r 1 . ,ri ei —r” t,,,,,, 1 4‘ i, -__ , ,. I 11 111011 . , .• .... . . _..,...,,,__ . . _ , _ ,... -- ,.. ._ - \ ,,_.,_:,. .,..•,.:4,,, .. - _. fir ���d L i�ki �{•�_ . �' - Page 38 ii7,7‘71L.,KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG --' -'7 FLORIDA35itLOCAL FIRM 1 TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications ................. 4 • '1 '�, ., 1 /d .r..�.. + 1 �..J t „ i !imi iiiq Mg's._ F k ` ,� Id y' .w•.yyN�Y„ kV. Monroe County Evaluation Appraisal & Report (EAR), Comprehensive Plan Update and Land Development Code Re-Write Monroe County, FL Comprehensive Plan Update: Monroe County has contracted with Keith and Schnars to update their Comprehensive Plan Policy and Technical Documents to the 2010-2030 planning timeframe;the last update occurred in 1 995. The County is located in an Area of Critical State Concern, encompasses the Florida Keys and portions of mainland Florida, specifically the Everglades, and is home to approximately 70,000 residents. Due to the environmental sensitivity of much of the land mass, its designation as a National Marine Sanctuary and the ACSC designation,this project includes extensive cooperative efforts with a wide-variety of jurisdictional bodies, external agencies such as FDOT, ACOE, DEP, US Navy, US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Community Affairs. Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR): Keith and Schnars also prepared the EAR for the County. The EAR process involves extensive public input to identify critical local issues;will assess the success of the Goals, Objectives,and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan;and gauge its compatibility with the state and regional policies, plans and regulatory requirements. Critical local issues include transportation impacts to its main road, US-I; strategies to balance growth and preservation of natural resources;water quality improvements;and hurricane evacuation requirements. The EAR was adopted in May 2012. Land Development Code (LDC) Re-Write: Monroe County's current regulations were drafted in 1985 and have been appended numerous times over the years.The piece-meal approach has resulted in a set of land development regulations that contains conflicting provisions;they are not interconnected;they lack cohesiveness in both the language and the construction of the regulations;and are neither reflective of the community's expressed design typologies nor incorporate modern planning principles.The goal of this project is to realign the LDC sections to make it more user friendly, incorporate modern planning strategies, and implement the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Client: Monroe County BOCC Contact: Mayte Santamaria,Planning Director Address: 2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 400, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: (305) 289-2500 Email:Santamaria-Mayte @MonroeCounty-FL.Gov Start Date: December 2009 Completion Date: Ongoing Fees: $1.3 million Page 39 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-3 •- z J, _J FLDRIDAS 5/k LOCAL FIRM TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications r IP V ; ,, . ,. PE. N l 1 --""1111111 ili ,., . LIG I jip . B■IMIN ________________-.---------- ii■•••••• ' • ---11. I DECORAn 0� 0HARDSCAPE +. TAMARAC rI ), “I, r r PLAN VIEW PERSPECTIVE E L'. yr'9 / ��\ II A 4 . i t .. ' -;,,,, . Illik o � ` '{ 'P ' ' '1 I I ...=.. PLANT PALETTE OPTIONS\ \I '' ro t 33 gra 9: -' t-`. I LED I n. t_ SIGN � � � '44:_, �� -• �,�,_. .' ��) TRANS � � SMELT rp ,. I it1/2. —` JJff \ -� —11--\1' ! 1 f AC. i ' lik: BIKE■ LANDSCAPE { Z• .` �y VWmow ,iii w NW 76th 5" a FL,'a ..M, .as e....r,olitake Palm Major Arterial Corridor Study: Creating Identity and Sense of Place Tamarac, FL The Major Arterial Corridor Study examined the City of Tamarac's four major roadways - Commercial Boulevard, University Drive, McNab Road and SR-7 for improvements related to the study's three design initiatives: gateways, streetscapes and neighborhood buffer walls. Keith and Schnars performed a full site inventory for fifteen miles of roadway, examining all aspects of each corridor, in order to develop design recommendations and concepts that would help create a cohesive aesthetic and begin to develop a stronger community identity and sense of place. Keith and Schnars provided graphic renderings (plans, sections and perspectives)to help illustrate the recommended improvements. In addition to the streetscape analysis,the neighborhood buffer wall initiative required an in depth evaluation of 28 residential neighborhoods. An objective, ranking system was formulated to compare attributes of all 28 neighborhoods, providing the City with an ordered list of neighborhoods recommended to receive buffer walls. As part of the study, Keith and Schnars held a community outreach meeting surveying the public to gather feedback.As a result,Keith and Schnars worked closely with City Staff to developed a document for the City to use for years to come. Client:City of Tamarac Contact:Frank Zickar,Planning&Zoning Manager Community Development Address: 7525 NW 88th Avenue,Tamarac,FL 33321 Phone:(954) 597-3535 Email:frank.zickar @tamarac.org Start Date:February 2012 Completion Date:July 2013 Design Fees: $90,000 �4.KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 40 ;� . ; FLORIDAs git LOCAL FIRM "RFGf 14-346-YG TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications , ,„ , ,,,...,,,,„,..,,,,,.,,,..„.„ , ALIT- , , _ :- ' _,_ oft 4,, . ,.„.„ -.,,,,,,„., :.,„,, ,_,.„..,,,,,... 4 . r. ,__--, -,,i-- ',/. , iliFill z,,:: h Y+. '.0-1z,:' tit ,,X11 TiTT �� �— i--____... IAN: liortimilmn,-• ..roi a, , yy , \*------ , ; _ ;j"�'� 'f i-0 .� - �, " E' °2• '�fir` �•"FY-•.I:... -k,.....m NW 27 Ave �� ��r•. -...� i . • ,, CRA District ;n � ,�...� , �� r _ mik.m \rad=r- --1-- � --ro.-; �Da - ar end 1M�L Mil �' -ter — —;1 I�r�l S+••• A R1 "'� � �� mss/ �mn F L O R I D A IF 1 _ ���, -�1 n.. ,��" J,,..,�` „ �L�'�� �SR7 Corridor "� = 1 1 !i , 1...�;:,-. CRA District .o` -!R „ ,.+`. J -p tatitell:... 11.71 ....0 la". ' 1. LitL- 1-.1 11:-"I r-al.4■-.147-1";-1---.-.L:-*I'L'-' Vrillire 7 - ' , ..,- , lia- • V _Tyr.... h1 111—RO:i.a. -4••-"--. 11"W-INILZ11.7.41i,46W-1 Jr:4 ... .7,, ..,........ „ ,,„ =....._ ,, ty,.../- Igeinit( ` .._ .■ �.._ al l /,/%/1-- . 1`-r .,ss:._ {,.t .:‘ . „,,,.,,,,,....w.,-� f 4 �, .jam dal�':'.�--_----_'-� �'�. .- f /ISC `._. - - _.., _ _ ,Imo, 1 laii �= �telli ,•fA I' .now L -1'1 r_ >.... l���q,mull CRA Connector j ..� District 1 '), � _I II II 1124Nrarr.1, r "'/11 ���<J• ^N s ., off City of Miami Gardens Finding of Necessity Miami Gardens, FL Keith and Schnars completed the Findings of Necessity to establish a Community Redevelopment Agency in I,707-acres in the City of Miami Gardens. In accordance with Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes, we completed various socio-economic and land use analyses, in order to determine if the Study Area satisfied the required criteria to establish findings of slum and blight. Factors evaluated included: demographic and economic conditions, population densities; poverty levels and incomes; taxable value of real property, tenure and occupancy; code violation and crime. As part of the land use analysis, we evaluated physical and infrastructure conditions; current land use and zoning; incompatible uses; code violations; current building structural conditions; and existence of conditions that endanger life and property. Client:City of Miami Gardens Contact:Cameron Benson,City Manager Address: 1515 NW 167 Street,Building 4,Miami Gardens,FL 33169 Phone:(305) 622-8000 Start Date:2013 Completion Date:Ongoing Fees:$60,000 Page 41 j-7-J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. FLORIDAS 5l$'LOCAL FIRM TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications a - r., gi„P -. '.., c_. 41 ' '''."' * '7,-*'-':* '-- ' :' .4 , „.._.. . , - .......x....... ... . t .:_ .fir.....T.• ass .w.`i����t �' '0 +; ill.....ai*-1—.1„„, I id r i •ar "fir SP* 6 ....._ 1 1 i 1 . ; , in. sr'a r -• _ .... , .... . .........., .■ •s as F * R *E , . ,, . s. . "+ s ] 1 ' �p J gyp. 1 .� 1 Ki i r ri r, ,. _ ;.}- j' fl rT 4 * g i ,i • 11�• f �r r tip' ' r. � ; i 0 li. r 1 ! - . 'A''"' II111111 i < lit, r.4,, c_1/$01 '-----L -I a J _� P p ► ' l_I I..I. `ticf4jr. f — EP A wr, - r bi). -IA II- ' - riAttilry- :-,--‘,.. bpi,v ','' ,, , -1k.7. -° 41"'" . - -"''' '' 11' ri-Apl 44*/w' '''i--T',_,1 :ill lib ar tip,,,. .4:tit; tip4..itit. h.• t 411%. . 49`,N1* ' 15 et i :if, %\4-I: - A, ,,f, s' . ,,,!:`,. ....4vrT . .-. ..\I i Washington Heights Neighborhood Plan Sebring, FL The City of Sebring Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) sought the assistance of Keith and Schnars to develop a neighborhood Plan for the Washington Heights community, one of the first communities established in the City that still values its deep cultural and historical roots. The Concerned Citizens of Washington Heights group works closely with the CRA, focused on revitalizing infrastructure and reinvestment in the commercial and residential areas. Keith and Schnars consultants designed a charrette process to elicit community input on the desired type and style of development in the neighborhood that included a community visioning and urban design workshop. Public Involvement is a key factor for stakeholder support of local initiatives. Keith and Schnars professionals from the Public Involvement, Landscape Architecture and Planning Divisions conducted a successful charrette to define the distinctive cultural heritage of Washington Heights and identify neighborhood challenges and needs. Based on charrette results, Keith and Schnars has developed approximately one dozen urban design plans, including streetscaping strategies; open space and park plans; affordable multifamily and senior housing options; mixed-use village center concept plans and building elevations; civic center conceptual plan, including community center, plaza, market space, outdoor staging, and parking. Plan development was informed by many factors, including the expressed needs of the neighborhood; necessary infrastructure upgrades; community character; desired economic and residential growth factors; and the historical and cultural relevancy of the Washington Heights neighborhood to the City. Client: City of Sebring Contact:Robin Hinote,CRA Executive Director Address:368 South Commerce Avenue,Sebring,FL 33870 Phone:(863) 471-5104 E-mail:rhinote @mysebring.com Start Date:May 2008 Completion Date:2009 Fees:$75,000 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 42 FLORIDA5817 LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .• • W .sm 1 • ' 1' �µ�1 _� y,,.., Walla 1577-.� ! I n .-..,....,.M, .,,,. ... t M.W. - - 5- -h North Miami Downtown Development and Major Corridor Master Plan North Miami, FL The City of North Miami desired to create a Downtown Development and Major Corridor Master Plan (the"Plan") to implement the City's vision for the downtown core and major corridors.The Plan areas include the downtown core and the major corridors of NE 1 25th Street,West Dixie Highway, NE 6th Avenue, NW 7th Avenue, NW 1 19th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. As part of the preparations for the Plan, Keith and Schnars compiled and analyzed existing data and studies that the City had undertaken over the past few years,including reviewing their Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan. Additionally,an economic/market analysis was performed identifying potential retail gaps or opportunities. During the data and analysis task, the opportunities and constraints of each corridor were analyzed and graphic representations created illustrating the existing conditions,opportunities and constraints of the corridors. These graphics and the findings became useful tools during the public involvement phase. The Plan portrays the ideas from the elected leadership,City staff,citizens and stakeholders within the City,and incorporates their desires for the future. The Plan will guide development and redevelopment within the downtown core and major corridors.For this purpose,City Council briefings and two business community workshops were held early in the process. The stakeholders participated in a"listening and work session",where they visited each of the corridor"stations"to discuss the issues with staff members and markup aerial maps of the corridor with their thoughts,ideas and desires.Participants completed a Preference Survey for each of the corridors.The surveys sought to determine how the corridors were used, the needs of the community,and identify the preferred architectural styles. The Plan includes mixed-use development and architectural design guidelines which address building layout;parking,vehicular and pedestrian circulation and parking lot design;streetscape design;signage;safety,desired architectural treatments related to building design,massing,scale and proportions,facade treatments and the preferred architectural style for each corridor. As well,the six major corridors were conceptually designed to include the City's desired multimodal and complete streets goals. The recommended corridor designs were represented graphically in section and plan view renderings. In addition, street furnishing,hardscape details,roadway and pedestrian lighting fixtures and gateway features were recommended. Client:City of North Miami Contact:Tanya Wilson-Sejour,City Planner Address: 12400 NE 8th Avenue,North Miami,FL 33161 Phone:(305) 895-9826 Email:tsejour @northmiamifl.gov Start Date:November 2011 Completion Date:April 2013 Design Fees:$124,000 Page 43 �,KEITH and SCUNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG FLORID&git LOCAL FIRM !: s1 • I Ai 111111 2• 7s Financial • 1 CapaciTy TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .............., ,-... K&S has requested that Dun & Bradstreet submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact: Yusbel Ganzalez Department of Procurement City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 (305) 673-7000 ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalex @miamibeachfl.gov , - + ,4 r -- j y + .. " ' ' -Ize G y�Y� ..+r -fit .. _. .r .w. , j55 +' -am__._.. '"°-.•"�""--__�... �.+.._.. T __ .-- v r { r �,,�s.-..-, r-.-.._ _�.� _,sue � ..•..-.�••-v--- .:.•-+ewer..- .. .� '�. �am�.�,....._- �Y ti Page 47 J , J KITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-Y ; - FLORIDAS Bit LOCAL FIRM TAB 3: Approach and Methodology - - g 2811.11',-1 4 144141: ■ !- 1 The City of Miami Beach has undertaken numerous planning Changes in the built environment can be controversial; activities to encourage a greater quality of life for residents, however,we have found that education in combination with visitors and tourists,including: a shared sense of authorship,are keys to creating consensus. For this reason, K&S utilizes a combination of on-location • 2025 Comprehensive Plan; planning, interactive public participation, design studio and • Strategic Plan 20 I I; city meetings.The process focuses community input over • 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey; a short period of time,through hands-on participation by • Sustainability Plan; those representing the full spectrum of interests. • Bicycle Master Plan; • Future Land Use Map; During a public kick-off and hands-on design session, • Zoning Map; community members with varied interests work side-by- • Environmental Scan 2003-20 I 4; side in groups to formulate plan goals,and to present their • FYI 5 Proposed Budget;and ideas and maps to the other groups.This workshop setting • City of Miami Beach: Parking Lots. provides members of the community a special opportunity to not only share their own opinions, but also to better K&S has identified areas within each of the aforementioned understand concerns from other perspectives. This studies and plans for which we can offer the City our technique is excellent for confirming, updating, or refining expertise.For the purposes of this response,we would like ideas from previous planning efforts. to discuss our approach to just a few: The K&S Team will set up a temporary location to have BUILDING FORM public meetings and design studio preferably within the proposed area. At the design studio, the community is Policy 2.3: Transit Oriented Design (TOD) within invited to see visual representations of how the Code the 2025 Comprehensive Plan states,"By 2015, the City changes would impact the built environment. shall examine the type of incentives and create design guidelines for TODs within the City." K&S has created It has been our experience that through the public design guidelines for many municipalities within Florida, participation process, participants come to care more including but not limited to,the City of North Miami Beach, about the planning documents.They see their ideas as they the City of Marathon, and the award-winning Mainstreet are refined, and become part of a more finalized vision. Design Standards for the City of Coconut Creek. We cannot emphasize enough the educational value of this approach.Citizens become familiar with the tools of quality The K&S Team of professionals understands the importance urban design, and gain an appreciation of the importance of taking a holistic approach to creating a well-planned of long-range thinking. Our goal is to make sure that all community. The team integrates design professionals, groups participate,are heard,and are understood. economists, land development regulation specialists, public involvement managers, landscape architects, as It is difficult to communicate exactly what change will look well as specialists in other supportive disciplines such as like. Change is easier to accomplish and more believable environmental,and civil engineers. (acceptable) when we know what to expect — a picture truly is worth a thousand words! In our design studio Page 49 KITH and SCHNARS,RA. RFQ 2014-346-YG j1 FLORIDASBi�'L CAL FIRM TAB 3: Approach and Methodology process, we create many drawings, sketches, renderings, Policy 9.5: Multi-modal Transportation encourages computer simulations, and "before-and-after" sequences the support of mobility alternatives, particularly those that can help the community study the options,visualizing associated with Beachwalk and Baywalk projects. The change before it occurs. City shall implement the recommendations within the parking management study for each of the Transportation The key is to regulate buildings, streets, and public spaces Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) and shall in order to ensure that new buildings respect the desired evaluate the following: character through their individual volume,scale,and detailing to create a high-quality public realm. The design elements • Placement of future public and private parking are created on form-based codes to achieve results. facilities related to the support of alternative modes of transportation; By being prescriptive and defining the desired urban form • Reduction of on-site parking requirements within rather than simply outlawing undesirable elements, Form- the City's land development regulations in order to Based Codes deliver predictable,desirable physical results. encourage multi-modal use; These proven results reveal that change and growth can • Commercial delivery issues including the provision often make places better,rather than worse. of loading zones within alleys to improve street flow and emergency vehicle access. Form-Based Codes can ensure an urban form that relates to established development patterns,architectural precedents, • and local climate,yielding authenticity in new development. ' �s I latte n addition regulations which allow a mixture of uses and pay kt careful attention to the placement of buildings and detailing nr of the streetscape produce walkable,lively settlements and ! ==, destinations. a lIA / MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION Ea PLANNING «. wh f pm � r- • - mitts, .., The City has adopted comprehensive plan policies to encourage multi-modal transportation: Policy 6.12: Multi-modal Options within the 2025 .. f .. Comprehensive Plan states, The City shall promote l sib_ alternate transportation modes and implement the transit, �. , pedestrian,bicycle and other modes of transportation ..." The continuation of implementing multimodal projects and securing funding mechanisms is important for an r--, active beach community plagued with traffic and parking �. • problems. The following items are identified within Policy 6.12: Multimodal Option: • Bicycle Master Plan - Prioritize projects which fill gaps within the bicycle and pedestrian networks • Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funded projects • Beachwalk • Middle Beach Recreation Corridor • North Beach Circulators/Intermodal Center • Coastal Communities Transit Master Plan projects (In regards to MMP Project Bank) • Improvements: Bicycle parking,transit shelters,and transit amenities (bike racks on buses) • Installation of crosswalks,curb ramp installation/ maintenance,and pedestrian countdown signals KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 50 �J FLORIDAS5,k LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 3: Approach and Methodology K&S is a leader in establishing mobility fee ordinances and ` ► has conducted mobility plans for numerous municipalities i and Counties,throughout Florida including: -= ,• ` �. � ' • Osceola County _ ". '.` } ''"✓ .ern: l''`. . `''." " a,r..-j raw. . v } "4 =y°- °'-•°..: "r t • ..�" y,. • City of Maitland s,?!4: ,m• s • Sarasota County ".O ^4 • City of Sarasota 9�e 4,./0 :. y . • Alachua County gu ,� �� ` ,.�` fir'. • ?.- • City of Altamonte Springs i.-r — 4 .- The approach to the mobility fee project would have many similar components to traditional planning projects. The following are typical tasks: • In addition, Policy 9.7: Concurrency Mitigation Fees Initial scoping meeting with the City • states, "Concurrency mitigation fees within the City's Preparation of detailed tasks • Data collection analysis TCMAs shall be used where appropriate to support multi- on an anay • modal options..." The policy indicates the following items: Public information meetings,including stake holders • Draft Technical Report preparation and review with • Contribution towards the construction of park and staff ride facilities to be served by transit; • Modify and finalize Technical Report based on staff • The construction of enhanced pedestrian amenities comments • that create a pedestrian friendly environment,such Report presentation to appropriate Boards for as: review and approval - Narrower traffic lanes; • City Commission presentation and adoption - Median refuges,curb extensions (bulb-outs); - Count-down pedestrian signals; The mobility fee study varies in length of time to accomplish, - Use of geometric designs that minimize depending on the available data and list of projects to crossing distances and increase visibility between be implemented. The study could be completed in six pedestrians and motorists; months or take up to a year to adopt. The major factors -Timing signals to minimize pedestrian delay& including the timeline are size of area and complexity of conflicts. improvements requested to be funded.The K&S staff has • The construction of bicycle facilities and/or the the ability to work with the City to meet any schedule. evaluation of reclaiming street space for other uses through the use of complete streets concepts. WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN Most communities are not aware that current legislation Objective 8: Water Supply Planning within the 2025 has changed the direction of concurrency fees to a new Comprehensive Plan states, "The City of Miami Beach shall method of mobility fees. The mobility fees have unique comply with its I 0-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.... features in that they can target specific geographical areas updated, at a minimum, every 5 years." The Water Supply and districts and provide funds for a far larger array of Facilities Work Plan is designed to: projects that typical concurrency road improvement plans can offer. • Assess current and projected potable water demands; K&S recommends creating a mobility plan/fee to offset • Evaluate the sources and capabilities of available additional expenditures to the City and its' CIP-funded water supplies; projects. The mobility fees would replace the currently • Identify those water supply projects,using all outdated proportionate fair-share method with a available technologies,necessary to meet the City's standardized and simplified approach for fee collection water demands for a I 0-year period. that provides the City and developer certainty relative to fee amounts.The fees can be used for sidewalks and trails, K&S has numerous relevant experience related to water bike lanes, transit facilities and streetscape improvements supply planning, and recently conducted analysis for the including lighting. City of Lauderdale Lakes regarding supply and demand.The Page 51 IIErfH and SCHNARS,RA. RFQ 2014-346-YG FLORDPS5I'LOCAL FIRM TAB 3: Approach and Methodology following outlines the approach K&S would take in order to P&Z, and present the recommendations and the update the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan: draft amendments to the City Commission for consideration to transmit to the State Land Planning • Our Team will meet with the Project Manager Agency. Prior to transmittal of the proposed from the City to refine work tasks and the project amendments, K&S shall incorporate revisions as schedule,establish reporting relationships and review directed by the Commission. expectations of the project. K&S will also collect relevant data and finalize the public participation • Meetings and Public Hearings components of the project. - Staff review Meeting- K&S shall attend one (I) meeting with City staff to review the data • Data and Analysis and analysis and the draft Comprehensive Plan - Population and Water Demand Projections amendments. Project water demand for at least a I 0-year - Development Review Committee (DRC)— K&S period. shall attend and discuss the data and analysis and - Information from Water Supplier(s) - the draft Comprehensive Plan amendments for Coordination with the City regarding the one (I) meeting of the DRC. availability of adequate sources and the necessary - Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing - infrastructure to serve the projected water K&S shall attend one (I) hearing before the P&Z demand. for review of the data and analysis and the draft - Identification of City Conservation Measures Comprehensive Plan amendments. - Identify current and future programs and -City Commission Public Hearing-K&S shall attend measures that the City is implementing or will two (2) hearings before the City Commission for implement to promote water conservation and transmittal and adoption of the Comprehensive reuse. Plan amendments. • Goals,Objectives,and Policies • Comprehensive Plan Amendments Follow-up and - In compliance with the statutory requirements, Modifications and based upon the data and analysis, the - Objections,Recommendations and Comments Comprehensive Plan shall be amended to include (ORC) Report Response - K&S shall analyze the goals, objectives and policies to implement the State Land Planning Agency response in its ORC water supply facilities work plan.K&S shall prepare to the transmittal of the Plan amendments and, a preliminary set of amendments for review by shall prepare a written response to each item. City staff. Based upon comments received, we - Modifications - K&S shall make the shall prepare draft amendments for review by necessary adjustments or modifications to the the Planning and Zoning Board (P&Z). K&S will Comprehensive Plan amendments and the Data then document the recommendations of the and Analysis. _ 2:1S1t4-.4:, .� T _ = M 5447- _ 14ta a 64 Ma%Ile ale=5 arid ... -,....«. ..error ., r i._ -✓.� .. �[, KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 52 FL0RIDAS 8iI LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 3: Approach and Methodology QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE CURRENT WORKLOAD AND AVAILABILITY Since we understand our clients want a consultant that K&S PlanningTeam has several municipal contracts currently can deliver high quality projects on time and within ongoing which will last 4 to 6 months. The Monroe County budget,we establish and implement a quality control plan contract will extend for some time but will not require for all our projects. Our Quality Control Plan is based on extensive staff hours to manage.The K&S staff has sufficient the philosophy that: time to undertake any size project. The following chart illustrates the Team's current and projected workload. • Quality is achieved by proper planning,coordination, supervision,and the appropriate use of skilled K&S utilizes the latest computer programs which include personnel; GIS and CADD. In addition to the Planning Department • Quality is controlled through the checking, resources,theTeam can utilize all K&S personnel,equipment reviewing and monitoring of work activities by and resources available companywide. The K&S Planning individuals outside of the Team; Team consistently utilizes expertise of in-house Landscape • Quality is verified by having a senior manager Architects and Transportation Planners to give input on performing QA/QC functions;and designs. If a GIS or CADD project requires additional • Quality is assured through independent reviews support personnel we can draw from other in-house by qualified staff through each stage of project capabilities to complete projects. development. It is our intent to utilize in-house K&S employees for the planning projects. K&S is not a minority or disadvantaged business, but has a diverse ethnic and cultural employee base. FDOT has recognized K&S for efforts above and beyond in utilizing minority or disadvantaged companies. 100% FUTURE WORKLOAD 75% 9: DG 0 W 50% CC Q I— a O q VC H 25% to r r;. It 0% NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV MONTHS (2014/2015) Page 53 J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346=, _ � Fi0RJDAS5it LOCAL FIRM I'R . r . 5 f { �,' g - 1 ,C "- ,. 't .. fJ .?JA ,°t� �44--,, A a m 1 # t:t' n „t ;1 ii r? a r ` m, YAj ' .:. '� , A .- A TMk o :st k; A ; ff 9' 4 �, r ry .. _ t a ash t - l f ,. a,� Yr. ;. t r __ B ., 1,,. , _--, 4.-r-ii 'T _- f fr ask 4,� .. -,:. , ,,777,,,zt::::&.,,;,.,,,,, • .. .„t,..,,it.....t.,..!.., _, _4.. ••• . fr..,,Lwi .i..„, ,. ..._-_,,...,..„:•.,_, ? ,k.„,.,.... , . . , -04,__1„: , . , . ... ,,,,,..,..„.41.4.„.. . vizz.,,...., t. .wi ( p- qXV.;fin , j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A.I. 7 43 ,,. J�; FLORIDA'S % LOCAL FIRM is --1.. �' r ,� ° 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 f $ °, Phone: (954) 776-1616 • Fax: (954) 771-7690 • Toll Free: (800} 488-1255 _ �= www.KSFLA.com {E t era,f hc- .., .i i a36 .w 7 9tR�`� pp V,,„7-1--- . y � S s ry•,,!,?Sri.. ,. � Yq - 3 e b• 1 (e0(diKf) 4''k "1°111 • h xf'C� & Fl fi m 1 �t �' i `0. m ,,{.' "f: 2• 11 d r YL d)YYl F ,�*.0,.,...„:0‘,4404-' ci', ''- L k.4 _*,, ti.:A 1 _. ' i�..�.: R' r i,i:,,,:14.--, ,.'.pis- - '�/ '. - - • X; •.i,. 1f f ` V. Ite ..■ , , .'•----,',..,--.--,,--7-1,;'''''.''''.•.\''1\ sf,' ' �y.M .1 , r\, ® ,,. .../s,:,,,k,. .,.. ,.. .s,. _,.,,•,,,,,,,,..,,„„. . .„:„..,,,,,,., ....1 Y£� „,.,".„...,, _ _ ._ , , • .... ,:-..,.„--,:.:„--.."7,..,: .:.., n,, -',:n:._1/2.n.1 -\''' . ,-.. .:-.'•••,---,-,\-4,... ..... .,.....„,4., .. ..„..., ,,..... . . . _. , ., . . ..... , „ ..... .,,,, .. . ,. _.„ ..... . . . , . . / • • .• t . '”" - `s 44,x* -- a° _� . y _ Y • _..CITY OF • . j ,. _,. Mir . .,,,, ...,_. • . - ..4„. _. ,, •\ ,...i..., , ..44.; .. epoP'•'-... . %, Ate... ': 1, .:, .' ',t !._ 0 December 2, 2014 � , GROUP B - ENGINEERING - ENVIRONMENTAL Professional Architectural and Engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG _' KEITH and SCH ARS,P.A. - - FLORIDAS art LOCAL FIRM t Ni4ft‘, Cover Letter and Table of Contents KEITH and SCHNARS,EA. (eoljak Ae. L. y FLORIDA'S 5( LOCAL FIRM October 22,2014 City of Miami Beach Mr.Alex Denis,Director Department of Procurement MIAMI BEACH 1700 Convention Center Drive f • '► Miami Beach,FL 33139 " Mavornb.r3]014 GROUP.-ENGINEERING- Pr c ol s:ono:A chNec Iwal and E s , ENVIRONMENTAL ngine.,M M RE: GROUP B - ENGINEER1 N G - ENVIRONMENTAL spetred colegorles on on`os-needed-Ooze Professional Architectural and Engineering services in specialized R�p,� .1G categories on an"as-needed-basis" • RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Mr.Denis, Keith and Schnars, P.A. (K&S) is pleased for this opportunity to respond to the City's solicitation for Group B (Engineering), Environmental Services. We ask that upon reviewing our comprehensive submittal, you give particular consideration to the important strengths that K&S will bring to the City: • K&S is a well-established firm with over 120 professionals in South Florida. Most of our staff is based locally in this area—we are your"BIG LOCAL"firm. • We offer a single point-of-contact to an experienced project manager. Proposer • K&S environmental professionals provide a full range of environmental services Keith an. it' , • including: Prima Contact: o environmental assessments; Errol Kalitici, Esq. o environmental and coastal permitting; Vice President o contamination assessment; ekalayci @ksfla.com o dune planting and management; , o coastal surveys and mitigation (mangroves,seagrasses,corals); Qvalificotio roup; o protected species permitting and relocation; o environmental compliance during construction; o NEPA compliance; Area of Specialization: o tree surveys and management;and o general environmental services. y. • K&S environmental professionals have extensive experience in the area,including: o benthic surveys for Crandon Park boat ramp repairs; o permitting of seawall repairs in Biscayne Bay; o coral relocation at a marina on Card Sound; o dune planting after beach renourishment at Lauderdale-by-the-Sea; o contamination assessment at the Intracoastal Mall in North Miami Beach;and o mangrove permitting at Arch Creek in North Miami. • Most of our environmental professionals have master's degrees,and contamination assessments are performed by a Florida Professional Geologist. We look forward to the opportunity to provide the professional services you seek. Respectfully submitted, r , Errol Kalayci,Esq. Vice President Page 3 ' 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 • (954) 776-1616 • Fax(954) 771-7690 e�, 'n- r-°e i�" Sc_-+ 'u}u `.. r�. t ! ,, iiiiii������, ,i, lit laaw,..:__ �• :��� '"#` _• " It . � I' Is PI.,/ .. _ /. .�,�� a .fir / �, N_ v. • '- 1//+►' .�, t,. r 1(0 ; i P .� l 4 t 444 j t om'ti•. ''w , — �It_ - "i'� 1� , ' 'tea.' f P _ ' 2—"' °s- c �, '��— r. i A , A , . 410 _,<Gy dIitb4 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements - 1 . 1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents - 1 .2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) - 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements • TAB 2: Experience and Qualifications - 2. 1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm - 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) . - 2.3 Financial Capacity TAB 3: Approach and Methodology .4, ,,,,,,,,,A.- . 1 KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ,yf��y J / J ,.r _- Mi-P J J���J r FLORIDAS�jr�LOCAL FIRM •y'_ : �' , : .. - ,� _Alba 6500 North Andrews Avenue 1 t 11 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 . .1'- a�,,..,�a..�u -�__�-�'� _� ,,- Phone: (954) 776-1616 ® "' -� Fax: (954) 771-7690 ,' Ig Toll Free: (800) 488-1255 V'. - 7 �-te. , . www.KSFLA.com • • , \if y I • i - . G Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affida v i t (Appendix A) TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ mraxe vc Poge9 �j K ERDITHmaxsnd4HNARSFI,RlivtiA. TAB 1 : Cover Letter a Minimum Qualifications Requirements Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 vusbeloonzalez(a.miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Keith and Schnars No of Years in Business: 42 No of Years in Business Locally: 42 No of Employees:120 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS):6500 North Andrews Avenue CITY: Fort Lauderdale STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33309 TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1255 FAX NO.: (954) 771-7690 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 10305 NW 41st Street,Suite 112 CITY: Doral STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Errol Kalayci, Esq. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (954) 776-1616 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: (800)488-1255 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: ekalayci @ksfla.coni FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-1406307 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 10 FLORIDAS elk,LOCAL FIRM Qz. RFQ 2014.346-YG TAB 1 : Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES Q NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. • ' - . '. •-• - --- - - •• '' - • -- - --- - •- •- • - -• - - :•• •••• _ ••. • ... - benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI U)Miami/Ft. Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.Department of Labor's Page 11 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-V+ FF FLORIDns&LOCAL FIRM TAB I : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements : • : .::••:•. .:••••. • _:.• _:. -. ••._ : _ _.. ••: •• • _ 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES ] NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.govlprocurementl. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. KEITH and SCHNARS,RA. Page 12 • FLORIDAS I�;LOCAL FIRM 1 + • " RFQ 20014-346-Y'G TAB 1 Caves Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt MA Addendum 1 MA Addendum 6 Addendum 11 MA Addendum 2 MA Addendum 7 Addendum 12 MA Addendum 3 MA Addendum 8 Addendum 13 MA Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 MA Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. Page 13 KITH and SCHNARS,P.A. FLORID s$iQ LOCAL FIRM TAB 1 : Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the,market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. KETI'H and SCHNARS RA. Page 14 FLORIDAS / LOCAL FIRM ; e` . " RFQ 2t>t14-°346y-YG TAB E: Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements PROPOSER CERTIFICATION hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Re•uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Errol Kalayci, Esq. Vice President Signature of Proposer's Au o. d presentative: Date: 10/22/2014 State of FLORIDA " ) On this 2P, day of ajr011Q4.,20111 personally appeared before me • who County of b PP rc �wa R 1 ) stated that (he is the ace_ t?A.es I AMT of ei,thachNA-Rs, a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: 626111104- rk._ /101A-r--- Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: . • 4.40.4", DONNA M.SOUZA ,' im fA Commission#EE 153810 ''{` Expires March 18,2016- '%l e" Bonded Thru Troy Fain Insurance 800.335-7019 Page 15 r — KEITH and SCHNARs PA A.!K ,J RFQ 2014-346-YG ' { FLOuDAS ,wcni FIRM ri tt ilk 111*Lk ei, R w. t +,,'' 4 tappe,-1: . sP i ,411 i= ..�_ .� a.a mac,• 3 ;714s/4s/ • :--'7 '-if :....,„„.„..,_, v � ,,// d, v 77 !, , ti• ` ,. I i .. - 1 .3 . . . Minimum .. , . .•.. . ... . ..„... . •.� Qualifications . . , 7 ;v,.. .7,,,,....-,--- irements 1, --"1 . ,.....__ ..., ...____...,, .._ . _ ., . ....,.. :.:_. ...._ _ ______ •, .. _ .• „,\. ,_ ,..,,:,.,.......„ ...,„ . .„ ,.‘,..., , ... „... „...,.. „. . .• ....,2:,_,,,....._... :. ,,:. . , ... ... ...„_,: . ,, . ,,,, . _,.,.... • • .. ,s, ..... . .. . ,...7.....t.., ..• . : . . ...„ , _ :;_,,,.i.. :,.....,.. . :,,,... „0,.....___, , .,._.,, . .. .,... :_ . 1 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements *, FINVRONMENTL INSTRELD UME ENTSI ,INC. A Congratulations on successfully completing FEI's Radiation Safety Training Radiation Safety Training I Certificate of Completion This certifies that John Abbott Keith & Schnars Successfully completed the FEI lnnov-X Systems Radiation Safety Tutorial for field portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrum Analyzers. Training Presented by: Mike Waltman FEI Radiation Safety Officer Completion date: 4/2014 RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION , u BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS %%lit; LICENSE NUMBER ' , '14 PG2401 The PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGIST •,,e ', , Named below IS LICENSED Gbbwa Under the provisions of Chapter 492 FS. Expiration date: JUL 31,2016 0 eit ABBOTT,JOHN CHARLES • 6500 N ANDREWS AVE +y tj_• 'V. FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33309 ..` . N"r ISSUED: 05/04/2014 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEQ# L1405040001408 Page 19 j�/�J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-34. ' 1 , FLORID&&LOCAL FIRM , � , I �� - / 1 � l 1 I ) , ( � �,- /�, { ! 1 rl� �C 3 ��_�� I 1 � �I'1 1 r- �IlhW�_: -- '. 11r\`s �1�r\�---;-*,-1-=,i-1tr\� ,. �1Ir- 5-':- ..i/1�r\ •Afr I-:cr --,Ar I s:--y • IZ � '2 Eza • I. Ii -i, QUALIFIED Nvi 1 1 .��� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INSPECTOR "' ► •mi l 4 ���� The undersigned hereby acknowledges that )�)�),, c + i John Abbot Abbott I. has successfully met all requirements necessary to be fully qualified through \�\� C \�\� the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Erosion %j/r� v -,• r: and Sedimentation Control Inspector Training Program i ,, Lk$i / / May 04,2011 i'?}.4A,siab..ri_. i›fil T=-- ►—- '—j�� Inspector Number 25672 ./�! 1 r Kristine ones Hal Lunsfor� � ■ ■ ' M ■ i- ►i. - �.� • L J lL – .k Jilt i= =k Jl_l4 i_ Jil.r ._ – -,..i.. „,,,t- , Jll� i: Jilt i_ s\ =!il Aiih2AIMAVjaiAri idiAhikWaararg/�iiA i i\���\T,./.i ii iIAA.W,/,l li1►►��AATi. i l i A.Na�i%�.iii�l► \A_Viif,diniihi►�\��.V rtt_ ..m7T'/i'S'h.,:f'✓'S •:x'^vWI. r.7 WAY,,,,,,.�A, '.,^an �aF `l'^S.., ,e Arnff7' n`r”4. Ij: r Y., l ,LH �' ht:l q;,,'r ,,v,,{, •C,'t ,g.,,,, ,t <^r` i,'•"u`l5 �i•,, t .{ 'l, .; A{j r'r. cif,Il f%, i1!n, {.,,1 1/ t.1 '{,„u1,.�/;/. :1�^.,,i, I/r�•j �.,,.,,,/J: .tia.Y nll+�;, Y co-,:;;?0,,I,,,,,,,.� �! }�n., Q'�',��J/:,� :e`u„I,•i�.,:r•� ,\\•,•f�..f:;i.•rllf.r,,. .^1.,,.,G..T((7;1i�/.i i�,l/,l�f'� ,,F,,m; �»1,�1 !i;/tm ,,I.Ly :(1 ait y ,,,/ ,.n r, u ti .,rt.v�∎Iil- }t,,,,k;!( ,,tdil, nN IC,;b4j/ :v:,1\y1 t;f�:I ,{I,.�� y�{\��,�\,�;.I'�'\��ley�'�b�;%/jl 1 Hti,:l l../✓�1::'t w3�, ,.,/�:���\t qo ':a:���'II� y i.,..,0,-,./,.1,.:1,:::: :' �r,,�,l l \h4.a i ,rt,i✓,",Il�\ I r/. I'�+Iti�tiyl;"n,4'�,"�%ll t r,i��',JJ+ 4'�•\� ..��1. :. '17}',%•et:7�� A:l ,,,, in,•,r,�/� ,1 '.. !. ��4:,i ITi ,%ul∎ rl, i;J�_\.:;to./r✓,,:� ,•. �ilsV.q0':�,`,. :,.i1','//eg;. ''',/ ��`�• �'���$'•.✓!,�.,��..;P�•4}.., a���:y,;•,.•,,'r `,.'V�.;IJ,�'i,..,l. wi.�,:. ,•}r:,..,;,,�� Y- .r C�\".� +,1) .111, �.:,.p,!{P,71 •/ �„�.� r-.. rc �y. tJpll!?.ri;' C ';,- �h'r',G'.:::,,,:11 ,. li'<. -Sel"::iJ.O;/nt.- j�\yiry•,,,',',: \`�'4n trrr ,: `.,Elzpi J 1 4tltlii J^.l,"��;,�.1;:1,, ... y.•i(1,�%,,1,' �'.'�J""•'t.� ,\\�.���i/�<�f�r\�lti��j/�q ... - -. •il 1� ;yr- j/mil��' �LrP,��j1.1 C�'}'K.,r:�i.^-1 a���tic,,. J ����t'�ZC�4✓��':��t.��✓'� �I.!j4. tv�,`� ,�. `LS3li;�ln ;✓ :-.� /"•- - - .i', '`.� - N t 1 r •�.bi 1 Y r: ',-4..a H(': _ 4. }* . _ r.-:. 1�^`_. u-.�j.. �=.�••s-�.,`.�,f.�:c�':,t:1.�,•�:.,-.�--"-�.� ..•. �s�. ?^vim 1.,L�-� �.i�°d i��r- i�ar{.._.��.y ..�..i�'�"� iz-�'� i`��,'1 w �' QUALIFIED*Iu R WATAGE r lei T �/j Fj NT ! ST'-' INS Ec OR L 3` ? i m�f'yf" C is ZF�4 t' 75 Q�W. \ice -, -i r ` 1,:* ■ P11H1t1 'N.:"4-.:. � s_� 4 FLQ A ter.- - _ '„ " r4'�-/i�fa r//��///!/,' / . ,l�t��\ fit• f /!j• �` The undersigned hereby acknowledge that .,,/ has successfully met all requirements necessary to be full - �� Y q �Y fully �rr�Y, f R . ; certified through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection;-� Stormwater,Erosion,and Sedimentation Control Inspector Training Program , W `1 04 wti 61-A el V October , ,, .(7, _,. ...,. Marleina Overton Inspector#3449 Greg Knecht .- E1.--.- -.,k-,-„, �rrr�j t� = yry -- -t N� t. 1:-A ,� -: �F 7t `v c y I` =� �., �.4 1'`AZ f/P�AkY ..%--,���U 7 ,` te 3 1 V. i a __ ,f '.;-7 i4-:-'��tif`'� .��1� ; `.i lAIKiI?C t,`\tf' " n;*% "�=ll. ✓� ,.4, w,�. 0-c1 r .M:*/ *�� ∎kV" � ' ' /r,. l 1 l t.,\hl,, gW "},1 0.w .v :r�•ant1v 4'N�k •-•fTZ:1,'a�` `,3j;:'h.`�'.,~ -Viii.!$6 JE �/-%;✓:R4Vrit.. ,;.f, ,v,,r,� , • • -i � p. 1 .�� 4111, "w,MI ,,e� J l 10✓���M r +"�w I 1if%,V V',1_y^�I I, �N,rn:t � ll�1 :,, 1 5 II,r,4 "',I 1 M.:,rI i\l,r;.M q,�\4+1, + r ��.1,I'h.,'' '-' i .'N�tl i 1�, 1 �( � ,�,, ✓L42illYdi∎ (hO 2 l,l C a� 1/i.t*°!4∎ L �_l A1 L -11,,t'''',4,4',:'.!1 r l/! ,''i '�∎,q0 1h•I.✓% 11 tl ii,tye'lk!,✓/Opiwillb��'.4 ,rh;tgti p, �� JA4,,,„;�s•s ' .,,,4,,,,,,,,,,S•�. a;` , Srgey:� �+f'n r .taY, �,` ttu,a$iYL.�y, �d•'..�iL(4;�Sts`� •t'�JF t�w� 1� �1,,•I, ;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 20 -__t-__-' 1 FLORIDAS 8I,LOCAL FIRM \; j 1 i, ` — TAB I . Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements t _ STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 0 .1 f.0. BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE i*�' .: LICENSE NUMBER ': `': ' r LA6666970 61— The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT t:{; � 'aCp . Named below HAS REGISTERED 0 -. . � Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30, 2015 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER BENJAMIN JR 1525 SW 17TH STREET i.... FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33312 • . VIVA FLORIDA"iii RICK SCOTT ISSUED: 10/07/2013 SEQ# L1310070001550 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY r .1`e O�`l.-7,:,'. .<:---77.:i- --":-':::-'..\,.':.7:e „,ice✓.` -- --- "> ,! \ .r--� te `^ • . !. ? - '�' -Y, 3 f;� f +'I1 '. f Y 111' YI F 1i. _ f . ▪J l' I - :., ..,:',.v..1.,ti. .f f5 : rl, F / '✓:k ` L / ?1' THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION ,• �Certifi es That On . � > . ▪_ February 10 2005 : f- - = ; Chris B. Miller :{t* ...,",_ ' i Candidate ID:50157 Is.. 1.': •4 `'_s- . Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirements ti:=L,,,� '':�'�:'` And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A :t . _`,I Iipv.:-Zittz•-•:, +' CERTIFIED GOLF IRRIGATION AUDITOR _., ;,, 4'+ ', 1; •::_Vii:- .,>,:".',4 i.. f, -'4', - i c 1-' .e ?Z14 .- :A::: - . 4c �� y/ Mark Hewitt,CID „i6,,,,,_.;:.....;�� ” i' ' I k y\ 4q Chair,Certification Board - '/ ,, Yf.,a). (re* CGIA is endorsed by The Golf Course Superintendents Association of America `-1 =`: 'f - T V tI ♦ T T V V V 4 . ! / Iff! t1;! , ,ti� t: ,ff `1f• ;J' ,,,7.::;.''.:•, A,"J L .* � ;47� Ylr T w 1��.�}[ ?_�..: .,y .; ",_L \:L'.. , :%' .r r Q-, yid j• : I ri^ �,�.'� ,,•'7;',r+ r+. tf�} 11`c, -F Page 21 . J KEITH and scut tRS,P.A. M75BY F RFQ 20144-3464\e' t,. x FIAItIDAS�I�;iACAL FIRM TAB1 . Cover_Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements - ----_-----,--............ _ _ - s ___-_, , _ . .-_, _,,...---__ -. , ,:_, ,.„.- ,-„, , , .-, . ___ , ,.,,,,,- l,.,..,,,..,,„,_ ., .„.., ,, ,----- ,-,-. ,...- r -.,.__ -,..,,-__,.- . . , , - . „ , - --,_ , -, % ,_,,..-‘, ..„- _--, , ,-_,,. .. ., ,,,- ,.,„. , ,.,:y ,„'-„,.-,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, „„k,, ,, THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION a4>,: a &., A':,%!,. Certifies That On 4'Ak''''y • November 12, 2004 - ,, .. r'•k' Ir fi a, 4, Chris B. Miller, CLIA '_a, Candidate ID Number: 50157 CAND ID 1.•..'4'.,V Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirements p� ,� And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A z .1.,, gin ' �r�, CERTIFIED LANDSCAPE 'k..".,,YF# � �;�i ,,', f‘))) ,� `y: IRRIGATION AUDITOR '"."i4r am(/ e ?ZOZ }±..,a '`. :d' ai a Mark Hewitt,CID .*s...—•', .. Chair,Certification Board �"4'.�`• , , 1, ,. .r'°st. ti7 71'�,- ,1W;i-.7.� y y:';*`a^‘*.7,r r :{#s VR ,",>-4,1 d t. I 'S',\--"--._.-.---":--=1,---\.-L'"----!----1-\----fillk -.:'----.401 ,,!-", --'-' -- -- , ' """'--/-77\--\1 --`- ;--4'.-.\---''''--;" y b, .‘,.% ,) .,' <C. THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION .) §. Certifies That On •j• November 13; 2004 `4rt CMl.11er ., ::.,' Candidate ID 004629 Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirements c And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A ;,•CERTIFIED IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR ' .4441 f. . . . . .1 271Z r 'Mark Hewitt,CID -+ -t kk5,1 I \ \ Certification Board Chair #„ A Y1' -fflou-...taw .....,... -i_i7-, --oryikit ...-46-7.---, - .........," ' %iii0.- V 14iiILVW4WAOWN4ir 40a0j0.0.* -!Plt O.' --- jvlblif, KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 22 FLORID&mod'LOCAL FIRM R1Q 4 -346-YG 1 1:-/App I 0 7 -10r- ■ (Th \r. ,,,i 7, 1 c. ---2 ° rid-, ------Thr,n----'n n' --C-0 egLgt7 I g 717ie Int.N ...--1 1---- , ,-,_,..i..A I-.?....-- , _-.. -- 146:\ - : VII --7.34_ , - r ( ,,: t.4.,..,;(1,I,Il 14,,,,,Ark.3,!■ ,,,..... .,....,,,,.4.4.2,..:.,...I 14....r..,. It.... A.. N...Mpar.4144144,10,44.44alyguip,,,,,,I.,-,d,.....,• ,/. ,..-!:. t. r. ' ' T ) THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION p l' i-,,,, . ,p,,, ( : '4. '1 ,'.1; .,4! Certifies That On , -.. - -- 4 :±4 k '-' Ju-ly 26 -1006 ,. . .-' , 2 ( _ ,.. .- .; .. ( '',1*.l. t Cliris B. Miller , • Candidate Number:004629 ( , ' )v,,,) , = ;,:',., :i Successfully COinplied-All:The Necessaryltequfrements ''''Y'i ili And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A ;. , .. , } ,. 1 I , , , . . ., ., . .. . .... . „_ / , ' / 4'if ' 'A.-•C CERTIFIED IRRIGATION DESIGNER 7,-COMMERCIAL -..s = , . . .... t-,,1 i i•■■A.,. .•.t",i• i ( ' -" ' •- '- - - •• • 1 ,,r ..,,,, ,1/4., 1 i ....Ci , '1 ( C V 1 ,44 I ) .-", )V (V. A ( , ).... , . it V 4" - ,;.,- ',: - :--,,,-,- i• Michael Clark Cm,CIC,CLIA,CGIA: ,:.„, ..,,,,.1 zir i:i, i ,( \\:,. .N.,. , -.--. -i \ II. Chair,Certification Board 4 $3.--- .... -,- . ,., /,,,4 il.■ ■ '--•, i :r....4.4ii4Tili.alia,........,pt•144.11-11,41,441.0.8.•.1.1141..Ct..t ....i.e...ot.e,......e.1444,.......,..... .. .. ., • '....-, ,v4,wr ' 1--,-Air ' :937,.. ----.. ,:,,..A,i,2_::: * L -:;::' 0:' ., *0* .., /(-----,Y--='-',,C----•,-----"7--;----,....---,--c,'""---,----,...----- ----\. .. ---,--,------,..---\.--,--------",.---- ----,,------7----- ,..--.--C c=-=:‘:' ---:::'i Y----.V171. ;4.„ ,,;, ' '....1,A1_-■,_,,:'.. ;_,..:,,,,.._,_7,-.:,:„L-___,-_..--,-, --,;, ..,:':-.: ., .. ____:.- ,-,-- -.- _.,.: -,..,_„_,,- .•,""----•i ,.... . ----a-'Itti,, ■—'`--.-,-7'-----.—:(7 i 1\i,,.S-17--W/ 7:,', ', :'-' ",s,------/-.- ),/,:,--..„.0.5,,,,.?;:,-_,,,-_,,,,-:F-:?'.,:',-1,''',::::•::':-:1?, ;_;,—..... ,3-:—.,:;:::',:4_74 -F_-::-;?;:`,?,',1'ti.4":;',:.'!".'l'.'''I'i'l''''';?'...,.'-'-''''=""-IV'' '',`,--?..':'':'''''':_":*'-''V''';'.;"'"'"'" l'%;,,,.; ,..L.1.:-V -;j:' '''-'-31,.•,._/', 4:..-;.:±ti,-;.;.,,,,:"..."..9i...- -.T.,*...i...7± :?.... ..;.".?-_-';:',.;-;.;,:i2544.,. .:,'-',.;-.. -;:._ .=7-‘.%-=,32.-;;;"-÷,;";=>}_::-:.:,-:7;;L:--...•;:--.Y,-1t--,.,!v.2,r e:Z„, ( ,,,,,....,,,i „.0.1.F.two, ''''''':''.'s•■V`,-' ' , ,4-- ',..?1',•-. FNGLA 71;,: , ,,,,,,,),:,•=i, -,,i 7.', = —271/11viF— -Z. ..7" l, •,..;"':'0 ,.''-■:- We Know What Grows ( '''';? '4,1 %:".i'''''7 ,, ;',7--;:,11.,i FNGLA CERTIFIED .;:',r.,- --.''.!,1 , ■, •••• ,,,' 1 7,.,t ? '•, The Florida Nursery, Growers & Landscape Association , ',i,,-,_1•E; Confers on • Chris Miller HC5 5762 , •,-,,,....:-.Y0 Certificate No. . , •i.._:--.ii,i The Title of ! ,A ,"■""'''''',■ FNGLA Certified Horticulture Professional (FCHP) •4,,,(-..., 4( .-,.':-.:,',ii,4. ,/,), !...1-, itti-ENLA. (.------ i'N'I'''-''-'7"-I-1-::.::77':::-:;?1,k,. 1 - ,,,,,,.:iz, ......,......,.....,_ 4'. December 31,2015 4 , ./,..., ' i.',,, Expiration Date September 2004 Certified Since Wes Parr h,FNGLA President rold Jenki FNGLA Certification Chair Ben Bolusky,FNG 'CE• ■i S.!,.--.r.,, , • Merry Mo Certi fication Dir , ; 'S,'s'S'''.-:';'P!'■ ''-k\ C::•'--'''::'ir•I■.,,47."7",4*777q. 777.,H-17,77Z.:773,'T-"-^z-7.7.4';777i:, ,:;A7`^-,Fir -777±1',...:7F?.;,F7'777-'?-: ■-5717,1 d3r771:--: :;ff;:':.-7,VZ!'■':ti ,...\...... s,.:',II, -::::::.,,,,pr,i f v s,......,:....,...--;i1/4.1 i ii,._...,:-,..\117..,:,..„,..,: i f V i..,.:,•!,iis.Tit ir,,;.-.-_,.::,.i I?),-,',,-;,..',:,,(1/),!-‘....},-- i 1,`"..-.....A....f:i 1 It i'•':....::;.,-- ;IST....../I'1..„.2.t ,,,.1\■-■■••%::,i'•-■1_..\.---,..'32.--,:\\ /.."--Ltz„... .',...-1,-.. .:- ._2,0,--c• ._ -)-:'.::',7k, f.-..'.:.-', ,!--1-L'-"\ /2-:.j._-'s•-cs ):-.-...:;;.;:a-, --;,-..;:-.1,-, ' .----L--/(1/----1:-:,,774.-12-.7—'7:`,..,K7---\-----'''-,7_,..,. ,..:" "3-1--?;.....,,,7------'1i-"c` .,,,::-..- 4:"7. ,,,7---"''''-\-. 5.7:.■::' ,-•,---'''7‘,- 7.,."3_'2:,Vf.:47 4' '. j ,\--- '' -:.- ''- ,• .,. `'.--- -2,4,J.-, `c-- -:,--.,., '‘-----.c.'-. "-- k 'kJ-- -/-;(_;_(-:-c 4--A -,-,- ,,.4: -1-.'',---1_)! \;,----,, =, Page 23 --r---1 KITH and SCHNARS,PA. _K Ei aq ZO.A644liFT@. -___ _-; RAM&5it,b0CAL FIRM -...._.... TAB 1 : Cover letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements . .. °' _ ' �`� ' - !(- ;' ,g 0h ) , ` •' i/t eft \•- :;: 4 h / ,//. . , .ti�4. I .."..; 5-2.1 c''t a,,2„ c .' . ' Aa S.S. '?":'? 5.A.,F ? - c v +..ksK t r` v' :m^•t'•°.'- - I '. :r�: ers._°�.C:1.. F'Fn r-f.�,-.�-._ _71), f_.%s1_21 : 1L=T �f.�.i7.,_ r_ .i.:E2; � r ; - lM •1 I., r ��•r,co,Vr ti:-- "' i M� k t � , <- ...c. <�,- V� e 'r, 1'. . ;�a, :;i F N G L A k,- W -.7- ,'6a We Know What Grows,1,:' FNGLA CesrwmD ri�,<' . �! `~ : The Florida Nursery Growers & Landscape Association q''..: -1 ., _ ,* Confers on 't.' ,A« .6';1 a', -1. Chris Miller Certificate No. CC5 0262 �;�` '' 4 j'.: The Title of ,.:. ty: FNGLA Certified Landscape Contractor (FCLC) �� �: , v...`' y December 31,2015 �G,�it+l C i�F•r;�v�H =;.1� Expiration Date Wes Parri h,FNGLA President Ben Bolusky,FNG 'CE• ;-''�j.. ti r `+ ice F4 .? November 2006 ��e , ',�. . '�.,. h;+L, Certified Since Harold Jenki FNGLA Certification Chair Mer Mott Certification Dir `I'o F't''. .. ,-r.f-r.� rat srr_- -- _'s�i'2-� - r r:,s r y_r �_-- - f �Ik "'/ "'4, 10:N..2 t_-!t ti..K,i..- , 3!??.7,4z....:G^S 1 i M'�c"O _'_.'-s"'S.•A'a"a t 3 '• 4 r - - +...--',?: _ ,r^, k y -�'l/'. 1\r. :ki rfl e. -.-\4 3 r t�� - T t; -1 i 1 f�- '--,!"\i,1 J� -� :;...4 ‘`-� -1 s ✓,ram :�.:�L9t' ..",-- 141--1::=. !l i�� , �ti r �,�t ° ��/�. \�_�JtC ��. �Y� r.----.) .-z--- '\ W1- .mil ".�_ ,r_„0 ■ ./ \ / /►A Z . -7 `�? �p,� �1 2 IS��r,.$:1�1,i=" �•pi'". ��F�..`��'7��G-�-1� Tri�c''/.!• =� ,rJ.'i �p'J't'�w P�is" ,l+ft,V � k �'�', 1 �V/ ��;!, h =y: 111 X11 -- Tl('u.1�1; — �I�; 'uiil� ( 11 b;-== 1�/( i1y►.,:=== 1'/....off:,'/// -%.Nid \su The�FCorida Irrigation Society hereby recognizes 19,fi,pl 3 1�1 VAitl -p// < �°�1 Chris�r� � : , ifr' I `..-All 1 On the 20�day of,�pri�2005 l I1 VA.' ��I�..r.,!111l This individual-has successfuify completed the Imgation Site 9Kanager Course as instructed by the -�It p'//•'A� ! cFCorida Irrigation Society. ' ar1;1.°- f6 .�'; CILB'ProviderWum6er.0002995 ! G % /4%r/ OA% cktill10:41�1 CILB Cour se Num6er:00079998 '° ��y' ';ail..••Weston skip h�rEI��hO CILBApprovedInstructor.Weston°Skip°Wright oirectorofT.Aucation,Way 2,2005 '4���'.11ii f Continuing Education Units:8 Genera! I�,! , IAA Course Date C :April206,2005 litt=6 i 1i el.t nno, ::∎ S J o •, JenniferA 11/:01.k!!i marosa 0 01=:,U, °Commission#00 323232 .� nl•..iii o�:_ iEN�@I w •Ex Tres M � 1� •N1;`r'p1i.k ��a v� ew..TR,C..m ofy..we OlcOamsro,9 I�j►{;]j+r• Ar.- v,r‘iz---17-------4,AAgit-r-vhow-s--,,Ap-,-c----.--sqicypi:-.-7.-Ta\ppr.,-Esivihr.:=7:_av . 4* � y: c c %rte=...... ; L�,: -.v.�y� ,.1.4i-""4... .!;..,.-1-', ti`" tZ�' �'c, -\\ -tip ••_ ��,-� ��-�_ �'"�� Q-,�'�. � �. _, _K KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 24 FLORIDAS girt,LOCAL FIRM , RFCA 2014`-346-YG 'i TAB 1 cover Letter & Minimum Quali cal a s Requirements� 1 _- . . _ _ ...._ ,. ., ... , . 2.7,-..7: 'I dr) GREEN ADVANTAGE i ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION ! :: • j ERCIAL/RESIDE. ,t :% 1 For successful demonstration of knowledge , , • of environmentally responsible building practices - 1 AWARDED TO I C/iris UI/litTer ., , . .‘,,..._, i .. ...._..., , , ...,..„......::.,_, V 1 `' Y '---C.. 1/31/2012 1/31/2012-1/31/:015 !' ° . _r'- Grady ORea ,Green Advantage,Inc. Date Certification Period ! Certification Number 1012598 ,_ 0,„",,, �", affirm . E.m r- 'u''nrr*nY `m`. ti t,mr � ,'v1.. td.°t:,.n r,7p�,.,..1,mTt rt,mra� r;m`" �, et+.rtrrm.^moo `p._ �T t n t7 to t o tttrr- n,r ".t r n,�, ,,...... � `fit - rq a.yit5 ihrl'>��t�. np„'+,.:�Ott tN� Vyy �''�'{t t �/ry.., ��V'r�.� t�""V'.�l ��4 y � 1ti � a_W:!r � t,,.r} '�' rx � �, �� "�r. '� ;p rr ^.t�t it � a , ? �J dYN r�. - �i .a 'hr�,�.��I�.,kil 1/4,6?-r ir1, w.-.1 w `r mow,. ^= w 1.� t w� ►-A.. ,:/�A-,-°a i c:' * -!, -..6.-a`, ., . _ ._..._.. . . ... .ow .. ....- :; a 1-.• �:-.`,:.:. ,\(-1,..=; --- tY - j•-�7,..,:,.,, .ur,..:....,,.�.�. u i., t,772.� ;wrw:,r:u wee-u..1.�a.u.7wz,'wr,wiw"WIWLUluv:,.JI.WJN4aS�.1"-",W.WV.ae',777'.+VI.LLv�:.u.w,..t.1:7,:7A„-3x : _r? `.ql Y' ICPI= �<;: .:„ 'a �zan ; ,. ...,.. t c`.4 ` ` �`.7,A1,t) = t `:, fi r -R- 4. - ': The!CPI acknowledges that ~° • g .F_ `t= Chris Miller - - = --I.E. -:'-',"4 , -►=S-.> 0; meets the requirements for the _E: ,r� '_♦ ,,,,,,.Air, `� h- ICPI Concrete Paver Installer Certification t ' Certification Valid through 12/31/2014 E a,.Ti f This document conveys that the participant named above has earned a Record of Completion for the Concrete Paver € �' �_ r S`, 9; Installer Course and has documented the required amount of installation experience and continuing education -E C t t• .. - ,it as required by ICPI for this certification. -i;f,.r``r"' ii.„, ,,.75t5ref_zred...-- ''I''''''''."111(1: :••N:."if.4 i Chair,ICPI Education Committee ICPI Director of Engineering ((j B f•-,-:'-',9','"' :i*: , Y"2', 'Y _ ��Y' r -t Y , 'Y - it r- , r-, Y ,_ c r f. " �,`]t'L N,T,✓�',�t.rp t?, �';tJY li to n,t`t'.�'. 9y n i�lttp0'' (4,31 Ntt -✓r,: t tea, Ci''7+ t "` ✓,f �Tt„'' f�,r�;`)%/ ,`,• .: /"-a pr�9 lam • ,4 .fn '''AL ,p.ls ,ems^ 14,.-,-t:n U:,0-4:II11+Lf inn'J1� y"1,..,•n. r J. "�.....✓ 1.s'�.�,.�fuCff'` ,�OafUl ._1 �.lyr..n. wiC 4!!U �'Lr:U� Page 25 I -\ iErrg and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 26 14 4 -,, � FIARIDAS I IocoL FIRM �� ' TAB 1: . Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements _ . T - :.:a „.„ % '\ !/_-j` . a. \ , / gin; ` . .; %�, ,n\ .I� \ . - : / � : 'ti' • �? �' r 5'; r t r r• ' ,' rr it t; rr.t ': r.,J .• rirJ .rrr.P •, l..t 4r•.t t ' rr•,}J , Z „r9:P,ti', r!t rrr...t ,,1. re...� iirr:::.t r,,.t , rr::t.,. Sr \ ,,, ::•:tii; i t, .. a.,........,,,,..:: ,,T.".:1,;:7-. Iii 3rtternationat ,,,,,otietl, of arborittitture r// \-,,,,,.;:::.1 „:::„_ "obi __.......,,\ .........•.. ••.„.:), .,,,,,,,,,:, -„,„.„,y, .^-=„; Qerttfieb rbort5t. '\\S�;iti.-: /�p .yam'���) (,,'”” labing 5ucce55futly complete)tile requirements e5tabli5[jeb by die Certification ;0 \(4 t'-'„ Iioarb of tlje international:ociety of arboriculture-, ' �� '':"' tl�e aboie nameb is hereby recognizeb a5 an i Certifieb rlrbori5t ;.\ //rr,.;:sf: - rte:?::, Sir 7,1;;•0A:-..?...- Certification oarb,Clair jtint bier.,,Q.xenaibe Director ;v ��•'':= 3oternationat tocirty of'Arboriculture Si ternation it •otiet r of'Arboriculture ;-:-5:-;:::%;1.fir (gti.;;4*; FL-5218A Sep 25,2004 Dec 31,2016 :v:; 'S)} '`::: Crnititate�2atubrr Certifieh +iure Lsviration sD•ate .:',.� 0..e, t.:.:::::::::,4 1 •r tt' t� 5 �•• �' �:• !. ;�4 S' r V•: � I r 1�'� 1.. `;ti' \.h P 4 ,' t yln �.� ��v �\ ":"):..51::.'4'.....W....,!•::::::: :‘.:!! $S .. ..$:5:+p -.t r r'. • 1 r :i: A:,..'�• R,;14 ••:::.,'! .�?�j•:li.�::r:,i, ..,:.r,• .!::::1 . •�V.ti r•. � • • ':'=i.: ! ! � fit _ 1 ,\ i _ V\ % _ _ / / ISA i 1 QUALIFICATIONS.' e°o� �° 3r�teruatioa�af ipociet of arboriculture- :Ito TM j f - ree Rilk a55e55meut 4JD uafificatiou I Chris Miller Having successfully completed the requirements established by the Certification Board of the International Society of Arboriculture:"the above named is hereby recognized as ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified. r-,(77,—.jy..";;C:::4„0-/:—.?-V.-,-:_,..,1-,, Skip Kincaid.Certification Board Chair jim Skiers,Executive Director International Society of Arboriculture International Society of Arboriculture I July 25,2013 July 25.2018 Issue Date Term of Validity End Date ;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 26 FwtuDAS LOCAL FIRM - �':: '':: ::. RFQ 20 4 344-YG 1 TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements L--. i _ ,. - -- ��suaaEti0 off' �0 1 n y- `, E -2 w i I GSGBG • , U.S. Green Building Council 1 HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT Christopher Miller Jr 1 1 HAS , CHtF.VEI) THE DESIGNATION OF LEER' ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL .4, 4.,... ,.,„ BY DEMONSTRATING THE KNOWLEDGE OF GREEN BUILDING PRACTICE REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN(LEER)GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM-•. ij ,, -- - _ 1-,___- _ date Issued 72_:...........— �� October 30,2006 -- s.Rictanl ' President CEO and Founding Chairman Ciaairma � ednaa, g / -f -J 17 L `� ' ./ -L l.r 7 1.�. �7 .! � - -.�-� �„>,-,:' ..-.4--i J • /i, L, ,:*,` �i A� ~{Y�S *-,`;1 ",�r i`,"` t , 4-Wiri"r '',1,4"-%-_ ,:, '` ( 'f YlftI A '' A; certification No. 2007-0016 #01 IL% re, Expiration dace: September 30, 2010 ♦ !� i A.., -.44 Ill"' l; p'54.2 1 :2—• 0.1. This certifies that e.c_?,,l to7; !► , '1.4k,4'1 Chris MitTer t`r.t."'' /:V t, Having shown to possess the necessary qualifications and having complied with the requirements of the IA +'`I Al: Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida,L.A.A. )',',\ • t was by an order of this body recognized as competent in dispensing of the duties of a _-r 1 ! - , ��/ 44- . Landscape Inspector �.- r.1 -Al.. _. ; f 1 Given under the seal of the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida,L.A.A. �"' pe pet ii �' this 1st day of October.2007 t t " . �N...- . ' L I' 1 V e_G iG t .President ly > , y 1� .� - . . y - ir'.". i r 4 '4 A'C sir -nr "ir Di. t• a i 1 , � w'��' '�� :411',-.",':--;-•,!.'x'� `' th` � ...., .�.t�i +t�t�. � t�V -v k r _ y..�� 1;Y�,% 9` ` t' }A -� rf 1� � y ''';‘1,}1* .v/ � Fi :r i.ta. 17—,- . sle s . T r :., , .,! im�,f, — '- `�. _-� f_. _Nf; - -�/ '`� "��.J� -*,_ / Page 27 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ. �, R FLORIDA'S FIARIDAS$pIACAL FIRM TAB 1 : Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifoations Requirements State of , orl a Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Coriann Elizabeth Salas P.E. FBPE 1'rcY t•:rYl�tit* is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2015 1 P.E. Lic. No: Audit No: 228201516736 64779 RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION "+t7- BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS , ,' GB99 • The GEOLOGY BUSINESS '• ' Named below IS CERTIFIED ; ,' + Under the provisions of Chapter 492 FS. Expiration date: JUL 31, 2016 • KEITH&SCHNARS P.A. :Ali'6500 N ANDREWS AVE .°.« ,,_ I FT LAUDERDALE FL-33309 • • • ISSUED: 07/08/2014 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEQ# L1407080002421 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 28 FLORIDAS ak,LOCAL FIRM ` ;R 201 _YG ► • W. 1 _ , •/ 7_•�6.4, r i y, • 41A. _t ✓ 4..a '� \r !'+' ... _ w ,.v... /'- , :-• •`' 44 �• v� Y .. c, • _. i j.. /t'3 c',. t � `!•\ , :.• . ). t\{ , . .• �\�I," ��.- G./ .°— ,j w 'IPr l C 4 otlit,f41 ....-,,— • yIrr , WT-.► ` n ``, v _ • • f ` � 2. 1 1 s - •.• _ .. _.....,..._ . •,.. ,,,„,........- Qualificati ons _�,. r . vim- ^..,9 - -� .....„. .:._ , .,,-----.--".1:,0‘..,. ..,..-_-. 7-...,.,.-I.i.:- of Proposing ._ ..,_:. _,____,_,,_....,, ,__ __ _ ____ _....,.. ...........,.._,....T.....„.r....7---,----,„ ...;.-->A.-_,----... ,. , . ----,,' . - ■,...:;-.. : --:•-,. :, -.--=7..-:,...., :' •-•.-:-.-:_ -- ....-- - - Firm 4.„. . ..,:.:_ ____ ,......_ ... . , .,...,7.,.„ .--7. Y '. f I r „l. «1 Imo. +lam' _ r r' - , ~j �54 rl� ��:.” r 1.. 1 ti k , t. . . 1 , FIRM OVERVIEW adapted.Through this adaptation,we have developed staff and a project portfolio that can be categorized into several K&S has comprehensive in-house resources focused areas of practice: on solving the engineering, planning and environmental challenges faced by a diverse client base. Our commitment • Environmental Sciences and Permitting; to professionalism and strong project management has • Structural Engineering (Bridges and Waterfront allowed us to play a key role in the development of Florida's Structures); residential, commercial, recreational, and transportation • Landscape Architecture; infrastructure.We are also very proud to say that over the • Comprehensive,Regional and Urban Planning; past several years, K&S has managed to maintain its high • General Civil Engineering; level of performance,despite our nation's and,in particular, • Surveying and Mapping; our region's economic difficulties.K&S has not experienced • Highway Engineering and Design; any significant organizational restructuring, ownership or • Transportation Planning; management changes.We strongly believe this is due to the • Grant Writing; positive reputation K&S has consistently maintained, the • Construction Engineering and Inspection; quality of work we produce,staying current with changes in • Project Development and Environment Studies; the industry,and the strong relationships we have built with • Public Involvement and Outreach; our clients over the years • Site Development Service;and • Visual Communications. Representing the continuation of historic firms dating to 1929, K&S incorporated in 1972. With 42 years in K&S has been performing environmental and water bli hed firm with over 120 resource services continuously for more than 30 ears.Our business, we are awell-esta s Y Y professionals. Our professionals include environmental environmental and water resources team includes experts scientists, landscape architects, planners, surveyors, civil in biology, ecology,geology, hydrogeology,water resource and structural engineers,highway engineers,transportation planning,botany,zoology,contamination,and environmental planners, construction inspection specialists, public involvement specialists,graphic designers,and technical and "-`` administrative support staff. K&S is a firm dedicated to the timely and cost-efficient „�,. y + Sr 3 �_ °hiM�.. fly �'y�L delivery of services. In fact, in 2007, when the FDOT '"` -. ` - released its annual summary of design overruns (time and money), K&S ranked among the best of the over two { = a. " ;. ;' 4w hundred firms surveyed.In the six-year period studied,K&S •+` designed and surveyed twelve projects with a construction c , +. „N;.. .; =, value in excess of$120 million.No other firm selected by ' ,- f . - FDOT in that six ear period completed this volume of work,and maintained such low overruns in cost and time ., ' ,,. 4,,,,..,..---, • r„' * 's;r,�A� , air r -+1"'• n As regulatory requirements have grown and the need for 1' `` * ' a true multidisciplinary approach to project delivery has .-� e a° '= . ', AI become essential to our clients, our firm and staff have .• ,, w Page 31 E.,:_' 'i IrrH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG J15�� FLORIDAsBigt LOCAL FIRM TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications x -s - ,. • Permitting; .-, fir..i° h°R, '` =,� ` �r - - '-� • 4� • Tree Surveys; -,#;. �- _' .-,• • Post Construction Compliance Monitoring; � _ -:.-/•",,„, Threatened and Endangered Species Studies and •` 7, .v ':. Relocations; ';`F a • „- - - = • Revegetation and Inspections; 1 ,�; • Water Quality Assessments; '': ;,'' ''��� ., 1'- • Watershed Assessment and Management Planning; . ,, - - \,.�. •r_• , -_ . • Wetland Development Feasibility Analysis; =._ f ' • -• • Wetland Impact Mitigation Design; r r. .� ':.>71 °{, R • Wetland Jurisdictional Determinations;and -4:- - .s • Wildlife Studies. t* '.:".:- i'- r ' ' I ' 1,i, '; ) ‘ 4 . t w'd n + f ,' 1 1 b ' if II: 8 ' . 1 - y s ,(f{ n 0. ` 0„,„' j K: ,,• a 1 v' *„ , a — ^` lire ` 1�. :-,-;..:s-.7. 'I ' ''t - 0 ,«� jai j, p ~t - - + - r • i a Al �. and civil engineering. Our projects range from small s 1'. , t' +)•`,I P .' E '•` - biological site monitoring projects to multimillion dollar ` } ,� - environmental planning and restoration projects. Many of 1 ''; our projects begin at the planning stage, proceed through - 1 `”` permitting and construction,and continue with monitoring. '1, J - Our Environmental Team has all the necessary expertise ;' and experience to assist the City on an"as-needed" basis. r.._ Our environmental services include: q • Ecological Surveys and Mapping; - `. • Wetlands and Upland Natural Areas; . , . • Ecosystem Restoration; i;. • Native Flora and Fauna; � ,' t • Wetland Delineation,Mitigation,Design,and Permitting; ," J • Environmental Impact Assessments; . . . . y • Invasive Species Control Planning,Implementation, '`, , and Management; ; • Environmental Compliance; a '`, - _ • GIS Database Evaluations; - ' • Sampling (soil,surface water,waste,groundwater); • Mitigation and Compliance Monitoring Issues; • Mitigation Construction Observation; J,K L j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 32 FLORIDAS 5/k LOCAL FIRM REQ 2014-346-YG ill of II 11 a ti 1...'',48 A" 4. 1 4th t 11i4 - r'9�oTk' .fl I 7 ,1 �,� Rye 1 P F�r,;," .. - i I 4,17 t • A• lt• el: •i iiir- 4 4, ill al'^thZ . 2 sf ' 11,4 a }' a • V --i h R . lillii , 4 i Qualifications , 1. - '- 'ti N.'% ' . ''' of Proposer _ _. 4t. ,_, .,.... _ F i 4• s f . Team .„ ,... ‘ . , , .....,_ _ • __:er....r. ... ,,.. a!"111111101,rsmi:,.,.. ,"'":"14Ik Y TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications ORGANIZATIONAL CHART z miAmiBEACH CONTRACT MANAGER /SINGLE POINTOF-CONTACT • John Abbott,P.G. 1 CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT '` ( PERMITTING LEAD LEAD LEAD Jill King • - John Abbott,P.G. Victor Neugebauer TREE MANAGEMENT COASTA GIS ENGINEERING LEAD Chris Miller,RLA,LEED AP Coriann Salas,P.E. Kenneth Wenning 1 NEPA COMPLIANCE . emu Barry Ehrlich J/ Page 35 I KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG ' ���� FLoRIDASBit LOCAL FIRM --- _>� �3 p / , John Abbott P .G. 4 . MEM = = � ; ' c . �� Mr. Abbott is the Director of the Environmental Sciences and Water Resources Planning Division at Keith and Schnars. In this capacity, he oversees all environmental projects in the firm, including environmental permitting, wetland mitigation and design, contamination i` '° ' assessment,and threatened and endangered species management projects. He has served as , project manager or technical lead on over 30 multi-million dollar environmental restoration •, I, projects. Academic Relevant Experience Background Phase 1 and II Environmental Site Assessments, FL: Project Manager and technical M.S., Geology, New Mexico lead-Mr.Abbott has supervised Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments for over 300 Tech, 1995 parcels in south Florida, ranging from small residential lots to complex industrial sites and large agricultural tracts. Mr.Abbott supervises drilling,well installation,soil and groundwater B.S., Geology, Virginia Tech, sampling, database searches, and report preparation. Clients:Various. (2004 to 2014) 1992 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Lead Environmental Professional Scientist- Mr.Abbott conducts groundwater compliance monitoring in one of the Broward Registrations County public wellfields. Mr. Abbott collects samples from monitoring wells quarterly. Registered Professional Analytes include VOAs, VOHs, FLPRO, and lead. Client/Contact: Berger Commercial Geologist, FL PG#2401 Realty/Cindy Rios, Phone: (954) 358-0900, email: CRios @bergercommercial.com. (2007 to 2014) FDEP Certified Stormwater Management Inspector Contamination Assessment of Abandoned Tree Farm, Hialeah FL: Project #25672 Manager and technical lead - Mr. Abbott assessed arsenic in soil at a I I4-acre abandoned tree farm and former cattle ranch. Mr. Abbott collected approximately 75 composite and Florida Fish and Wildlife depth-discrete soil samples and analyzed them for total arsenic and arsenic by SPLP. To Conservation Commission streamline the sampling effort, Mr. Abbott used XRF (x-ray fluorescence) in the field to Authorized Gopher delineate hot spots. This approach was key to meeting the project schedule, to minimizing Tortoise Agent laboratory costs, and accurately delineating hot spots. Mr. Abbott also conducted an (GTA-09-00267B) assessment of whether the arsenic in the soil was anthropogenic or naturally-occurring. Mr. Abbott also conducted soil gas sampling for methane, and groundwater sampling for ammonia. Client/Contact: Bilzin Sumburg Baena Price & Axelrod, LLP/Howard Nelson, Phone: 305-350-2386, email: hnelson @bilzin.com. (2/14 to Present) Contamination Assessment of Cattle Ranch and Abandoned Quarry, Miami Lakes FL: Project Manager and technical lead - Mr.Abbott assessed arsenic in soil at a 145 acre cattle ranch and abandoned quarry. Mr. Abbott collected soil samples for arsenic. To streamline the sampling effort and minimize laboratory costs, Mr. Abbott collected both composite and depth-discrete soil samples. This project area was an active cattle ranch; Mr. Abbott worked with the cattle rancher to ensure protection of the cattle during sampling activities. Client/Contact: Bilzin Sumburg Baena Price & Axelrod, LLP/Cristina Lumpkin, Phone: (305) 350-7241, email: CLumpkin @bilzin.com. (3/14 to 5/14) Chlorinated Solvent Plume at a Dry Cleaning Facility,Sunrise,FL: Project Manager and technical lead - Mr.Abbott directed a Site Assessment Report(SAR)for a groundwater plume at a dry cleaning facility. Mr.Abbott developed the sampling plan, provided oversight of the well installation, developed a Natural Attenuation Monitoring (NAM) Plan, and conducted quarterly groundwater sampling. Client: One Price Drycleaning. (2004 to 2012) Petroleum Plume from an Underground Storage Tank, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Project Manager and technical lead-Mr.Abbott directed a Site Assessment Report(SAR)for a petroleum groundwater plume. Mr. Abbott developed a Natural Attenuation Monitoring (NAM) Plan and conducted quarterly groundwater sampling. Client Wool Plumbing. (2007) .KEITH and SCHI ARS,P.A. Page 36 FLOR DAS$l LOCAL FIRM = � ! -. RFC)2014-346-YG • John Abbott, P.G. Environmental Assessment and Cleanup Feasibility Studies of Superfund Sites, Savannah River Site, SC: Technical lead and/or project manager responsible for the characterization, risk assessment, and remediation of over 30 disposal pits and hazardous debris piles at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina. Sites ranged in complexity from small debris piles to the largest environmental problems in the State. Mr.Abbott determined the nature and extent of contamination. This included identifying data needs,preparing sampling and analysis plans,interpreting the analytical and geotechnical data, and supporting contaminant migration modeling and risk assessments. Mr. Abbott also led teams of biologists conducting wildlife surveys, biological sampling, and ecological risk assessments. Mr. Abbott was also responsible for managing data uncertainties, identifying and screening remedial technologies, and developing the preferred remedial action,and ensuring that the Feasibility Studies were acceptable to the Department of Energy,the State of South Carolina, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the public. Client: Westinghouse Savannah River Company. (1996 to 2005) Seawall Stabilization at Bicentennial Park, Miami, FL: Environmental permitting of this design/build project. Project consisted of repairing a 1,447 ft seawall in Biscayne Bay. Mr.Abbott prepared the permit applications (Miami-Dade County RER, SFWMD, and USACE). The project was complicated by the discovery of delicate corals near the seawall, which required an alternate construction method to avoid the corals. Owner: City of Miami. Client/Contact: Ebsary Foundation Co./Matt Shiring, Phone: (305) 325-0530, email: matt @ebsaryfoundationco.com. (1/13 to 5/13) Dune Restoration for Beach Renourishment, Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, FL: Conducted suveys for piping plovers and other shorebirds on a 5-mile stretch of beach in Broward County. Also conducted a dune vegetation inventory and conducted dune restoration, including planting sea oats. Also assisted with preparing parts of the Environmental Protection Plan. Client/Contact: Eastman Aggregate Enterprises LLC/Bernie Eastman, Phone: (561) 969-7147, email: buydirt2 @gmail.com. (10/13 to 3/14) Benthic Surveys for Three Boat Ramps in the Keys, Monroe County, FL: To support enviornmetnal permitting of needed repairs and improvements, Mr. Abbott conducted a benthic survey at three different boat ramps: Harris Park on Key Largo, SR 4A boat ramp on Little Torch Key, and Gulfstream Park on Big Coppitt Key. Client: Monroe County (9/14 to 10/14) Arch Creek Pedestrian Bridges, City of North Miami, FL: Lead Environmental Scientist - Keith and Schnars designed two single span shared use bridges along the Arch Creek Bicycle Path connecting NE I35th Street and the FIU Biscayne Bay Campus. Mr. Abbott directed the environmental services which included an ecological field inspection to document the presence of wetlands and any listed species located on the site and processing permit applications through the SFWMD, the USACE, and Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Management. Mangroves along the creek banks that would be impacted by construction activities were located and measured to determine the replacement canopy required by DERM. Client: City of North Miami. (2009 to 20 I I) Coastal Barrier Resources Act Policy Analysis, Monroe County, FL: Environmental planner for analysis of Coastal Barrier Resources Act policies in Monroe County. Monroe County had a policy debate and litigation over their comprehensive plan policies and their land development regulations related to the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. Mr. Abbott analyzed lands within each coastal barrier resources unit in the Keys,identified how these areas could be protected from further development, and made recommendations for changes to the land development code. Client/Contact: Monroe County/Christine Hurley,Phone:(305)289-2500,email:Hurley-Christine @MonroeCounty-FL.gov.(2/13 to 5/13) Coral Creek Bridge Replacement and Trail, Charlotte County, FL: Environmental Scientist- Keith and Schnars designed a 438-foot, I 2-span cast-in-place concrete deck bridge to replace the existing obsolete and deteriorated two-lane bridge. The bridge and roadway were located in an environmentally sensitive area and the alignment was coordinated with a public park, mangrove wetlands, seagrasses, a historical structure, and Indian mounds that were located in the project area. Mr.Abbott provided oversight of permitting coordination of a multi-use trail that converted an abandoned railroad right-of-way to a multi-use trail. Client: Charlotte County. (2007 to 2008) Page 37 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 20 4-346-YG FLORIDAS aft LOCAL FIRM 4 John Abbot, P.G. Monroe County Comprehensive Plan and LDRs, Monroe County, FL: Environmental Scientist for updating the Comprehensive Plan for the Florida Keys and the mainland part of Monroe County. Updated the Coastal Management element, the Conservation element, and the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge element. This included analyses of soils, water quality, floodplains, seagrasses, coral reefs, wetlands, beaches, upland vegetation, protected species, air quality,water uses, hazardous wastes, areas of particular concern, effects of future land use on natural resources, natural disaster planning,climate change and conservation of energy. Also updated the associated Land Development Regulations. Client/Contact: Monroe County/Christine Hurley, Phone: (305) 289-2500, email: Hurley-Christine @MonroeCounty-FL. gov. (1/10 to 2014) Grant Application for Keegan Clair Park Public Boat Dock, Indian Rocks Beach, FL: Grant application writer for a FFWCC Florida Boating Improvement Program Grant Application for Boating Access Facilities for a proposed public dock at the Keegan Clair Park. Located on the Intracoastal Waterway, the site contained a shoreline of mangroves, sea grapes, and oysters. Using a 400-ft long dock that paralleled the shoreline but extended into the Intracoastal Waterway, Keith and Schnars met the desired boat capacity,water depths, Intracoastal Waterway setback requirements,and avoided the mangroves, thus minimizing environmental impacts and streamlining the permitting process. As part of the grant application, Keith and Schnars provided a project description and justification, conceptual design, cost estimate for permitting and construction, and environmental assessment. Client: City of Indian Rocks Beach. (4/08 to 5/08) Climate Change Assessment, Fort Lauderdale and Davie, FL: Environmental Scientist for an assessment of potential effects of climate change on environmental conditions at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport and the North Perry Airport. The report evaluated potential effects of sea level rise on wetlands,water quality,flooding, storage tanks, contaminated sites, and salinity in irrigation wells. Mr. Abbott also evaluated potential changes in the number of bird strikes by aircraft. Client/Contact: Broward County Aviation Department/Mike Pacitto, Phone: (954) 359-6103, email: MPPacitto @broward.org. (9/1 I to 2012) South Miami-Dade Watershed Study and Plan, Miami-Dade County, FL: Environmental Scientist and Deputy Project Manager for the South Miami-Dade Watershed Study and Plan. This project was a $3 million scientifically-based planning effort that provides the framework for making land use decisions for 371 square miles over the next 50 years. Mr. Abbott was responsible for assessing the effect of projected increases in population growth on natural communities, including wetlands and remnant natural forests and assessing the impacts on Biscayne Bay. The project won the 2007 Award of Excellence from the Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association. Client: South Florida Regional Planning Council/Bob Daniels, Phone: (954) 924-6805, email: bdaniels @ci.dania-beach.fl.us. (6/04 to 4/07) Sustainability Training, Broward County, FL: Project Manager and technical lead - Developed and presented educational seminars on sustainable growth to policy makers and leaders of the Seminole Tribe. Topics focused on how land use affects stormwater, water quality, and wetlands. Client/Contact: Seminole Tribe of Florida/Cherise Maples, Phone: (954) 962-8727, email: CMaples @semtribe.com. (2010) Burrowing Owl Relocation, North Dade Optimists Club Park,Miami Gardens, FL: Lead environmental scientist. Mr. Abbott conducted surveys, marked burrows to prevent accidental damage during construction, prepared a FWC relocation permit application, and constructed starter burrows. Client/Contact: City of Miami GardensNernita. Nelson, Phone: (305) 652-1732, email: vnelson @miamigardens-fl.gov. asmithl@miamigardens-fl.gov. (1/14 to 2/14) ICEM1 and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 38 FLORIDAS 5/k,LOCAL FIRM {� y _4 R REED 201 4-346,-YG 1 V. T. .- , _____.lfr-4:..-.:14,..,„ .i....._ ,. .., • - - ' ''':'''' OH E' Lw . :,_._,,, , ___) 1 - .sia - .:. -," - ?. - ., - ,, N , , ,N,, Y;3 Ms. King is an Environmental Scientist at Keith and Schnars. Prior to joining Keith and I s ,z - 0 Schnars, she worked for FDEP for I 0 years where she reviewed the environmental resource F '" and wetland impact permit applications that were submitted through the FDEP West .i ,�-._, y-_ Palm Beach office. Through her years with FDEP, Ms. King has a vast knowledge of the �, ..-:„-: g Y g g v+ �' various regulatory rules and statutes, has conducted numerous wetland assessments, and r i l l 1,1 ;,' '"~% .... ,; has reviewed countless mitigation proposals and plans. Prior to her work at FDEP, Ms. - ,,,/ King worked for three years with the Southeast Environment Research Center as a field Academic technician in the macrophyte and periphyton group on the phosphorus dosing project within Background Everglades National Park and the Loxahatchee Wildlife Refuge. M.S., Environmental Relevant Experience Sciences, Florida International University, Environmental Permitting for Seawall Stabilization at Port of Miami, Miami, FL: 2002 Project manager for 4 different seawall sections (4 separate permit applications) for the repair of the Port's seawall. The projects consisted of repairing approximately 8,000 linear B.S., Environmental ft seawall in Government Cut/Biscayne Bay. The project included dredging directly adjacent Studies, Florida State to the seawall and filling of surface waters to create a uniform line along the Port's shoreline. University, 1999 The project was complicated by the discovery of delicate corals attached to many sections Professional Training of the seawall,which required the Department to help the applicant seek alternate locations to relocate the corals. Client/Contact Miami-Dade County Port of Miami/FDEP/Timothy FDEP Wetland Delineation Rach, Phone: (850) 245-8015. (10/03 to 6/13) Training Environmental Permitting for Force Main under Biscayne Bay, FL: Project FDEP UMAM Training manager for the permit application to replace a 54-inch sanitary sewage force main pipeline via micro-tunneling under the Government Cut in Biscayne Bay. Ms. King reviewed and expedited the permit application as the existing pipeline had numerous sections close to failing. The project entailed the review of coral impacts associated with an in-water cofferdam for the project. Coordinated with other review agencies to determine the appropriate mitigation methodology and plan to be utilized to offset unavoidable impacts.Client/Contact: Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Dept./ FDEP/Timothy Rach, Phone: (850) 245-8015. (10/03 to 6/13) Environmental Permitting for Grove Harbor Marina, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project manager for the permit application/reconstruction of a phased marina project. The project entailed the construction of I 2,292-sq. ft. of additional structures and a total of 29 defined slips. The proposed structures and mooring areas were located within seagrass habitat. Ms. King provided oversight of permitting coordination with the other county and federal agencies to determine a suitable mitigation project for the unavoidable seagrass impacts. Client/Contact: FDEP/Timothy Rach, Phone: (850) 245-8015. (10/03 to 6/13) Wetland Compliance Monitoring at Everglades Restoration Area, Weston, FL: Environmental Scientist— Ms. King conducts quarterly vegetation compliance monitoring of • a 42-acre wetland mitigation area.This includes wetland flora and fauna sampling within the freshwater marsh and tree island communities. The field data is then collected and compiled in a quarterly monitoring report submitted to Broward County for review. Ms. King is also responsible to construct, maintain, and repair established monitoring quadrats throughout the field site. Client/Contact: Broward County Engineering Division/Charlie Quandt,Phone: (954) 577-4604, email: CQUANDT @broward.org. (2013 to Present) Page 39 ,. y;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. 1 U 'f __ _-- - ----------._-,- -✓,' FLORIDAS&LrOCALFIRM Jill King Environmental Restoration at Fullerton Island, Jupiter, FL: Project manager for the Environmental permitting of this design project. Project consisted of the creation of 4.64 acres of seagrass habitat, creation of 0.54 acres of mangrove habitat,construction of public docks to create access to island,and the dredging of a channel to create access to the island. Ms. King reviewed the permit application and made recommendations to avoid impacts to existing seagrass habitat. Client/ Contact: Palm Beach County, FDOT, and FIND/FDEP/Timothy Rach, Phone: (850) 245-8015. (10/03 to 6/13) Environmental Restoration at Lake Wyman Park and Rutherford Park, Boca Raton, FL: Project manager for the Environmental permitting of this design project. Project consisted of the creation of approximately 4 acres of seagrass habitat, creation of approximately 5 acres of mangrove and oyster habitat, construction of public docks and boardwalks, and the dredging of a basin. Ms. King reviewed the permit application and conducted a UMAM assessment for seagrass impacts associated with the project. Reviewed and provided comment on the mitigation and monitoring plan. Client/ Contact: Palm Beach County, FDOT, and FIND/FDEP/Timothy Rach, Phone: (850) 245-8015. (10/03 to 6/13) Wetland Assessments and Delineations, FL: Ms. King conducted mitigation assessments using the Unified Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). She conducted site inspections and biological assessments (including marine and estuarine communities, and freshwater wetlands). Mr. King was a panelist of the UMAM Discussion at the South Florida Environmental Professionals Annual Conference in 2011, and was a presenter at the Administration and Enforcement of the Wetlands conference in 2008. Client/Contact: FDEP/Timothy Rach, (850) 245-8015. (10/03 to 6/13) Dune Restoration for Beach Renourishment, Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, FL: Conducted surveys for piping plovers and other shorebirds on a 5-mile stretch of beach in Broward County. Assisted with preparing parts of the Environmental Protection Plan and preparing an assessment of dune vegetation impacts. Also conducted dune vegetation restoration at completion of project. Client/Contact: Eastman Aggregate Enterprises LLC, Phone: (56 I) 969-7147. (10/13 to Present) Benthic Survey and Coral Rescue for Anglers Club Breakwater, Key Largo, FL: Biologist that planned and conducted a benthic survey on a 'A mile long in-water riprap breakwater. Prepared a benthic survey report documenting the presence of all coral and seagrass species within the project footprint. Coordinated with FKNMS on permitting and mitigation. Relocated corals prior to construction. Client/Contact: Dan Moss P.E., (561) 662-0819. (10/13 to Present) Burrowing Owl Relocation, North Dade Optimists Club Park, Miami Gardens, FL: Biologist that conducted surveys, marked burrows to prevent accidental damage during construction, assisted with FWC relocation permit application, and constructed starter burrows. Client/Contact: City of Miami Gardens/Anthony Smith, Phone: (305) 622-8000, email: asmithl@miamigardens-fl.gov. (1/14 to 2/14) Manatee Research, Crystal River, FL: For her master's thesis, Ms. King assessed manatee behavior as affected by human interactions in the Crystal River. The project included two field seasons of data collection. She coordinated closely with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, local fisherman, the local diving community, and the general public to evaluate the implications of human interactions with this endangered species. The project included developing strategies to effectively allow human interactions to continue with this endangered species without compromising its protection. This study was one of the first to investigate specifically human implications on manatee behavior and was published in the journal Biological Conservation. Client/Contact: Florida State University (2000 to 2002) Development Feasibility Study of 193-acres of vacant land near Hialeah, Miami-Dade County, FL: Environmental Scientist - Conducted a threatened and endangered species survey, conducted a wetlands permitting feasibility assessment, and assisted with Phase I ESAs. Development of the land was complicated by large tracts of wetlands,two known archaeological sites,and numerous landowners including State-owned lands. Client/Contact: RMGA / Bob Gorlow, Phone: (305) 556-4739, email: rgorlow @comcast.net. (2/14 to Present) Wetland Permitting for Waste Management Roadway, Medley, FL: Environmental Scientist - Delineated wetlands and prepared a Class IV permit application for Miami-Dade County RER for wetland impacts for a new roadway and stormwater retention area. Client/Contact:Waste Management Inc.of Florida/Luke DeBock, Phone: (954)984-2029, email: Idebock @wm.com. (8/14 to 10/14) KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 40 FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM ,"s m RFQ 2014 346 YG ` \ E ,. ,. , - '----4' ‘i Vi oeoQU\f J -` 1,� Mr. Neugebauer is an environmental scientist with 20 years of experience in environmental ,,yam A permitting,habitat assessments,and ecological assessments. As a former employee of the Florida `4 '' r' r �\ 4; Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation • }` Commission FFWCC , Mr. Neugebauer uses his experience and relationships at the regulatory .-� ( ) g P P agencies to expedite environmental permitting. Relevant Experience Academic Dune Restoration for Beach Renourishment,Lauderdale-by-the-Sea,FL: Conducted Background y suveys for piping plovers and other shorebirds on a 5-mile stretch of beach in Broward County. B.S.,Zoology, University of Assisted with vegetation analyses of dune impacts. Client/Contact Eastman Aggregate Enterprises South Florida, 1986 LLC/Bernie Eastman, Phone: (56 I)969-7147,email:buydirt2 @gmail.com. (10/13 to 3/14) A.A., Biology, Central Coral Rescue for Anglers Club Breakwater, Key Largo, FL: Conducted a coral survey Florida Community College, on a 1/4 mile long breakwater,then relocated corals prior to construction. Client/Contact Dan 1983 Moss P.E (10/13 to 2/14) Professional Boot Key Harbor Marina, Marathon, FL:Assisted with a feasibility study for dredging two Certifications accesses channels to Boot Key Harbor. Conducted underwater habitat assessment, led dive Wetland Delineation safety operations,and assessed potential impacts to mangroves. Assisted with mitigation options. Certification Client City of Marathon. (2003) FDEP Qualified Stormwater Seagrass Survey for Sombrero Beach Swim Buoy Installation, Marathon, FL: Management Inspector Conducted seagrass survey for a proposed swim buoy line. Client City of Marathon (2004) #3449 Hurricane Coastal Damage Assessment,FL: After hurricane Opal in 1995 and hurricane FDOF:S-1305490 Irene in 1999 Mr.Neugebauer provided hurricane relief assistance through coastal environmental Wildland Fire Fighter damage assessment and obtaining public needs information as a disaster relief representative for FEMA and FDCA. Provided permitting and inspection assistance to the FDEP Bureau of Beaches PAD!Divemaster and Coastal Systems.Client FDEP. (1995, 1999) Decompartmentalization and Sheetflow Enhancement of WCA-3 Hydrologic Field Test, Miami-Dade County, FL: Environmental monitor - The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)is degrading 4000 feet of the L-67C levee and constructing culverts through the L-67A levee. For the contractor, Mr. Neugebauer conducted daily turbidity monitoring and wildlife monitoring. Client/Contact LDH, Inc./Hector Sevilla, Phone: (305)835-8964,email: hsevillall@aol.com. (1/13 to 1 1/13) Lake Okeechobee Herbert Hoover Dike Rehabilitation Protected Species Management, Palm Beach County, FL: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is performing a major rehabilitation of the Herbert Hoover Dike around Lake Okeechobee. Mr. Neugebauer conducted biological monitoring for protected species including Okeechobee gourds, bald eagles, and other species. Client/Contact GFA International under contract with Treviicos South/Tom Ortner, Phone: (561) 347-0070, email: tortner @teamgfa.com. (4/10 to 6/10,5/12 to 6/12) Kissimmee River Restoration, S-65EX1 Spillway, Protected Species Management, Okeechobee County, FL: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is constructing a new spillway on the Kissimmee River. For the contractor,Cajun Constructors,Mr.Neugebauer conducts biological monitoring for protected species. Client/Contact GFA International under contract with Cajun Constructors/Tony Macaluso, Phone: (772) 924-3575, email: tmacaluso@ teamgfa.com. (2013) _ �. —--—— Page 41 I, j KErrn and SCHNARS,RA. t 6° '-.. -._2_ -__ _,, FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM Victor Neugebauer Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Biologist: At the Sunrise Field Office, Mr. Neugebauer served as a biologist. He participated in three prescribed burns in the Frances S.Taylor Wildlife Management Area. Assisted in exotic vegetation control and native revegetation efforts on tree islands in the Everglades. Participated in annual aerial deer surveys. Assisted in bird identification at Stormwater Treatment Areas while monitoring duck hunting check stations. Assisted with exotic removal of purple swamp hen in Stormwater Treatment Areas and Wildlife Management Areas. Client: FWC. (2009) Wetland Mitigation at Everglades Restoration Area (ERA), Weston FL: Assisted with construction compliance of a 42-acre wetland'mitigation area, and assisted with setting transects and collection of field data for the time zero baseline report. Site included a mosaic of emergent wetlands, tree islands, open water habitat, and a perimeter berm. Client/Contact: Broward County Engineering Division/Charlie Quandt, Phone: (954) 577-4604, email: CQUANDT @broward.org. (9/03 to 8/06,9/12-2013) St. Lucie River Habitat Mapping, St. Lucie County, FL: Biologist assisted in habitat mapping of the St. Lucie River and adjacent floodplain habitats (approximately 850-acres). Data used in development of a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study and Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) to evaluate a major new bridge over the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. Conducted surveys for gopher tortoise and Florida scrub jays. Client/Contact City of Port St. Lucie/Patricia Roebling, Phone: (772) 871-5177,email: PatR @cityofpsl.com. (9/03 to 8/06) Coral Creek Bridge Replacement Permitting, Placida, FL: This bridge replacement project was located in an environmentally sensitive area with a public park,mangrove wetlands,seagrasses,a historical structure,and Indian mounds. Mr. Neugebauer was responsible for ensuring completeness of the permit applications and addressing RAIs in order to secure a bridge permit from the USCG and an ERP from the SWFWMD. Client Charlotte County. (9/03 to 8/06) Burrowing Owl Survey at Palm Beach International Airport, Palm Beach County, FL: Mr. Neugebauer assisted with a burrowing owl survey at Palm Beach International Airport. Client: Community Asphalt. (7/12) Vegetation Compliance Monitoring at Winston Park Mitigation Site,Coconut Creek,FL: Assisted with vegetation compliance monitoring at a 6-acre wetland restoration/mitigation site. Client School Board of Broward County.(9/03 to 8/06) Vegetation Compliance Monitoring at Local Area of Potential Concern#28,Coconut Creek,FL: Assisted with vegetation compliance monitoring at a 32-acre parcel located north of Tradewinds Park. Client Broward County Engineering Division. (9/03 to 8/06) Habitat Mapping for Crosstown Parkway, Port St. Lucie, FL: For a corridor study to widen West Virginia Drive (now Crosstown Parkway) between 1-95 and Floresta Drive, Mr. Neugebauer assisted with assessing mapping natural habitats and protected species on every vacant parcel within the proposed right-of-way. Mapping included numerous gopher tortoise burrows. K&S Client City of Port St. Lucie. Client/Contact City of Port St. Lucie/Patricia Roebling, Phone: (772) 871-5177, email: PatR @cityofpsl.com. (9/03 to 5/04) Hurricane Debris Inspections, FL: Mr. Neugebauer provided over 400 hours of debris inspection services after hurricane Ivan in 2004 and over 1000 hours after hurricane Wilma in 2005. Mr. Neugebauer coordinated field teams,provided inspection services of vegetation and construction & demolition debris, filled out FEMA forms, and provided inspections of sidewalk and sod repair. Mr. Neugebauer helped coordinate the assignment of debris monitors and evaluated the performance of debris collection contractors. Mr. Neugebauer served as an inspector in charge of storm debris assessment in Santa Rosa, Okaloosa and Walton Counties after Hurricane Ivan in 2004. Mr. Neugebauer's duties included training staff in classification and quantification of storm debris and participating in interagency meetings with FEMA and local governmental agencies.Client/ Contact:Various. (2004 to 2006) KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 42 J FLORID& I,LOCAL FIRM g°'�� r $� RFQ 2014-346-YG { 1 ''Pty' c 4. i ki@D �D _)co� ©er o c , , Ms. Salas has worked in the area of structural engineering and management since 2001. She { ,: , ` ` has served in roles such as Engineer of Record Responsible-in-Charge, Pro ect Mana er and \ �: i t g 1 g -. Lead Engineer for various types of projects including urban and rural bridges, limited access ., bridges, miscellaneous structures including marine walls and rehabilitation projects for State t' and Local government entities as well as private clients. - , ._:.,.., i,,,,,,-)./i.....,-,:- s,- =° Relevant Experience Academic Rickenbacker East Fishing Pier Repairs, Miami-Dade County, FL: Post Design Background engineer for the analysis of the existing pier cap for the construction loads during repair B.S., Civil Engineering, work. Performed analysis of pier structures based on construction conditions during University of Central repairs that deviated for the plans and evaluated severly corroded steel beams for structural Florida, 2001 adequacy.Client/Contact:Miami-Dade County Public Works Department/Marcos Redondo, P.E., Phone: (305) 375-3848. (1/09 to 3/12) Professional Island House Bridge Inspection and Repair Recommendations, Hillsboro Registration Beach, FL: Project manager for the bridge inspection and repair recommendations and Registered Professional prioritization for the bridge leading to the Island House Condo community in the Town of Engineer, FL#64779 Hillsboro Beach. Client/Contact: Town of Hillsboro Beach/Jean-Marie Mark, Phone: (954) 427-401 I. (5/I I to I I/I I) Professional Affiliations Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT), Monroe County, FL: Structurally American Society of Civil assessed the 23 historic FDEP-owned old US-I bridges, on behalf of the FDOT, for the Engineers proposed FKOHT Trail for suitability for multi-trail use. Field inspections were performed and recommendations for repair and/or removal were prioritized and an emergency removal American Institute of Steel plan was detailed for bridges that were in danger of imminent failure. Client/Contact FDOT Construction District 6/Aileen Boucle,AICP, Phone: (305)470-5201. (10/13 to 2/14) Women in Transportation Flynn Dock, Hillsboro Beach, FL: Design Engineer of a private wooden dock on the Seminar intercoastal waterway. The structure was comprised of prestressed square concrete piles on pressure-treated wood. Project duties included project layout and the spacing of the piles, Professional Civic the evaluation and distribution of loads to the joists and beams, calculating pile loads and Involvement sizing pressure-treated timber beams and joists. Client/Contact: B.K. Marine Construction/ City of Deer field Beach Glen Bryant, Phone: (954)-421-2321. (6/05 to 8/07) Safe Structures Board El Rio Canal Shared Use Pathway-Yamato Road to LWDD L-40 Canal, Boca Member Raton, FL: Structural engineer of record for the preparation of substructure design plans and specifications for a 60-foot pre-manufactured steel truss pedestrian bridge over the LWDD L-40 Canal and a I 6'x 16' pressure-treated wood fishing pier for recreational use. This project was a FDOT D4/City of Boca Raton LAP Project. Client/Contact: City of Boca Raton/Tony Puerta, Phone: 561-416-3402. (5/07 to 1/09) Crosstown Parkway Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Port St Lucie, FL: Developed the feasibility and construction impacts for several bridge alternative alignments for the crossing of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. The EIS considered top-down construction, tunnel construction, and suspension and cable-stayed bridges due to the environmentally-sensitive project site and the involvement of federal funds. Client/Contact City of Port St. Lucie/Patricia Roebling, P.E., Phone: (772) 871-5177. (12/08 to 2/14) 1-95 Pedestrian Overpass, Miami-Dade County, FL: Design Engineer for the replacement of an existing pedestrian truss. The feasibility of rehabilitating the existing structure to meet the current code requirements was studied,including the effects harmonic motion.The final design resulted in the replacement of the 214-ft long truss over a congested I2-lane interstate highway. The new truss is a 230-ft long signature hollow structural steel (HSS) truss near the northern entrance to Miami-Dade County. The design method used was LFD. Client/Contact: FDOT District 6/Jason Chang, P.E., Phone: (305)470-5331. (11/03 to 5/04) Page 43 ,_ i;KEITH and SCHNARS,EA. a L — — -_, 1 FLORIDAS jI$;IOC AL FIRM '- Kenneth Wenning f „ 40Ps' s 2f <: Mr. Wenning has a broad range of interdisciplinary experience gained from his work with ior, 7 a developers, consultants and governmental agencies in the fields of planning, environmental, '' ,-f.�-. 'r landscaping, permitting, development approval, project management, and site/master plan ), - - - design. Mr.Wenning's full range of experience includes,rezoning,land use plan amendments, 111Ii1, ∎., ,` - a environmental site assessments(ESA's),endangered&threatened species surveys/relocations, - f + monitoring, and mitigation. He also has extensive experience in project coordination� . E� 1 l. ii!! __,.r. . administration of development review process, computer aided design (CAD), geographic Academic information systems (GIS), due diligence, and marine surveying/mapping/photography. Background Relevant Experience B.A., Urban and Regional Planning& Development, Monroe County Comprehensive Plan updates, Monroe County, FL: Mr. Ball State University, 2005 Wenning assisted with the statutorily required amendments to the comprehensive plan and land development codes. Numerous text amendments were needed in both documents Minor, Geography, Ball to facilitate future growth within unincorporated areas within the Florida Keys. Mr. State University, 2005 Wenning also drafted conservation regulations and low impact development standards for the landscaping section. Client/Contact: Monroe County/Mayte Santamaria, Phone: (305) Minor, Natural Resources, 289-2500. Ball State University, 2005 Comprehensive Plan, Monroe County, FL: Mr. Wenning prepared and assembled Professional numerous maps that were statutorily required for inclusion within the comprehensive plan: Certifications land use, soils, flood zone, terrestrial habitat, coastal high hazard, road system, roadway PADI Scuba functional classification, number of through lanes, roadway level of service, and potable water facilities. Client/Contact: Monroe County/Mayte Santamaria, Phone: (305) 289-2500. Action Plan, North Miami, FL: Mr. Wenning prepared implementation strategies and funding mechanisms to achieve goals outlined in the city's Master Plan. The goal of the Action Plan was to revitalize the downtown and its' major transportation corridors by providing the following: Streetscaping, landscaping,façade enhancements, multi-modal transportation options, civic complex, pedestrian connectivity, student housing, capital improvement projects, university incubators, and public outreach/advisory committee. Client/Contact: City of North Miami/Tanya Wilson-Sejour, Phone: (305) 895-9286. C-51 ICW Access Study,Various Municipalities, FL: Mr.Wenning prepared a map to indicate parcels which could benefit from the construction of a boat lift at the C-5 I control structure(S-155) located between West Palm Beach, and Lake Worth. Nearly 1,500 parcels could potentially gain boat access to the Atlantic Ocean, and municipalities would likely gain additional property taxes from the construction of personal boat docks. Client/Contact: James Anaston-Karas, Phone: (772) 341-0524. Ei i,KEITH and SCHNARS,EA. Page 44 FLORIDA'S 60;LOCAL FIRM _ — t' r ` ' REQ2(114-346-YG • Chris Miller/ RLA, ISA, LEES? AP - Aj r Mr. Miller is a highly qualified landscape architect with a keen interest in the Green Industry. His many years of experience include planning and design for commercial developments, n w•� t parks,municipal centers,streetscapes and FDOT roadway beautification projects. Mr. Miller ti currently holds I3 Green Industry Certifications. :y Relevant Experience Beach Streetscape Las Olas Boulevard Phase, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Landscape Academic Background Designer — This 0.50-mile improvements consisted of roadway realignment, hardscape B.LA.studies,Landscape treatments,ADA upgrades,landscaping,decorative lighting,signage and improved stormwater Architecture,University of Florida, 1993 to 1997 drainage for a tourist destination known around the world. Services provided: streetscape, roadway, planting, hardscape, irrigation, landscape, pedestrian and street lighting design,tree Vicenza,Italy Institute of relocation plans, bidding assistance, and construction management. Client/Contact: City of Architecture(European Study Fort Lauderdale/Hal Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. (2006 to 2008) program),University of Florida, 1997 Dune Restoration at Spanish River Park, Boca Raton, FL:A Beach Dune Restoration Professional Project for this popular destination required DEP permitting, invasive plant removal, native Registration beach dune plant restoration, contract specifications, bidding assistance and CEI services. Registered Landscape Client/Contact: City of Boca Raton/Jennifer Bistyga, Phone: (561) 416-3397. (2010 to 2013) Architect,FL#6666970 Professional Al A/Seabreeze Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL: This design for 0.4-miles of a Certifications new pedestrian-friendly roadway and sidewalk corridor along a boulevard parallel to Fort ISA Certified Arborist Lauderdale Beach including themed pavement treatments, landscape, and irrigation designs LEED Accredited Professional through details and construction documents. Client/Contact: City of Fort Lauderdale/Hal GREEN Advantage Certified Barnes, P.E., Phone: (954) 828-5065. (Present) Practitioner FNGLA Certified Horticultural Professional Tree Assessment, Coral Way, FL: Performed a tree risk assessment and analysis along FNGLA Certified Landscape historic Coral Way in Miami to make recommendations for the preservation of the historic Contractor trees along this scenic highway, in preparation for a roadway rehabilitation project. Client/ FIS Certified Irrigation Site Contact FDOT District 6/Kirk Hoosac, RLA, (305)470-5384, email: kirk.hoosac @dot.state. Manager fl.us. IA Certified Irrigation Contractor Municipal Beach Complex, Lantana, FL: Park master planning; programming, IA Certified Irrigation Designer IA Certified Golf Irrigation survey, design, citizens and park user's survey, public meetings; opinion of implementation Auditor cost, concepts, preliminary and final master plan. Client/Contact: Town of Lantana/Mike IA Certified Landscape Greenstein, Parks and Recreation Manager, Phone: (561) 540-5766. (2007) Irrigation Auditor LIAF Certified Landscape Big Cypress Wetland Enhancement Areas, Big Cypress Seminole Indian Inspector Reservation, FL: Assisted with monitoring of vegetation in wetland enhancement areas,to ICPI Certified document baseline conditions prior to hydrological improvements.Client/Contact:Seminole Florida Master Naturalist Tribe of Florida/Cherise Maples, Phone: (954) 962-8727, email: CMaples @semtribe.com. Professional Affiliations American Horticultural Society American Society of Landscape Architects Florida Irrigation Society Florida Native Plant Society Florida Nursery Growers and Landscape Association Florida Urban Forestry Council International Society of Arboriculture International Palm Society Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida The Irrigation Association US Green Building Council KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-3346-Y k v_ FLo[uenS alt,LOCAL FIRM r j Barry Ehrlich rT ,. Mr. Ehrlich has over 36 years of experience. He has a strong knowledge of the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Federal and State regulations and procedures. He has been involved in projects of every Class of Action as well as Re-evaluations and State Environmental Impact Reports (SEIR). a �e Relevant Experience Crosstown Parkway Extension, Port St. Lucie, FL: This project studies alternatives to Academic provide an additional crossing of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. This is an extremely Background sensitive and challenging project since it effects an Aquatic Preserve, Outstanding Florida B.S., Environmental Water, State owned Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL), Section 4(f) resources, Technology and Urban wetlands, wildlife and essential fish habitat, and numerous other sensitive environmental Systems, Florida features. As such, the Class of Action for this PD&E study is an Environmental Impact International University Statement(EIS) -the highest level of environmental documentation. (The study is currently Professional Training in progress through a LAP Agreement between the City of Port St. Lucie and FDOT District 4). Client/Contact: City of Port St. Lucie/Patricia Roebling, City Engineer, Phone: (772) Air/Noise/Water Quality 370-8213, email: PatR @cityofpsl.com. Assessment Port of Miami Tunnel, Miami-Dade County, FL: Internal Project Management and Environmental Impact Coordination for PD&E study to build a tunnel connecting Watson Island with the Port of Assessment Miami. Responsibilities included: preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (later reduced to EA/FONSI) and other documentation, public involvement, coordination with Aquatic Resources permit and review agencies, billing and client communication. Environmental Miami Avenue Bridge Replacement, Miami-Dade County, FL: Environmental Instrumentation Assessment for bridge replacement and approaches, including one-way-pair concepts. Fundamentals of Hydrology SR-AIA/Evans Crary Bridge, Martin County, FL: Environmental Document for major Professional improvements to bridge and approach roads. Publications US-1/Dupont Plaza Improvements for 1-95 Redesign, Miami-Dade County, FL: Chemical and Biological Environmental Assessment for connection of US-I to 1-95 in Downtown Miami. Analysis of the Lakes along Palmetto Expressway Opa-Locka Tri-Rail Station,Opa-Locka,FL: Preparation of Environmental Assessment (Funded by FDOT) to redevelop an historic railroad station for use as a Tri-rail Station. The project required extensive coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office. Succeeded in getting the Co-authored findings Environmental Assessment approved by the Federal Transit Administration in the first round of above research in of reviews. publication entitled "Aquatic Swale Theory" SW 2nd Avenue Improvements, Miami-Dade County, FL: Environmental Assessment for roadway and bridge improvements in downtown Miami. Redevelopment of Homestead Air Reserve Base, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Management for the Preservation and Enhancement Plan and Report. Development of a plan to preserve and maintain endangered species and critical habitat within the development area. Broward Urban Area Transportation Study, Broward County, FL: Large scale study to document the short- and long-term environmental impacts associated with the county-wide transportation improvements program. KEITH and SCHNARS,RA. Page 46 FLORIDAS&LOCAL FIRM TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications ,,,,,,,v,.., -.,.. , „, ..„r9?.,,"-,-l'''-'.."-I.".— ' -r---'-`-'11.-" —--:' - 7:I. : . .1‘.411464.4...... `e.. . i-!yl'r11 ?S �.y; /4 .� II* tam- .. , -w ;' I! '. * rar . — _* h'1,---.- jam- p . � �' `'' ,,.,,ky .4 f . l _tit v jx'^ I. - e,t rti' 3 k { colt -44 '��'%r-t . /� � ' mss. 'N , , � '' 1 /.• ,.1 Sr t 6 Al A BEACH REVETMENT ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND PERMIT COMPLIANCE Palm Beach County, FL Keith and Schnars played a key role in an FDOT project to reduce the threat of beach erosion along an approximately one- mile stretch of A I A in the City of Palm Beach.The project involved reinforcing the existing stone shoreline revetment with additional boulders and cap rock. Keith and Schnars was contracted to perform construction monitoring and environmental permit compliance during construction. Our biologists provided field oversight to ensure the construction did not inadvertently damage sea turtle nests along the beach and did not result in the loss of sea turtle nesting habitat. Biologists also provided guidance to avoid impacts to the sensitive dune ecosystem,inspected stormwater facilities to ensure they were functioning properly,and advised on mitigation and restoration for unavoidable impacts. Client: FDOT District 4 Start Date: June 2007 Completion Date:August 2007 Environmental Compliance Contract Amount: $52,500 Page 47 j� �j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG s , ;"` x; ,- FLORJDns 5i'LOCAL FIRM TAB 2: Experience & QuaIificaifs . . .. , ._ . . z. . z , . '-„,,-;.,„,.•,-,,---„,,,;,),..,,,,,..,. _-,,,, ,,,-: , *- _-, , _.,,,,,,,--, _,,,..,,,...„•,4 ,1,1-,,,,, , • i'' '4, IltN'ir N-*".'1 ," " ' s it- ::to t 4: fa'),'" ' >. P Otsr • g' 4y. •14'' Coral Rescue at Angler's Club Marina Breakwater Key Largo, FL The marina at Angler's Club in Key Largo is surrounded by a '/4-mile l = '_'"'' " long rip-rap breakwater. The breakwater needed repair,but contained .., prorcipml.. miticistmier-' J.Ask,301.,. several thousand coral colonies that required protection before construction could begin. Seagrass was also present in the vicinity. s,r A / 4e' 1 Keith and Schnars conducted a benthic survey to document the ■ :MARINA BASIN •... location,types,and amount of coral and seagrass. Keith and Schnars �� o -• . ., coordinated with the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary , ;//.,: \ ' (FKNMS) to develop a plan to avoid and minimize impacts. Despite .4 `�! 4-. / ,., avoidance and minimization efforts, some unavoidable impacts to . 10, were anticipated. Keith and Schnars worked with FKNMS to �t� ; obtain an emergency authorization for relocation of those corals that tip, 1 might be impacted by the construction. Keith and Schnars divers .r relocated coral colonies from the construction zone to an area onsite that would not be affected by construction. Client:Dan Moss,P.E. Start Date:October 2013 Completion Date:2014 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A.5 j Page 48 FLORID&5l p LOCAL FIRM '' :,��.. ::,.U� RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 2: _ , Experience & Qualifications r__ ...__ ................... „ -,..-„,,.._, , _ . - Pggi la t 1 fr '' t_ , (_ . a: ,`" # ` y ...e... , 7. ! u.w f: € $q f 2 t r fM'- , - 1t . r Y s ,y f 'o I I `',4•y+' .. r i " 4. '4? . •e ,: .+-s !y/ ,1 .'! '`� ' '-•ice.• <' � 1:71.. ,;. . .. :i 1 I' f planting day 3 months later 6 months later: 100% survival and substantial growth Broward Beach Renourishment Environmental Compliance Monitoring Broward County, FL The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers conducted a beach renourishment project on 5 miles of beach from Hillsboro Inlet to south of Lauderdale-by-the-Sea,Florida.The project involved placing 115,000 cubic yards of sand at a rate of approximately 2000 tons daily for 5 months.The project area contains sensitive dunes,is a sea turtle nesting beach,and is within wintering grounds for the threatened piping plover. Under contract with Eastman Aggregate Enterprises, Keith and Schnars provided shorebird surveys that focused on the threatened piping plover. Keith and Schnars also prepared an inventory of beach dune vegetation and prepared photo- documentation of dune vegetation prior to construction.We also wrote portions of the Environmental Protection Plan.At the end of construction,Keith and Schnars developed a dune restoration plan,and planted and maintained 1000 sea oats. Client: Eastman Aggregate Enterprises,LLC Start Date: October 2013 Completion Date:February 2014 Fee:$7,112,595 Page 49 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG :,`- ��_� FLORID&gig'LOCAL FIRM 1 TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications .,:- „,,.............. , .. .. .- • :.x . --,- 6Aaaft , ^ w II • / i r - '*;k V,,,,,'-"' a . I ' $ ^ ; . 1 t ! ? _ 1 F' A •,}}, >r-'-`.:e - 6E ., s_ 6A ,, , z ,, p t. .. �s 'yam `' ill . II ' . f', Ply 1L • ...,, ,,.. LA , a �r: Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study and EIS Port St. Lucie, FL The City of Port St. Lucie has identified an additional crossing of the North Fork St. Lucie River (NFSLR) as far back as their 1980 Comprehensive Plan. The City experienced fast-paced growth,and was ranked as one of the top five fastest growing cities in the nation by the U.S.Census Bureau for cities with populations over 100,000 since 2004,making the need for the bridge more urgent. Keith and Schnars was hired to perform the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this challenging project which requires extending the Crosstown Parkway(a 330'wide 6-lane parkway)through neighborhoods, a new 2500+ foot long bridge over the river,and a new connection to U.S. 1. The project is highly controversial because it traverses environmentally-sensitive wetlands, passes through a State Park, and crosses over an Aquatic Preserve and Outstanding Florida Waters. Because of the impacts to State-owned lands,a Section 4(f) evaluation was prepared as part of the EIS. Keith and Schnars transportation planners,scientists and engineers have been actively involved in developing the analyses and documentation necessary to complete the EIS. As part of this project,our team has developed a Corridor Report and an Alternatives Report, and numerous support documents including a Wetlands Evaluation Report, Endangered Species Biological Assessment,Location Hydraulics Report,Pond Siting Report,Noise Report,and Design Traffic Technical Memorandum. Additionally,Keith and Schnars engineers provided EIS support by evaluating crossing alternatives (bridges and tunnels), bridge span lengths, and various bridge construction methods for a 6-lane facility with 10' shoulders, 6' sidewalks,and a 22' vertical clearance over the main channel. In order to minimize environmental impacts,we evaluated "top down" bridge construction methods ranging from conventional equipment to specialized machinery. This required close coordination with contractors nationwide who are familiar with"Top Down" construction techniques in order to evaluate up-to-date industry capabilities and construction costs. In addition to the Kick-off,Scoping and Alternatives meetings,Public Hearing,and workshops,this study required an intensive public outreach effort, including development and coordination of a Citizens Advisory Committee, an Environmental Advisory Group, and monthly coordination meetings with the resource and regulatory agencies including the USACE, FHWA,FDOT,NMFS,USFWS,USEPA,FDEP,FWC,and the SFWMD. Client: City of Port St.Lucie Contact:Patricia Roebling, 121 SW Port St.Lucie Boulevard,Port St.Lucie,FL 34984 Phone:(772) 871-5177 Start Date:2007 Completion Date: 2013 Estimated Construction Cost:$125 million J;��j KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. Page 50 FioRiDns git LOCAL FIRM RFQ 2014-346-YG 1 1 TAB2: r' n Qualifications Exile �e ce & r t = , i , rte; „ty,:„..x------- t. . .,, ____,--___., ..„--- ,____. , __,....„:..._, I : Asir. __..., ..„,_-_-:-____...-- _ ,-#.170 1' /"fir i‘j, -1 r L ______________ , _. _ litt. __ _ -- ,..,_i _. _ _ _ . ad11111111111111•11111111111111—r— Ile It :,..::- r-- - , ,.. - ms`s_` East Rickenbacker Fishing Pier Miami-Dade County, FL Keith and Schnars was retained by Miami-Dade County Public Works Department to provide engineering and environmental services related to the rehabilitation of the East Fishing Pier.Engineers gathered baseline information and inspection reports then inspected the pier to determine the extent of the required repairs.Structural engineers developed construction plans, a project cost estimate and specifications for the rehabilitation work.The Environmental Section supported the engineering team in obtaining the required permits.During the construction phase,Keith and Schnars provided support in the bidding process,reviewed project shop drawings and responded to RFIs from the contractor. This environmentally sensitive area is identified as a critical habitat for Johnson's seagrasss (Halophilia johnsonii) and is within a designated Manatee Protection zone.Although the repair work was above the water surface, permits and authorizations were required from and processed through DERM,USACE,FDEP and SFWMD. Client: Miami-Dade County Public Works Department Address: I II NW I st Street,Miami,FL 33128 Start Date: January 2009 Completion Date: November 2009 (design services);Construction:201 I Fee: $299,878 (includes post design services) Page 51 1;KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG J� J FLORIDAS jjitLOCAL FIRM rl 4 e x t * , .17 qy _ • • • � 4 2.3 Financial iry7., • • G�. h: m TAB 2: Experience & Qualifications ,,,. K&S has requested that Dun & Bradstreet submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact: Yusbel Ganzalez Department of Procurement City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 (305) 673-7000 ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalex @miamibeachfl.gov x .. „,,,,,--1,i 41 ` P � =tZ i 1^ - r _< —,t1^; - w _ v R tii ' N :. , ,-1------...--,,- --,----t. , , 4;- ",", , ..., - , ci , , . . . r ' . ' - . , . _ ,. - : ...— ....., . __ —_•4‘1 .:::::,,,,,_\,,,,,, S 1' j:‘,-' --,:v..,,,,, =, , ,s ,. „I, , , . _ 4 r " V \a . . ,. .„-,/ ".-'7"::;`t',' it ,.. 4 / c ?�j _ �.] — ,C- _ y r r..- e ` IP* ,'/ ' / ft"/ i'{i r , ,,,,.:-.v._, . ''N , , ,, it i IT 4. .,, \ ,„,,,:, . ` ! % / y r,, '`•- \ •— -• ',",;•7,',. iii • \ 1 , , �. ,,i•'iPt,� , t 1,j+' N:.:.•,,\,,, % �' 7 i 4 i '� P s r '/ { i s" Page 55 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346—YG ' �I FLORIDAS8i9'LOCAL FIRM ,, TAB 3: Approach and Methodology ,,.,,,..,,r,,,,,,-4,-,1--"77,...m7,,,rm,,,--- . _ T t '` .- ,.,. %. ,., i ' ,.„...,. k -,1:, ,.. , , I! ,, ',..g.... '',.„$.4., All% -,a,•- Ir, ,.,,,., otro‘ `, •A. \�.,1� 1. ' pt .. ,l , 1t ' _. 1„gi err , f . JJ 4, s A, VI,. ,” --',--- --j, ' _ A- '''' ( -,- , -- K&S is well-versed in completing "on call" and continuing Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Fish and service assignments for local governments. We will Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), the Water serve the City as a seamless extension of your staff. We Management Districts, and local agencies. As a result, we understand the City will issue a project-specific Task have developed excellent relationships with permitting Order/City Purchase Order for each project. Although agencies. K&S experts provide valuable input during our approach to the various requested services will be project planning and development phases, ensuring early customized to each specific project, provided below are coordination with key agencies to avoid costly redesign descriptions of our detailed project approach: efforts and time delays. We believe that well-planned pre application meetings are invaluable tools, which introduce Assign a Single Point-of-Contact the agencies to the project, identify potential obstacles,and provide opportunities for joint solutions to expedite the We understand that there is a wide range of services that process. Our Permitting Lead, Jill King, has 10 years of may be required under this contract. To address this, we coastal permitting experience at FDEP. offer our Director of Environmental Sciences, Mr. John Abbott, P.G. as the Contract Manager and direct point-of- Track the Permit and Environmental contact between the City and K&S. Mr.Abbott oversees all Compliance Requirements environmental projects at K&S in his capacity as Director of the Environmental Sciences and Water Resources Our staff can assist the City in updating or developing Planning Division. Regardless of the type of service needed spreadsheets and computer programs to track permit by the City, Mr. Abbott will coordinate the Team that is expiration dates, environmental commitments, monitoring best suited to accomplish the particular task. Further, Mr. report due dates, compliance issues, inspection schedules, Abbott will ensure that the City's objective is completed or permit processing tracking. We have developed a with technical accuracy, on time, and within budget. number of database and spreadsheet applications specifically designed for tracking environmental permit information Use Experienced Permit Compliance Staff (e.g., expiration dates, special conditions, monitoring and maintenance schedules, etc.) that can be readily applied to Nearly every project involves some form of federal, City projects. Our database applications also allow us to state or local permitting, and often the procurement track schedules for other permit-related deliverables, such of these permits must be expedited. We work on as as-built surveys and permit compliance forms. Environmental Resource Permit applications almost every day. Our Environmental Resource Permit experience is Contamination Assessment unparalleled in the State. K&S has more than 30 years of experience obtaining and modifying permits from the K&S uses experienced and qualified environmental U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), USCG, Florida professionals to prepare high-quality and dependable Phase Page 57 j� .�j KEITH and SCHNARS P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG FLORIDAS 5,./LOCAL FIRM r TAB 3: Approach and Methodology _ , I and Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments. We follow Seagrass and Benthic Surveys ASTM guidelines to give our customers the best assurance that the environmental conditions at their site are accurately Marinas, bridges, and utility work across waterways will characterized. We understand that time is of the essence usually require a benthic survey to delineate seagrass beds in preparing ESAs for real estate transactions, and use our and other marine resource communities. K&S conducts in-house engineering, planning, and surveying resources pre-construction and post-construction benthic surveys to expeditiously meet the schedule of our clients. K&S using our certified SCUBA divers. For permit applications, has conducted contamination assessments for hundreds we generally conduct seagrass surveys during the growing of properties in South Florida including gas stations, season (April I to August 31), but construction surveys drycleaners, agricultural lands, and industrial sites. Our may be performed at any time. As one of Florida's largest contamination assessments are led by a Florida registered surveying firms,we also provide detailed instrument survey Professional Geologist. as needed. Wetlands • • K&S' biologists are trained in wetland identification and delineation. We have extensive experience in wetland ) ,N evaluations, ranging from Wetland Evaluation Technique ''', (WET II), Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP), Wetland 47 •. +a;, L Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), Modified WRAP ..•,,� ;.3 (M-WRAP), and the Uniform Mitigation Assessment ,, :,.F" , .4". Method(UMAM). Wetlands are identified using the criteria ` • specified in the State of Florida's Wetland Delineation . 1", Manual and the ACOE 1 987 Wetland Delineation Manual '.., 1' `, and the ACOE Interim Regional Supplement to the ACOE «.� Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (2008). Habitat mapping is completed using I' ' '. the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification ' t , System (FLUCCS). Jurisdictional wetlands are delineated mow'' _ with flagging in the field, shown on aerial photographs, and instrument surveyed by our surveyors. Each year we delineate many wetlands across the State and perform w ,_� ; UMAM scoring. Our biologists have decades of experience in wetland mitigation planning and creating plans to produce Threatened and Endangered Species systems with optimum biological value. Y P g Our biologists routinely conduct surveys for protected . "-44--chi,# ,�. "4t,, ,i_ril wildlife, obtain permits, and relocate protected species ` < % J ,;43 • , r r .,� from construction zones. We perform protected species :`; -,� r . - X r surveys using appropriate protocols including dawn and _ ` ' d• �' ' ' '' a''r dusk monitoring, pedestrian transects,and variable circular ,� ,�;, 4, point counts as specified by agency protocol or permit 3 .∎ o A; conditions. }!p, ~ Fes, , .. , , '4 -k..,;:::. ,e-k ts ,4 `,_ ,.•- ;:' lgi�• _�•r'+ :� `� 'f Ir i-L ., - 'PV.`',,T' s '-144,,t-,/,4 ,,-,/'.. ,urn - `. - _ ' r. a k: Y a , /w.. 'i!5 t Id . ' - , K J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 58 J FWRIDns 5i7 LOCAL FIRM s`'_:',1-. RFQ 2014-346-YG TAB 3: Approach and Methodology Post-Construction Environmental station/data collection systems, and in 1986 we became Monitoring of Mitigation Sites Florida's largest provider of Geodetic Surveying Services through Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology. K&S will monitor mitigation sites according to the specific This commitment to excellence continues today, as we conditions of the environmental permits. To obtain implement the latest Trimble GPS equipment and Leica repeatable and defendable data we establish permanent data capture technologies. Our focus is the seamless monitoring transects and quadrat locations. We quantify integration of accurate information across all corporate our observations using non-statistical and statistical disciplines and we are skilled and equipped in every relevant methods, as well as document fish and wildlife through technology from Autocadd to Microstation to Geographic direct and indirect observations and trapping (using Information Systems (GIS). Our initial desktop research trapping grids or drift fences, etc.). We conduct vegetative on nearly every environmental project involves our use of and aquatic macrofauna sampling, establish site hydrology GIS. We obtain data and maps on endangered species, land using staff gauges and other instruments, and establish uses, natural communities,wetlands, soils,and a wide range permanent photographic locations. of other database information. Our biologists inspect and document conditions at each Cost Control mitigation area for the presence of invasive or nuisance species (as defined in Chapter 17-3.021 (19) F.A.C.). If K&S has a well-earned reputation of delivering high these species are observed, we submit recommendations quality plans within budget. In order to control costs, for control or eradication. If the mitigation area is our staff implements a strong Project Management not functioning according to permit conditions or to System corporate-wide. Our history of cost overruns design standards, we make specific recommendations. and supplemental agreements are lower than the average Recommendations will be supported by field monitoring within our industry. This is due to the strong start we get data. Monitoring includes Time Zero Reports and periodic on all projects by strictly adhering to a proven system of reports as specified by permit conditions. We compile project management and control. field data, data sheets, photographs, and other supporting information into a written report. Reports conform to the Over the past several years, K&S has completed design for South Florida Water Management District's Environmental 12 FDOT projects with a construction value in excess of Monitoring Report Guidelines, the specific conditions of $120 million. The average cost overrun for our six year the environmental permits, and/or the format requested average is only 4%, and our construction time overrun is by the agencies. I%. No other firm selected by FDOT in the past six years has completed this volume of work, and maintained such low overruns in cost and time. K&S' Project Management System starts with the '{ °' � a development of a well prepared project scope which ;may ��i is properly staffed and budgeted. Staffing availability is ift _- .- - compared with the project budget and schedule during the preparation of the project staffing plan to ensure that no team members are over committed which could lead to project delays. Once a comprehensive scope is ' ' ' used to develop an appropriate schedule, and qualified - - professionals are selected with the resources necessary to meet that schedule, the rest comes down to successful ""', '4 communication and project management skills to document the flow of the project. °.� Schedule Control Use the Latest Technology At K&S,we understand the importance of keeping a project As Florida's innovative technological leader, we are always on schedule. Control of the project schedule begins with on the cutting edge in implementing technology. In the the Project Manager identifying the key milestones and the 1980s we were the first state-wide firm to embrace total critical path. The schedule is created and tracked using Page 59 KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG J' FLURIDAS 5j/'LOCAL FIRM TAB 3: A • proach and Methodology P3e, Primavera, or Microsoft Project software. This allows a review by our senior QA/QC Officers selected for this the Project Manager to monitor the progress of the work contract. from kick-off to closeout. Any variances are identified early in the process so that corrective action may be K&S believes that our clients, our profession and our implemented if needed. Progress against the schedule is projects deserve the highest quality product that can be monitored through performance meetings and regular produced;therefore,we have an established quality control progress reports to the team and the client. The Project plan that is implemented on all projects. Our Quality Manager provides an overview of the schedule at each Control Plan is based on the philosophy that: team meeting and prepares a chronological summary of all project activities needed to complete the project. In • Quality is achieved by proper planning,coordination, this way, the Project Manager effectively communicates supervision,and the appropriate use of skilled the schedule to the project team, and each team member personnel; understands his or her role and responsibility in adhering • Quality is controlled through checking,reviewing and to the schedule. monitoring of work activities by individuals outside of the Team; Schedule slippage due to poor subcontractor performance • Quality is verified by having a senior manager is a common industry problem. K&S minimizes this by performing QA/QC functions;and performing critical path work in-house and by selecting • Quality is assured through independent reviews subcontractors from a limited pool of proven, high-quality by qualified staff through each stage of project firms. With 75 years of Florida-based experience, K&S development. has long-standing and valued relationships with many high-quality firms. As a seamless team, we strive for the A successful project also requires a properly defined scope, betterment of our relationship and to provide our mutually fully qualified staff, a schedule and budget with adequate shared goal of providing best-value services to our clients. hours and time to complete the tasks including QA/QC Liquidated damage clauses are also negotiated to provide reviews. A Project Execution Plan is prepared for each additional incentive for the subcontractors to meet or project to establish and define the scope, production goals, exceed the schedule. schedule, tasks, budget, project staff and QC requirements necessary for the project development and execution of K&S is one of the largest and most respected consulting the assignment. Each Project Execution Plan is updated as firms in Florida, and we will commit the proposed team necessary as the project develops. to successfully perform the work under the contract to maintain our reputation. We are wholly committed The level of detail in the Project Execution Plan is a function to the contract, and have the manpower to start work of the size and complexity of the assignment; included in immediately and take on emergency projects when and if the Plan are the following elements: they arise under the continuing services agreement. • General information such as the project description Quality Management and location; • Scope of services that details each task,milestone and High-quality service is attained through the active deliverable; implementation of the K&S internal Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC) Program. The purpose of the program is to verify that the methodologies and work processes meet or exceed the project scope of services - . ,. ' r and are free of errors or omissions based on sound tie Ar h - w -: multidisciplinary consultin g P ractices. K&S uses the ' -�---�- - t Contract Manager/QC Officer approach to QA. The firm :` �', fir 1. _ , assigns a quality control professional to coordinate the x 6► �,, project; this individual schedules and closely monitors the project through formal regular meetings with the Team to discuss schedules, resources and project details. To satisfy the requirements of this program,the Contract Manager will • • review each deliverable to ensure that it meets appropriate technical and quality standards prior to its submittal to the City. When required, the Contract Manager may solicit J j KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. Page 60 FLORIDAS 5i',LOCAL FIRM w RFQ 201 4-346-YG I TAB 3: Approach and Methodology • Staffing plan with names of responsible individuals for each major task and deliverable item including the individual responsible for QA/QC; • Project schedule with line items for each major task including QC reviews; • Project budget by task including labor,subconsultants and other direct costs; ++ ' ' - ;�, „ •� • Billing plan including format,level of detail and ":� "- i • „; .• ', : .� =� required backup; — • The QC Plan; • An internal communication and coordination plan; • A client communication and coordination plan _ including contact information and format and frequency of progress reports;and • A document control plan identifying the status of > a' important documents and outlining which documents will be archived and where. Management Team that is ready to serve and QA/QC and In addition, a project specific Quality Control Plan that Execution Plans that have been tested and proven to work. includes the following elements, will be prepared for each project: Sections of Scope to be Performed by Firm • QC requirements for subconsultants; • Identification of milestones requiring QA/QC reviews All services will be performed by K&S Environmental Team; • Individuals responsible for QA/QC reviews by task no subconsultants are being proposed. element • Descriptions of any specialized QC review or QA Current Workload and Staff Availability procedures to be followed • List of required supplemental reviews (biddability, K&S is one of the largest and most respected consulting constructability,peer);and firms in South Florida, and we will commit the proposed • QA/QC log to be utilized by the Project Manager team to successfully perform the work under the contract to maintain our reputation. We are wholly committed K&S includes all the necessary components for successful to the contract, and have the manpower to start work execution of any and all assignments authorized by the immediately and take on emergency projects when and if City. We have offered an experienced Team that are they arise under the continuing services agreement. enthusiastic about working with the City to provide the high-quality products that are expected. K&S has in place a The availability of key staff are listed below. Overall Availability to Key Staff Projects Currently Under Contract Availability Miami Beach on any given Project John Abbott, P.G. • Tamiami Trail environmental compliance 40% 80% • Contamination assessments (various) Jill King • Coral Relocation at Anglers Breakwater 70% 100% • Misc.coastal permitting projects Victor Neugebauer • Misc.field surveys 50% 100% Coriann Salas, P.E. • Misc. 20% 40% Kenneth Wenning • Monroe County Comprehensive Plan 80% 100% Barry Ehrlich • Oslo Road 60% 100% Chris Miller, RLA, LEED AP • FDOT projects (various) 30% 60% Page 61 ,KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. RFQ 2014-346-YG FLOR DAS 8it LOCAL FIRM ` te" � s` t + - 'f F ,.pp. l- r j . ,.- -:------,-----_, ., 7,, ` r ' ht?. :J ,, :ry ,-' E t': f Y 4 ... Y r t Ar r yJ" a ., 9 t - G � ;A �1 F�fi �R '1 1 ^9 r j : , tt N a, , }1 y] • . .3 i S t„,,,'$�ti T� i_ . "< an r c: `i- 1 'C Y �e y . _ r _JJ ” < t i � a ? cl2 " 9 s 4::,f r._._.t r � "4'', �§ .; I ', • ti ` M. v y �� P vJ Y 3 ' Y, i ii t • i• 1 ` 3t ' ink p r�L i ,..:;4.'�.. .l: 4, �i� r ( ii it 6r a3 i ',.I A ,, to 1F4fit`€ •aa, 2 .:.c i >4 ,f. 1• 3,'''',1;;_.,.;e • n t • 4 is s 3E 3St ,,.,,...-,4,_.,.. 1 ir 4Y s fir, w x, / J KEITH and SCHNARS,P.A. ' '�tt FLORIDAS 5l1 LOCAL FIRM ir ,t a 3: �X 6500 North Andrews Avenue • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 µ " ` . Phone: (954) 776-1616 • Fax (954) 771-7690 • Toll Free: (800) 488-1255 ,r 1t www.KSFLA.com -`l 3 _ ._ _ - - - -. 2222 - - hey ., 1... i 1^. 3'- ' t„�,� �� • i Zi• w ` tW 2 .'.: .;�- ..1N ' {& i'R;dal ci.F ki. 'i_iii i.:. _,t.-... ..sLt:4 A-.'_ ' i N. (&■(dilikr st‘-k& Oat/ . KEITAND-01 RBROOKS AC-CAREY CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DDNYYY) 12/4/2015 I THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). ,, PRODUCER CONTACT '\ NAME: _ __ _ \ Ames&Gough PHONE — 703 827-2277 FAX 703 827-2279 8300 Greensboro Drive �/C No,Ext):( ) (A/C,No):( } E-MAIL h.com ames ou i dmn Suite 980 �ADDRESS:a @ � g McLean,VA 22102 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:National Union Fire Insurance Company .119445 INSURED INSURER B:Continental Casualty Company(CNA)A,XV ;20443 •Keith and Schnars,P.A. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh,PAI19445 ; INSURER C: i 6500 North Andrews Avenue INSURER D: ri , Ft.Lauderdale,FL 33309-2132 INSURER E: L— I I INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: . THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR i TYPE OF INSURANCE -- Db SUBRj I POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR 11NSD wvD I POLICY NUMBER '(MMIDDNYYY) (MM!DD!YYYY) LIMITS A ' XI COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ' EACH OCCURRENCE !$ 1,000,000 -1 —DAMAGE TO RENT5D I j CLAIMS-MADE L j OCCUR j X 7046486 03/0112015 03/01/2016 PREMISES(Ea occurrence) - $ 300,000 X Contractual Liab. I MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 1 I I PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER ; 1 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 X POLICY X I JECT I X LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG I$ 2,000,000 f l OTHER I I$ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) ANY AUTO i 2248380 03/01/2015 i 03/01/20161,BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ A •X•ALL OWNED SCHEDULED I BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ 1 AUTOS ;AUTOS I I I NON-OWNED i I i PROPERTY DAMAGE I I HIRED AUTOS _._._.'AUTOS I ; I(Per accident) I$ X UMBRELLA LIAB I ! `I X I OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 B i EXCESS LIAB I I CLAIMS-MADE I L6012004191 03/01/2015;03/01/2016 i AGGREGATE I$ 5,000,000 DED I .X ;RETENTION$ 10,0001 ' $ WORKERS COMPENSATION : y I PR AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY I STATUTE I H ER Y/N• C ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE ;'� N!A :28234533 03/01/2015103/01/2016 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT 1$ 1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) I E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE$ 1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below I i •E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT I$ 1,000,000 B 1Professional AEH 00 609 12 27 03101/2015 03/01/2016 Per Claim 2,000,000 B Liability AEH 00 609 12 27 03/01/2015103/01/2016(Aggregate 4,000,000i I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS!LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) RE:Qualifications no.2014-346-YG 1 Resolution no.2015-29041 and 2015 29068 The City of Miami Beach,Florida is Included as additional insured with respects to General Liability when required by written contract.30-day Notice of Cancellation will be issued in accordance with policy terms and conditions.Auto Liability,General Liability and Worker's Compensation policies include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the additional insureds where permissible by state law and when required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION • SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE The City of Miami Beach,Florida THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. cio Insurance Tracking Services,Inc.(ITS) P.O.Box 20270 Long Beach,CA 90801 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I • ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD I