Agenda and Handouts_2-18-21
General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee
City of Miami Beach
Karen Rivo, Chair
Maria Hernandez, Liaison
AGENDA – VIRTUAL MEETING
February 18, 2021
I. Roll Call and Introductions All 4:30pm
II. Committee Business Karen Rivo 4:35pm
• Adoption of Meeting Minutes from 1-21-21
• Welcome New Members:
o Jason Koslowe & Carmen Browne
• Committee Charge Refresher
• Org Charts: Maria Hernandez
o Committee Org Chart for 2021
o Program Org Chart - Current
• Sunshine Law Refresher Jason Jacobson
III. Community Outreach Allison Novack 4:50pm
• List of Current Public Meetings (Pending)
IV. Public Comment Public 4:55pm
V. 72nd Street Complex Update Procurement / CIP 5:10pm
• Commission Item C7 R (Deferred)
VI. Fire Station No. 1 Update CIP 5:20pm
VII. Revision to Implementation Plan Maria Hernandez / 5:30pm
• Worksheet and Summary John Woodruff
VIII. Public Comment Public 6:50pm
IX. Adjournment 7:00pm
Committee Charge
The purpose of the General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee is to make advisory recommendations to the City Manager and City Commission from a macro perspective regarding the timely progress, overall goals, costs, including financial efficiencies, and the timely
completion of General Obligation Bond Program projects approved by the voters in the City of Miami Beach Special Election held on
November 6, 2018. The Committee shall have the following powers & duties:
1. Receive input from the public, the City Administration, City consultants, and the City’s Inspector General, as needed, to make recommendations relative to the overall timing, cost efficiencies, and prioritization of the G.O. Bond Program projects.
2. Provide general oversight to ensure that G.O. Bond Program project timelines, budgets (including cost efficiencies) are prioritized and
achieved, and that the projects are completed in accordance with the scope of work approved by the voters.
3. Review City staff and G.O. Bond Program project managers’ progress reports and provide monthly reports to the City Commission.
Mayor &Commission
Chair
Karen Rivo
Jason Greene
South Beach
MIAMIBEACH
GO Bond
Oversight Committee
Carmen M.
Browne
North Beach
Laura Veitia
North Beach
JackGlottmann
Middle Beach
Francisco Diez-
Rivas
Middle Beach
MariePeter
South Beach
John Bowes
Budget
Committee
Voting Members Non-Voting Members
Sean Smith
Parks &
Recreation
Committee
Jason Koslowe
Sustainability
Committee
Bryan
Rosenfeld
Audit
Committee
SECTION II.a
Project Strikethrough Indicates Completed Project
Project Red Indicaties Project in Process
Mayor &Commission
GO Bond
Oversight
Committee
Interim CityManager
Raul J. Aguila
GOBond
Working Group
GO Bond Program
Director
Maria Hernandez
GOBond Program
Assistant Director
Thais Vieira
Community
Information Manager
Allison Novack
Program
Coordinator
Devin Ramirez
Communications Finance / Budget
Resiliency Procurement
CIP Environment &
Sustainability Parks Property
Management Police / Fire Public Works Tourism/Economic
Development
Transportation
-Marine Patrol Facility
-PAR3/Bayshore Park
-Art Deco Museum
Expansion
-Ocean Rescue North Beach
-Baywalk
-72nd St Community
Complex
-Flamingo Park & Youth
Center
-Maurice Gibb Park
-Fire Station #1
-Fire Station #3
-Beach Walks
-Palm & Hibiscus
Landscaping
-La Gorce Neighborhood
-Flamingo Park
Neighborhood
-North Shore Neighborhood
-Neighborhood Above
Ground Improvements
-Street Tree Master
Plan
-Waterway Restoration
-LED Lighting In
Parks
-Collins Park
-Crespi Park
-Fairway Park
-Fisher Park
-La Gorce Park
-Marjorie Stoneman
Douglas Park
-Muss Park
-Palm Island Park
-Pinetree Park
-Polo Park
-Stillwater Park
-Tatum Park
-Skate Park
-South Pointe Park
-Lummus Park
-Police HQ
Renovations
-Roofs For Cultural
Facilities
-Log Cabin
-Scott Rakow Youth
Center
-North Shore Park &
Youth Center
-Security Cameras
-License Plate Readers
-Public Radio System
-Street Lighting
Improvements
-Security For Public
Spaces
-Street Pavement
Program
-Sidewalk Improvement
Program
-Seawalls & Living
Shorelines
-Soundscape Park
-West Lots
Redevelopment
-Ocean Drive Project
-41st StCorridor
-Washington Avenue
Corridor
-Neighborhood Traffic Calming
& Pedestrian Friendly Streets
-Protected Bike Lanes &
Shared Bike / Pedestrian Paths
MIAMIBEACH
GO Bond Program
Inspector
General
Residents
SECTION II.b
SECTION III
ITEMS RELATED TO G.O. BOND PROGRAM PROJECTS
AT VARIOUS CITY COMMISSION & COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS & VIRTUAL
PUBLIC COMMUNITY MEETINGS
UPCOMING MEETINGS:
2/19/21 Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee
• Discussion regarding adding a funding source for the Bayshore Park (former par 3)
project utility relocation (Public Works)
2/24/21 Neighborhood and Quality of Life Committee
• Discussion Regarding the North Beach Regional Parking Plan Recommendations
(pending agenda)
• Discussion and Approval of The Florida Department Of Transportation Traffic Analysis
For The 63 Street Complete Streets Study Proposing An Elimination Of An Eastbound
Travel Lane On 63 Street Between Pine Tree Drive And Indian Creek Drive To
Accommodate Protected Bicycle Lanes. – (Commissioner Meiner, Transportation)
• Discussion Regarding Lighting in Lummus Park and Marine Turtle Protection
(Environmental)
2/25/21 Mayor’s 41 Street Blue Ribbon Committee
• Update on GO#40: 41 Street Corridor project
2/24/21 (or 3/17/21) City Commission Meeting
• Award RFP 2020-180-ND, Design/Build Services for 72nd St. Community Complex. (CIP)
3/2/21 Urban Forestry Master Plan Commission Workshop
• Special Commission Workshop to discuss Street Tree Master Plan palm removals
(Commissioner Meiner, Environmental)
Page 2 of 2
3/2/21 Virtual Community Meeting: Normandy Traffic Calming Project
• Discuss and gain resident feedback on G.O. Bond-funded Traffic Calming solutions
(Transportation)
3/4/21 Virtual Community Meeting: Bayshore Traffic Calming Project
• Discuss and gain resident feedback on G.O. Bond-funded Traffic Calming solutions
(Transportation)
3/17/21 City Commission Meeting
• TBD, Items Pending Agenda
*Note: All upcoming items are subject to change. For the most accurate items for each meeting,
please review the agendas on the City’s website.
Agendas: https://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/agenda-archive-main-page-2/
Meeting Notices: https://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/meeting-notices/
PAST MEETINGS:
1/28/21 Mayor’s 41 Street Blue Ribbon Committee
• Update on 41 Street Corridor project – Design Development Phase (CIP)
2/10/21 City Commission Meeting
• Award ITB 2020-026-DF, North Beach Oceanside Park Beachwalk. (CIP) PASSED
2/11/21 Parks and Recreation Facilities Advisory Board
• An update on the implementation of GO Bond projects related to Parks and Rec.
(CM, Finance)
2/12/21 Mayor’s Art Deco Cultural District Panel
• Discussion regarding Ocean Drive
_________
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street Community Complex Page 1
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Dan Gelber and Members of the City Commission
FROM: Raul J. Aguila, Interim City Manager
DATE: February 10, 2021
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2020-180-ND, FOR DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES FOR 72ND STREET COMMUNITY COMPLEX (THE RFP); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE HASKELL COMPANY, AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE HASKELL COMPANY, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KAUFMAN LYNN CONSTRUCTION, INC., AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE FINAL NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION.
RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami
Beach, Florida approve the Resolution accepting the City Manager’s recommendation pertaining to the proposals received pursuant to RFP 2020-180-ND for design/build services for the 72nd street community complex.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY On November 6, 2018, Miami Beach residents approved a ballot measure, which authorized
the issuance of a general obligation bond (G.O. Bond) for the design, permitting, installation, and construction of the 72nd Street Community Complex. A total of $53.8 million of general obligation bonds are allocated to fund the project, including but not limited to the design, permitting, and construction. An additional $10.6 million has been allocated from different funding sources bringing the total project budget to $64.4 million. The Project programming as described in the Design Criteria Package (DCP) includes a multi-level mixed-use parking garage requiring the program components of a 500 space parking structure, 50-meter competition pool with support amenities, 25-meter multi-purpose pool, 7,500 SF Miami-Dade
County library, 5,000 SF commercial/retail, 7, 500 SF fitness center, 5,000 SF community center, 60,000 SF of active green space, and a jogging path.
Furthermore, the DCP included Project Enhancement components that could be considered by the proposers as desired (but not required) project elements with the intent to be included within the proposed project budget.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 859C08A2-267B-42D2-9718-9442485A69B2 Agenda Item: C7 R
Date: 2/10/2021
MIAMI BEACH
SECTION V
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street Community Complex Page 2
ANALYSIS
On June 24, 2020, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street Community Complex.
The RFP stipulated a two-phase process. Phase I required the submittal and consideration of the Design/Build firm’s qualifications. Phase II required the submittal and consideration of the Design/Build firm’s Technical Proposal which included each firm’s proposed design, project
approach during design and construction, project schedule and the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). On June 26, 2020, the RFP was issued.
The RFP established a proposed project budget of $55 million for design and construction. The intent was to have the Design/Build firms include all the project programming and any project enhancements that could be implemented within this proposed project budget.
On August 10, 2020, the City received seven (7) Phase I proposals. On September 16, 2020, City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-31387 shortlisting the following firms to be further considered in Phase II: Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc, PCL Construction Services, Inc. and The Haskell Company. On December 14, 2020, the City received proposals in response to Phase II of the RFP from the three short-listed proposers.
The Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 276-2020, convened on
January 29, 2021, to consider the Phase II technical proposals received. The Committee was comprised of Monica Beltran, Assistant Director, Parking Department; Cynthia Casanova, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Department; David Gomez, Division Director, The
Office of Capital Improvement Projects; Carolina Jones, Member, Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee; Carmen Sanchez, Deputy Planning Director, Planning Department; Daniel Veitia, Resident, North Beach; and Elizabeth Wheaton, Director, Environment and
Sustainability Department.
The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City’s Cone
of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, a copy of each proposal, and engaged in a question and answer session with each proposer. The Committee was instructed to score and
rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFP for Phase II. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A, in the following order:
1st The Haskell Company
2nd PCL Construction Services, Inc. 3rd Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc.
The Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) submitted by each firm is as follows:
The Haskell Company $94,200,025.
PCL Construction, Inc. $80,202,724. Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc. $79,976,000.
Given the large size of the Phase II proposals, they are not attached to this item but are available upon request. A summary of each of the firms follows:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 859C08A2-267B-42D2-9718-9442485A69B2
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street Community Complex Page 3
Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc. Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc. (Kaufman Lynn), founded in 1989, is a local construction
company that has built high-quality buildings for more than 30 years, with a diverse portfolio of projects to reflect this expertise. Its management approach is focused on fulfilling the objectives of their clients by embracing the collaborative nature of the process. Kaufman Lynn
has grown into an industry leader by blending best in class cost savings with stringent quality control processes. It is consistently recognized by peers for quality, safety, business practices, and community service, and rank among the largest contractors in the nation.
Kaufman Lynn in association with Zyscovich Architects and Recreational Design & Construction bring a high-quality design sensitive to the issues of the location and the
community, with specialized experience in recreational aquatics design and the quality of construction to meet the high expectations of Miami Beach. Combined, the team has worked on over 350 parking garages, and more than 400 pools, including elevated, competition, and
Myrtha pools in various design and construction functions. The team members have collaborated on various projects including the FAU Mixed Use Parking Garage, Mirador Mixed Use Parking Garage, Bluesten Park, and many others. Its significant parking garage and aquatic experience is supplemented by its experience building community spaces for municipal and other public clients.
PCL Construction Services, Inc. PCL Construction Services, Inc. (PCL) specializes in multi-faceted projects including mixed-
use, parking structures, aquatic facilities, libraries and community/recreation centers in coastal communities. Its Florida staff of over 200 provide full service preconstruction, estimating, purchasing, human resources, and marketing services in-house. PCL is ranked #1 contractor
in Florida by Engineering News-Record (ENR). Finally, its capability to manage a large and complex design-build project is reflected in the firm’s experience on more than 870 previous design-build projects.
PCL along with BEA Architects and Brooks + Scarpa have assembled a team of highly qualified professionals to execute the 72nd Street Community Complex. This strategic team
brings the City of Miami Beach the combined depth and breadth of PCL, the nation’s 9th largest contractor with two of South Florida’s most prominent architects, with 40 years of trusted local experience and superior standing in the South Florida market. Its selected subconsultants
round out this team with their extensive relevant experience, local knowledge, and commitment to the success of this high-profile project.
The Haskell Company The Haskell Company (Haskell), is a global pioneer in design-build construction with over 55
years of experience. It has been working and committed to the Miami area for over 20 years, completing such projects as three Miami Dade College parking garages and most recently, the Norwegian Cruise Line Terminal also known as the “Pearl of Miami”. The Miami office has
supported landmark projects, such as the Adrienne Arsht Center. With over $1B in annual revenues and over 2,500 design-build projects completed to date, Haskell is appropriately experienced, staffed and financed to support large and complex design-build projects that are
fast-tracked and programmed with multiple disciplines.
Partnered with Haskell is Arquitectonica, who brings a very experienced team of professionals
that have creativity and community in mind, as well as Kimley-Horn, McNamara Salvia, Weston & Sampson, SEQUIL, SLS and Weller Pools. The team, combined with noteworthy consultants with vast local experience, was formed for each firm’s relevant field experience
and organizational excellence in order to bring the City the best design-build solution. This team, which contains a considerable degree of experience, imagination and capability, intends
DocuSign Envelope ID: 859C08A2-267B-42D2-9718-9442485A69B2
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street Community Complex Page 4 to combine the criteria noted in the design criteria package, while delivering on time and within budget.
SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA Results from the 2019 resident survey show that 80% of residents are satisfied or very
satisfied with living in North Beach. In order to continue to improve the satisfaction of these residents, the City intends to contract with a design/build firm to design and construct the 72nd Street Community Complex which will provide the North Beach residents with a multi-level
mixed use parking garage. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Final project costs to be determined via negotiations, not to exceed the approved project budget. CONCLUSION After reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee’s rankings and commentary, I concur with the Evaluation Committee and find that The Haskell Company provided the best technical proposal. However, because the GMPs proposed exceed the City’s cost expectation, I also concur with staff’s recommendation that the City negotiate with the firms, in rank order, to finalize a design build agreement. Some of the highlights of the technical proposals of the three firms, as articulated by the evaluation committee, include:
The Haskell Company
• The firm designed a multifunctional field that can hold up to 2,000 people and can be
utilized for athletic and event programming.
• The firm designed the largest footprint, but the least overbearing.
• The firm designed a cohesive community civic center.
• From the four street fronts, to the elevated green field and upper pool deck, the entire
complex is oriented to enhance the well-being of the community. PCL Construction Services, Inc.
• The firm designed the complex to serve as an urban living room that would be ideal for relaxing and socializing as well as providing a recreational anchor for the North Beach
district.
• The firm’s design provided the best pedestrian connection. However, the footprint did
feel overpowering.
• The solar roof was well thought out with the panels strategically placed to capture as
much energy as possible.
• The building design is massive and does not necessarily engage Collins Avenue.
Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc.
• The firm incorporated a rain garden in the design.
• The design was disjointed. The pool, the community center, and fitness center had no connectivity between them.
• The design places the field on the west side, which forms a screen that protects the turtles from the evening lights.
• The design has no integration. It is a building on a field.
Given the disparity between the GMP proposals submitted by the Design-Build firms and the proposed project budget, City staff is in the process of hiring an independent consultant to develop a cost estimate of the DCP programming in order to assist in negotiations.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 859C08A2-267B-42D2-9718-9442485A69B2
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street Community Complex Page 5 For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Haskell Company,
as the top ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with The Haskell Company, authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with PCL Construction Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if
the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with PCL Construction Services, Inc., authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; provided, however, that the final negotiated
agreement shall be subject to the prior approval of the Mayor and City Commission.
AH / DM / AD
DocuSign Envelope ID: 859C08A2-267B-42D2-9718-9442485A69B2
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
RESOLUTION NO. ____ _
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST
FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2020-180-ND, FOR DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES FOR
72No STREET COMMUNITY COMPLEX {THE RFP); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE HASKELL
COMPANY, AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN
AGREEMENT WITH THE HASKELL COMPANY, AUTHORIZING THE
ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER;
FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN
NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO
NEGOTIATIONS WITH KAUFMAN LYNN CONSTRUCTION, INC., AS THE
THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE FINAL NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PRIOR
APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2020, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance
of RFP 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Services for the 72nd Street Community Complex (the
RFP); the RFP was issued on June 26, 2020, with an opening date of August 10, 2020; and
WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on July 7, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the RFP provides for a two-step, phased evaluation process; and
WHEREAS, the scope of Phase I of the evaluation process related to qualifications,
experience and availability of the proposers and key members of the design-build team, including the lead designer and lead construction firm: and
WHEREAS, only those Proposers short-listed during Phase I would be authorized to proceed to Phase II of the RFP selection process, during which phase the price and detailed
technical proposals, based on the approved Design Criteria Package (the "DCP"), would be considered; and
WHEREAS, under Phase I, the City received proposals in response to the RFP from the following seven (7) firms:
• ANF Group, Inc.;•Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC;•Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc.;•KVC Constructors, Inc.;
•NV2A Group, LLC;•PCL Construction Services, Inc.; and•The Haskell Company; and
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
WHEREAS, the proposal from AN F Group, Inc. was deemed non-responsive for failure to meet the minimum requirements of the RFP, and was not further evaluated; and
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2020, via L TC # 276-2020, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee (the" Evaluation Committee"), which convened on August 26, 2020 to
consider the remaining proposals subm itted under Phase I; and
WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee's Phase I rankings were as follows: 1) Kaufman
Lynn Construction, Inc.; 2) PCL Construction Services, Inc.; 2) The Haskell Company; 4) NV2AGroup, LLC; 5) KVC Constructors, Inc.; 6) Balfou r Beatty Construction, LLC; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2020, City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-31387, accepting the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of the
proposals with respect to Phase I of the RFP selection process, and authorized (1) Kaufman
Lynn Construction, Inc., (2) PCL Construction Services, Inc., and (3) The Haskell Company, to be further considered in Phase II of the RF P evaluation process; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, the Procurement Department issued Phase II of the RF P to the short-listed proposers; and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2020, the City rece ived the technical and price proposalsin response to Phase II of the RFP; and
WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager via L TC # 276-2020, convened on January 29, 2021 to consider the proposals received under Phase II; and
WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee's rankings for Phase II were as follows:
(1)The Haskell Company;(2)PCL Construction Services, Inc.; and
(3)Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's
rankings, the City Manager concurs with the Evaluation Committee and recommends that the
Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Haskell Company, as the top ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in
negotiating an agreement with The Haskell Company, authorizing the Administration to enter
into negotiations with PCL Construction Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with PCL Construction
Services, Inc., authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Kaufman Lynn
Construction, Inc., as the third ranked proposer, with the final negotiated agreement being subject to the prior approval of the Mayor and City Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, to authorize negotiations
relating to Request for Proposals No. 2020-180-ND, for Design/Build Services for 72nd Street
Community Complex (the RFP); authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Haskell Company, as the top ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with The Haskell Company, authorize the Administration to enter into
negotiations with PCL Construction Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if the
-' I II ---· --.--. .. --,--I ·-l 1 I -I 1 .. r ----
l I I i I -I ,-. I -. ·1 -: '
I I --------'·j -J I I ;
I I ' I I I ---'' ' i _, ,--.----i -I -I
I I: i I I I --l ii I I -I; ;
I I -I ii -I r-, I -' -I -: ---.. ·-. I ·-, ·f--i--
I 'i 11 I -I -·, ·r 'i ·1 11 I -' -1 I -,-. ,--··: --' I ·-. -I I I I I
, I I • I -I . I I . I -,. --' -r'i I -; ; 1· I I I I ' I 11 I I I I
I I -• I I -, i -i l r--1 .;· --I --. ----
I I I ' --I I --, -, ' -I -rl --.-· --
l ' I I I -I l I I I I -,
I I I I -I I ,· .
I : -1 -'i I I --I I . I --1 • 1 ·-,---:·1·
I ;
I I I 'j II I I 'j T i -II I --' -11 I -f -·1 I I I I: I ,. ·r r -r I I 'I
I i -i1 I fl .--' I I -1 ---.. I I I I I I ' I I I o
I I -I • I I -I -r 1 I ·1 -1 --I I j· ·: -r· j" I -
I t I I ' I I -I -' ' I I ' '
I I I I I I I r· --i . -· -, ' 1· I -J ,T -I (,--1·1··1·-.--1-
ii I -: I I I I . II I I I I I I
I I I I -I -I I ii 'I , .. . I ,-1· I--,. ·;-,--.. ---I ' 11 I -
I' I I ' I I • I I I
--I I I , I -, I I --I I I I 11 ! I -r: -1·, .
I I ' I r: -r--
I -I, ,-. ' -I
I -.. -I I, '
I .. --·-
r . --
I -----··-----.-,.· ._ ' DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with PCL Construction Services, Inc., authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Kaufman Lynn Construction,
Inc., as the third ranked proposer; provided, however, that the final negotiated agreement shall be subject to the prior approval of the Mayor and City Commission.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ____ 2021.
ATTEST:
Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Dan Gelber, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
Dote
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
RFQ 2020-180-ND
Design/Build Services for 72nd Street
Community Complex
PHASE II
Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal Qualitative Lowest GMP Subtotal
Kaufman Lynn Costruction, Inc.90 10 100 2 88 10 98 2 76 10 86 2 80 10 90 3 68 10 78 3 65 10 75 3 90 10 100 3 18 3
PCL Construction Services, Inc.89 10 99 3 86 10 96 3 73 10 83 3 91 10 101 2 78 10 88 2 85 10 95 2 92 10 102 1 16 2
The Haskell Company 97 8 105 1 92 8 100 1 84 8 92 1 95 8 103 1 98 8 106 1 89 8 97 1 94 8 102 1 7 1
Proposer GMP
Kaufman Lynn Costruction, Inc.$79,976,000
PCL Construction Services, Inc.$80,202,724
The Haskell Company $94,200,025
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
Monica Beltran
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
Cynthia Casanova David Gomez Low
Aggregate
Totals
10
9.97
8.4
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
Carolina Jones Carmen Sanchez
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
10
8
FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION.
Total Points Awarded
Elizabeth Wheaton
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
Cost Proposal
Maximum Allowable Points
Daniel Veitia
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
10
DocuSign Envelope ID: 859C08A2-267B-42D2-9718-9442485A69B2
DE
F
E
R
R
E
D
SECTION VI
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4M
2028
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Notes
1 40 Infrastructure CIP 41st Street Corridor 15,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 1,500,000 13,500,000 -Move up all $13.5M of remaining funding to T2
2 31 Infrastructure CIP Ocean Drive Improvement
Project 20,000,000 -4,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 2,000,000 18,000,000 - Fund $2M design in T1 from #39 Seawalls; move up
remaining funding of $18M to T2
3 32 Infrastructure CIP Palm & Hibiscus Neighborhood
Enhancements 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 - - No change; COMPLETE
4 36 Infrastructure CIP Washington Ave Corridor 10,000,000 -2,000,000 6,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 9,000,000 - Fund $1M design in T1 from #39 Seawalls; move up
remaining funding of $9M to T2
5 1 Parks CIP 72nd Street Park, Library, and
Aquatic Center 53,800,000 10,800,000 43,000,000 - - 10,800,000 43,000,000 -No change
6 15 Parks CIP Bayshore Park (Par 3 /
Community Park)15,700,000 15,700,000 - - - 15,700,000 - - No change
7 23 Parks CIP Baywalk 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 - - 10,000,000 5,000,000 - No change; begin permitting for T2 projects from
unused appropriation in T1 for Pedestrian Bridge
8 27 Parks CIP Log Cabin Reconstruction 1,076,000 -1,076,000 - - - 1,076,000 -No change
9 10 Parks CIP Maurice Gibb Park 3,300,000 3,300,000 - - - 3,300,000 - - No change
10 24 Parks CIP Middle Beach Beachwalk 4,500,000 4,500,000 - - - 4,500,000 - - No change
11 12 Parks CIP North Beach Oceanside Park
Beachwalk 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - - No change
12 5 Parks CIP PAL Facility, Flamingo Park &
Youth Center 30,550,000 15,400,000 -15,150,000 -15,400,000 15,150,000 -
Move up T3 funding of $15.15M to T2; start Flamingo
Park Master Plan improvements in T1 with unused
appropriation from PAL facility
13 28 Parks CIP Art Deco Museum Expansion 2,000,000 -2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 -No change
14 54 Public Safety CIP/Fire Marine Patrol Fire/Police
Facility 2,700,000 2,700,000 - - - - 2,700,000 -
Move to T2 from T1 due to estimated O&M impact of
$1.5M; Provide $2.7M in T1 to #52 LED Lighting in
Parks to advance the sub-project for Flamingo Park
Lighting
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet 1 of 5 2/15/2021
SECTION VII.a
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4M
2028
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Notes
15 51 Public Safety CIP/Fire Replace Fire Station #3 10,000,000 - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 2,000,000 8,000,000 -
Move design of $2M into T1 and move remaining
funding to T2; Use unused appropriation from #45 FS
#1
16 45 Public Safety CIP/Fire Replace Fire Station #1 10,000,000 7,000,000 3,000,000 - - 4,000,000 6,000,000 - Move $2M for design of #51 FS#3 and move $1M for
design of #46 Ocean Rescue NB Facility
17 46 Public Safety CIP/Fire/Parks Ocean Rescue North Beach
Facility 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 -
Move up $1M of design into T1 and move remaining
funding to T2; Use unused appropriation from #45
FS#1; pending confirmation from the County
18 13 Parks CIP/Parks North Shore Park & Youth
Center 5,725,000 4,930,000 795,000 - - 3,540,000 2,185,000 -
Provides $750K to #30 Skate Park project and $640K to
#18 Scott Rakow flooring projects; baseball field
conversion of $3.69M pushed out from T1 to T2 to
align with completion of #1 72nd Street Project
19 39 Infrastructure CIP/PW Resilient Seawalls and Living
Shorelines 10,000,000 8,000,000 2,000,000 - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - Move $2M to #31 Ocean Drive for design and $1M to
#36 Washington Ave in T1
20 29 Parks Econ Dev West Lots Redevelopment 5,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 -1,000,000 4,000,000 -Move remaining funding of $4M to T2
21 33 Infrastructure Env Street Tree Master Plan 5,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 -No change
22 25 Parks Env/CIP Waterway Restoration 6,000,000 -1,500,000 4,500,000 - - 6,000,000 -Move all funding to T2
23 49 Public Safety Fire/Police Public Safety Radio System 10,000,000 10,000,000 - - - 10,000,000 - - No change
24 30 Parks Parks Skate Park Improvements 750,000 - - 750,000 -750,000 - -
Funded in T1 from #13 North Shore Park & Youth
Center due to move out of $3.69M baseball conversion
sub-project to T2 to align with completion of #1 72nd
Street Project
25 2 Parks Parks Collins Park 640,000 640,000 - - - 640,000 - - No change; COMPLETE
26 3 Parks Parks Crespi Park 211,000 211,000 - - - 211,000 - - No change; COMPLETE
27 4 Parks Parks Fairway Park 260,000 260,000 - - - 260,000 - - No change
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet 2 of 5 2/15/2021
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4M
2028
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Notes
28 6 Parks Parks Fisher Park 105,000 - - - 105,000 -105,000 -Move up to T2 from T4
29 7 Parks Parks La Gorce Park 150,000 - - 150,000 - - 150,000 -Move up to T2 from T3
30 8 Parks Parks Lummus Park 4,737,000 4,737,000 - - - 4,737,000 - - No change
31 9 Parks Parks Marjory Stoneman Douglas
Park 682,000 682,000 - - - 682,000 - - No change
32 11 Parks Parks Muss Park 250,000 - - 250,000 - - 250,000 -Move up to T2 from T3
33 14 Parks Parks Palm Island Park 231,000 -231,000 - - - 231,000 -No change
34 16 Parks Parks Pinetree Park 700,000 -700,000 - - - 700,000 -No change
35 17 Parks Parks Polo Park 500,000 500,000 - - - 500,000 - - No change; COMPLETE
36 20 Parks Parks South Pointe Park 480,000 - - 480,000 - - 480,000 -Move to T2 from T3
37 21 Parks Parks Stillwater Park 145,000 145,000 - - - 145,000 - - No change; COMPLETE
38 22 Parks Parks Tatum Park 840,000 - - - 840,000 -840,000 -Move up to T2 from T4
39 18 Parks Parks Scott Rakow Youth Center 5,088,000 4,448,000 640,000 - - 5,088,000 - -
Move to T1 the $640,000 T2 amount for basketball
flooring, gymnastics flooring, mondo flooring at ice
rink, outdoor patio flooring using funding from #13
North Shore Park & Youth Center due to move out of
$3.69M baseball conversion sub-project to T2 to align
with completion of #1 72nd Street Project
40 19 Parks Parks Soundscape Park 4,500,000 4,500,000 - - - 4,500,000 - - No change - Scope & budget change required to
remove Restrooms.
41 52 Public Safety Parks LED Lighting in Parks 4,500,000 1,041,000 3,459,000 - - 3,741,000 759,000 -
Move up sub-project Flamingo Park lighting of $2.7M
into T1 from T2; Use $2.7M of unused appropriation
from #54 Marine Patrol Facility
42 47 Public Safety Police License Plate Readers 1,950,000 1,950,000 - - - 1,950,000 - - No change
43 50 Public Safety Police Security Cameras in Business
Districts 825,000 825,000 - - - 825,000 - - No change
44 57 Public Safety Police Security Cameras in
Entertainment District 1,490,000 1,490,000 - - - 1,490,000 - - No change
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet 3 of 5 2/15/2021
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4M
2028
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Notes
45 56 Public Safety Police Security Cameras on Beach
Walk 400,000 400,000 - - - 400,000 - - No change
46 26 Parks Prop Mgmt Roof Replacement for Cultural
Facilities 2,980,000 2,980,000 - - - 2,980,000 - - No change; COMPLETE
47 48 Public Safety Prop Mgmt/Police Police Headquarters
Renovations 10,000,000 4,000,000 -6,000,000 -5,500,000 4,500,000 -
Advance $1.5M of T2 spending into T1 from unused
appropriation in #55 Part 1 Street Lights; Move
remaining funding to T2 from T3
48 37 Infrastructure PW Sidewalk Improvement
Program 13,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 5,200,000 3,900,000 3,900,000 Add $1.7M in T1 from #38 Streets and redistribute
remaining $7.8M across T2 and T3 in equal amounts
49 38 Infrastructure PW Street Pavement Program 30,000,000 7,500,000 7,500,000 7,500,000 7,500,000 5,800,000 12,100,000 12,100,000 Provides $1.7M in T1 to #37 Sidewalks and redistribute
remaining $24.2M across T2 and T3 in equal amounts
50 55 Public Safety PW Street Lighting Improvements 10,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 - - 3,500,000 6,500,000 -Move $1.5M to #48 Part 1 Police HQ
51 35 Infrastructure PW/CIP Flamingo Park Neighborhood 20,000,000 - - 8,000,000 12,000,000 - - 20,000,000 Move all $20M of funding to T3 based on Jacob's
Engineering stormwater sequencing plan
52 41 Infrastructure PW/CIP La Gorce Neighborhood
Improvements 14,000,000 -2,000,000 3,000,000 9,000,000 - - 14,000,000 Move all $14M to T3 based on Jacob's Engineering
stormwater sequencing plan
53 34 Infrastructure PW/CIP Neighborhood Above Ground
Improvements 43,000,000 -5,000,000 15,000,000 23,000,000 -23,000,000 20,000,000
Move Indian Creek Parkway ($2M), South Pointe
($5M), Normandy Isle ($8M), and City Center ($8M) to
T2; remainder of $20M to T3 consistent with Jacob's
Engineering stormwater sequencing plan
54 44 Infrastructure PW/CIP North Shore Neighborhood
Improvements 8,000,000 - - 8,000,000 - - - 8,000,000 No change consistent with Jacob's Engineering
stormwater sequencing plan
55 53 Public Safety PW/CIP Security for Public Spaces 4,350,000 2,000,000 2,350,000 - - 2,000,000 2,350,000 -No change
56 42 Infrastructure Transp Neighborhood Traffic Calming
& Pedestrian-Friendly Streets 2,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 - - 1,500,000 500,000 -No change
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet 4 of 5 2/15/2021
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4M
2028
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Notes
57 43 Infrastructure Transp/CIP Protected Bicycle Lanes and
Shared Bike/Pedestrian Paths 5,000,000 2,500,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 -2,500,000 2,500,000 -Move up remaining funding of $2.5M to T2
TOTAL 435,115,000 151,139,000 101,951,000 97,580,000 84,445,000 151,139,000 205,976,000 78,000,000
Red Indicates Completed projects
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet 5 of 5 2/15/2021
Summary Revised G.O. Bond Implementation Plan DRAFT
COSTS
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9 M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6 M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4 M
2028
Total
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Total
Total Project Costs per Tranche 151,139,000 101,951,000 97,580,000 84,445,000 435,115,000 151,139,000 205,976,000 78,000,000 435,115,000
Estimated Issuance Costs and Rounding 1,178,409 884,966 884,966 787,620 3,735,960 1,178,409 1,855,551 702,000 3,735,960
Total per Tranche 152,317,409 102,835,966 98,464,966 85,232,620 438,850,960 152,317,409 207,831,551 78,702,000 438,850,960
CATEGORY
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9 M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6 M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4 M
2028
Total
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Total
Parks, Recreational Facilities, and Cultural Facilities 86,733,000 56,942,000 23,280,000 945,000 167,900,000 86,733,000 81,167,000 - 167,900,000
Police, Fire, and Public Safety 36,406,000 13,809,000 8,000,000 13,000,000 71,215,000 36,406,000 34,809,000 - 71,215,000
Neighborhoods and Infrastructure 28,000,000 31,200,000 66,300,000 70,500,000 196,000,000 28,000,000 90,000,000 78,000,000 196,000,000
Estimated Issuance Costs and Rounding 1,178,409 884,966 884,966 787,620 3,735,960 1,178,409 1,855,551 702,000 3,735,960
Total per Tranche 152,317,409 102,835,966 98,464,966 85,232,620 438,850,960 152,317,409 207,831,551 78,702,000 438,850,960
LOCATION
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
ORIGINAL
Tranche 2
$101.9M
2022
ORIGINAL
Tranche 3
$97.6M
2025
ORIGINAL
Tranche 4
$84.4M
2028
Total
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 2
$206.0 M
2023
REVISED
Tranche 3
$78.0 M
2027
Total
North 19,346,000 46,871,000 10,750,000 5,840,000 82,807,000 19,706,000 55,101,000 8,000,000 82,807,000
Mid 29,948,000 4,840,000 11,400,000 23,105,000 69,293,000 32,588,000 22,705,000 14,000,000 69,293,000
South 50,549,000 18,581,000 37,630,000 22,000,000 128,760,000 47,849,000 60,911,000 20,000,000 128,760,000
Citywide 51,296,000 31,659,000 37,800,000 33,500,000 154,255,000 50,996,000 67,259,000 36,000,000 154,255,000
Estimated Issuance Costs and Rounding 1,178,409 884,966 884,966 787,620 3,735,960 1,178,409 1,855,551 702,000 3,735,960
Total per Tranche 152,317,409 102,835,966 98,464,966 85,232,620 438,850,960 152,317,409 207,831,551 78,702,000 438,850,960
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet 1 of 1 2/15/2021
SECTION VII.b
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan - T1 Funding Realignment- Part 1 DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond
Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
Notes Tranche 1
Only Values
1 31 Infrastructure CIP Ocean Drive Improvement
Project 20,000,000 - 2,000,000 Fund $2M design in T1 from #39 Seawalls; move up
remaining funding of $18M to T2 2,000,000
2 36 Infrastructure CIP Washington Ave Corridor 10,000,000 - 1,000,000 Fund $1M design in T1 from #39 Seawalls; move up
remaining funding of $9M to T2 1,000,000
3 54 Public Safety CIP/Fire Marine Patrol Fire/Police
Facility 2,700,000 2,700,000 -
Move to T2 from T1 due to estimated O&M impact of
$1.5M; Provide $2.7M in T1 to #52 LED Lighting in
Parks to advance the sub-project for Flamingo Park
Lighting
(2,700,000)
4 51 Public Safety CIP/Fire Replace Fire Station #3 10,000,000 - 2,000,000
Move design of $2M into T1 and move remaining
funding to T2; Use unused appropriation from #45 FS
#1
2,000,000
5 45 Public Safety CIP/Fire Replace Fire Station #1 10,000,000 7,000,000 4,000,000 Move $2M for design of #51 FS#3 and move $1M for
design of #46 Ocean Rescue NB Facility (3,000,000)
6 46 Public Safety CIP/Fire/Parks Ocean Rescue North Beach
Facility 5,000,000 - 1,000,000
Move up $1M of design into T1 and move remaining
funding to T2; Use unused appropriation from #45
FS#1; pending confirmation from the County
1,000,000
7 13 Parks CIP/Parks North Shore Park & Youth
Center 5,725,000 4,930,000 3,540,000
Provides $750K to #30 Skate Park project and $640K
to #18 Scott Rakow flooring projects; baseball field
conversion of $3.69M pushed out from T1 to T2 to
align with completion of #1 72nd Street Project
(1,390,000)
8 39 Infrastructure CIP/PW Resilient Seawalls and Living
Shorelines 10,000,000 8,000,000 5,000,000 Move $2M to #31 Ocean Drive for design and $1M to
#36 Washington Ave in T1 (3,000,000)
9 30 Parks Parks Skate Park Improvements 750,000 - 750,000
Funded in T1 from #13 North Shore Park & Youth
Center due to move out of $3.69M baseball
conversion sub-project to T2 to align with completion
of #1 72nd Street Project
750,000
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet_Tranche 1 Only 1 of 2 2/17/2021
G.O. Bond Revised Implementation Plan - T1 Funding Realignment- Part 1 DRAFT
Item
No.
Proj.
No.Category Impl. Dept.Project Name GO Bond
Budget
ORIGINAL
Tranche 1
$151.1M
2019
REVISED
Tranche 1
$151.1 M
2019
Notes Tranche 1
Only Values
10 18 Parks Parks Scott Rakow Youth Center 5,088,000 4,448,000 5,088,000
Move to T1 the $640,000 T2 amount for basketball
flooring, gymnastics flooring, mondo flooring at ice
rink, outdoor patio flooring using funding from #13
North Shore Park & Youth Center due to move out of
$3.69M baseball conversion sub-project to T2 to align
with completion of #1 72nd Street Project
640,000
11 52 Public Safety Parks LED Lighting in Parks 4,500,000 1,041,000 3,741,000
Move up sub-project Flamingo Park lighting of $2.7M
into T1 from T2; Use $2.7M of unused appropriation
from #54 Marine Patrol Facility
2,700,000
12 48 Public Safety Prop Mgmt/Police Police Headquarters
Renovations 10,000,000 4,000,000 5,500,000
Advance $1.5M of T2 spending into T1 from unused
appropriation in #55 Part 1 Street Lights; Move
remaining funding to T2 from T3
1,500,000
13 37 Infrastructure PW Sidewalk Improvement
Program 13,000,000 3,500,000 5,200,000 Add $1.7M in T1 from #38 Streets and redistribute
remaining $7.8M across T2 and T3 in equal amounts 1,700,000
14 38 Infrastructure PW Street Pavement Program 30,000,000 7,500,000 5,800,000
Provides $1.7M in T1 to #37 Sidewalks and
redistribute remaining $24.2M across T2 and T3 in
equal amounts
(1,700,000)
15 55 Public Safety PW Street Lighting Improvements 10,000,000 5,000,000 3,500,000 Move $1.5M to #48 Part 1 Police HQ (1,500,000)
TOTAL 146,763,000 48,119,000 48,119,000 -
GOB Implementation Tracking Sheet_Tranche 1 Only 2 of 2 2/17/2021